Article published in:
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics
Vol. 22:2 (2017) ► pp. 212241
References

References

Argamon, S., & Koppel, M.
(2013) A systemic functional approach to automated authorship analysis. Journal of Law and Policy, 21(2), 299–316.
Barlow, M.
(2013) Individual differences and usage-based grammar. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 18(4), 443–478. Crossref link
Becker, J. D.
(1975) The phrasal lexicon. In B. L. Nash-Webber & R. Shank (Eds.), Theoretical Issues in Natural Language Processing (pp. 60–63). Cambridge, MA: Bolt Beranek and Newman.
Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Cortes, V.
(2004)  If you look at …: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics, 25(3), 371–405. Crossref link
Bloch, B.
(1948) A set of postulates for phonemic analysis. Language, 24(1), 3–46. Crossref link
Cohen, W. W.
(2009) Enron Email Dataset [online]. Retrieved from http://​www​.cs​.cmu​.edu​/~enron/ (last accessed November 2010).
Coniam, D.
(2004) Concordancing oneself: Constructing individual textual profiles. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 9(2), 271–298. Crossref link
Cotterill, J.
(2010) How to use corpus linguistics in forensic linguistics. In A. O’Keefe & M. McCarthy (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics (pp. 578–590). London: Routledge. Crossref link
Coulthard, M.
(1994) On the use of corpora in the analysis of forensic texts. Forensic Linguistics. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 1(1), 27–43. Crossref link
(2004) Author identification, idiolect, and linguistic uniqueness. Applied Linguistics, 24(4), 431–447. Crossref link
Coulthard, M., Grant, T., & Kredens, K.
(2011) Forensic Linguistics. In R. Wodak, B. Johnstone & P. Kerswill (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Sociolinguistics (pp. 531–544). London: Sage. Crossref link
Coyotl-Morales, R., Villaseñor-Pineda, M. L., Montes-y-Gómez, M., & Rosso, P.
(2006) Authorship attribution using word sequences. In J. F. Martínez-Trinidad, J. A. Carrasco Ochoa & J. Kittler (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th Iberoamerican Congress on Pattern Recognition (pp. 844–853). Berlin: Springer.
Durrant, P., & Doherty, A.
(2010) Are high-frequency collocations psychologically real? Investigating the thesis of collocational priming. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 6(2), 125–155. Crossref link
Eckert, P., & McConnell-Ginet, S.
(1998) Communities of practice: Where language, gender and power all live? In J. Coates (Ed.), Language and Gender: A Reader (pp. 484–494). Oxford: Blackwell.
Eder, M.
(2015) Does size matter? Authorship attribution, small samples, big problem. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 30(2), 167–182. Crossref link
Firth, J. R.
(1957) A synopsis of linguistic theory 1930–1955. In F. R. Palmer (Ed.), Selected papers of J.R. Firth 1952–1959 (pp. 168–205). London: Longman.
Grant, T.
(2007) Quantifying evidence in forensic authorship analysis. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 14(1), 1–25. Crossref link
(2008) Approaching questions in forensic authorship analysis. In J. Gibbons & M. T. Turell (Eds.), Dimensions of Forensic Linguistics (pp. 215–229). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Crossref link
(2010). Txt 4n6: Idiolect free authorship analysis? In M. Coulthard & A. Johnson (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics (pp. 508–522) London: Routledge.
(2013) Txt 4N6: Method, consistency and distinctiveness in the analysis of SMS text messages. Journal of Law and Policy, 21(2), 467–494.
Grieve, J.
(2007) Quantitative authorship attribution: An evaluation of techniques. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 22(3), 251–270. Crossref link
Hoey, M.
(2005) Lexical Priming: A New Theory of Words and Language. London: Routledge. Crossref link
Hoover, D. L.
(2002) Frequent word sequences and statistical stylistics. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 17(2), 157–180. Crossref link
Johnson, A. & Wright, D.
(2014) Identifying idiolect in forensic authorship attribution: An n-gram textbite approach. Language and Law (Linguagem e Direito) 1(1), 37–69.
Juola, P.
(2008) Authorship Attribution. Delft: NOW Publishing.
(2013) Stylometry and immigration: A case study. Journal of Law and Policy, 21(2), 287–298.
Koppel, M., Schler, J., & Argamon, S.
(2011) Authorship attribution in the wild. Language Resources and Evaluation, 45(1), 83–94. Crossref link
Kredens, K.
(2002) Towards a corpus-based methodology of forensic authorship attribution: A comparative study of two idiolects. In B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (Ed.), PALC’01: Practical Applications in Language Corpora (pp. 405–437). Peter Lang: Frankfurt am Mein.
Kuiper, K.
(2004) Formulaic performance in conventionalised varieties of speech. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), Formulaic Sequences: Acquisition, Processing and Use (pp. 37–54). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Langacker, R.
(1988) A usage-based model. In B. Rudzka-Ostyn (Ed.), Topics in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 127–161). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Crossref link
(2000) A dynamic usage-based model. In M. Barlow & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Usage-Based Models of Language (pp. 1–63). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Larner, S.
(2014) A preliminary investigation into the use of fixed formulaic sequences as a marker of authorship. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 21(1), 1–22. Crossref link
Love, H.
(2002) Attributing Authorship: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Luyckx, K., & Daelemans, W.
(2011) The effect of author set size and data size in authorship attribution. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 26(1), 35–55. Crossref link
Mikros, G.
(2012) Authorship attribution and gender identification in Greek blogs. In I. Obradovic, E. Kelih & Reinhard Köhler (Eds.), Methods and Applications of Quantitative Linguistics (pp. 21–32). University of Belgrade: Academic Mind.
Mollin, S.
(2009) ‘I entirely understand’ is a Blairism: The methodology of identifying idiolectal collocations. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 14(3), 367–392. Crossref link
Nattinger, J. R., & DeCarrico, J.
(1992) Lexical Phrases and Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nini, A., & Grant, T.
(2013) Bridging the gap between stylistic and cognitive approaches to authorship analysis using Systemic Functional Linguistics and multidimensional analysis. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 20(2), 173–202.
Sanderson, C., & Guenter, S.
(2006) Short text authorship attribution via sequence kernels, Markov chains and author unmasking: An investigation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Engineering (pp. 482–491). Morristown, NJ: Association for Computational Linguistics.
Schmid, H-J.
(2016) A framework for understanding linguistic entrenchment and its psychological foundations. In H-J. Schmid (Ed.), Entrenchment and the Psychology of Language Learning: How We Reorganize and Adapt Linguistic Knowledge (pp. 9–36). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Schmitt, N., Grandage, S., & Adolphs, S.
(2004) Are corpus-derived recurrent clusters psycholinguistically valid? In N. Schmitt (Ed.) Formulaic Sequences: Acquisition, Processing and Use (pp. 12–151). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Scott, M.
(2008) WordSmith Tool (Version 5) [Computer software]. Liverpool: Lexical Analysis Software.
Sinclair, J. M.
(1991) Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stamatatos, E.
(2009) A survey of modern authorship attribution methods. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(3), 538–556. Crossref link
(2013) On the robustness of authorship attribution based on character n-gram features. Journal of Law and Policy, 21(2), 421–440.
Svartvik, J.
(1968) The Evans Statements: A case for Forensic Linguistics. Gotëborg: University of Gothenburg Press.
Turell, M. T., & Gavaldà, N.
(2013) Towards an index of idiolectal similitude (or distance) in forensic authorship analysis. Journal of Law and Policy, 21(2), 495–514.
Woolls, D.
(2013) CFL Jaccard n-gram Lexical Evaluator (Jangle) (Version 2) [Computer software]. CFL Software Limited. Retrieved from http://​www​.cflsoftware​.com/ (last accessed January 2017).
Wray, A.
(2002) Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
(2008) Formulaic Language: Pushing the Boundaries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wright, D.
(2013) Stylistic variation within genre conventions in the Enron email corpus: Developing a text-sensitive methodology for authorship research. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 20(1): 45–75. Crossref link
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Beom-mo Kang
2017. Morpheme N-grams and Lexical Frames. EONEOHAG null:79  pp. 3 ff. Crossref logo
Deviterne-Lapeyre, Capitaine Marie
2020. Interpol review of questioned documents 2016–2019. Forensic Science International: Synergy Crossref logo
Evans, Mel & Alan Hogarth
2020. Stylistic palimpsests: Computational stylistic perspectives on precursory authorship in Aphra Behn’s drama. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities Crossref logo
Fonteyn, Lauren & Andrea Nini
2020. Individuality in syntactic variation: An investigation of the seventeenth-century gerund alternation. Cognitive Linguistics 31:2  pp. 279 ff. Crossref logo
Grant, Tim & Nicci MacLeod
2020.  In Language and Online Identities, Crossref logo
Grieve, Jack, Isobelle Clarke, Emily Chiang, Hannah Gideon, Annina Heini, Andrea Nini & Emily Waibel
2019. Attributing the Bixby Letter using n-gram tracing. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 34:3  pp. 493 ff. Crossref logo
Sharon Belvisi, Nicole Mariah, Naveed Muhammad & Fernando Alonso-Fernandez
2020.  In 2020 8th International Workshop on Biometrics and Forensics (IWBF),  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Vetchinnikova, Svetlana
2019.  In Phraseology and the Advanced Language Learner, Crossref logo
Yang, Yang, Wu Youyou & Brian Uzzi
2020. Estimating the deep replicability of scientific findings using human and artificial intelligence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117:20  pp. 10762 ff. Crossref logo
Zhao, Yunqi, Igor Borovikov, Fernando de Mesentier Silva, Ahmad Beirami, Jason Rupert, Caedmon Somers, Jesse Harder, John Kolen, Jervis Pinto, Reza Pourabolghasem, James Pestrak, Harold Chaput, Mohsen Sardari, Long Lin, Sundeep Narravula, Navid Aghdaie & Kazi Zaman
2020. Winning Is Not Everything: Enhancing Game Development With Intelligent Agents. IEEE Transactions on Games 12:2  pp. 199 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 june 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.