This paper is concerned with the question of which factors govern prenominal adjective order (AO) in English. In particular, the analysis aims to overcome shortfalls of previous analyses by, firstly, adopting a multifactorial approach integrating all variables postulated in the literature, thereby doing justice to the well-established fact that cognitive and psychological processes are multivariate and complex. Secondly, the phenomenon is investigated on the basis of a large corpus, rendering the results obtained more representative and valid of naturally occurring language than those of previous studies. To this end, corpus-linguistic operationalizations of phonological, syntactic, semantic and pragmatic determinants of AO are devised and entered into a Linear Discriminant Analysis, which determines the relative influence of all variables (semantic variables being most important) and yields a classification accuracy of 78%. Moreover, by means of the operationalizations developed in this analysis, the ordering of yet unanalyzed adjective strings can be predicted with about equal accuracy (73.5%).
2010. Linguistics from the Perspective of the Theory of Models in Empirical Sciences: From Formal to Corpus Linguistics. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 40:4 ► pp. 379 ff.
Hampe, Beate
2011. Discovering constructions by means of collostruction analysis: The English Denominative Construction. cogl 22:2 ► pp. 211 ff.
He, Qingshun
2020. A Corpus-based Study of Transfers in English Nominal Groups. Glottotheory 10:1-2 ► pp. 57 ff.
2022. Determining the cognitive biases behind a viral linguistic universal: the order of multiple adjectives. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 9:1
Leivada, Evelina & Marit Westergaard
2019. Universal linguistic hierarchies are not innately wired. Evidence from multiple adjectives. PeerJ 7 ► pp. e7438 ff.
Liu, Zoey
2022. A multifactorial approach to crosslinguistic constituent orderings. Linguistics Vanguard 0:0
Mitchell, Margaret
2010. A Flexible Approach to Class-Based Ordering of Prenominal Modifiers. In Empirical Methods in Natural Language Generation [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5790], ► pp. 141 ff.
Nelken, Rani
2009. On the Ontological Nature of Syntactic Categories in Categorial Grammar. In Languages: From Formal to Natural [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5533], ► pp. 170 ff.
Panther, Klaus-Uwe
2022. Attribute transfer. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 20:1 ► pp. 130 ff.
Saba, Walid S.
2008. Concerning Olga, the Beautiful Little Street Dancer: Adjectives as Higher-Order Polymorphic Functions. In KI 2008: Advances in Artificial Intelligence [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5243], ► pp. 300 ff.
Scontras, Gregory
2023. Adjective Ordering Across Languages. Annual Review of Linguistics 9:1 ► pp. 357 ff.
Scontras, Gregory, Judith Degen & Noah D. Goodman
2017. Subjectivity Predicts Adjective Ordering Preferences. Open Mind 1:1 ► pp. 53 ff.
Spike, Matthew
2017. The evolution of linguistic rules. Biology & Philosophy 32:6 ► pp. 887 ff.
Trainin, Nitzan & Einat Shetreet
2021. It's a dotted blue big star: on adjective ordering in a post-nominal language. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 36:3 ► pp. 320 ff.
Trainin, Nitzan & Einat Shetreet
2023. Subjectivity predicts adjective ordering preferences in Hebrew, but lexical factors matter too. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience► pp. 1 ff.
Trotzke, Andreas & Eva Wittenberg
2019. Long-standing issues in adjective order and corpus evidence for a multifactorial approach. Linguistics 57:2 ► pp. 273 ff.
Vandekerckhove, Bram, Dominiek Sandra & Walter Daelemans
2013. Selective impairment of adjective order constraints as overeager abstraction: An elaboration on Kemmerer et al. (2009). Journal of Neurolinguistics 26:1 ► pp. 46 ff.
Vandekerckhove, Bram, Dominiek Sandra & Walter Daelemans
2015. Effects of online abstraction on adjective order preferences. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 30:7 ► pp. 816 ff.
Westbury, Chris
2021. Prenominal adjective order is such a fat big deal because adjectives are ordered by likely need. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 28:1 ► pp. 122 ff.
2013. The Mechanism of the Form-Content Correlation Process in the Paradigm of Socio-Natural Sciences. In Perspectives on Linguistic Pragmatics [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 2], ► pp. 469 ff.
Zielińska, Dorota
2016. Linguistic research in the empirical paradigm as outlined by Mario Bunge. SpringerPlus 5:1
Zielińska, Dorota
2019. The Field Model of Language and Free Enrichment. In Further Advances in Pragmatics and Philosophy: Part 2 Theories and Applications [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 20], ► pp. 239 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.