Review published In:
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics
Vol. 6:2 (2001) ► pp.339359
Biber, D.
1988Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Channell, J.
1994Vague Language. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J.
1992 “ ‘Corpus Linguistics’ or ‘Corpus-aided armchair linguistics’.” Svartvik, J. (ed.), Directions in Corpus Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Firth, J.
1957Papers in Linguistics. London: OUP.Google Scholar
Francis, G. and S. Hunston
1996Grammar Patterns 1: Verbs. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Fries, C.
1952The Structure of English: An Introduction to the Construction of English Sentences. Harcourt, Brace & Company: New York.Google Scholar
Huddleston, R.
1965 “Rank and Depth.” Language 411: 574–586. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hunston, S. and G. Francis
1998Grammar Patterns 2: Nouns and Adjectives. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O.
1909–1949A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles I–VII1. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Quirk, R., S. Greenbaum, G. Leech and J. Svartvik
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J.
1989 “Uncommonly common words”. M. Tickoo (ed.), Learners’ Dictionaries: State of the Art SEAMEO Regional Language Centre, Singapore. Republished as Chapter 6 of Corpus, Concordance, Collocation 1991 Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
1999 “A way with common words”. Hasselga°rd, Hilde and Signe Oksefjell (eds.), Out of Corpus: Studies in Honour of Stig Johansson. Studies in Practical Linguistics 261: 157–175. Amsterdam/Atlanta: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. et al.
1990Collins Cobuild English Grammar. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J., P. Hanks et al.
1987Collins Cobuild English Language Dictionary. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Tognini Bonelli, E.
2001Corpus Linguistics at work. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zagrebelsky, M. T. P.
2001 “Review of The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English . S. Nuccuroni (ed.), Studi Italiani di Linguistica Teroica e Applicata. Volume 2(1), 327–334.Google Scholar
Zipf, G.
1935The Psychobiology of Language. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 11 other publications

Cheng, Winnie, Martin Warren & Xu Xun-feng
2003. The language learner as language researcher: putting corpus linguistics on the timetable. System 31:2  pp. 173 ff. DOI logo
Freitas, Ana Luiza Pires de
2020. The spread of Brazilian science through the advancement of written proficiency in English: a matter that cannot be postponed. Jornal Brasileiro de Doenças Sexualmente Transmissíveis 32 DOI logo
Ivaska, Ilmari
2015. Longitudinal changes in academic learner Finnish. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 1:2  pp. 210 ff. DOI logo
Izre'el, Shlomo
2018. Unipartite clauses. In Afroasiatic [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 339],  pp. 235 ff. DOI logo
Izre'el, Shlomo
2022. The syntax of existential constructions. Journal of Speech Sciences 11  pp. e022001 ff. DOI logo
Izre'el, Shlomo
2022. The syntax of existential constructions. Journal of Speech Sciences 11  pp. e022002 ff. DOI logo
Rizvić-Eminović, Edina & Đelaludina Šukalić
Sardinha, Antonio P. Berber
2003. Uso de corpora na formação de tradutores. DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada 19:spe  pp. 43 ff. DOI logo
Sewbihon-Getie, Addisu
2021. The Effectiveness of Using the Lexical Approach to Developing Ethiopian EFL Learners’ Vocabulary Competence. HOW 28:1  pp. 69 ff. DOI logo
Zhukovska, Victoria
2021. INTERPRETING DETACHED CONSTRUCTIONS WITH EXPLICIT SUBJECT THROUGH THE PRISM OF RELATED TERMS. Germanic Philology Journal of Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University :831-832  pp. 48 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.