Cover not available
Article published In:
Compilation, transcription, markup and annotation of spoken corpora
Edited by John M. Kirk and Gisle Andersen
[International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 21:3] 2016
► pp. 323–347

Semi-lexical features in corpus transcription

Consistency, comparability, standardisation

| NHH Norwegian School of Economics
An aspect of corpus compilation that poses a particular challenge is the question of how to transcribe orthographically units that are not part of any standardised vocabulary. Among the problematic categories we find voiced pauses, minimal response signals, interjections, certain discourse markers, phonologically reduced forms, colloquialisms and dialect forms. Such semi-lexical features are usually represented by regular phonemic-graphemic correspondences but are nevertheless often inconsistently handled. This paper reviews a number of existing transcription guidelines and assesses whether the recommendations they provide are sufficient and detailed enough to secure a consistent transcription of the categories mentioned. Further, the paper assesses to what extent transcription of semi-lexical features is consistent within and across two spoken corpora. On the basis of a cross-corpus comparison of the Bergen Corpus of London Teenage Language (COLT) and the London English Corpus (LEC), the paper provides specific recommendations for corpus transcription.
Keywords: interjections, minimal response signals, spoken corpus, colloquialisms, discourse markers
Published online: 29 September 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.21.3.02and
References (30)
Aijmer, K. (2002). English Discourse Particles: Evidence from a Corpus. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ameka, F. (1992). Interjections: The universal yet neglected part of speech. Journal of Pragmatics, 18(2/3), 101–118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andersen, G. (2001). Pragmatic Markers and Sociolinguistic Variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2016). Using the corpus-driven method to chart discourse-pragmatic change. In H. Pichler (Ed.), Discourse-Pragmatic Variation and Change in English: New Methods and Insights (pp. 21–40). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berglund, Y. (2005). Expressions of Future in Present-day English: A Corpus-based Approach. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.Google Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Brinton, L. (1996). Pragmatic Markers in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cheshire, J., Fox, S., Kerswill, P., & Torgersen, E. (2008). Ethnicity, friendship network and social practices as the motor of dialect change: Linguistic innovation in London. Sociolinguistica Jahrbuch, 221, 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cheshire, J., Kerswill, P., Fox, S., & Torgersen, E. (2011). Contact, the feature pool and the speech community: The emergence of Multicultural London English. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 15(2), 151–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, J.W., Schuetze-Coburn, S., Cumming, S., & Danae, P. (1993). Outline of discourse transciption. In J.A. Edwards & M.D. Lampert (Eds.), Talking Data: Transcription and Coding in Discourse Research (pp. 45–89). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Edwards, J.A. (1993). Principles and contrasting systems of discourse transcription. In J.A. Edwards & M.D. Lampert (Eds.), Talking Data: Transcription and Coding in Discourse Research (pp. 3–31). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
French, J.P. (1992). Notes and conventions for soundscript transcribers. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Gibbon, D., Moore, R., & Winsky, R. (Eds.) (1997). Handbook of Standards and Resources for Spoken Language Systems. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Jefferson, G. (1983). Issues in the transcription of naturally occurring talk: Caricature versus capturing pronunciational particulars. Tilburg Papers in Language and Literature, 341, 1–12.Google Scholar
. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G.H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation (pp. 13–31). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johansson, S. (1995). The approach of the Text Encoding Initiative to the encoding of spoken discourse. In G. Leech, G. Myers & J. Thomas (Eds.), Spoken English on Computer: Transcription, Mark-up and Application (pp. 82–98). Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Nelson, G. (2002). International Corpus of English: Markup Manual for: Spoken Texts. Retrieved from [URL] (last accessed November 2015).
Payne, J. (1995). The COBUILD spoken corpus: Transcription conventions. In G. Leech, G. Myers & J. Thomas (Eds.), Spoken English on Computer: Transcription, Mark-up and Application (pp. 203–207). Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Poplack, S. & Tagliamonte, S. (2000). The grammaticization of going to in (African American) English. Language Variation and Change, 11(3), 315–342. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sachs, H., Schegloff, E.A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, J. (1995). From theory to practice. In G. Leech, G. Myers & J. Thomas (Eds.), Spoken English on Computer: Transcription, Mark-up and Application. (pp. 99–109). Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J.M. (Ed.). (1987). Looking Up. London/Glasgow: Collins ELT.Google Scholar
Stenström, A.-B. (1998). From sentence to discourse: cos (because) in teenage talk. In A. Jucker & Y. Ziv. (Eds.), Discourse Markers: Descriptions and Theory (pp. 127–146). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stenström, A.-B., Andersen, G., & Hasund, K. (2002). Trends in Teenage Talk: Corpus Compilation, Analysis and Findings. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
TEI, T.-E. I. TEI P5: Guidelines for Electronic Text Encoding and Interchange.
Thompson, P. (2005). Spoken language corpora. In M. Wynne (Ed.), Developing Linguistic Corpora: A Guide to Good Practice (pp. 59–70). Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
Torgersen, E., Gabrielatos, C., Hoffman, S., & Fox, S. (2011). A corpus-based study of pragmatic markers in London English. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 7(1), 93–118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van den Heuvel, H., & Boves, L. (2001). Annotation in the SpeechDat projects. International Journal of Speech Technology, 41, 127–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wynne, M. (Ed.). (2005). Developing Linguistic Corpora: A Guide to Good Practice. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Taylor, Roxanne
2022. Lexical and functional adpositions: the view from <em>of</em> in Old and present-day English. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 7:1 DOI logo
Põldvere, Nele, Johan Frid, Victoria Johansson & Carita Paradis
2021. Challenges of releasing audio material for spoken data: The case of the London-Lund Corpus 2. Research in Corpus Linguistics 9:1 ► pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
Pizarro Pedraza, Andrea
2019. MadSex: collecting a spoken corpus of indirectly elicited sexual concepts. Language Resources and Evaluation 53:1 ► pp. 191 ff. DOI logo
KIRK, JOHN M.
2017. Developments in the spoken component of ICE corpora. World Englishes 36:3 ► pp. 371 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.