Article published in:
International Journal of Learner Corpus Research
Vol. 1:1 (2015) ► pp. 96129
References

References

Agresti, A.
2002An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis 2. New York: John Wiley & Sons. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K.
2000Tense and Aspect in Second Language Acquisition: Form, Meaning and Use. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bley-Vroman, R.
1989 “What is the logical problem of foreign language learning?”. In S.M. Gass and J. Schachter (Eds.), Linguistic Perspectives on Second Language Acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press, 41–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Church, K.W. & Hanks, P.
1990 “Word association norms, mutual information, and lexicography”, Computational Linguistics 16(1), 22–29.Google Scholar
Clark, S. & Curran, J.R.
2007 “Wide-coverage efficient statistical parsing with CCG and log-linear models”, Computational Linguistics 33(4), 493–552. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Council of Europe
2001Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
de Bot, K., Lowie, W. & Verspoor, M.H.
(Eds.) 2011A Dynamic Approach to Second Language Development. Methods and Techniques. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R.M.
2005 “What makes learning second language grammar difficult? A review of issues”, Language Learning 55, S1, 1–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dulay, H., Burt, M. & Krashen, S.
1982Language Two. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, N.C.
2010 “Construction learning as category learning”. In M. Pütz & L. Sicola (Eds.), Cognitive Processing and Second Language Acquisition: Inside the Learner’s Mind. John Benjamins, 27–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Feldweg, H.
1991The European Science Foundation Second Language Database. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.Google Scholar
Fillmore, L.W.
1979 “Individual differences in second language acquisition”. In C. Fillmore, D. Kempler & W.S.-Y. Wang (Eds.), Individual Differences in Language Ability and Language Behavior. New York: Academic Press, 203–228. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Flynn, S., Foley, C. & Vinnitskaya, I.
2004 “The cumulative enhancement model for language acquisition: comparing adults’ and children’s patterns of development in first, second and third language acquisition of relative clauses”, The International Journal of Multilingualism 1(1), 3–16. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Geertzen, J., Alexopoulou, T., Baker, R., Hendriks, H., Jiang, S. & Korhonen, A.
2013aThe EF Cambridge Open Language Database (EFCAMDAT): User Manual Part I: Writtings. Available at http://​corpus​.mml​.cam​.ac​.uk​/EFCAMDAT​/EFCAMDATUserManualv02​.pdf. (accessed 19 November 2014).
Geertzen, J., Alexopoulou, T. & Korhonen, A.
2013b “Automatic linguistic annotation of large scale L2 databases: The EF-Cambridge Open Language Database (EFCAMDAT)”. In R.T. Miller, K.I. Martin, C.M. Eddingon, A. Henery, N. Marcos Miguel, A.M. Tseng, A. Tuninetti & D. Walter (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Second Language Research Forum (SLRF), Carnegie Mellon. Cascadilla Proceedings Project, 240–254.Google Scholar
Granger, S.
1998Learner English on Computer. London: Longman.Google Scholar
2008 “Learner corpora”. In A. Lüdeling & M. Kytö (Eds.), Corpus Linguistics. An International Handbook. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter, 259–275.Google Scholar
Granger, S., Dagneaux, E. & Meunier, F.
2002International Corpus of Learner English. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
Granger, S., Dagneaux, E., Meunier, F. & Paquot, M.
2009International Corpus of Learner English. Version 2 (Handbook + CD-ROM). Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
Granger, S., Kraif, O., Ponton, C., Antoniadis, G. & Zampa, V.
2007 “Integrating learner corpora and natural language processing: A crucial step towards reconciling technological sophistication and pedagogical effectiveness”, ReCaLL 19(3), 252–268. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hockenmaier, J. & Steedman, M.
2007 “CCGbank: a corpus of CCG derivations and dependency structures extracted from the Penn Treebank”, Computational Linguistics 33(3), 355–396. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lardiere, D.
1998 “Dissociating syntax from morphology in a divergent L2 end-state grammar”, Second Language Research 14(4), 359–375. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lozano, C. & Mendikoetxea, A.
2013 “Learner corpora and second language acquisition: The design and collection of CEDEL2”. In N. Ballier, A. Díaz-Negrillo & P. Thompson (Eds.), Automatic Treatment and Analysis of Learner Corpus Data. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 65–100. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meunier, F. and Littré, D.
2013 “Tracking learners’ progress: adopting a dual corpus cum experimental data approach”, Modern Language Journal 97, 61–76. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meurers, D.
2009 “On the automatic analysis of learner language”, CALICO Journal 26(3), 469–473.Google Scholar
Miller, G.A.
1995 “WordNet: a lexical database for English”, Communications of the ACM 38(11), 39–41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Murakami, A.
2013L1 Influence and Individual Variation in the L2 Accuracy Development of Grammatical Morphemes: Insights from Learner Corpora. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge, UK.
Myles, F.
2008 “Investigating learner language development with electronic longitudinal corpora: Theoretical and methodological issues”. In L. Ortega and H. Byrnes (Eds.), The longitudinal Study of Advanced L2 Capacities. New York and London: Routledge, 58–72.Google Scholar
2012 “Complexity, accuracy and fluency; the role played by formulaic sequencies in early interlanguage development”. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 Performance and Proficiency: Complexity, Accuracy and Fluency in SLA, Language Learning & Language Teaching. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 71–94. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Myles, F. & Mitchell, R.
2007French learner language oral corpora (FLLOC). Available at http://​www​.flloc​.soton​.ac​.uk/ (accessed 19 November 2014).
O’Donnell, M.B., Römer, U. & Ellis, N.C.
2013 “The development of formulaic sequences in first and second language writing: investigating effects of frequency, association and native form”, International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 18(1), 83–108. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Orasan, C. & Evans, R.
2007 “NP animacy identification for anaphora resolution”, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 29, 79–103.Google Scholar
Ortega, L.
2009Understanding Second Language Acquisition. London: Hodder Education/Routledge.Google Scholar
Paquot, M.
2013 “Lexical bundles and L1 transfer effects”, International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 18(13), 391–417. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perdue, C.
1993Adult Language Acquisition: Volume I: Field Methods. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rimell, L., Clark, S. & Steedman, M.
2009 “Unbounded dependency recovery for parser evaluation”. In Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: Volume 2. Association for Computational Linguistics, 813–821. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P. and Ellis, N.C.
2008Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schachter, J.
1974 “An error in error analysis”, Language Learning 24, 205–214. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Selinker, L.
1972 “Interlanguage”, International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 10(1–4), 209–232. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shirai, Y. & Ozeki, H.
2007 “Introduction to the special issue: The acquisition of relative clauses and the noun phrase accessibility hierarchy: a universal in SLA?”, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 29, 55–167. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, J.
2005 “How to build a corpus”. In M. Wynne (Ed.), Developing Linguistic Corpora: A Guide to Good Practice, Oxford: Oxbow Books, 79–83.Google Scholar
Steedman, M.
2000The Syntactic Process. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tavakoli, P. & Foster, P.
2008 “Task design and second language performance: the effect of narrative type on learner output”, Language Learning 58(2), 439–473. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Team, R.C.
2008R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Tizón-Couto, B.
2013Clausal Complements in Native and Learner Spoken English. A Corpus-based Study with LINDSEI and VICOLSE. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Vyatkina, N.
2012 “The development of second language writing complexity in groups and individuals: A longitudinal learner corpus study”, The Modern Language Journal 96, 576–598. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
White, L.
1989Universal Grammar and Second Language Acquisition. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wray, A.
2002Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wulff, S., Ellis, N.C., Römer, U., Bardovi-Harlig, K. & LeBlanc, C.
2009 “The acquisition of tense-aspect: Converging evidence from corpora and telicity readings”, Modern Language Journal 93, 354–369. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wulff, S., Lester, N. & Martinez-Garcia, M.T.
2014 “ That-variation in German and Spanish L2 English”, Language and Cognition 6, 271–299. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 12 other publications

Alexopoulou, Theodora, Marije Michel, Akira Murakami & Detmar Meurers
2017. Task Effects on Linguistic Complexity and Accuracy: A Large-Scale Learner Corpus Analysis Employing Natural Language Processing Techniques. Language Learning 67:S1  pp. 180 ff. Crossref logo
Azazil, Lina
2020. Frequency effects in the L2 acquisition of the catenative verb construction – evidence from experimental and corpus data . Cognitive Linguistics 31:3  pp. 417 ff. Crossref logo
Chen, Xiaobin, Theodora Alexopoulou & Ianthi Tsimpli
2021. Automatic extraction of subordinate clauses and its application in second language acquisition research. Behavior Research Methods 53:2  pp. 803 ff. Crossref logo
Garner, James R.
2016. A phrase-frame approach to investigating phraseology in learner writing across proficiency levels. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 2:1  pp. 31 ff. Crossref logo
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle
2020.  In A Practical Handbook of Corpus Linguistics,  pp. 283 ff. Crossref logo
Meurers, Detmar & Markus Dickinson
2017. Evidence and Interpretation in Language Learning Research: Opportunities for Collaboration With Computational Linguistics. Language Learning 67:S1  pp. 66 ff. Crossref logo
Murakami, Akira
2016. Modeling Systematicity and Individuality in Nonlinear Second Language Development: The Case of English Grammatical Morphemes. Language Learning 66:4  pp. 834 ff. Crossref logo
Römer, Ute
2019. A corpus perspective on the development of verb constructions in second language learners. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 24:3  pp. 268 ff. Crossref logo
Römer, Ute & Cynthia M. Berger
2019. OBSERVING THE EMERGENCE OF CONSTRUCTIONAL KNOWLEDGE. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 41:5  pp. 1089 ff. Crossref logo
Shatz, Itamar
2020. Refining and modifying the EFCAMDAT. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 6:2  pp. 220 ff. Crossref logo
Vyatkina, Nina
2016. The Kansas Developmental Learner corpus (KANDEL). International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 2:1  pp. 101 ff. Crossref logo
Zalaltdinova, Liya
2018. “Stop doing this at once!”: The preferred use of modality for advice-giving by English language learners. Intercultural Pragmatics 15:3  pp. 349 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 august 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.