Article published in:
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics
Vol. 24:4 (2019) ► pp. 445489
References

[ p. 479 ]References

Aijmer, K.
(2017) The intensifier ‘fucking’ in Spoken BNC14. Paper presented at the ICAME 38 Conference, Prague, Czech Republic.
Arnon, I. & Snider, N.
(2010) More than words: Frequency effects for multi-word phrases. Journal of Memory and Language, 62, 67–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barnfield, K. & Buchstaller, I.
(2010) Intensifiers on Tyneside: Longitudinal developments and new trends. English World-Wide, 31(3), 252–287. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, L. & Bauer, W.
(2002) Adjective boosters in the English of young New Zealanders. Journal of English Linguistics, 30(3), 244–257. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beltrama, A. & Casasanto, L. A.
(2017)  Totally tall sounds totally younger: Intensification at the socio-semantics interface. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 21(2), 154–182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. & Finegan, E.
(1999) Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Blumenthal-Dramé, A.
(2012) Entrenchment in Usage-based Theories: What Corpus Data Do and Do not Reveal about the Mind. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Breban, T. & Davidse, K.
(2016) The history of ‘very’ – the directionality of functional shift and (inter)subjectification. English Language and Linguistics, 20(2), 221–249. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brysbaert, M. & New, B.
(2009) Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 977–990. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Buchstaller, I.
(2014) Quotatives. New Trends and Sociolinguistic Implications. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bybee, J.
(2003) Mechanisms of change in grammaticization: The role of frequency. In B. D. Joseph & R. D. Janda (Eds.), The Handbook of Historical Linguistics (pp. 602–623). Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chong, P. F. & Nahji, N. S.
(2010) When very intense is not really so intense. Strathy Undergraduate Working Papers on Canadian English, 8, 52–63.Google Scholar
D’Arcy, A.
(2015) Stability, stasis and change. Thee longue durée of intensification. Diachronica, 32(4), 449–493. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davies, M.
(2008–) The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 520 million words, 1990-present. Available online at http://​www​.english​-corpora​.org​/coca/
(2010–) The Corpus of Historical American English: 400 million words, 1810–2009. Available online at http://​www​.english​-corpora​.org​/coha/
(2013) Corpus of Global Web-Based English: 1.9 billion words from speakers in 20 countries. Available online at https://​www​.english​-corpora​.org​/glowbe/
Davies, M. & Fuchs, R.
(2015a) Expanding horizons in the study of World Englishes with the 1.9 billion word Global Web-Based English Corpus (GloWbE). English World-Wide, 36(1), 1–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015b) A Reply. English World-Wide, 36(1), 45–47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 480 ]
Davis, B. H. & Brewer, J.
(1999) Electronic Discourse: Linguistic Individuals in Virtual Space. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Davydova, J., A. E. Tytus & E. Schleef
(2017) Acquisition of sociolinguistic awareness by German learners of English: A study in perceptions of quotative be like . Linguistics, 55(4), 783–812. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W.
(1977) Where have all the adjectives gone? Studies in Language, 1(1), 19–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, R. & Gut, U.
(2016) Register variation in intensifier usage across Asian Englishes. In H. Pichler (Ed.), Discourse-pragmatic Variation and Change in English: New Methods and Insights (pp. 183–210). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gries, S. Th., & Mukherjee, J.
(2010) Lexical gravity across varieties of English: An ICE-based study of n-grams in Asian Englishes. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 15(4), 520–548. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hale, C. & Scanlon, J.
(1999) Wired Style: Principles of English Usage in the Digital Age. New York, NY: Broadway Books.Google Scholar
Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G. K.
(2002) The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hundt, M.
(1998) New Zealand English Grammar – Fact or Fiction? A Corpus-based Study in Morphosyntactic Variation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ito, R. & Tagliamonte, S.
(2003) ‘Well’ weird, ‘right’ dodgy, ‘very’ strange, ‘really’ cool: Layering and recycling in English intensifiers. Language in Society, 32(2), 257–279. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jurafsky, D. & Martin, J. H.
in preparation). Chapter 15: Vector Semantics (Draft of November 7, 2016). In D. Jurafsky & J. H. Martin, Speech and Language Processing (3rd ed.). Retrieved from https://​web​.stanford​.edu​/~jurafsky​/slp3/ (last accessed July 2017).
Kachru, B. B.
(1985) Standards, codification, and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the Outer Circle. In R. Quirk & H. G. Widdowson (Eds.), English in the World (pp. 11–30). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, C. & McNally, L.
(2005) Scale structure, degree modification, and the semantics of gradable predicates. Language, 81(2), 345–381. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kortmann, B. & Lunkenheimer, K.
(Eds.) (2013) The Electronic World Atlas of Varieties of English. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Retrieved from http://​ewave​-atlas​.org (last accessed April 2019).
Labov, W.
(1994) Principles of Linguistic Change. Volume 1: Internal Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Levshina, N.
(2015) How to Do Linguistics with R: Data Exploration and Statistical Analysis. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lorenz, G.
(2002) Really worthwhile or not really significant? A corpus-based approach to the delexicalization and grammaticalization of intensifiers in Modern English. In I. Wischer & G. Diewald (Eds.), New Reflections on Grammaticalization (pp. 143–161). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Love, R., Dembry, C., Hardie, A., Brezina, V., & McEnery, T.
(2017) The Spoken BNC2014: Designing and building a spoken corpus of everyday conversations. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 22(3), 319–344. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Macauley, R.
(2006) Pure grammaticalization: The development of a teenage intensifier. Language Variation and Change, 18, 267–283.Google Scholar
[ p. 481 ]
Mair, C.
(2015) Response to Davies & Fuchs. English World-Wide, 36(1), 29–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McEnery, T., Tono, Y. & Xiao, R.
(2006) Corpus-based Language Studies: An Advanced Resource Book. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Méndez-Naya, B.
(2008) On the history of downright . English Language and Linguistics, 12(2), 267–287. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mesthrie, R. & R. Bhatt
(2008) World Englishes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mukherjee, J.
(2015) Response to Davies & Fuchs. English World-Wide, 36(1), 34–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, G.
(2015) Response to Davies & Fuchs. English World-Wide, 36(1), 38–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nevalainen, T. & Rissanen, M.
(2002) Fairly pretty or pretty fair? On the development and grammaticalization of English downtoners. Language Sciences, 24, 359–380. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary Online
Retrieved from http://​www​.oed​.com (last accessed April 2019).
Paradis, C.
(1997) Degree Modifiers of Adjectives in Spoken British English. Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar
(2000) ‘It’s well weird’. Degree modifiers of adjectives revisited: The nineties. In J. M. Kirk (Ed.), Corpora Galore: Analyses and Techniques in Describing English (pp. 147–160). Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
(2001) Adjectives and boundedness. Cognitive Linguistics, 12(1), 47–65. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Partington, A.
(1993) Corpus evidence of language change: The case of intensifiers. In M. Baker, G. Francis & E. Tognini-Bonelli (Eds.), Text and Technology: In Honour of John Sinclair (pp. 177–192). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perek, F. & Hilpert, M.
(2017) A distributional semantic approach to the periodization of change in the productivity of constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 22(4), 490–520. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peters, P.
(2015) Response to Davies & Fuchs. English World-Wide, 36(1), 41–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quaglio, P.
(2009) Television Dialogue. The Sitcom Friends vs. Natural Conversation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., Svartvik, J.
(1985) A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
R Core Team
(2016) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. [Computer software]. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from https://​www​.R​-project​.org/ (last accessed April 2019).
Racz, P.
(2012) Operationalising salience: Definite article reduction in the North of England. English Language and Linguistics, 16(1), 57–79. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reichelt, S. & Durham, M.
(2017) Adjective intensification as a means of characterization: Portraying in-group membership and Britishness in Buffy the Vampire Slayer . Journal of English Linguistics, 45(1), 60–87. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, E. W.
(2007) Postcolonial English. Varieties around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 482 ]
Schweinberger, M.
(2016) Ongoing change in the New Zealand English intensifier system. Paper presented at the ISLE 4 Conference, Poznan, Poland.
Stenström, A.-B.
(1999) ‘He was really gormless – She’s bloody crap’: Girls, boys and intensifiers. In H. Hasselgård & S. Okesfjell (Eds.), Out of Corpora: Studies in Honour of Stig Johansson (pp. 69–78). Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Stoffel, C.
(1901) Intensives and Down-toners. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, S.
(2008) So different and pretty cool! Recycling intensifiers in Toronto, Canada. English Language and Linguistics, 12(2), 361–394. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, S. & Roberts, C.
(2005) So weird; so cool; so innovative: The use of intensifiers in the television series ‘Friends’. American Speech, 80(3), 280–300. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, S.
(2016) So sick or so cool? The language of youth on the internet. Language in Society, 45(1), 1–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tan, P. K. W. & Tan, D. K. H.
(2008) Attitudes towards non-standard English in Singapore. World Englishes, 27(3/4), 465–479. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Heuven, W. J. B., Mandera, P., Keuleers, E. & Brysbaert, M.
(2014) Subtlex-UK: A new and improved word frequency database for British English. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(6), 1176–1190. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Rooy, B., & Schäfer, L.
(2003) An evaluation of three POS taggers for the tagging of the Tswana Learner English Corpus. In D. Archer, P. Rayson, A. Wilson & T. McEnery (Eds.), Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics 2003 Conference, Technical Papers Volume 16 (pp. 835–844). Lancaster: University Centre for Computer Corpus Research on Language.Google Scholar
Wagner, S.
(2017) Totally new and pretty awesome: Amplifier-adjective bigrams in GloWbE. Lingua, 200, 63–83. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(submitted). To each their own – trajectories of change and the role of social factors for high-frequency intensifier-adjective combinations in spoken British English 1994–2014.Google Scholar
Xia, R. & Tao, H.
(2007) A corpus-based sociolinguistic study of amplifiers in British English. Sociolinguistic Studies, 1(2), 241–273.Google Scholar
Zwicky, A.
(2011) “GenX so.” Arnold Zwicky’s Blog. Retrieved from http://​arnoldzwicky​.org​/2011​/11​/14​/genx​-so/ (last accessed April 2019).