Cover not available
Article published In:
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics
Vol. 24:1 (2019) ► pp.3–32

Dimensions of variation across American television registers

| São Paulo Catholic University
| Federal University of São Paulo
The goal of this study is to identify the dimensions of variation across American television programs, following the multidimensional analysis (MD) framework introduced by Biber (1988). Although television is a major form of mass communication, there has been no previous large-scale MD study of television dialogue. A large corpus containing the key types of contemporary American television programs was collected, annotated with the Biber tagger, and subjected to multi-dimensional analysis, which indicated four factors of statistically correlated linguistic features. Each of these factors was interpreted communicatively to reveal the underlying dimensions of variation on American television, namely “Exposition and discussion vs. Simplified interaction” (Dimension 1), “Simulated conversation” (Dimension 2), “Recount” (Dimension 3) and “Engaging presentation” (Dimension 4). This article presents, illustrates, and discusses each of these dimensions, showing the macro linguistic patterns in use across hundreds of American television programs.
Keywords: multidimensional analysis, American television, dimensions of register variation, television registers
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Studies of the language of television
  • 3.Corpus design and compilation
  • 4.Dimensions of variation
    • 4.1Dimension 1: Exposition and discussion vs. Simplified interaction
    • 4.2Dimension 2: Simulated conversation
    • 4.3Dimension 3: Recount
    • 4.4Dimension 4: Engaging presentation
    • 4.5Comparing the mean dimension scores
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 2 July 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.15014.ber
References (48)
References
Al-Surmi, M. (2012). Authenticity and TV shows: A multidimensional analysis perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 46 (4), 671–694.Google Scholar
Berber Sardinha, T. (2014). Comparing Internet and pre-Internet registers. In T. Berber Sardinha & M. Veirano Pinto (Eds.), Multi-dimensional Analysis, 25 Years on: A Tribute to Douglas Biber (pp. 81–105). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berber Sardinha, T., & Veirano Pinto, M. (2017a). American television and off-screen registers: A corpus-based comparison. Corpora, 12 (1), 85–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017b, July). A linguistic typology of American television programs. Paper presented at the Corpus Linguistics 2017 Conference (CL2017), Birmingham, UK.
(2019). Multi-dimensional Analysis: Research Methods and Current Issues. London: Bloomsbury. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berber Sardinha, T., Veirano Pinto, M., Mayer, C., Zuppardi, M. C., & Kauffmann, C. (2019). Adding registers to a previous Multi-dimensional Analysis. In T. Berber Sardinha & M. Veirano Pinto (Eds.), Multi-dimensional Analysis: Research Methods and Current Issues (pp. 165–188). London: Bloomsbury. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bednarek, M. (2010). The Language of Fictional Television: Drama and Identity. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
(2011). The language of fictional television: A case study of the ‘dramedy’ Gilmore Girls. English Text Construction, 4 (1), 54–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012). ‘Get us the hell out of here’: Keywords and trigrams in fictional television series. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 17 (1), 35–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016, October). Corpus linguistics and profanity (‘Bad’ language, swear words, curse words, taboo words…). Plenary presented at the Third Asia Pacific Corpus Linguistics Conference (APCLC 2016), Beijing, China.
Besnier, N. (1988). The linguistic relationships of spoken and written Nukulaelae registers. Language, 64 (4), 707–736. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D. (1988). Variation Across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1990). Methodological issues regarding corpus-based analyses of linguistic variation. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 5 (4), 257–269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1993). Representativeness in corpus design. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 8 (4), 243–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006). University Language: A Corpus-based Study of Spoken and Written Registers. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Connor, U., & Upton, T. A. (2007). Discourse on the Move: Using Corpus Analysis to Describe Discourse Structure. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Cantos Gomez, P. (2013). Statistical Methods in Language and Linguistic Research. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
Carroll, R. L. (1985). Television news. In B. G. Rose (Ed.), TV Genres: A Handbook and Reference Guide (pp. 213–236). Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar
Csomay, E., & Petrovic, M. (2012). ‘Yes, your honor!’: A corpus-based study of technical vocabulary in discipline-related movies and TV shows. System, 40 (2), 305–315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dant, T. (2012). Television and the Moral Imaginary: Society Through the Small Screen. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Egbert, J. (2019). Corpus design and representativeness. In T. Berber Sardinha & M. Veirano Pinto (Eds.), Multi-dimensional Analysis: Research Methods and Current Issues (pp. 125–144). London: Bloomsbury. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Egbert, J., & Staples, S. (2019). Doing multi-dimensional analysis in SPSS, SAS and R. In T. Berber Sardinha & M. Veirano Pinto (Eds.), Multi-dimensional Analysis: Research Methods and Current Issues (pp. 27–42). London: Bloomsbury. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frank, R. E., Becknell, J. C., & Clokey, J. D. (1971). Television program types. Journal of Marketing Research, 8 (2), 204–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fonseca de Araújo, R. (2017). A Linguagem dos Reality TV Shows Norte-Americanos: Análise e Classificação [The Language of North-American Reality TV Shows: Analysis and Classification] (Unpublished master’s thesis). São Paulo Catholic University, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.Google Scholar
Friginal, E., & Hardy, J. A. (2014). Conducting multi-dimensional analysis using SPSS. In T. Berber Sardinha & M. Veirano Pinto (Eds.), Multi-dimensional Analysis, 25 Years on: A Tribute to Douglas Biber (pp. 298–316). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gray, B. (2019). Tagging and counting linguistic features for Multi-dimensional Analysis. In T. Berber Sardinha & M. Veirano Pinto (Eds.), Multi-dimensional Analysis: Research Methods and Current Issues (pp. 43–66). London: Bloomsbury. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johansson, S. (1995). The encoding of spoken texts. Computers and Humanities, 29 (2), 149–159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kozloff, S. (1992). Narrative theory and television. In R. C. Allen (Ed.), Channels of Discourse, Reassembled: Television and Contemporary Criticism (pp. 52–76). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lieberman, M. (1983). The verbal language of television. Journal of Reading, 26 (7), 602–609.Google Scholar
Lorenzo-Dus, N. (2009). Television Discourse: Analysing Language in the Media. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marshall, J., & Werndly, A. (2002). The Language of Television. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, M. (2007). The Discourse of Broadcast News: A Linguistic Approach. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murray, S., & Quellette, L. (2004). Reality TV: Remaking Television Culture. New York, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Quaglio, P. (2009). Television Dialogue: The Sitcom Friends vs. Natural Conversation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rao, V. R. (1975). Taxonomy of television programs based on viewing behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 12 (3), 355–8. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richardson, K. (2010). Television Dramatic Dialogue: A Sociolinguistic Study. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rose, B. G. (1985). Introduction. In B. G. Rose (Ed.), TV Genres: A Handbook and Reference Guide (pp. 3–10). Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar
SAS Institute Inc. (2015). SAS University Edition [Computer software]. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
Shimazumi, M. (forthcoming). Dimensions of Variation on British Television. (Unpublished manuscript).
Stephens, M. (2000). The history of television. In Grolier Multimedia Encyclopedia. New York, NY: Grolier. Retrieved from [URL] (last accessed February 2019).
Tamborini, R., Mastro, D., Chory-Assad, R. M., & Huang, R. H. (2000). The color of crime and the court: A content analysis of minority representation on television. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 77 (3), 639–653. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tolson, A. (2001). Talking about talk: The academic debates. In A. Tolson (Ed.), Television Talk Shows: Discourse, Performance, Spectacle (pp. 7–30). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006). Media Talk: Spoken Discourse on TV and Radio. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Veirano Pinto, M. (2014). Dimensions of variation in North American movies. In T. Berber Sardinha & M. Veirano Pinto (Eds.), Multi-dimensional Analysis, 25 Years on: A Tribute to Douglas Biber (pp. 109–149). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018). Variation in movies and television programs: The impact of corpus sampling. In V. Werner (Ed.), The Language of Pop Culture (pp. 139–161). London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wasko, J. (2010). Introduction. In J. Wasko (Ed.), A Companion to Televison (pp. 1–13). London: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Webb, S., & Bacue, A. (1999). Vocabulary demands of television programs. Language Learning, 59 (2), 335–366. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Akbary, Mary & Scott Jarvis
2023. Lexical diversity as a predictor of genre in TV shows. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 38:3 ► pp. 921 ff. DOI logo
Castro, Adrián
2023. Telecinematic stylistics: Language and style in fantasy TV series. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics DOI logo
Diao, Hong
2022. Homogenized literary co-translation: A Hero Born and A Bond Undone. Across Languages and Cultures 23:1 ► pp. 92 ff. DOI logo
Berber Sardinha, Tony & Marcia Veirano Pinto
2021. A linguistic typology of American television. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 26:1 ► pp. 127 ff. DOI logo
Csomay, Eniko & Ryan Young
2021. Language use in pop culture over three decades. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 26:1 ► pp. 71 ff. DOI logo
Werner, Valentin
2021. A diachronic perspective on telecinematic language. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 26:1 ► pp. 38 ff. DOI logo
Costa, Andressa
2020. Biber, Douglas; Egbert, Jesse. 2018. Register Variation Online. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316388228.. DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada 36:2 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.