Article published In:
International Journal of Corpus LinguisticsVol. 20:3 (2015) ► pp.378–404
Shell-nounhood in academic discourse
A critical state-of-the-art review
Numerous studies to date have investigated the cohesive, evaluative and formal features of semantically unspecific abstract nouns such as objective or assumption. These nouns share the property of ‘shell-nounhood’, associated with their ability to package and characterise complex discourse segments. One broad genre where this ability is widely exploited is academic discourse, which favours a markedly nominal cohesive style. Despite the extensive use of academic corpora in the study of shell-nounhood, the research focus has been primarily on specific sub-genres, formal patterns and rhetorical functions. This paper critically reviews the available evidence on this genre, using the corpora from which such evidence was obtained as its basic organising principle. In so doing, it uncovers some of the gaps to be addressed by future research, thereby setting the stage for more comprehensive descriptions that may usher in new pedagogies for the teaching of this crucial aspect of lexical cohesion in academic discourse.
References (41)
Aktas, R.N., & Cortes, V. (2008). Shell nouns as cohesive devices in published and ESL student writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(1), 3–14. 
Álvarez de Mon y Rego, I. (2006). A contrastive study of encapsulation and prospection in written scientific text. In J. Flowerdew & M. Gotti (Eds.), Studies in Specialized Discourse (pp. 21–40). Bern, Germany: Peter Lang.
Benitez-Castro, M.-A. (2015). Coming to grips with shell-nounhood: A critical review of insights into the meaning, function and form of shell-noun phrases. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 35(2), 168–194.
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London, UK: Longman.
Caldwell, C. (2009). Lexical Vagueness in Student Writing: Are Shell Nouns the Problem? Saarbrücken, Germany: Verlag Dr. Müller.
Charles, M. (2003). ‘This mystery…’: A corpus-based study of the use of nouns to construct stance in theses from two contrasting disciplines. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2(4), 313–326.
. (2007). Argument or evidence? Disciplinary variation in the use of the noun that pattern in stance construction. English for Specific Purposes, 26(2), 203–218.
Cortes, V. (2013). The purpose of this study is to: Connecting lexical bundles and moves in research article introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12(1), 33–43.
Cutting, J. (2012). Vague language in conference abstracts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(4), 283–293.
Flowerdew, J. (2003). Signalling nouns in discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 22(4), 329–346.
. (2006). Use of signalling nouns in a learner corpus. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 11(3), 345–362.
. (2010). Use of signalling nouns across L1 and L2 writer corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 15(1), 36–55.
Flowerdew, J. & Forest, R.W. (2015). Signalling Nouns in English: A Corpus-based Discourse Approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Flowerdew, L. (2008). Corpus-based Analyses of the Problem-Solution Pattern: A Phraseological Approach. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
Francis, G. (1994). Labelling discourse: An aspect of nominal-group lexical cohesion. In M. Coulthard (Ed.), Advances in Written Text Analysis (pp. 83–101). London, UK: Routledge.
Fraurud, K. (1992). Situation Reference (What does ‘It’ Refer to?). Hamburg, Germany: Fachbereich Informatik, Universität Hamburg.
Gray, B. (2010). On the use of demonstrative pronouns and determiners as cohesive devices: A focus on sentence-initial this/these in academic prose. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(3), 167–183.
Gray, B., & Cortes, V. (2011). Perception vs. evidence: An analysis of this and these in academic prose. English for Specific Purposes, 30(1), 31–43.
Halliday, M.A.K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London/New York: Longman.
Hasselgård, H. (2012). Facts, ideas, questions, problems, and issues in advanced learners’ English. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 11(1), 22–54.
Hinkel, E. (2004). Teaching Academic ESL Writing: Practical Techniques in Vocabulary and Grammar. Mahwah/London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hoey, M. (1983). On the Surface of Discourse. London, UK: George Allen & Unwin.
. (2005). Lexical Priming: A New Theory of Words and Language. London, UK: Routledge.
Ivanič, R. (1991). Nouns in search of a context: A study of nouns with both open- and closed-system characteristics. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 29(2), 93–114.
Kanté, I. (2010). Head nouns as modal stance markers: Academic texts vs legal texts. Revue de Linguistique et de Didactique des Langues, 411, 121–135.
López Samaniego, A. (2011). La categorización de entidades del discurso en la escritura profesional [The categorisation of discourse entities in professional writing]. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Mahlberg, M. (2009). Lexical cohesion: Corpus linguistic theory and its application in English language teaching. In J. Flowerdew & M. Mahlberg (Eds.), Lexical Cohesion and Corpus Linguistics (pp. 103–122). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
Martin, J.R., & White, P.R.R. (2005). The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
Moreno, A.I. (2004). Retrospective labelling in premise-conclusion metatext: An English-Spanish contrastive study of research articles on business and economics. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 3(4), 321–339.
Nesi, H., & Moreton, E. (2012). EFL/ESL writers and the use of shell nouns. In R. Tang (Ed.), Academic Writing in a Second or Foreign Language: Issues and Challenges Facing ESL/EFL Academic Writers in Higher Education Contexts (pp. 126–145). London, UK: Continuum.
Paquot, M. (2010). Academic Vocabulary in Learner Writing: From Extraction to Analysis. London/New York: Continuum.
Petch-Tyson, S. (2000). Demonstrative expressions in argumentative discourse: A computer corpus-based comparison of non-native and native English. In S. Botley & T. McEnery (Eds.), Corpus-based and Computational Approaches to Discourse Anaphora (pp. 43–64). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
Ravelli, L.J. (2004). Signalling the organization of written texts: Hyper-Themes in management and history essays. In L.J. Ravelli & R.A. Ellis (Eds.), Analysing Academic Writing: Contextualized Frameworks (pp. 104–130). London/New York: Continuum.
Schmid, H.J. (1999). Towards a functional-cognitive lexicology of nouns. In W. Falkner & H.J. Schmid (Eds.), Words, Lexemes, Concepts — Approaches to the Lexicon: Studies in Honour of Leonhard Lipka (pp. 213–226). Tübingen, Germany: Gunter Narr.
. (2000). English Abstract Nouns as Conceptual Shells: From Corpus to Cognition. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Sing, C.S. (2013). Shell noun patterns in student writing in English for specific academic purposes. In S. Granger, G. Gilquin & F. Meunier (Eds.), Twenty Years of Learner Corpus Research: Looking Back, Moving Ahead (pp. 411–422). Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.
Swales, J.M. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Tadros, A. (1985). Prediction in Text. Birmingham: English Language Research, University of Birmingham.
. (1994). Predictive categories in expository text. In M. Coulthard (Ed.), Advances in Written Text Analysis (pp. 69–82). London, UK: Routledge.
Thompson, P. (2014). Exploring Hoey’s notion of text colligation in a corpus of student writing. In A. Alcaraz-Sintes & S. Valera-Hernández (Eds.), Diachrony and Synchrony in English Corpus Linguistics (pp. 347–371). Bern, Germany: Peter Lang.
Winter, E.O. (1977). A clause-relational approach to English texts: A study of some predictive lexical items in written discourse. Instructional Science, 6(1), 1–92.
Cited by (10)
Cited by ten other publications
Casal, J. Elliott, Genggeng Zhang, Ghadi Matouq & Hana Alqabba
Wang, Yunyun & Guangwei Hu
2023. Shell noun phrases in scientific writing: A diachronic corpus-based study on research articles in chemical engineering. English for Specific Purposes 71 ► pp. 178 ff. 
Benitez-Castro, Miguel-Angel
2021. Shell-noun use in disciplinary student writing: A multifaceted analysis of problem and way in third-year undergraduate writing across three disciplines. English for Specific Purposes 61 ► pp. 132 ff.
Fang, Alex Chengyu & Min Dong
2021. Shell nouns as register-specific discourse devices. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 26:2 ► pp. 219 ff.
Becker, Maria, Michael Bender & Marcus Müller
2020. Classifying heuristic textual practices in academic discourse. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 25:4 ► pp. 426 ff.
Bordet, Geneviève
2018. Chapter 4. “This dissonance”. In Intercultural Perspectives on Research Writing [AILA Applied Linguistics Series, 18], ► pp. 83 ff.
Schanding, Brian & Hye K. Pae
2018. Shell noun use in English argumentative essays by native speakers of Japanese, Turkish, and English. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 4:1 ► pp. 54 ff.
Liu, Qingrong & Liming Deng
2017. A genre-based study of shell-noun use in the N- be-that construction in popular and professional science articles. English for Specific Purposes 48 ► pp. 32 ff.
Jiang, Feng (Kevin) & Ken Hyland
2016. Nouns and Academic Interactions: A Neglected Feature of Metadiscourse. Applied Linguistics ► pp. amw023 ff.
Jiang, Feng (Kevin) & Ken Hyland
2021. ‘The goal of this analysis …’: Changing patterns of metadiscursive nouns in disciplinary writing. Lingua 252 ► pp. 103017 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.