Article published In:
International Journal of Corpus LinguisticsVol. 28:3 (2023) ► pp.291–317
Things we smell and things they smell like
Communicatively relevant odours and odorants
The sense of smell has been relatively neglected in the Western research. It is not regarded as particularly useful compared to the perceived importance of senses like sight, sound, and touch. Correspondingly, English speakers are ill-equipped to describe qualities of smells, instead invoking entities that share similar olfactory qualities, e.g. like roses. This raises the question: which odours do English speakers frequently refer to, and which terms describe them? This corpus-driven study looks at nouns in olfactory contexts, and the conceptual domains they fall into. Results show that speakers invoke different smells according to context: when talking about a smell they perceive, when describing a smell, or in a description of another smell, which demonstrates the differential communicative functions of smells. Further analysis shows that smells that are described are more variable than those used as descriptors, and smells being used to describe are more emotional using psychometric norming data.
Keywords: English, olfaction, smell, semantic prosody, communicative need
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Descriptions of smells
- 3.Methodology
- 3.1Corpus
- 3.2Word selection and data cleaning
- 3.3Coding
- 3.4Semantic tagging
- 3.5Valence norms
- 3.6Odorant variability norms
- 4.Results
- 4.1Item frequency
- 4.2Conceptual domains
- 4.3Olfactory contexts
- 4.3.1Valence
- 4.3.2 Odorant variability
- 5.Discussion
- 5.1Stimulus
- 5.2Descriptum
- 5.3Descriptor
- 6.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
References (56)
Allan, K., & Burridge, K. (2006). Forbidden Words: Taboo and the Censoring of Language. Cambridge University Press. 
Arshamian, A., Gerkin, R. C., Kruspe, N., Wnuk, E., Floyd, S., O’Meara, C., Rodriguez, G. G., Lundström, J. N., Mainland, J. D., & Majid, A. (2022). The perception of odor pleasantness is shared across cultures. Current Biology,
32
(9), 2061–2066.
Berlin, B., & Kay, P. (1969). Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution. University of California Press.
Boisson, C. P. (1997). La dénomination des odeurs: Variations et régularités linguistiques [The naming of odours: Linguistic variations and regularities]. Intellectica,
24
(1), 29–49.
Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2009). Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods,
41
(4), 977–990.
Chastrette, M. (2002). Classification and structure-odor relationships. In C. Rouby, B. Schaal, D. Dubois, R. Gervais, & A. Holley (Eds.), Olfaction, Taste, and Cognition (pp. 100–116). Cambridge University Press.
Chrea, C., Ferdenzi, C., Valentin, D., & Abdi, H. (2007). Revisiting the relation between language and cognition: A cross-cultural study with odors. Current Psychology Letters,
22
(2), 1–14.
Chrea, C., Valentin, D., Sulmont-Rossé, C., Ly Mai, H., Hoang Nguyen, D., & Abdi, H. (2004). Culture and odor categorization: Agreement between cultures depends upon the odors. Food Quality and Preference,
15
(7–8), 669–679.
Classen, C., Howes, D., & Synnott, A. (1994). Aroma: The Cultural History of Smell. Routledge.
Croijmans, I., & Majid, A. (2016). Not all flavor expertise is equal: The language of wine and coffee experts. PLoS ONE,
11
(6), 1–21.
Darwin, C. (1889). The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. D. Appleton and Company.
Davies, M. (2008–). The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): One billion words, 1990–2019. [URL]
Dubois, D. (2000). Categories as acts of meaning: The case of categories in olfaction and audition. Cognitive Science Quarterly,
1
1, 35–68.
Engen, T. (1983). The human uses of olfaction. American Journal of Otolaryngology,
4
(4), 250–251.
Floyd, S., San Roque, L., & Majid, A. (2018). Smell is coded in grammar and frequent in discourse: Cha’palaa olfactory language in cross-linguistic perspective. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology,
28
(2), 175–196.
Gibson, E., Futrell, R., Jara-Ettinger, J., Mahowald, K., Bergen, L., Ratnasingam, S., Gibson, M., Piantadosi, S. T., & Conway, B. R. (2017). Color naming across languages reflects color use. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
114
(40), 10785–10790.
Hörberg, T., Larsson, M., & Olofsson, J. K. (2020). Mapping the semantic organization of the English odor vocabulary using natural language data. PsyArXiv.
Howes, D. (1987). Olfaction and transition: An essay on the ritual uses of smell. Canadian Review of Sociology,
24
(3), 398–416.
Iatropoulos, G., Herman, P., Lansner, A., Karlgren, J., Larsson, M., & Olofsson, J. K. (2018). The language of smell: Connecting linguistic and psychophysical properties of odor descriptors. Cognition,
178
1, 37–49.
Iravani, B., Schaefer, M., Wilson, D. A., Arshamian, A., & Lundström, J. N. (2021). The human olfactory bulb process odor valence representation and initiate motor avoidance behavior. bioRxiv.
Kaeppler, K., & Mueller, F. (2013). Odor classification: A review of factors influencing perception-based odor arrangements. Chemical Senses,
38
1, 189–209.
Kemp, C., Xu, Y., & Regier, T. (2018). Semantic typology and efficient communication. Annual Review of Linguistics, 41, 109–128.
Kövecses, Z. (2019). Perception and metaphor: The case of smell. In L. J. Speed, C. O’Meara, L. San Roque, & A. Majid (Eds.), Perception Metaphors (pp. 327–346). John Benjamins.
Krifka, M. (2010). A note on the asymmetry in the hedonic implicatures of olfactory and gustatory terms. In S. Fuchs, P. Hoole, C. Mooshammer, & M. Zygis (Eds.), Between the Regular and the Particular in Speech and Language (pp. 235–245). Peter Lang.
Lee, A. P. (2015). Lexical categories and conceptualization of olfaction in Amis. Language and Cognition,
7
(3), 321–350.
Levinson, S. C., & Majid, A. (2014). Differential ineffability and the senses. Mind and Language,
29
(4), 407–427.
Majid, A. (2021). Human olfaction at the intersection of language, culture, and biology. Trends in Cognitive Sciences,
25
(2), 111–123.
Majid, A., & Burenhult, N. (2014). Odors are expressible in language, as long as you speak the right language. Cognition,
130
(2), 266–270.
Majid, A., Burenhult, N., Stensmyr, M., De Valk, J., & Hansson, B. S. (2018). Olfactory language and abstraction across cultures. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences,
373
(1752).
Majid, A., & Kruspe, N. (2018). Hunter-gatherer olfaction is special. Current Biology,
28
(3), 409–413.e2.
Majid, A., Roberts, S. G., Cilissen, L., Emmorey, K., Nicodemus, B., O’Grady, L., Woll, B., LeLan, B., de Sousa, H., Cansler, B. L., Shayan, S., de Vos, C., Senft, G., Enfield, N. J., Razak, R. A., Fedden, S., Tufvesson, S., Dingemanse, M., Ozturk, O., … Levinson, S. C. (2018). Differential coding of perception in the world’s languages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U.S.A,
115
(45), 11369–11376.
McGann, J. P. (2017). Poor human olfaction is a 19th-century myth. Science,
356
(6338), eaam7263.
O’Meara, C., & Majid, A. (2016). How changing lifestyles impact seri smellscapes and smell language. Anthropological Linguistics,
58
(2), 107–131.
Peeters, G., & Czapinski, J. (1990). Positive-negative asymmetry in evaluations: The distinction between affective and informational negativity effects. European Review of Social Psychology,
1
(1), 33–60.
Plümacher, M. (2007). Color perception, color description and metaphor. In M. Plümacher & P. Holz (Eds.), Speaking of Colors and Odors (pp. 61–84). John Benjamins.
Poulton, T. (2020a). Odours and Odorants (COCA) [Data set].
(2020b). The smells we know and love: Variation in codability and description strategy. Language and Cognition,
12
(3), 501–525.
Poulton, T., & Hill, C. (forthcoming). Linguistic descriptions and cultural models of olfaction in Umpila and English. Language Sciences.
Rayson, P., Archer, D. E., Piao, S., & McEnery, T. (2004). The UCREL semantic analysis system. Proceedings of the Workshop on Beyond Named Entity Recognition Semantic Labelling for NLP tTasks in Association with LREC 2004. Lisbon (pp. 7–12). [URL]
Rouby, C., & Bensafi, M. (2002). Is there a hedonic dimension to odors? In C. Rouby, B. Schaal, D. Dubois, R. Gervais, & A. Holley (Eds.), Olfaction, Taste, and Cognition (pp. 140–159). Cambridge University Press.
San Roque, L., Kendrick, K. H., Norcliffe, E., Brown, P., Defina, R., Dingemanse, M., Dirksmeyer, T., Enfield, N. J., Floyd, S., Hammond, J., Rossi, G., Tufvesson, S., van Putten, S., & Majid, A. (2015). Vision verbs dominate in conversation across cultures, but the ranking of non-visual verbs varies. Cognitive Linguistics,
26
(1), 31–60.
Schwarz, N., & Lee, S. W. S. (2019). The smell of suspicion: How the nose curbs gullibility. In J. P. Forgas & R. F. Baumeister (Eds.), The Social Psychology of Gullibility (pp. 234–252). Routledge.
Shepherd, G. M. (2004). The human sense of smell: Are we better than we think? PLoS Biology,
2
(5), e146.
Sperber, D. (1975). Rethinking Symbolism. Cambridge University Press.
Sweetser, E. (1990). From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge University Press.
Valenzuela, J., & Soriano, C. (2008). Sensorial perception as a source domain: A cross-linguistic study [Paper presentation]. VII International Conference on Researching and Applying Metaphor (RaAM 7), Cáceres, Spain.
Vanek, N., Sóskuthy, M., & Majid, A. (2021). Consistent verbal labels promote odor category learning. Cognition,
206
1, 104485.
Viberg, Å. (1983). The verbs of perception: A typological study. In B. Butterworth, B. Comrie, & D. Östen (Eds.), Explanations for Language Universals. Walter de Gruyter.
Warriner, A. B., Kuperman, V., & Brysbaert, M. (2013). Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13,915 English lemmas. Behavior Research Methods,
45
(4), 1191–1207.
Wilson, D. A., & Stevenson, R. J. (2006). Learning to Smell: Olfactory Perception from Neurobiology to Behavior. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Winter, B. (2016). Taste and smell words form an affectively loaded and emotionally flexible part of the English lexicon. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience,
31
(8), 975–988.
(2019). Sensory Linguistics: Language, Perception and Metaphor. John Benjamins.
Winter, B., Perlman, M., & Majid, A. (2018). Vision dominates in perceptual language: English sensory vocabulary is optimized for usage. Cognition,
179
1, 213–220.
Wnuk, E., & Majid, A. (2014). Revisiting the limits of language: The odor lexicon of Maniq. Cognition,
131
(1), 125–138.
Yeshurun, Y., & Sobel, N. (2010). An odor is not worth a thousand words: From multidimensional odors to unidimensional odor objects. Annual Review of Psychology,
61
(1), 219–241.
Zaslavsky, N., Kemp, C., Tishby, N., & Regier, T. (2019). Color naming reflects both perceptual structure and communicative need. Topics in Cognitive Science,
11
(1), 207–219.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Schönefeld, Doris Eveline
2024. Expressing smells in (American) English. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.