Article published in:
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics
Vol. 20:3 (2015) ► pp. 378404
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Bordet, Geneviève
2018.  In Intercultural Perspectives on Research Writing [AILA Applied Linguistics Series, 18],  pp. 83 ff. Crossref logo
Jiang, Feng (Kevin) & Ken Hyland
2016. Nouns and Academic Interactions: A Neglected Feature of Metadiscourse. Applied Linguistics  pp. amw023 ff. Crossref logo
Liu, Qingrong & Liming Deng
2017. A genre-based study of shell-noun use in the N- be-that construction in popular and professional science articles. English for Specific Purposes 48  pp. 32 ff. Crossref logo
Schanding, Brian & Hye K. Pae
2018. Shell noun use in English argumentative essays by native speakers of Japanese, Turkish, and English. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 4:1  pp. 54 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 june 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Aktas, R.N., & Cortes, V.
(2008) Shell nouns as cohesive devices in published and ESL student writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(1), 3–14. Crossref link
Álvarez de Mon y Rego, I.
(2006) A contrastive study of encapsulation and prospection in written scientific text. In J. Flowerdew & M. Gotti (Eds.), Studies in Specialized Discourse (pp. 21–40). Bern, Germany: Peter Lang.
Benitez-Castro, M.-A.
(2015) Coming to grips with shell-nounhood: A critical review of insights into the meaning, function and form of shell-noun phrases. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 35(2), 168–194. Crossref link
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E.
(1999) Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London, UK: Longman.
Caldwell, C.
(2009) Lexical Vagueness in Student Writing: Are Shell Nouns the Problem? Saarbrücken, Germany: Verlag Dr. Müller.
Charles, M.
(2003) ‘This mystery…’: A corpus-based study of the use of nouns to construct stance in theses from two contrasting disciplines. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2(4), 313–326. Crossref link
(2007) Argument or evidence? Disciplinary variation in the use of the noun that pattern in stance construction. English for Specific Purposes, 26(2), 203–218. Crossref link
Cortes, V.
(2013) The purpose of this study is to: Connecting lexical bundles and moves in research article introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12(1), 33–43. Crossref link
Cutting, J.
(2012) Vague language in conference abstracts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(4), 283–293. Crossref link
Flowerdew, J.
(2003) Signalling nouns in discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 22(4), 329–346. Crossref link
(2006) Use of signalling nouns in a learner corpus. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 11(3), 345–362. Crossref link
(2010) Use of signalling nouns across L1 and L2 writer corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 15(1), 36–55. Crossref link
Flowerdew, J. & Forest, R.W.
(2015) Signalling Nouns in English: A Corpus-based Discourse Approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Flowerdew, L.
(2008) Corpus-based Analyses of the Problem-Solution Pattern: A Phraseological Approach. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Francis, G.
(1994) Labelling discourse: An aspect of nominal-group lexical cohesion. In M. Coulthard (Ed.), Advances in Written Text Analysis (pp. 83–101). London, UK: Routledge.
Fraurud, K.
(1992) Situation Reference (What does ‘It’ Refer to?). Hamburg, Germany: Fachbereich Informatik, Universität Hamburg.
Gray, B.
(2010) On the use of demonstrative pronouns and determiners as cohesive devices: A focus on sentence-initial this/these in academic prose. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(3), 167–183. Crossref link
Gray, B., & Cortes, V.
(2011) Perception vs. evidence: An analysis of this and these in academic prose. English for Specific Purposes, 30(1), 31–43. Crossref link
Halliday, M.A.K., & Hasan, R.
(1976) Cohesion in English. London/New York: Longman.
Hasselgård, H.
(2012) Facts, ideas, questions, problems, and issues in advanced learners’ English. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 11(1), 22–54.
Hinkel, E.
(2004) Teaching Academic ESL Writing: Practical Techniques in Vocabulary and Grammar. Mahwah/London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hoey, M.
(1983) On the Surface of Discourse. London, UK: George Allen & Unwin.
(2005) Lexical Priming: A New Theory of Words and Language. London, UK: Routledge. Crossref link
Ivanič, R.
(1991) Nouns in search of a context: A study of nouns with both open- and closed-system characteristics. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 29(2), 93–114. Crossref link
Kanté, I.
(2010) Head nouns as modal stance markers: Academic texts vs legal texts. Revue de Linguistique et de Didactique des Langues, 41, 121–135.
López Samaniego, A.
(2011) La categorización de entidades del discurso en la escritura profesional [The categorisation of discourse entities in professional writing]. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Mahlberg, M.
(2009) Lexical cohesion: Corpus linguistic theory and its application in English language teaching. In J. Flowerdew & M. Mahlberg (Eds.), Lexical Cohesion and Corpus Linguistics (pp. 103–122). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Martin, J.R., & White, P.R.R.
(2005) The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
Moreno, A.I.
(2004) Retrospective labelling in premise-conclusion metatext: An English-Spanish contrastive study of research articles on business and economics. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 3(4), 321–339. Crossref link
Nesi, H., & Moreton, E.
(2012) EFL/ESL writers and the use of shell nouns. In R. Tang (Ed.), Academic Writing in a Second or Foreign Language: Issues and Challenges Facing ESL/EFL Academic Writers in Higher Education Contexts (pp. 126–145). London, UK: Continuum.
Paquot, M.
(2010) Academic Vocabulary in Learner Writing: From Extraction to Analysis. London/New York: Continuum.
Petch-Tyson, S.
(2000) Demonstrative expressions in argumentative discourse: A computer corpus-based comparison of non-native and native English. In S. Botley & T. McEnery (Eds.), Corpus-based and Computational Approaches to Discourse Anaphora (pp. 43–64). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Ravelli, L.J.
(2004) Signalling the organization of written texts: Hyper-Themes in management and history essays. In L.J. Ravelli & R.A. Ellis (Eds.), Analysing Academic Writing: Contextualized Frameworks (pp. 104–130). London/New York: Continuum.
Schmid, H.J.
(1999) Towards a functional-cognitive lexicology of nouns. In W. Falkner & H.J. Schmid (Eds.), Words, Lexemes, Concepts — Approaches to the Lexicon: Studies in Honour of Leonhard Lipka (pp. 213–226). Tübingen, Germany: Gunter Narr.
(2000) English Abstract Nouns as Conceptual Shells: From Corpus to Cognition. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Crossref link
Sing, C.S.
(2013) Shell noun patterns in student writing in English for specific academic purposes. In S. Granger, G. Gilquin & F. Meunier (Eds.), Twenty Years of Learner Corpus Research: Looking Back, Moving Ahead (pp. 411–422). Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.
Swales, J.M.
(1990) Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Tadros, A.
(1985) Prediction in Text. Birmingham: English Language Research, University of Birmingham.
(1994) Predictive categories in expository text. In M. Coulthard (Ed.), Advances in Written Text Analysis (pp. 69–82). London, UK: Routledge.
Thompson, P.
(2014) Exploring Hoey’s notion of text colligation in a corpus of student writing. In A. Alcaraz-Sintes & S. Valera-Hernández (Eds.), Diachrony and Synchrony in English Corpus Linguistics (pp. 347–371). Bern, Germany: Peter Lang.
Winter, E.O.
(1977) A clause-relational approach to English texts: A study of some predictive lexical items in written discourse. Instructional Science, 6(1), 1–92. Crossref link