Article published In:
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics
Vol. 19:1 (2014) ► pp.94117
References (62)
Adams, M. J. 2010-2011. “Advancing our students’ language and literacy: The challenge of complex tasks”. American Educator , 34 (4), 3-11, 53.Google Scholar
2009. “The challenge of advanced texts: The interdependence of reading and learning”. In E. H. Hiebert (Ed.), Reading More, Reading Better: Are American Students Reading Enough of the Right Stuff? New York: Guilford, 163-189.Google Scholar
Armbruster, F. E. 1977. Our Children’s Crippled Future: How American Education Has Failed . New York: Quadrangle/New York Times Book Co.Google Scholar
Barr, R. & Sadow, M. 1989. “Influence of basal programs on fourth-grade reading instruction”. Reading Research Quarterly , 24 (1), 44-71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bestor, A. E. 1953. Educational Wastelands: The Retreat from Learning in Our Public Schools . Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Britton, G. & Lumpkin, M. C. 1977. “For sale: Subliminal bias in textbooks”. The Reading Teacher , 31 (1), 40-45.Google Scholar
Brown, D. 2011. “What aspects of vocabulary knowledge do textbooks give attention to?”. Language Teaching Research , 15 (1), 83-97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carroll, J. B. 1964. Language and Thought . Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. B., Davies, P. & Richman, B. 1971. The American Heritage Word Frequency Book . Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Chall, J. S. 1967. Learning to Read: The Great Debate . New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Chall, J. S., Conard, S. S., Harris, S. H. & College Entrance Examination Board. 1977. An Analysis of Textbooks in Relation to Declining SAT Scores: Prepared for the Advisory Panel on the Scholastic Aptitude Test Score Decline . New York: The Board.Google Scholar
Copperman, P. 1978. The Literacy Hoax: The Decline of Reading, Writing, and Learning in the Public Schools and What We Can Do About It . New York: Morrow.Google Scholar
Council on Interracial Books for Children, Inc. 1976. Sexism and Racism in Popular Basal Readers 1964-1976. The Racism and Sexism Resource Center for Educators . New York: Racism and Sexism Resource Center for Educators.Google Scholar
Coxhead, A. 2000. “A new academic word list”. TESOL Quarterly , 34 (2), 213-238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Criado, R. & Sanchez, A. 2009. “Vocabulary in EFL textbooks: A contrastive analysis against three corpus-based word ranges”. In P. Cantos & A. Sanchez (Eds.), A Survey on Corpus-based Research . Murcia: Spanish Association for Corpus Linguistics, 862-875.Google Scholar
Durkin, D. 1978-1979. “What classroom observations reveal about reading comprehension instruction”. Reading Research Quarterly , 14 (4), 481-533. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1981. “Reading comprehension instruction in five basal reader series”. Reading Research Quarterly , 16 (4), 515-544. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Educational Testing Service 1991. College Bound Seniors: 1991 Profile of SAT and Achievement Test Takers . Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
Foster, T. E., Ardoin, S. P. & Binder, K. S. 2013. “Underlying changes in repeated reading: An eye movement study”. School Psychology Review , 42 (2), 140-156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graesser, A., McNamara, D. S., Louwerse, M. & Cai, Z. 2004. “Coh-Metrix: Analysis of text on cohesion and language”. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers , 36 (2), 193-202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grissmer, D. 2000. “The continuing use and misuse of SAT scores”. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law , 6 (1), 223-232. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hayes, D. P. 1992. “The growing inaccessibility of science”. Nature , 356 (6372), 739-740. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003. A Guide to the Lexical Analysis of Natural Texts Using QLEX or QANALYSIS. Sociology Technical Report No. 2003-1 . Ithaca, NY: Cornell University. Available at: [URL] (accessed June 2011).Google Scholar
Hayes, D. P., Wolfer, L. T. & Wolfe, M. F. 1996. “Schoolbook simplification and its relation to the decline in SAT-Verbal scores”. American Educational Research Journal , 33 (2), 489-508. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herdan, G. 1960. Type-Token Mathematics . The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
1966. The Advanced Theory of Language as Choice and Chance . Berlin: Springer-Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, E. D., Jr. 2009. The Making of Americans: Democracy and Our Schools . New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hitchcock, M. E. & Tompkins, G. E. 1986. “Basal readers: Are they still sexist?”. The Reading Teacher , 41 (3), 288-192.Google Scholar
Hu, M. & Nation, I. S. P. 2000. “Unknown vocabulary density and reading comprehension”. Reading in a Foreign Language , 13 (1), 403-430.Google Scholar
Hyland, K. & Tse, P. 2007. “Is there an ‘academic vocabulary’?”. TESOL Quarterly , 41 (2), 235-253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Itzkoff, S. W. 1994. The Decline of Intelligence in America: A Strategy for National Renewal . Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Joseph, H. S. S. S. L., Nation, K. & Liversedge, S. P. 2013. “Using eye movements to investigate word frequency effects in children’s sentence reading”. School Psychology Review , 42 (2), 207-222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kliebard, H. M. 2004. The Struggle for the American Curriculum, 1893-1958 (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laufer, B. & Ravenhorst-Kalovski, G. C. 2010. “Lexical threshold revisited: Lexical text coverage, learners’ vocabulary size and reading comprehension”. Reading in a Foreign Language , 22 (1), 15-30.Google Scholar
Lu, X. 2009. “Automatic measurement of syntactic complexity in child language acquisition”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics , 14 (1), 3-28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010. “Automatic analysis of syntactic complexity in second language writing”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics , 15 (4), 474-496. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012. The relationship of lexical richness to the quality of ESL learners’ oral narratives. The Modern Language Journal , 96 (2), 190-208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marks, C. B., Doctorow, M. J. & Wittrock, M. C. 1974. “Word frequency and reading comprehension”. The Journal of Educational Research , 67 (6), 259-262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B. 2000. The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk . Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Magali, P. 2010. “Academic vocabulary in learner writing: From extraction to analysis”. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Malvern, D., Richards, B., Chipere, N. & Durán, P. 2004. Lexical Diversity and Language Development: Quantification and Assessment . Houndmills: Palgrave MacMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, M. & Schmitt, N. (Eds.) 1997. Vocabulary Description, Acquisition and Pedagogy . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
McGregor, A. K. 1989. “The effect of word frequency and social class on children’s comprehension”. Reading , 23 (2), 105-115.Google Scholar
Meunier, F. & Gouverneur 2009. “New types of corpora for new educational challenges”. In K. Aijmer (Ed.), Corpora in Language Teaching , Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 179-201.
Michel, J.-B., Shen, Y. K., Aiden, A. P., Veres, A., Gray, M. K., The Google Books Team, Pickett, J. P., Hoiberg, D., Clancy, P. N., Orwant, J., Pinker, S., Nowak, M. A. & Aiden, E. L. 2011. “Quantitative analysis of culture using millions of digitized books”. Science , 331 (6014), 176-182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Minnen, G., Carroll, J. & Pearce, D. 2001. “Applied morphological processing of English”. Natural Language Engineering , 7 (3), 207-223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Monaghan, E. J. & Hartman, D. K. 2000. “Undertaking historical research in literacy”. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research (Vol. 31). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 109-121.Google Scholar
Nation, I. S. P. 2006. “How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening?”, Canadian Modern Language Review , 63 (1), 59-82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nation, P. & Waring, R. 1997. “Vocabulary size, text coverage and word lists”. In M. McCarthy & N. Schmitt (Eds.), Vocabulary Description, Acquisition and Pedagogy . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 6-19.Google Scholar
Pearson, P. D. 2009. “The roots of reading comprehension instruction”. In S. E. Israel & G. G. Duffy (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Reading Comprehension . New York: Routledge, 3-31.Google Scholar
Reyhner, J. 1986. “Native Americans in basal reading textbooks: Are there enough?”. Journal of American Indian Education , 26 (1), 14-22.Google Scholar
Richards, B. 1987. “Type/token ratios: What do they really tell us?”. Journal of Child Language , 14 (2), 201-209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rupley, W. H., Garcia, J. & Longinion, B. 1987. “Sex role portrayal in reading materials: Implications for the 1980’s”. The Reading Teacher , 34 (7), 786-791.Google Scholar
Schmitt, N., Jiang, X. & Grabe, W. 2011. “The percentage of words known in a text and reading comprehension”, Modern Language Journal , 95 (1), 26-43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schoenfeld, A. H. & Pearson, P. D. 2009. “The reading and math wars”. In G. Sykes, B. Schneider, D. N. Plank & T. G. Ford (Eds.), Handbook of Education Policy Research . New York: Routledge, 560-580.Google Scholar
Sykes, C. J. 1995. Dumbing down Our Kids: Why American Children Feel Good about Themselves but Can’t Read, Write, or Add . New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Tanner, D. & Tanner, L. N. 1990. History of the School Curriculum . New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Templin, M. 1957. Certain Language Skills in Children: Their Development and Interrelationships . Minneapolis, MN: The University of Minnesota Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Toutanova, K., Klein, D., Manning, C. & Singer, Y. 2003. “Feature-rich part-of-speech tagging with a cyclic dependency network”. In Proceedings of the 2003 Human Language Technology Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics . Edmonton: The Association for Computational Linguistics, 252-259.Google Scholar
Venezky, R. L. 1987. “A history of the American reading textbook”. The Elementary School Journal , 87 (3), 246-265. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waite, R. R. 1968. “Further attempts to integrate and urbanize first grade reading textbooks: A research study”. The Journal of Negro Education , 37 (1), 62-69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Woody, C. 1920. “The overlapping in the content of fifteen second readers”. The Journal of Educational Research , 2 (1), 465-474. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (9)

Cited by nine other publications

Wang, Zhongliang, Ming Liu & Kanglong Liu
2024. Utilizing Machine Learning Techniques for Classifying Translated and Non-Translated Corporate Annual Reports. Applied Artificial Intelligence 38:1 DOI logo
Wu, Anping, Fei Zhao & Qiong Zhang
2024. Construction of a text complexity grading model for English textbooks in the context of globalization. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences 9:1 DOI logo
Zhang, Xiaopeng & Xiaofei Lu
2024. Testing the Relationship of Linguistic Complexity to Second Language Learners’ Comparative Judgment on Text Difficulty. Language Learning 74:3  pp. 672 ff. DOI logo
Crosthwaite, Peter, Sulistya Ningrum & Martin Schweinberger
2023. Research trends in corpus linguistics. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 28:3  pp. 344 ff. DOI logo
Zhou, Xinye, Yuan Gao & Xiaofei Lu
2023. Lexical complexity changes in 100 years’ academic writing: Evidence from Nature Biology Letters. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 64  pp. 101262 ff. DOI logo
Jin, Tan, Huiqiong Duan, Xiaofei Lu, Jing Ni & Kai Guo
2021. Do research articles with more readable abstracts receive higher online attention? Evidence from Science. Scientometrics 126:10  pp. 8471 ff. DOI logo
Lu, Xiaofei & Renfen Hu
2021. Sense-aware lexical sophistication indices and their relationship to second language writing quality. Behavior Research Methods 54:3  pp. 1444 ff. DOI logo
Chen, Xiaobin & Detmar Meurers
2018. Word frequency and readability: Predicting the text‐level readability with a lexical‐level attribute. Journal of Research in Reading 41:3  pp. 486 ff. DOI logo
Chen, Xiaobin & Detmar Meurers
2019. Linking text readability and learner proficiency using linguistic complexity feature vector distance. Computer Assisted Language Learning 32:4  pp. 418 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.