The root of ruthless
Individual variation as a window on mental representation
Linguistic variation between individuals must be linked to how linguistic material is mentally represented. Therefore, by examining individual variation, light can be shed on the nature of mental representation itself. This paper presents an individual differences study of semi-opaque derivations (e.g. ruthless) to establish whether their representations are mentally associated to those of fully segmentable forms with the same suffix (e.g. sightless). This way, a prediction of connectionist and exemplar models of morphology is tested, namely that to language users semi-opaque forms are likely to retain some degree of internal complexity, despite the fact that they are not segmentable. Using corpus data, it is demonstrated that individuals who rely more heavily on the segmentable forms are also more likely to use the semi-opaque forms. This pattern in the variation across individuals indicates that semi-opaque derivations are not represented independently of the derivational paradigm from which they historically derive.
Keywords: rule, morphological representation, individual variation, connectionism, backformation
Published online: 08 September 2016
Bybee, J., & McClelland, J.L.
Bybee, J., & Slobin, D.I.
De Smet, H.
Gonnerman, L.M., Seidenberg, M.S., & Andersen, E.S.
Hay, J.B., & Baayen, R.H.
Kemmer, S., & Barlow, M.
Cited by 2 other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 october 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.