Article published In:
Errors and Disfluencies in Spoken CorporaEdited by Gaëtanelle Gilquin and Sylvie De Cock
[International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 16:2] 2011
► pp. 231–254
Edited by Gaëtanelle Gilquin and Sylvie De Cock
[International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 16:2] 2011
► pp. 231–254
Well I’m not sure I think… The use of well by non-native speakers
Pragmatic markers are an important part of the grammar of conversation and not simply markers of disfluency. They have a number of functions that help the speaker to organise the conversation and to express feelings and attitudes. Advanced EFL learners use frequent pragmatic markers such as well. However their use of well diverges from the native speaker norm. The present study uses data from the Swedish component of the LINDSEI corpus and its native speaker counterpart (LOCNEC) to examine similarities and differences between native and non-native speakers. The overall picture is that Swedish learners overuse well, although there are considerable individual differences. Thus learners use well above all as a fluency device to cope with speech management problems but underuse it for attitudinal purposes. Pragmatic markers cannot be taught in the same way as other lexical items but it is important to discuss how and where they are used.
Keywords: pragmatic marker, well, language teaching, learner corpora, non-native speaker
Cited by
Cited by 53 other publications
Aijmer, Karin
2014. Pragmatic markers. In Corpus Pragmatics, ► pp. 195 ff. 
Andersen, Gisle
2014. Pragmatic borrowing. Journal of Pragmatics 67 ► pp. 17 ff.
Basol, Hasan Çağlar & Galip Kartal
2019. The use of micro-level discourse markers in British and American feature-length films: Implications for teaching in EFL contexts. Dil ve Dilbilimi Çalışmaları Dergisi 15:1 ► pp. 276 ff.
Beeching, Kate
2015. Variability in Native and Non-Native Use of Pragmatic Markers: the Example of Well in Role-Play Data. In Researching Sociopragmatic Variability, ► pp. 174 ff.
Beeching, Kate, Grant Howie, Minna Kirjavainen & Anna Piasecki
2022. Discourse-pragmatic markers, fillers and filled pauses. Pragmatics & Cognition 29:2 ► pp. 181 ff.
Brezina, Vaclav
2018. Collocation Graphs and Networks: Selected Applications. In Lexical Collocation Analysis [Quantitative Methods in the Humanities and Social Sciences, ], ► pp. 59 ff.
Buysse, Lieven
2012. So as a multifunctional discourse marker in native and learner speech. Journal of Pragmatics 44:13 ► pp. 1764 ff.
Buysse, Lieven
2017. The pragmatic marker you know in learner Englishes. Journal of Pragmatics 121 ► pp. 40 ff.
Buysse, Lieven & Meaghan Blanchard
2022. L1 and non-L1 perceptions of discourse markers in English. Pragmatics & Cognition 29:2 ► pp. 222 ff.
Callies, Marcus
2013. Advancing the Research Agenda of Interlanguage Pragmatics: The Role of Learner Corpora. In Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2013 [Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics, 1], ► pp. 9 ff.
Campillos Llanos, Leonardo & Paula González Gómez
2014. Oral Production of Discourse Markers by Intermediate Learners of Spanish: A Corpus Perspective. In Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2014 [Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics, 2], ► pp. 239 ff.
Chan, Clarice S.C.
2017. Investigating a research-informed teaching idea: The use of transcripts of authentic workplace talk in the teaching of spoken business English. English for Specific Purposes 46 ► pp. 72 ff.
Chen, Yaoyao & Svenja Adolphs
2023. Towards a speech–gesture profile of pragmatic markers: The case of “you know”. Journal of Pragmatics 210 ► pp. 36 ff.
Crible, Ludivine & Sarah E. Blackwell
2020. Introduction: Discourse-pragmatic markers in speech and sign. Journal of Pragmatics 156 ► pp. 24 ff.
Crible, Ludivine & Elena Pascual
2020. Combinations of discourse markers with repairs and repetitions in English, French and Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics 156 ► pp. 54 ff.
Ellederová, Eva
2022. Information technology students’ involvement in in-class debates: Speech acts and modification of the illocutionary force . Discourse and Interaction 15:2 ► pp. 28 ff.
Fernández, Julieta
Fernández, Julieta, Anna Gates Tapia & Xiaofei Lu
2014. Oral proficiency and pragmatic marker use in L2 spoken Spanish: The case of pues and bueno. Journal of Pragmatics 74 ► pp. 150 ff.
Friginal, Eric, Joseph J. Lee, Brittany Polat & Audrey Roberson
2017. Corpora of Spoken Academic Discourse and Learner Talk: A Survey. In Exploring Spoken English Learner Language Using Corpora, ► pp. 35 ff.
Fu, Yanli & Victor Ho
2022. Discourse markers in TV interviews: A corpus-based comparative study of Chinese and the western media. Frontiers in Psychology 13
Gablasova, Dana & Vaclav Brezina
2015. Does Speaker Role Affect the Choice of Epistemic Adverbials in L2 Speech? Evidence from the Trinity Lancaster Corpus. In Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2015 [Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics, 3], ► pp. 117 ff.
Gheitasi, Parvin & Janet Enever
2022. Formulaic time buyers for young foreign language learners. Language Teaching for Young Learners 4:1 ► pp. 66 ff.
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle
2015. At the interface of contact linguistics and second language acquisition research. English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English 36:1 ► pp. 91 ff.
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle
2016. Discourse markers in L2 English. In New Approaches to English Linguistics [Studies in Language Companion Series, 177], ► pp. 213 ff.
Gras, Pedro, Patricia Galiana & Elisa Rosado
2021. Modal and Discourse Marking in L1 & L2 Spanish: A Comparative Analysis of Oral Narratives. Corpus Pragmatics 5:1 ► pp. 63 ff.
Hogeweg, Lotte, Helen de Hoop, Stefanie Ramachers, Frans van der Slik & Verena Wottrich
2016. The L2-acquisition of the German particle doch
. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 54:3 ► pp. 201 ff.
Huang, Lan-fen
2014. “I Think” in NS and Chinese NNS Spoken English. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching 4:1 ► pp. 84 ff.
Huang, Lan-fen
2019. A Corpus-Based Exploration of the Discourse Marker Well in Spoken Interlanguage. Language and Speech 62:3 ► pp. 570 ff.
Huang, Lan-fen, Yen-liang Lin & Tomáš Gráf
2023. Development of the use of discourse markers across different fluency levels of CEFR. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 33:1 ► pp. 49 ff.
Huang, Zeping & Gavin Bui
2019. Lexical bundles in conversation across Englishes. English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English 40:3 ► pp. 299 ff.
Jakupčević, Eva
2019. Young Language Learners’ Use of Discourse Markers in L2 Narratives. English Teaching & Learning 43:4 ► pp. 411 ff.
Lim, Jessica
2018. So How Do English Language Learners Use "So"?. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics 21:1 ► pp. 94 ff.
Lin, Yen-Liang
2015. Using key part-of-speech analysis to examine spoken discourse by Taiwanese EFL learners. ReCALL 27:3 ► pp. 304 ff.
Lin, Yen-Liang
2022. Discourse marking in spoken intercultural communication between British and Taiwanese adolescent learners. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 221 ff.
Liu, Binmei
2013. Effect of first language on the use of English discourse markers by L1 Chinese speakers of English. Journal of Pragmatics 45:1 ► pp. 149 ff.
Liu, Binmei
2022. The use of discourse markers but and so by native English speakers and Chinese speakers of English. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 479 ff.
Lohmann, Arne & Christian Koops
2016. Aspects of discourse marker sequencing. In Outside the Clause [Studies in Language Companion Series, 178], ► pp. 417 ff.
Magliacane, Annarita
2020. Erasmus students in an Irish studyabroad context. Study Abroad Research in Second Language Acquisition and International Education 5:1 ► pp. 89 ff.
Maschler, Yael & Deborah Schiffrin
2015. Discourse MarkersLanguage, Meaning, and Context. In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ► pp. 189 ff.
Nelson, Gerald
2019. World Englishes and Corpora Studies. In The Handbook of World Englishes, ► pp. 523 ff.
O'Boyle, Aisling
2014. ‘You’ and ‘I’ in university seminars and spoken learner discourse. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 16 ► pp. 40 ff.
Polat, Brittany
2011. Investigating acquisition of discourse markers through a developmental learner corpus. Journal of Pragmatics 43:15 ► pp. 3745 ff.
Pyykönen, Maria
2023. Epistemic stance in written L2 English: The role of task type, L2 proficiency, and authorial style. Applied Corpus Linguistics 3:1 ► pp. 100040 ff.
Pérez-Paredes, Pascual & M. Camino Bueno-Alastuey
2019. A corpus-driven analysis of certainty stance adverbs: Obviously, really and actually in spoken native and learner English. Journal of Pragmatics 140 ► pp. 22 ff.
Romero-Trillo, Jesús
2018. Corpus Pragmatics and Second Language Pragmatics: A Mutualistic Entente in Theory and Practice. Corpus Pragmatics 2:2 ► pp. 113 ff.
Rosen, Anna
2019. The use of smallwords in the speech of German learners of English. In Learner Corpora and Language Teaching [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 92], ► pp. 219 ff.
Rosen, Anna
2019. The use of smallwords in the speech of German learners of English. In Learner Corpora and Language Teaching [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 92], ► pp. 219 ff.
Wu, Xinxin & He Yang
2022. A comparative analysis of English for academic purposes teachers’ interactive metadiscourse across the British and Chinese contexts. Frontiers in Psychology 13
Yoon, Soyeon
2020. The Learner Corpora of Spoken English: What Has Been Done and What Should Be Done?. Lanaguage Research 56:1 ► pp. 29 ff.
Youn, Soo Jung
2023. The use of discourse markers across pragmatic performance levels and task types. Language Teaching Research
ŞAHİN KIZIL, Aysel
2021. Discourse Markers in Learner Speech: A Corpus Based Comparative Study. Dil Eğitimi ve Araştırmaları Dergisi 7:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
[no author supplied]
2014. Pragmatics and Second Language Acquisition. In Acquiring Pragmatics, ► pp. 176 ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 august 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.