Cover not available
Article published In:
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics
Vol. 28:2 (2023) ► pp.202–231

Register variation across text lengths

Evidence from social media

ORCID logo | University of Helsinki
This paper explores variation in lexico-grammatical register features across text lengths in a large-scale sample of Reddit comments. Very short texts are known to be problematic for many statistical methods, so understanding their nature is important for the corpus-linguistic study of social media, where most contributions are short. I show that the frequencies of linguistic features change with comment length, even between longer comments, although longer texts are often considered similar in statistical terms. Moreover, I classify the variation found between short comments of different lengths into two main patterns, although other patterns can also be found, and there is variation even within these patterns. Furthermore, I interpret the observed differences in terms of register variation. For example, shorter comments appear to be more casual and less edited in terms of their feature makeup, whereas narrative and informational registers seem to favor longer comments.
Keywords: text length, register analysis, social media, Reddit, functional variation
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Register, social media, and text length
    • 2.1Register analysis
    • 2.2Social media and the problem of text length
    • 2.3Earlier studies with text length as a variable
  • 3.Data and method
    • 3.1Data
    • 3.2Method
  • 4.Variation across text lengths
    • 4.1Rounded rise
    • 4.2Initial peak
    • 4.3Other patterns
    • 4.4Lengthwise variation between longer comments
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 23 August 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.20177.lii
References (30)
References
Baroni, M. (2008). Distributions in text. In A. Lüdeling & M. Kytö (Eds.), Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook (pp. 803–822). Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, J., Zannettou, S., Keegan, B., Squire, M., & Blackburn, J. (2020). The Pushshift Reddit Dataset. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 14 (1), 830–839. [URL]. DOI logo
Berber Sardinha, T., & Veirano Pinto, M. (2014). Multi-dimensional Analysis, 25 Years on: A Tribute to Douglas Biber. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D. (1988). Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1993). Representativeness in corpus design. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 8 (4), 243–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1994). An analytical framework for register studies. In D. Biber & E. Finegan (Eds.), Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Register (pp. 31–56). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Biber, D., & Conrad, S. (2001). Introduction: Multi-dimensional analysis and the study of register variation. In S. Conrad & D. Biber (Eds.), Variation in English: Multi-Dimensional Studies (pp. 3–12). Pearson Education.Google Scholar
(2009). Register, Genre, and Style. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., & Egbert, J. (2016). Register variation on the searchable web: A multi-dimensional analysis. Journal of English Linguistics, 44 (2), 95–137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018). Register Variation Online. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2013). Being specific about historical change: The influence of sub-register. The Journal of English Linguistics, 41 1, 104–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clarke, I., & Grieve, J. (2017). Dimensions of abusive language on Twitter. In Z. Waseem, W. Hui Kyong, D. Hovy, & J. Tetreault (Eds.), Proceedings of the First Workshop on Abusive Language Online (pp. 1–10). Association for Computational Linguistics. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019). Stylistic variation on the Donald Trump Twitter account: A linguistic analysis of tweets posted between 2009 and 2018. PLoS ONE, 14 (9), Article e0222062. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eberl, M. (2020). Double trouble: Are 280-character tweets comparable to 140-character tweets? In S. Rüdiger & D. Dayter (Eds.), Corpus Approaches to Social Media. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Egbert, J., & Schnur, E. (2018). The role of text in corpus and discourse analysis. In C. Taylor & A. Marchi (Eds.), Corpus Approaches to Discourse: A Critical Review (pp. 159–173). Taylor & Francis. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friginal, E. (Ed.) (2013). Twenty-five Years of Biber–s Multi-Dimensional Analysis [Special issue]. Corpora, 8 ( 2 ). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glynn, D. (2014). Correspondence analysis: Exploring data and identifying patterns. In D. Glynn & J. A. Robinson (Eds.), Corpus Methods for Semantics: Quantitative Studies in Polysemy and Synonymy (pp. 443–485). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grieve, J., Biber, D., Friginal, E., & Nekrasova, T. (2011). Variation among blog text types: A multi-dimensional analysis. In A. Mehler, S. Sharoff, & M. Santini (Eds.), Genres on the Web: Corpus Studies and Computational Models (pp. 302–322). Springer.Google Scholar
Hess, C. W., Haug, H. T., & Landry, R. G. (1989). The reliability of type-token ratios for the oral language of school age children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 32 (3), 536–540. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hess, C. W., Sefton, K. M., & Landry, R. G. (1986). Sample size and type-token ratios for oral language of preschool children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 29 (1), 129–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hiltunen, T. (2014). Choice of national variety in the English-language Wikipedia. In J. Tyrkkö & S. Leppänen (Eds.), Texts and Discourses of New Media. VARIENG. [URL]
Holler, J., Kendrick, K. H., Casillas, M., & Levinson, S. C. (2015). Editorial: Turn-taking in human communicative interaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 6 1(1919). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koizumi, R., & In–nami, Y. (2012). Effects of text length on lexical diversity measures: Using short texts with less than 200 tokens. System, 40 (4), 554–564. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020). Using lengthwise scaling to compare feature frequencies across text lengths on Reddit. In S. Rüdiger & D. Dayter (Eds.), Corpus Approaches to Social Media (pp. 111–130). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manning, C. D., Surdeanu, M., Bauer, J., Finkel, J., Bethard, S. J., & McClosky, D. (2014). The Stanford CoreNLP natural language processing toolkit. In K. Bontcheva & J. Zhu (Eds.), Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations (pp. 55–60). Association for Computational Linguistics. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosen, A. (2017, November 7). Tweeting made easier. [URL]
Titak, A., & Roberson, A. (2013). Dimensions of web registers: An exploratory multi-dimensional comparison. Corpora, 8 (2), 239–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wallis, S. (2020). Statistics in Corpus Linguistic Research: A New Approach. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Wood, Margaret
2024. Linguistic variation in functional types of statutory law. Applied Corpus Linguistics 4:1 ► pp. 100081 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Jiawei & Zhiying Xin
2023. A novel multi-dimensional analysis of reply, response and rejoinder articles: When discipline meets time. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 65 ► pp. 101286 ff. DOI logo
Liimatta, Aatu
2022. Do registers have different functions for text length?. Register Studies 4:2 ► pp. 263 ff. DOI logo
Liimatta, Aatu
2024. Text length and short texts. In Challenges in Corpus Linguistics [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 118], ► pp. 106 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.