Article published In:
International Journal of Corpus LinguisticsVol. 15:1 (2010) ► pp.56–87
Is it a chief, main, major, primary, or principal concern?
A corpus-based behavioral profile study of the near-synonyms
Using the Corpus of Contemporary American English as the source data and employing a corpus-based behavioral profile (BP) approach, this study examines the internal semantic structure of a set of five near-synonyms (chief, main, major, primary, and principal).1 By focusing on their distributional patterns, especially the typical types of nouns that they each modify, the study has identified several important fine-grained semantic and usage differences among the five near-synonyms and produced a meaningful delineation of their internal semantic structure. Some of the findings of the study challenge several existing understandings of these adjectives’ meanings and usage patterns. Furthermore, the results of the study have affirmed (i) the theory and applicability of the BP approach for studying the semantic and usage patterns of synonyms in a set, and (ii) previous research findings about the co-occurrents of adjectives that best capture the essence of the semantics of adjectives, especially attributive adjectives.
Cited by (40)
Cited by 40 other publications
Bębeniec, Daria
2024. In search of methodological standards for corpus-based cognitive semantics: The case of Behavioral Profiles. Studia Neophilologica ► pp. 1 ff. 
Liu, Meichun & Jinmeng Dou
2024. Metaphorical polysemy of the Chinese color term hēi 黑 “black”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 29:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Quan, Zhi, Lynn Grant & Darryl Hocking
2024. Comparing concordances of language patterns and words by ESL intermediate learners: a preliminary experiment with two mobile concordancers. Computer Assisted Language Learning 37:5-6 ► pp. 1421 ff.
Youcef, Jihad, Mohd Nour Al Salem & Marwan Jarrah
2024. Errors in Arabic-English Translation of Documents from the Department of Lands and Survey in Jordan. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique 37:1 ► pp. 217 ff.
Liu, Daohuan & Xuri Tang
2023. The Contextualized Representation of Collocation. In Chinese Computational Linguistics [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 14232], ► pp. 3 ff.
Liu, Daohuan & Xuri Tang
2024. Comparative linguistic analysis with Firthian collocations: Cases of synonym differentiation and proficiency assessment. Lingua 306 ► pp. 103755 ff.
Wu, Shuqiong & Yue Ou
2023.
A quantitative study of the polysemy of Mandarin Chinese perception verb
kàn
‘look/see’
. Australian Journal of Linguistics 43:3 ► pp. 191 ff.
Alanazi, Zaha
2022. Corpus-based analysis of near-synonymous verbs. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education 7:1
Chen, Alvin Cheng-Hsien
2022. Words, constructions and corpora: Network representations of constructional semantics for Mandarin space particles. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 18:2 ► pp. 209 ff.
Coffey, Stephen James
2022. English adjectives of very similar meaning used in combination: an exploratory, corpus-aided study. Lexis :19
Deng, Qi
2022. Choice Between the Synonymous Pairs of Sutoppu and Teishi. Acta Linguistica Asiatica 12:2 ► pp. 27 ff.
Deng, Yaochen & Dilin Liu
2022. A multi-dimensional comparison of the effectiveness and efficiency of association measures in collocation extraction. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 27:2 ► pp. 191 ff.
Kekki, Niina & Ilmari Ivaska
2022. The use of synonymous adjectives by learners of Finnish as a second language. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 8:1 ► pp. 67 ff.
Kruawong, Thana & Supakorn Phoocharoensil
2022. A GENRE AND COLLOCATIONAL ANALYSIS OF THE NEAR-SYNONYMS TEACH, EDUCATE AND INSTRUCT: A CORPUS-BASED APPROACH. TEFLIN Journal: A publication on the teaching and learning of English 33:1 ► pp. 75 ff.
Liesenfeld, Andreas, Meichun Liu & Chu-Ren Huang
2022. Profiling the Chinese causative construction withrang(讓),shi(使) andling(令) using frame semantic features. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 18:2 ► pp. 263 ff.
Poole, Robert
2022. “Corpus can be tricky”: revisiting teacher attitudes towards corpus-aided language learning and teaching. Computer Assisted Language Learning 35:7 ► pp. 1620 ff.
Yevchuk, Alina
2022. An Empirical Study of Near-synonym Choice: A Comparison of Advanced EFL Learners to L1 English Speakers. Taikomoji kalbotyra 17 ► pp. 79 ff.
徐, 文倩
2022. Review and Prospect of Semantic Research Methods of Synonyms at Home and Abroad. Modern Linguistics 10:03 ► pp. 366 ff.
Crowther, Dustin, Susie Kim, Jongbong Lee, Jungmin Lim & Shawn Loewen
2021. Methodological Synthesis of Cluster Analysis in Second Language Research. Language Learning 71:1 ► pp. 99 ff.
Hsu, Chan-Chia
2021. Categorization as appraisal: Using classificatory verbs in Chinese for evaluative purposes. Journal of Pragmatics 184 ► pp. 107 ff.
Lin, Yen-Yu & Siaw-Fong Chung
2021. A Corpus-Based Study on Two Near-Synonymous Verbs in Academic Journals: PROPOSE and SUGGEST. English Teaching & Learning 45:2 ► pp. 189 ff.
Pettersson-Traba, Daniela
2021. Measuring semantic distance across time. Journal of Research Design and Statistics in Linguistics and Communication Science 6:2
Pettersson-Traba, Daniela
2021. A diachronic perspective on near-synonymy: The concept of sweet-smelling in American English. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 17:2 ► pp. 319 ff.
Pettersson-Traba, Daniela
2022. Chapter 7. Distributional changes in synonym sets. In English Historical Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 359], ► pp. 120 ff.
Pettersson-Traba, Daniela
2022. Ongoing semantic change in a modernising society: a look at some adjectives from the olfactory domain in the Corpus of Historical American English. Corpora 17:3 ► pp. 389 ff.
Wu, Shuqiong
2021. A corpus-based study of the Chinese synonymous approximativesshangxia, qianhouandzuoyou. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 17:2 ► pp. 411 ff.
Su, Hung-Kuan & Alvin Cheng-Hsien Chen
2019. Conceptualization of containment in Chinese. Concentric. Studies in Linguistics 45:2 ► pp. 211 ff.
卓, 淑敏
2019. COCA Corpus-Based Study of the Near-Synonymous Verbs—Taking “Destroy”, “Damage” and “Ruin” for Reference. Modern Linguistics 07:01 ► pp. 27 ff.
CHOYOUNGSOON
2018. Behavioral Profiles of Sentence Adverbs of Evaluation and Attitude. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal 26:3 ► pp. 235 ff.
Green, Clarence & James Lambert
2018. Advancing disciplinary literacy through English for academic purposes: Discipline-specific wordlists, collocations and word families for eight secondary subjects. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 35 ► pp. 105 ff.
Shao, Juan
2017. Teaching near-synonyms more effectively. In Lexical Priming [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 79], ► pp. 164 ff.
Liu, Dilin & Shouman Zhong
2016. L2 vs. L1 Use of Synonymy: An Empirical Study of Synonym Use/Acquisition. Applied Linguistics 37:2 ► pp. 239 ff.
SoHee Kim
2016. A Comparative Analysis for Teaching Idioms:Intuition, COCA, and a Book. Journal of the Korea English Education Society 15:2 ► pp. 31 ff.
최영주
2016. Corpus Based Collocation Analysis of the Phrasal Verb Stand Up. English21 29:2 ► pp. 379 ff.
Peirsman, Yves, Dirk Geeraerts & Dirk Speelman
2015. The corpus-based identification of cross-lectal synonyms in pluricentric languages. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 20:1 ► pp. 54 ff.
Granvik, Anton & Susanna Taimitarha
2014. Topic-marking prepositions in Swedish: A corpus-based analysis of adpositional synonymy. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 37:2 ► pp. 257 ff.
Almela, Moisés, Pascual Cantos & Aquilino Sánchez
2013. Collocation, Co-collocation, Constellation... Any Advances in Distributional Semantics?. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 95 ► pp. 231 ff.
Dilin Liu
2013. Using Corpora to Help Teach Difficult-to-distinguish English Words. English Teaching 68:3 ► pp. 27 ff.
Liu, Dilin
2018. A corpus study of Chinese EFL learners’ use of circumstance, demand, and significant
. Journal of Second Language Studies 1:2 ► pp. 310 ff.
Pollach, Irene
2012. Taming Textual Data: The Contribution of Corpus Linguistics to Computer-Aided Text Analysis. Organizational Research Methods 15:2 ► pp. 263 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.