Cover not available
Article published In:
Linguistic Innovations: Rethinking linguistic creativity in non-native Englishes
Edited by Sandra C. Deshors, Sandra Götz and Samantha Laporte
[International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 2:2] 2016
► pp. 252–277

In case of innovation

Academic phraseology in the Three Circles

| Independent scholar
| Erasmus University Rotterdam
This paper addresses the equivalence often drawn between labels such as ESL, New Englishes and Outer Circle on the one hand, and between EFL, Learner Englishes and Expanding Circle on the other. It argues that this mapping takes insufficient account of both intra-varietal variation and inter-varietal similarities. We compare the two non-native varietal types with each other and with native English on the basis of ‘user’ data from the International Corpus of English and the Corpus of Dutch English, focusing on three-word clusters in academic writing. Quantitative analyses reveal no clear grouping per circle, but rather a regional East Africa grouping. Case studies of four specific clusters (in case of, due to the, the fact that and the other hand) mostly show a native/non-native divide. Characteristics of both ESL and EFL, including innovative processes as well as learner strategies, are shown to be at play in the Outer and Expanding Circle alike. The findings are consistent with the notion of neither a strict divide between varietal types, nor a continuum.
Keywords: non-native innovation, Expanding Circle, Outer Circle, New Englishes, Learner Englishes
Published online: 20 October 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.2.2.06edw
References (66)
Bamgbose, A. 1998. “Torn between the norms: Innovations in World Englishes”, World Englishes 17(1), 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berns, M. 1995. “English in the European Union”, English Today 11(3), 3–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D. & Barbieri, F. 2007. “Lexical bundles in university spoken and written registers”, English for Specific Purposes 26(3), 263–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. & Finegan, E. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken And Written English. Harlow, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
Biewer, C. 2011. “Modal auxiliaries in second language varieties of English: A learner’s perspective”. In J. Mukherjee & M. Hundt (Eds.), Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging a Paradigm Gap. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 7–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bruckfield, A. 2012. Prepositions: The Ultimate Book. Mastering English Prepositions for International Students (Rev. ed.). Oak Publishers.Google Scholar
Callies, M. 2015. Towards a process-oriented approach to comparing EFL and ESL varieties: A corpus-study of lexical innovations. Paper presented at the pre-conference workshop Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Innovations in Non-native Englishes, ICAME 36 , Trier, 27 May 2015.
Chen, Y. & Baker, P. 2010. “Lexical bundles in L1 and L2 academic writing”, Language Learning & Technology 14(2), 30–49.Google Scholar
Coghill, A.M. & Garson, L.R. 2006. The ACS Style Guide: Effective Communication of Scientific Information, Michigan: American Chemical Society. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cortes, V. 2004. “Lexical bundles in published and student disciplinary writing: Examples from history and biology”, English for Specific Purposes 23(4), 397–423. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, W. 2000. Explaining Language Change: An Evolutionary Approach. Harlow, UK: Longman/Pearson.Google Scholar
Davydova, J. 2012. “Englishes in the outer and expanding circles: A comparative study”, World Englishes 31(3), 366–385. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deshors, S.C. 2014. “A case for a unified treatment of EFL and ESL - A multifactorial approach”, English World-Wide 35(3), 277–305. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deshors, S.C., Götz, S. & Laporte, S. 2015. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Innovations in Non-Native Englishes: A thematic introduction. Thematic introduction to the pre-conference workshop Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Innovations in Non-native Englishes, ICAME 36 , Trier, 27 May 2015.
Edwards, A. 2014. “The progressive aspect in the Netherlands and the ESL/EFL continuum”, World Englishes 33(2), 173–194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Edwards, A. & Laporte, S. 2015. “Outer and Expanding Circle Englishes: The competing roles of norm orientation and proficiency levels”, English World-Wide 36(2), 135–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
ELFA. 2008. The Corpus of English as a Lingua Franca in Academic Settings. Director: Anna Mauranen. Available at [URL].Google Scholar
Ellis, N.C., Simpson-Vlach, R., Römer, U., O’Donnell, M. & Wulff, S. 2015. “Learner corpora and formulaic language in second language acquisition research”. In S. Granger, G. Gilquin & F. Meunier (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Learner Corpus Research. Cambridge, UK: CUP, 357–378. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, R. 2015. The frequency of the present perfect in World Englishes. Paper presented at the 21st IAWE conference , Boğaziçi University/Turkey, 8-10 October 2015.
Gilquin, G., De Cock, S. & Granger, S. 2010. The Louvain Database of Spoken English Interlanguage. (Handbook + CD-ROM). Louvain-La-Neuve: Presses universities de Louvain.Google Scholar
Gilquin, G. & Granger, S. 2011. “From EFL to ESL: Evidence from the International Corpus of Learner English”. In J. Mukherjee & M. Hundt (Eds.), Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging a Paradigm Gap. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 55–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Götz, S. & Schilk, M. 2011. “Formulaic sequences in spoken ENL, ESL and EFL: Focus on British English, Indian English and learner English of advanced German learners.” In J. Mukherjee & M. Hundt (Eds.), Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging a Paradigm Gap. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 79–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graddol, D. 1997. The Future of English: A Guide to Forecasting the Popularity of the English Language in the 21st Century. London: British Council.Google Scholar
Granger, S., Dagneaux, E., Meunier, F. & Paquot, M. (Eds.). 2009. International Corpus of Learner English. Version 2 (Handbook + CD-ROM). Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
Greenbaum, S. 1991. “ICE: The International Corpus of English”, English Today 7(4), 3–7. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, S. Th. 2008. “Dispersions and adjusted frequencies in corpora”, International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 13(4), 403–437. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, S. Th. & Deshors, S.C. 2015. “EFL and/vs. ESL? A multi-level regression modeling perspective on bridging the paradigm gap”, International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 1(1), 130–159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, S. Th. & Mukherjee, J. 2010. “Lexical gravity across varieties of English: An ICE-based study of n-grams in Asian Englishes”, International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 15(4), 520–548. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hasselgren, A. 1994. “Lexical teddy bears and advanced learners: A study into the ways Norwegian students cope with English vocabulary”, International Journal of Applied Linguistics 4(2), 237–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hilgendorf, S.K. 2015. The Expanding Circle, transnational media, and linguistic localization. Plenary lecture at the 21st IAWE conference , Boğaziçi University/Turkey, 8-10 October 2015.
Hudson-Ettle, D. & Schmied, J. 1999. Manual to accompany the East African component of the International Corpus of English (ICE-EA): Background information, coding conventions and lists of source texts. Chemnitz: Chemnitz University of Technology.Google Scholar
Hundt, M. & Vogel, K. 2011. “Overuse of the progressive in ESL and learner Englishes – fact or fiction?” In J. Mukherjee & M. Hundt (Eds.), Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging a Paradigm Gap. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 145–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K. 2008. “As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation”, English for Specific Purposes 27(1), 4–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kachru, B.B. 1982. “Models for non-native Englishes”. In B.B. Kachru (Ed.), The Other Tongue: English Across Cultures. Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 48–74.Google Scholar
. 1985. “Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the outer circle”. In R. Quirk & H. Widdowson (Eds.), English in the World: Teaching and Learning the Language and Literatures. Cambridge, UK: CUP, 11–30.Google Scholar
Kachru, Y. 2003. “On definite reference in World Englishes”, World Englishes 22(4), 497–510. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kumar, S. 2010. English Usage for the CAT (2nd ed.). Chandigarh, Delhi and Chennai: Pearson.Google Scholar
Laitinen, M. 2011. “Contacts and variability in international Englishes: Compiling and using the Corpus of English in Finland”, Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English 61. Available at [URL].Google Scholar
. 2016. “Ongoing changes and advanced L2 use of English: Evidence from new corpus resources”. In M. José López-Couso, B. Méndez-Naya, P. Núñez-Pertejo & I.M. Palacios-Martínez (Eds.), Corpus Linguistics on the Move: Exploring and Understanding English through Corpora. Amsterdam and New York: Brill/Rodopi, 59–84. DOI logo
Laitinen, M. & Levin, M. 2016. “On the globalization of English: Observations of subjective progressives in present-day Englishes”. In E. Seoane & C. Suárez-Gómez (Eds.), World Englishes: New Theoretical and Methodological Considerations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 229–252.Google Scholar
Laporte, S. 2012. “Mind the Gap! Bridge between World and Learner Englishes in the making”, English Text Construction 5(2), 264–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mauranen, A. 2011. “Learners and users - Who do we want corpus data from?”. In F. Meunier, S. De Cock, G. Gilquin & M. Paquot (Eds.), A Taste for Corpora: In Honour of Sylviane Granger. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Exploring ELF: Academic English Shaped by Non-native Speakers. Cambridge, UK: CUP.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, J. & Gries, S. Th. 2009. “Collostructional nativisation in New Englishes: Verb-construction associations in the International Corpus of English”, English World-Wide 30(1), 27–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mukherjee, J. & Hoffmann, S. 2006. “Describing verb-complementational profiles of New Englishes”, English World-Wide 27(2), 147–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muñoz, C. 2000. “Bilingualism and trilingualism in school students in Catalonia”. In J. Cenoz & U. Jessner (Eds.), English in Europe: The Acquisition of a Third Language. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters, 157–178.Google Scholar
Oksefjell Ebeling, S. & Hasselgard, H. 2015. “Learner corpora and phraseology”. In S. Granger, G. Gilquin & F. Meunier (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Learner Corpus Research. Cambridge, UK: CUP, 207–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paquot, M. & Granger, S. 2012. “Formulaic language in learner corpora”, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 321, 130–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Llantada, C. 2014. “Formulaic language in L1 and L2 expert academic writing: Convergent and divergent usage”, Journal of English for Academic Purposes 141, 84–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J. 1972. A Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Schneider, E.W. 2007. Postcolonial English: Varieties Around the World. Cambridge, UK: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scott, M. 2015. WordSmith Tools. Version 6. Liverpool: Lexical Analysis Software.Google Scholar
Seidlhofer, B. 2004. “Research perspectives on teaching English as a Lingua Franca”, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 241, 209–239. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sharma, D. 2005. “Dialect stabilization and speaker awareness in non-native varieties of English”, Journal of Sociolinguistics 9(2), 194–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sridhar, K.K. & Sridhar, S.N. 1986. “Bridging the paradigm gap: Second language acquisition theory and indigenized varieties of English”, World Englishes 5(1), 3–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Staples, S., Egebert, J., Biber, D. & McClair, A. 2013. “Formulaic sequences and EAP writing development: Lexical bundles in the TOEFL iBT writing section”, Journal of English for Academic Purposes 12(3), 214–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, B. & Kortmann, B. 2011. “Typological profiling: learner Englishes versus indigenized L2 varieties of English”. In J. Mukherjee & M. Hundt (Eds.), Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging a Paradigm Gap. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 168–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Rooy, B. 2006. “The extension of the progressive aspect in Black South African English”, World Englishes 25(1), 37–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. “A principled distinction between error and conventionalized innovation in African Englishes”. In J. Mukherjee & M. Hundt (Eds.), Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging a Paradigm Gap. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 189–207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
VOICE. 2013. The Vienna-Oxford International Corpus of English (version 2.0 online). Director: Barbara Seidlhofer. Available at [URL].Google Scholar
Wahid, R. 2013. “Definite article usage across varieties of English”, World Englishes 32(1), 23–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Werner, V. 2013. The Present Perfect in World Englishes: Charting Unity and Diversity. PhD dissertation, University of Bamberg.Google Scholar
Wilson, K.G. 1996. The Columbia Guide to Standard American English. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Davydova, Julia
2019. Quotative like in the Englishes of the Outer and Expanding Circles. World Englishes 38:4 ► pp. 578 ff. DOI logo
EDWARDS, ALISON
2017. ICE Age 3: The Expanding Circle. World Englishes 36:3 ► pp. 404 ff. DOI logo
GUT, ULRIKE & ROBERT FUCHS
2017. Exploring speaker fluency with phonologically annotated ICE corpora. World Englishes 36:3 ► pp. 387 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Corpora, Constructions, New Englishes [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 100], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.