Article published in:
International Journal of Learner Corpus Research
Vol. 4:1 (2018) ► pp. 122
References
Abudalbuh, M.
2012Ideology, Gender Roles, and Pronominal Choice: A Sociolinguistic Analysis of the Use of English Third Person Generic Pronouns by Native Speakers of Arabic. Unpublished PhD Thesis. University of Kansas, Lawrence.Google Scholar
American Psychological Association
2009Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Antón-Méndez, I.
2009 “Gender bender: Gender errors in L2 pronoun production”, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 391, 119–139. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 “Whose? L2-English speakers’ possessive pronoun gender errors”, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 14(3), 318–331. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baranowski, M.
2002 “Current usage of the epicene pronoun in written English”, Journal of Sociolinguistics 6(3), 378–397. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baron, D.
1981 “The epicene pronoun: The word that failed”, American Speech 56(2), 83–97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Finegan, E., Johansson, S., Conrad, S. & Leech, G.
1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Bodine, A.
1975 “Androcentrism in prescriptive grammar: Singular ‘they’, sex-indefinite ‘he’, and ‘he or she’”, Language in Society 4(2), 129–146. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bußmann, H. & Hellinger, M.
(Eds.) 2001Gender across Languages: The Linguistic Representation of Women and Men. Volume 11. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
(Eds.) 2002Gender across Languages: The Linguistic Representation of Women and Men. Volume 21. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
(Eds.) 2003Gender across Languages: The Linguistic Representation of Women and Men. Volume 31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Centre for English Corpus Linguistics
2016: online. The Louvain Corpus of Native English Essays (LOCNESS). Available at: https://​uclouvain​.be​/en​/research​-institutes​/ilc​/cecl​/locness​.html (accessed June 2017).
Corbett, G.
1991Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Curzan, A.
2003Gender Shifts in the History of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014Fixing English: Prescriptivism and Language History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gerner, J.
2000 “Singular and plural anaphors of indefinite personal pronouns in spoken British English”. In Kirk, J. (Ed.), Corpora Galore: Analyses and Techniques in Describing English. Papers from the Nineteenth International Conference of English Language Research on Computerised Corpora (ICAME 1998). Amsterdam: Rodopi, 93–114.Google Scholar
Granger, S., Dagneaux, E., Meunier, F., & Paquot, M.
(Eds.) 2009The International Corpus of Learner English. Version 2 (Handbook + CD-ROM). Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
Gygax, P., Gabriel, U., Sarrasin, O., Oakhill, J., & Garnham, A.
2008 “Generically intended, but specifically interpreted: When beauticians, musicians, and mechanics are all men”, Language and Cognitive Processes 23(3), 464–485. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hellinger, M. & Motschenbacher, H.
(Eds.) 2015Gender across Languages: The Linguistic Representation of Women and Men. Volume 41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Henley, N. & Abueg, J.
2003 “A review and synthesis of research on comprehension of the masculine as a generic form in English”, Estudios de Sociolinguistica: Linguas, Sociedades e Culturas 4(2), 427–454.Google Scholar
Huddleston, R. & Pullum, G. K.
2002The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laitinen, M.
2007Agreement Patterns in English: Diachronic Corpus Studies on Common-Number Pronouns. Helsinki, Finland: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Lee, J.
2007 “Acceptability of sexist language among young people in Hong Kong”, Sex Roles 561, 285–195. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meyers, M.
1990 “Current generic pronoun usage: An empirical study”, American Speech 65(3), 228–237. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, F.
1994 “Student writing and pronoun reference: A study of inclusive language in practice”, Women and Language 17(2), 2–6.Google Scholar
Newman, M.
1992 “Pronominal disagreements: The stubborn problem of singular epicene antecedents”, Language in Society 21(3), 447–475. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1998 “What can pronouns tell us? A case study of English epicenes”, Studies in Language 22(2), 353–389. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paterson, L.
2011 “Epicene pronouns in UK national newspapers: A diachronic study”, ICAME Journal 351, 171–184.Google Scholar
2014British Pronoun Use, Prescription, and Processing. Linguistic and Social Influences Affecting ‘They’ and ‘He’. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Pauwels, A.
2001 “Non-sexist language reform and generic pronouns in Australian English”, English World-Wide 22(1), 105–119. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, R. Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J.
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Svenska Akademiens ordlista över svenska språket
(SAOL) 2015 14th edition. Stockholm: Svenska Akademien.Google Scholar
Scott, M.
2008WordSmith Tools. Version 5. Liverpool: Lexical Analysis Software.Google Scholar
Zuber, S. & Reed, A.
1993 “The politics of grammar handbooks”, College English 55(5), 515–530. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

Liu, Dilin
2018. A corpus study of Chinese EFL learners’ use of circumstance, demand, and significant . Journal of Second Language Studies 1:2  pp. 310 ff. Crossref logo
Paterson, Laura L.
2020. Non-sexist Language Policy and the Rise (and Fall?) of Combined Pronouns in British and American Written English. Journal of English Linguistics 48:3  pp. 258 ff. Crossref logo
Stormbom, Charlotte
2019. Language change in L2 academic writing: The case of epicene pronouns. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 38  pp. 95 ff. Crossref logo
Stormbom, Charlotte
2020. Gendering in open access research articles: The role of epicene pronouns. English for Specific Purposes 60  pp. 193 ff. Crossref logo
Stormbom, Charlotte
2020. Singular they in English as a foreign language. Applied Linguistics Review 0:0 Crossref logo
Zhang, Xiufeng & Hengwen Yang
2021. Gender voices in Chinese university students’ English writing: A corpus study. Linguistics and Education 64  pp. 100935 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.