Cover not available
Article published In:
Linguistic Innovations: Rethinking linguistic creativity in non-native Englishes
Edited by Sandra C. Deshors, Sandra Götz and Samantha Laporte
[International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 2:2] 2016
► pp. 151–176

“This hair-style called as ‘duck tail’”

The ‘intrusive as’-construction in South Asian varieties of English and Learner Englishes

 | Dresden University of Technology
This paper focuses on the ‘intrusive as’-construction in complex-transitive verb complementation which was so far only attested for Indian English. Our data show that ‘intrusive as’ is a common feature in South Asian Englishes generally, albeit to different degrees. Comparing the South Asian data with data from Learner Englishes allows to test several hypotheses concerning the origin of ‘intrusive as’; the most robust correlation within the data points to redundancy as a motivating factor for both ESL and EFL contexts.
Keywords: verb complementation, innovation, ‘intrusive as', Learner Englishes, South Asian Englishes, complex transitives
Published online: 20 October 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.2.2.02koc
References (48)
Bauer, L. 2001. Morphological Productivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bernaisch, T., Gries, S. Th. & Mukherjee, J. 2014. “The dative alternation in South Asian English(es): Modelling predictors and predicting prototypes”, English Word-Wide 35(1), 7–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bernaisch, T., Koch, C., Schilk, M. & Mukherjee, J. 2011. Manual to the South Asian Varieties of English (save) Corpus. Giessen: Justus Liebig University, Department of English.Google Scholar
Biewer, C. 2011. “Modal auxiliaries in second language varieties of English: A learner’s perspective”. In J. Mukherjee & M. Hundt (Eds.), Exploring Second-language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging a Paradigm Gap. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 7–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buchstaller, I. 2014. Quotatives. New Trends and Sociolinguistic Implications. Malden: Wiley.Google Scholar
Buschfeld, S. 2011. The English Language in Cyprus: An Empirical Investigation of Variety Status. PhD dissertation, University of Cologne.Google Scholar
. 2014. “English in Cyprus and Namibia: A critical approach to taxonomies and models of World Englishes and Second Language Acquisition research”. In S. Buschfeld, T. Hoffmann, M. Huber & A. Kautzsch (Eds.), The Evolution of Englishes. The Dynamic Model and beyond. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 181–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buschfeld, S. & Kautzsch, A. 2016. “Towards an integrated approach to postcolonial and non-postcolonial Englishes”, World Englishes. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. 1995. Morphology: A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. & Thompson, S. 2007. “Three frequency effects in syntax”. In J. Bybee (Ed.), Frequency of Use and the Organization of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 269–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deshors, S.C. 2014. “A case for a unified treatment of EFL and ESL: A multifactorial approach”, English World-Wide 35(3), 277–305. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Edwards, A. 2014. English in the Netherlands. Functions, Forms and Attitudes. PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Edwards, A. & Laporte, S. 2015. “Outer and expanding circle Englishes: The competing roles of norm orientation and proficiency levels”, English World-Wide 36(2), 135–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffin, R.C. 1934. “Some notes on Indian English”. In A.A. Goffin & R.C. Goffin (Eds.), S.P.E. Tract No. XLI. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 20–32.Google Scholar
Granger, S., Dagneaux, E., Meunier, F. & Paquot, M. (Eds.). 2009. International Corpus of Learner English. Version 2 (Handbook + CD-ROM). Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
Heaton, J.B. & Turton, N.D. 1997. Longman Dictionary of Common Errors. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Hock, H.H. 1982. “The Sanskrit quotative: A historical and comparative study”, Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 12(2), 39–85.Google Scholar
Hothorn, T., Hornik, K. & Zeileis, A. 2006. “Unbiased recursive partitioning: A conditional inference framework”, Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 15(3), 651–674. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, R. 2002. “The verb”. In R. Huddleston & G.K. Pullum (Eds.), The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language (CGEL). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 213–322. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, R. & Pullum, G.K. (Eds.). 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language (CGEL). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ishikawa, S. 2011. “A new horizon in learner corpus studies: The aim of the ICNALE project”. In G. Weir, S. Ishikawa & K. Poonpon (Eds.), Corpora and Language Technologies in Teaching, Learning and Research. Glasgow: University of Strathclyde Publishing, 3–11.Google Scholar
Kachru, B.B. 1985. “Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the outer circle”. In R. Quirk & H.G. Widdowson (Eds.), English in the World: Teaching and Learning the Language and Literatures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press for The British Council, 11–30.Google Scholar
. 1991. “Liberation linguistics and the Quirk concern”, English Today 25(1), 3–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kachru, Y. 1979. “The quotative in South Asian Languages”, South Asian Languages Analysis 11, 63–77.Google Scholar
Koch, C. & Bernaisch, T. 2013. “Verb complementation in South Asian English(es): The range and frequency of ‘new’ ditransitives”. In G. Andersen & K. Bech (Eds.), English Corpus Linguistics: Variation in Time, Space and Genre. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 69–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kornfilt, J. 1997. Turkish. Oxon and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lange, C. 2014. People call it as city of garden – tracing the ‘intrusive as’ construction in South Asian varieties of English. Paper presented at the 30th South Asian Languages Analysis Roundtable (SALA 30), University of Hyderabad/India, 6-8 February 2014.
. 2015. “The ‘intrusive as’-construction in South Asian varieties of English”, World Englishes 35(1), 133–146. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Lohmann, A. 2013. “Is tree hugging the way to go? Classification trees and random forests in linguistic study”, Views (Vienna English Working Papers) 221, 1–17. Available at: [URL] (accessed February 2016).Google Scholar
Matras, Y. & Sakel, J. 2007. “Investigating the mechanisms of pattern replication in language convergence”, Studies in Language 31(4), 829–865. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mukherjee, J. 2007. “Steady states in the evolution of New Englishes: Present-day Indian English as an equilibrium”, Journal of English Linguistics 35(2), 157–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nihalani, P., Tongue, R.K., Hosali, P. & Crowther, J. 2004. Indian and British English: A Handbook of Usage and Pronunciation. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Quirk, R. 1990. “Language varieties and standard language”, English Today 211, 3–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team. 2015. The R Project for Statistical Computing. Version 3.2.2. Available at: [URL] (accessed February 2016).Google Scholar
Rohdenburg, G. 1996. “Cognitive complexity and increased grammatical explicitness in English”, Cognitive Linguistics 7(2), 149–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schneider, E.W. 2007. Postcolonial English: Varieties around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. “Exploring the interface between World Englishes and Second Language Acquisition – and implications for English as a Lingua Franca”, Journal of English as a Lingua Franca 1(1), 57–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. “New reflections on the evolutionary dynamics of World Englishes”, World Englishes 33(1), 9–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Singh, R. 2007. “The nature, structure, and status of Indian English”. In R. Singh (Ed.), Annual Review of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 2007. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 33–46.Google Scholar
Smith-Pearse, T.L.H. 1968. The English Errors of Indian Students. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sridhar, S.N. 1992. “The ecology of bilingual competence: Language interaction in indigenized varieties of English”, World Englishes 11(2–3), 141–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, S. & Baayen, H. 2012. “Models, forests and trees of York English: Was/were variation as a case study for statistical practice”, Language Variation and Change 241, 135–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weinreich, U., Labov, W. & Herzog, M.I. 1968. “Empirical foundations for a theory of language change”. In W.P. Lehmann & Y. Malkiel (Eds.), Directions for Historical Linguistics: A Symposium. Austin and London: University of Texas Press, 97–195.Google Scholar
Williams, J. 1987. “Non-native varieties of English: A special case of language acquisition”, English World-Wide 8(2), 161–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yadurajan, K.S. 2001. Current English. A Guide for the User of English in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (10)

Cited by ten other publications

Leuckert, Sven, Claudia Lange, Tobias Bernaisch & Asya Yurchenko
2024. Indian Englishes in the Twenty-First Century, DOI logo
Schmidt, Karola
2024. The subjunctive alternation in Indian English. World Englishes DOI logo
Yurchenko, Asya, Sven Leuckert & Claudia Lange
2021. Comparing written Indian Englishes with the newCorpus of Regional Indian Newspaper Englishes(CORINNE). ICAME Journal 45:1 ► pp. 179 ff. DOI logo
Brato, Thorsten
2020. Noun phrase complexity in Ghanaian English. World Englishes 39:3 ► pp. 377 ff. DOI logo
Lange, Claudia & Sven Leuckert
2020. Tag Questions and Gender in Indian English. In Gender in World Englishes, ► pp. 69 ff. DOI logo
Schneider, Edgar W.
2020. CallingEnglishesAsComplex Dynamic Systems: Diffusion and Restructuring. In Language Change, ► pp. 15 ff. DOI logo
Buschfeld, Sarah
2019. Language Acquisition and World Englishes. In The Cambridge Handbook of World Englishes, ► pp. 559 ff. DOI logo
Lange, Claudia
2019. English in South Asia. In The Cambridge Handbook of World Englishes, ► pp. 236 ff. DOI logo
GUT, ULRIKE & ROBERT FUCHS
2017. Exploring speaker fluency with phonologically annotated ICE corpora. World Englishes 36:3 ► pp. 387 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Corpora, Constructions, New Englishes [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 100], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.