Article published In:
Linguistic Innovations: Rethinking linguistic creativity in non-native Englishes
Edited by Sandra C. Deshors, Sandra Götz and Samantha Laporte
[International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 2:2] 2016
► pp. 278301
References
Ansaldo, U
2004 “The evolution of Singapore English. Finding the matrix”. In L. Lim (Ed.), Singapore English. A Grammatical Description. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 127–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 “The Asian typology of English: Theoretical and methodological considerations”, English World-Wide 30(2), 133–148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aronoff, M
1976Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Balteiro, M
2007The Directionality of Conversion in English. A Dia-Synchronic Study. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Bao, Z
2005 “The aspectual system of Singapore English and the systemic substratist explanation”, Journal of Linguistics 41(2), 237–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 “ One in Singapore English”, Studies in Language 33(2), 338–365. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010a “A usage-based approach to substratum transfer: The case of four unproductive features in Singapore English”, Language 86(4), 792–820. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010b “ Must in Singapore English”, Lingua 120(7), 1727–1737. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S
2014lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package Version 1.1–7. Available at [URL] (accessed March 2016).
Bernaisch, T
2015The Lexis and Lexicogrammar of Sri Lankan English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biermeier, T
2008Word-Formation in New Englishes. A Corpus-based Analysis. Münster: Lit.Google Scholar
Biewer, C
2011 “Modal auxiliaries in second language varieties of English: A learner’s perspective”. In J. Mukherjee & M. Hundt (Eds.), Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes. Bridging a Paradigm Gap. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 7–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolton, K
2000 “The sociolinguistics of Hong Kong and the space for Hong Kong English”, World Englishes 19(3), 265–285. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003Chinese Englishes. A Sociolinguistic History. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2012 “Language policy and planning in Hong Kong. The historical context and current realities”. In E. Low & A. Hashim (Eds.), English in Southeast Asia. Features, Policy and Language in Use. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 221–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J
2010Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cannon, G
1985 “Functional shift in English”, Linguistics 231, 411–431. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Census and Statistics Department, Hong Kong SAR
2013: online. Thematic Household Survey – Report No. 51. Use of Language in Hong Kong. Utilisation of Child Health and Family Planning Services Provided by Maternal and Child Health Centres. Available at [URL] (accessed March 2016).
China Labor News Translations
n.d. About. Available at [URL] (accessed February 2015).
Chui, S
2010 “Sensitivity to differences between speech and writing: Hong Kong students’ use of syntactic features in English”. PhD thesis, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Collins, P. & Yao, X
2013 “Colloquial features in World Englishes”, International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 18(4), 479–505. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, M
2013Corpus of Global Web-Based English: 1.9 Billion Words from Speakers in 20 Countries. Available at [URL] (accessed March 2016).Google Scholar
Deshors, S
2014 “A case for a unified treatment of EFL and ESL: A multifactorial approach”, English World-Wide 35(3), 277–305. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Don, J., Trommelen, M. & Zonneveld, W
2000 “Conversion and category indeterminacy”. In G. Booij, C. Lehmann & J. Mugdan (Eds.), Morphologie. Ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung, Vol. 11. Berlin: De Gruyter, 943–952.Google Scholar
Edwards, A. & Laporte, S
Evans, S
2010 “Business as usual: The use of English in the professional world in Hong Kong”, English for Specific Purposes 29(3), 153–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 “Word-Formation in Hong Kong English: Diachronic and synchronic perspectives”, Asian Englishes 17(2), 116–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gilquin, G
2015“At the interface of contact linguistics and Second Language Acquisition research. New Englishes and Learner Englishes compared”, English World-Wide 36(1), 91–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gilquin, G. & Granger, S
2011 “From EFL to ESL. Evidence from the International Corpus of Learner English”. In J. Mukherjee & M. Hundt (Eds.), Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes. Bridging a Paradigm Gap. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 55–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gisborne, N
2009 “Aspects of the morphosyntactic typology of Hong Kong English”, English World-Wide 30(2), 149–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, S
2015 “The most underused statistical method in corpus linguistics: Multi-level (and mixed-effects) models”, Corpora 10(1), 95–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gut, U
2009 “Past tense marking in Singapore English verbs”, English World-Wide 30(3), 262–277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heller, B. & Röthlisberger, M.
2015“Big data on trial. Researching syntactic alternations in GloWbE and ICE”. Paper presented at From data to evidence. Big data, rich data, uncharted data , University of Helsinki, 19–22 October 2015.
Horch, S
2016Conversion in Asian Englishes: A Usage-Based Account of the Emergence of New Local Norms. PhD thesis, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg.Google Scholar
Johnson, R
1994 “Language policy and planning in Hong Kong”, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 1993/1994 (14), 177–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kachru, B
1985 “Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the Outer Circle”. In R. Quirk & H. Widdowson (Eds.), English in the World: Teaching and Learning the Language and Literatures. Cambridge: CUP, 11–30.Google Scholar
Kastovsky, D
1982Wortbildung und Semantik. Düsseldorf: Schwann-Bagel.Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, A
2012 “Theoretical issues”. In E. Low & A. Hashim (Eds.), English in Southeast Asia. Features, Policy and Language in Use. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 13–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laporte, S
2012 “Mind the gap! Bridge between World Englishes and Learner Englishes in the making”, English Text Construction 5(2), 264–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leimgruber, J
2013aSingapore English. Structure, Variation, and Usage. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013b “The management of multilingualism in a city-state: Language policy in Singapore”. In P. Siemund, I. Gogolin, M. Schulz & J. Davydova (Eds.), Multilingualism and Language Diversity in Urban Areas. Acquisition, Identities, Space, Education. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 227–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lim, L
2010 “Migrants and ‘Mother Tongues’: Extralinguistic forces in the ecology of English in Singapore”. In L. Lim, A. Pakir & L. Wee (Eds.), English in Singapore. Modernity and Management. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 19–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mair, C
2015 “Response to Davies and Fuchs”, English World-Wide 36(1), 29–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marchand, H
1960The Categories and Types of Present–Day English Word-Formation. A Synchronic-Diachronic Approach. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Matthews, S. & Yip, V
1994Cantonese. A Comprehensive Grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, J
2015 “Response to Davies and Fuchs”, English World-Wide 36(1), 34–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mukherjee, J. & Hundt, M
OED Online
2015 Oxford: OUP. Available at [URL] (accessed March 2016).
Pang, T
2003 “Hong Kong English: A stillborn variety?”, English Today 19(2), 12–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pavesi, M
1998 “ ‘Same word, same idea’: Conversion as a word formation process”, International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 36(3), 213–231.Google Scholar
Peters, P
2015 “Response to Davies and Fuchs”, English World-Wide 36(1), 41–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plag, I
2003Word–Formation in English. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Po-Ching, Y. & Rimmington, D
2004Chinese. A Comprehensive Grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J
1972A Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
R Core Team
2014R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Version 3.2.0. Wien: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at [URL] (accessed March 2016).Google Scholar
Schneider, E.W
2003 “The dynamics of New Englishes: From identity construction to dialect birth”, Language 79(2), 233–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007Postcolonial English. Varieties Around the World. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014a “Asian Englishes – into the future: A bird’s eye view”, Asian Englishes 16(3), 249–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014b “New reflections on the evolutionary dynamics of World Englishes”, World Englishes 33(1), 9–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seoane, E. & Suárez-Gómez, C
2013 “The expression of the perfect in East and South-East Asian Englishes”, English World-Wide 34(1), 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Setter, J., Wong, C. & Chan, B
2010Hong Kong English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Sridhar, K. & Sridhar, S
1986 “Bridging the paradigm gap: Second language acquisition theory and indigenized varieties of English”, World Englishes 5(1), 3–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strang, B
1970A History of English. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sun, C
2006Chinese. A Linguistic Introduction. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tan, Y
2014 “English as a ‘Mother Tongue’ in Singapore”, World Englishes 33(3), 319–339. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
The ICE Project
2014International Corpus of English. Available at [URL] (accessed July 2014).Google Scholar
Traugott, E. & Trousdale, G
2013Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Rooy, B
2011 “A principled distinction between error and conventionalized innovation in African Englishes”. In J. Mukherjee & M. Hundt (Eds.), Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes. Bridging a Paradigm Gap. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 189–207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wald, B
1993 “On the Evolution of would and other modals in the English spoken in east Los Angeles”. In N. Dittmar & A. Reich (Eds.), Modality in Language Acquisition. Berlin: De Gruyter, 59–96.Google Scholar
Wee, L
2013 “Governing English in Singapore. Some challenges for Singapore’s language policy”. In L. Wee, R. Goh & L. Lim (Eds.), The Politics of English. South Asia, Southeast Asia and the Asia Pacific. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 105–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Werner, V
2014The Present Perfect in World Englishes. Charting Unity and Diversity. Bamberg: University of Bamberg Press.Google Scholar
Williams, J
1987 “Non-native varieties of English: A special case of language acquisition”, English World-Wide 8(2), 161–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wong, W
2011Census of Population 2010. Statistical Release 1: Demographic Characteristics, Education, Language and Religion. Singapore: Department of Statistics, Ministry of Trade and Industry, Republic of Singapore.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Deshors, Sandra C.
2017. Structuring subjectivity in Asian Englishes. English Text Construction 10:1  pp. 132 ff. DOI logo
Deshors, Sandra C. & Gaëtanelle Gilquin
2018. Modeling World Englishes in the 21st century. In Modeling World Englishes [Varieties of English Around the World, G61],  pp. 281 ff. DOI logo
Deshors, Sandra C. & Sandra Götz
2020. Common ground across globalized English varieties: A multivariate exploration of mental predicates in World Englishes. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 16:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Qin, Melissa Xiaohui
2023. A corpus‐based approach to Chinese English lexis. World Englishes 42:2  pp. 308 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 february 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.