Cover not available
Article published In:
Corpus-based Approaches to Spoken L2 Production: Evidence from the Trinity Lancaster Corpus
Edited by Vaclav Brezina, Dana Gablasova and Tony McEnery
[International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 5:2] 2019
► pp. 207–230

The development of verb constructions in spoken learner English

Tracing effects of usage and proficiency

| Georgia State University
| University of Florida
Based on datasets of L1 Italian and Spanish learner language culled from the Trinity Lancaster Corpus Sample, this paper investigates how verb-argument constructions (VACs) develop in the spoken English of L2 learners across proficiency levels. In addition to proficiency and L1 effects, we focus on the potential influence of native English usage on learner VAC production. Insights into learners’ productive knowledge of five target VACs and the verbs used in those VACs are gained through (1) comparisons of normalized entropy scores for verbs in VACs; (2) correlation analyses comparing for each VAC the verbs produced by groups of learners and by native English speakers; and (3) regression analyses comparing learner verb-VAC associations against indices of VAC usage, including verb-VAC frequency, VAC-verb association strength and contingency. Results indicate that, across L1 backgrounds, more proficient learners are more productive in their VAC use and closer to patterns in L1 English usage than less proficient learners.
Keywords: second language development, Construction Grammar, usage-based SLA, L1 Italian and Spanish learners, frequency effects
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction and background
  • 2.Data and methods
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1Distribution of verbs in VACs across TLCS subsets
    • 3.2Learner verb constructions across proficiency levels and L1s
    • 3.3Effects of L1 usage on learner verb construction development
      • 3.3.1Correlations
      • 3.3.2Regression analysis
  • 4.Conclusion and outlook
  • References
Published online: 24 September 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.17015.rom
References (24)
References
Ambridge, B. & Lieven, E. 2015. “A constructivist account of child language acquisition”. In B. MacWhinney & O’Grady, W. (Eds.), The Handbook of Language Emergence. Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 478–510.Google Scholar
Burnard, L. 2007. Reference Guide for the British National Corpus (XML edition). Retrieved from: <[URL]>
Bybee, J. 2010. Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Council of Europe. 2001. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eeg-Olofsson, M. & Altenberg, B. 1994. “Discontinuous recurrent word combinations in the London-Lund Corpus”. In U. Fries, G. Tottie, & P. Schneider (Eds.), Creating and Using English Language Corpora: Papers from the Fourteenth International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 63–77.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. & Ferreira-Junior, F. 2009. “Constructions and their acquisition: Islands and the distinctiveness of their occupancy”. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 71, 188–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C. & O’Donnell, M. B. 2014. “Construction learning as category learning: A cognitive analysis”. In T. Herbst, H. J. Schmid & S. Faulhaber (Eds.), Constructions Collocations Patterns. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 71–97.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C., O’Donnell, M. B. & Römer, U. 2014. “Second language processing of verb-argument constructions is sensitive to form, function, frequency, contingency, and prototypicality”. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 4(4), 405–431. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C., Römer, U. & O’Donnell, M. B. 2016. Usage-based Approaches to Language Acquisition and Processing: Cognitive and Corpus Investigations of Construction Grammar. Malden MA: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Eskildsen, S. W. 2009. “Constructing another language: Usage-based linguistics in second language acquisition”. Applied Linguistics 30(3), 335–357. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012. “L2 negation constructions at work”. Language Learning 62(2), 335–372. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eskildsen, S. W. & Cadierno, T. 2007. “Are recurring multi-word expressions really syntactic freezes? Second language acquisition from the perspective of usage-based linguistics”. In M. Nenonen & S. Niemi (Eds.), Collocations and Idioms 1. Papers from the First Nordic Conference on Syntactic Freezes. Joensuu: Joensuu University Press, 86–99.Google Scholar
Gablasova, D., Brezina, V., McEnery, T. & Boyd, E. 2015. “Epistemic stance in spoken L2 English: The effect of task and speaker style”. Applied Linguistics Advanced Access. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A. E. 1995. Constructions. A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2003. “Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language”. Trends in Cognitive Science 71, 219–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, S. T. & Ellis, N. C. 2015. “Statistical measures for usage-based linguistics”. Language Learning 65(S1), 228–255. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kilgarriff, A., Baisa, V., Bušta, J., Jakubíček, M., Kovář, V., Michelfeit, J. & Suchomel, V. 2014. “The Sketch Engine: Ten years on”. Lexicography 1(1), 7–36.Google Scholar
Kumar, U., Kumar, V. & Kapur, J. N. 1986. “Normalized measures of entropy”. International Journal of General Systems 12(1), 55–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, P., Eskildsen, S. W. & Cadierno, T. 2014. “Tracing an L2 learner’s motion constructions over time: A usage-based classroom investigation”. The Modern Language Journal 981, 612–628. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Römer, U., O’Donnell, M. B. & Ellis, N. C. 2014. “Second language learner knowledge of verb-argument constructions: Effects of language transfer and typology”. The Modern Language Journal 98(4), 952–975. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Römer, U., Roberson, A., O’Donnell, M. B. & Ellis, N. C. 2014. “Linking learner corpus and experimental data in studying second language learners’ knowledge of verb-argument constructions”. ICAME Journal 381, 59–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Römer, U., Skalicky, S. & Ellis, N. C. 2018. “Verb-argument constructions in advanced L2 English learner production: Insights from corpora and verbal fluency tasks”. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory. Advanced online access. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. 2003. Constructing a Language. A Usage-based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Trousdale, G. & Hoffmann, T. (Eds.). 2013. Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (12)

Cited by 12 other publications

Huang, Jinyun
2024. A Systematic Study of Intercultural Listening Strategies in Higher Education Institutions in the Context of Big Data. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences 9:1 DOI logo
Liu, Yingying & Xiaofei Lu
2024. Development of verb argument constructions in L2 English learners: A close replication of research question 3 in Römer and Berger (2019). Studies in Second Language Acquisition ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Park, Ji-Hyun & Min-Chang Sung
2024. Expansion of verb-argument construction repertoires in L2 English writing. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 62:2 ► pp. 903 ff. DOI logo
Römer-Barron, Ute
2024. How do constructions with modal verbs develop in second language learners of English?. Journal of Second Language Studies DOI logo
Wang, Gui, Hui Wang & Li Wang
2024. Exploring the Development of Progressive Construction in Chinese and Japanese EFL Writing: A Usage‐Based Approach. TESOL Quarterly DOI logo
Kim, Hyunwoo & Eunseok Ro
2023. Assessment of sentence sophistication in L2 spoken production: Expansion of verbs and argument structure constructions. System 119 ► pp. 103175 ff. DOI logo
Casal, J. Elliott, Yasuhiro Shirai & Xiaofei Lu
2022. English verb-argument construction profiles in a specialized academic corpus: Variation by genre and discipline. English for Specific Purposes 66 ► pp. 94 ff. DOI logo
Du, Hang
2022. Grammatical and lexical development during study abroad: Research on a corpus of spoken L2 Chinese. Foreign Language Annals 55:4 ► pp. 985 ff. DOI logo
Paquot, Magali, Dana Gablasova, Vaclav Brezina & Hubert Naets
2022. Phraseological complexity in EFL learners’ spoken production across proficiency levels. In Complexity, Accuracy and Fluency in Learner Corpus Research [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 104], ► pp. 115 ff. DOI logo
Römer, Ute
2022. Applied corpus linguistics for language acquisition, pedagogy, and beyond. Language Teaching 55:2 ► pp. 233 ff. DOI logo
Wu, Tianqi & Min Wang
2022. Development of the progressive construction in Chinese EFL learners’ written production: From prototypes to marginal members. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 18:2 ► pp. 307 ff. DOI logo
Yilmaz, Selahattin & Ute Römer
2020. A corpus-based exploration of constructions in written academic English as a lingua franca. In Advances in Corpus-based Research on Academic Writing [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 95], ► pp. 60 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.