Article published In:
Linguistic Innovations: Rethinking linguistic creativity in non-native Englishes
Edited by Sandra C. Deshors, Sandra Götz and Samantha Laporte
[International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 2:2] 2016
► pp. 278301
Ansaldo, U
2004 “The evolution of Singapore English. Finding the matrix”. In L. Lim (Ed.), Singapore English. A Grammatical Description. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 127–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 “The Asian typology of English: Theoretical and methodological considerations”, English World-Wide 30(2), 133–148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aronoff, M
1976Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Balteiro, M
2007The Directionality of Conversion in English. A Dia-Synchronic Study. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Bao, Z
2005 “The aspectual system of Singapore English and the systemic substratist explanation”, Journal of Linguistics 41(2), 237–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 “ One in Singapore English”, Studies in Language 33(2), 338–365. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010a “A usage-based approach to substratum transfer: The case of four unproductive features in Singapore English”, Language 86(4), 792–820. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010b “ Must in Singapore English”, Lingua 120(7), 1727–1737. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S
2014lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package Version 1.1–7. Available at [URL] (accessed March 2016).
Bernaisch, T
2015The Lexis and Lexicogrammar of Sri Lankan English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biermeier, T
2008Word-Formation in New Englishes. A Corpus-based Analysis. Münster: Lit.Google Scholar
Biewer, C
2011 “Modal auxiliaries in second language varieties of English: A learner’s perspective”. In J. Mukherjee & M. Hundt (Eds.), Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes. Bridging a Paradigm Gap. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 7–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolton, K
2000 “The sociolinguistics of Hong Kong and the space for Hong Kong English”, World Englishes 19(3), 265–285. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003Chinese Englishes. A Sociolinguistic History. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2012 “Language policy and planning in Hong Kong. The historical context and current realities”. In E. Low & A. Hashim (Eds.), English in Southeast Asia. Features, Policy and Language in Use. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 221–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J
2010Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cannon, G
1985 “Functional shift in English”, Linguistics 231, 411–431. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Census and Statistics Department, Hong Kong SAR
2013: online. Thematic Household Survey – Report No. 51. Use of Language in Hong Kong. Utilisation of Child Health and Family Planning Services Provided by Maternal and Child Health Centres. Available at [URL] (accessed March 2016).
China Labor News Translations
n.d. About. Available at [URL] (accessed February 2015).
Chui, S
2010 “Sensitivity to differences between speech and writing: Hong Kong students’ use of syntactic features in English”. PhD thesis, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Collins, P. & Yao, X
2013 “Colloquial features in World Englishes”, International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 18(4), 479–505. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, M
2013Corpus of Global Web-Based English: 1.9 Billion Words from Speakers in 20 Countries. Available at [URL] (accessed March 2016).Google Scholar
Deshors, S
2014 “A case for a unified treatment of EFL and ESL: A multifactorial approach”, English World-Wide 35(3), 277–305. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Don, J., Trommelen, M. & Zonneveld, W
2000 “Conversion and category indeterminacy”. In G. Booij, C. Lehmann & J. Mugdan (Eds.), Morphologie. Ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung, Vol. 11. Berlin: De Gruyter, 943–952.Google Scholar
Edwards, A. & Laporte, S
Evans, S
2010 “Business as usual: The use of English in the professional world in Hong Kong”, English for Specific Purposes 29(3), 153–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 “Word-Formation in Hong Kong English: Diachronic and synchronic perspectives”, Asian Englishes 17(2), 116–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gilquin, G
2015“At the interface of contact linguistics and Second Language Acquisition research. New Englishes and Learner Englishes compared”, English World-Wide 36(1), 91–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gilquin, G. & Granger, S
2011 “From EFL to ESL. Evidence from the International Corpus of Learner English”. In J. Mukherjee & M. Hundt (Eds.), Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes. Bridging a Paradigm Gap. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 55–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gisborne, N
2009 “Aspects of the morphosyntactic typology of Hong Kong English”, English World-Wide 30(2), 149–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, S
2015 “The most underused statistical method in corpus linguistics: Multi-level (and mixed-effects) models”, Corpora 10(1), 95–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gut, U
2009 “Past tense marking in Singapore English verbs”, English World-Wide 30(3), 262–277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heller, B. & Röthlisberger, M.
2015“Big data on trial. Researching syntactic alternations in GloWbE and ICE”. Paper presented at From data to evidence. Big data, rich data, uncharted data , University of Helsinki, 19–22 October 2015.
Horch, S
2016Conversion in Asian Englishes: A Usage-Based Account of the Emergence of New Local Norms. PhD thesis, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg.Google Scholar
Johnson, R
1994 “Language policy and planning in Hong Kong”, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 1993/1994 (14), 177–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kachru, B
1985 “Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the Outer Circle”. In R. Quirk & H. Widdowson (Eds.), English in the World: Teaching and Learning the Language and Literatures. Cambridge: CUP, 11–30.Google Scholar
Kastovsky, D
1982Wortbildung und Semantik. Düsseldorf: Schwann-Bagel.Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, A
2012 “Theoretical issues”. In E. Low & A. Hashim (Eds.), English in Southeast Asia. Features, Policy and Language in Use. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 13–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laporte, S
2012 “Mind the gap! Bridge between World Englishes and Learner Englishes in the making”, English Text Construction 5(2), 264–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leimgruber, J
2013aSingapore English. Structure, Variation, and Usage. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013b “The management of multilingualism in a city-state: Language policy in Singapore”. In P. Siemund, I. Gogolin, M. Schulz & J. Davydova (Eds.), Multilingualism and Language Diversity in Urban Areas. Acquisition, Identities, Space, Education. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 227–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lim, L
2010 “Migrants and ‘Mother Tongues’: Extralinguistic forces in the ecology of English in Singapore”. In L. Lim, A. Pakir & L. Wee (Eds.), English in Singapore. Modernity and Management. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 19–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mair, C
2015 “Response to Davies and Fuchs”, English World-Wide 36(1), 29–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marchand, H
1960The Categories and Types of Present–Day English Word-Formation. A Synchronic-Diachronic Approach. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Matthews, S. & Yip, V
1994Cantonese. A Comprehensive Grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, J
2015 “Response to Davies and Fuchs”, English World-Wide 36(1), 34–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mukherjee, J. & Hundt, M
OED Online
2015 Oxford: OUP. Available at [URL] (accessed March 2016).
Pang, T
2003 “Hong Kong English: A stillborn variety?”, English Today 19(2), 12–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pavesi, M
1998 “ ‘Same word, same idea’: Conversion as a word formation process”, International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 36(3), 213–231.Google Scholar
Peters, P
2015 “Response to Davies and Fuchs”, English World-Wide 36(1), 41–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plag, I
2003Word–Formation in English. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Po-Ching, Y. & Rimmington, D
2004Chinese. A Comprehensive Grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J
1972A Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
R Core Team
2014R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Version 3.2.0. Wien: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at [URL] (accessed March 2016).Google Scholar
Schneider, E.W
2003 “The dynamics of New Englishes: From identity construction to dialect birth”, Language 79(2), 233–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007Postcolonial English. Varieties Around the World. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014a “Asian Englishes – into the future: A bird’s eye view”, Asian Englishes 16(3), 249–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014b “New reflections on the evolutionary dynamics of World Englishes”, World Englishes 33(1), 9–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seoane, E. & Suárez-Gómez, C
2013 “The expression of the perfect in East and South-East Asian Englishes”, English World-Wide 34(1), 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Setter, J., Wong, C. & Chan, B
2010Hong Kong English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Sridhar, K. & Sridhar, S
1986 “Bridging the paradigm gap: Second language acquisition theory and indigenized varieties of English”, World Englishes 5(1), 3–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strang, B
1970A History of English. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sun, C
2006Chinese. A Linguistic Introduction. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tan, Y
2014 “English as a ‘Mother Tongue’ in Singapore”, World Englishes 33(3), 319–339. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
The ICE Project
2014International Corpus of English. Available at [URL] (accessed July 2014).Google Scholar
Traugott, E. & Trousdale, G
2013Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Rooy, B
2011 “A principled distinction between error and conventionalized innovation in African Englishes”. In J. Mukherjee & M. Hundt (Eds.), Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes. Bridging a Paradigm Gap. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 189–207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wald, B
1993 “On the Evolution of would and other modals in the English spoken in east Los Angeles”. In N. Dittmar & A. Reich (Eds.), Modality in Language Acquisition. Berlin: De Gruyter, 59–96.Google Scholar
Wee, L
2013 “Governing English in Singapore. Some challenges for Singapore’s language policy”. In L. Wee, R. Goh & L. Lim (Eds.), The Politics of English. South Asia, Southeast Asia and the Asia Pacific. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 105–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Werner, V
2014The Present Perfect in World Englishes. Charting Unity and Diversity. Bamberg: University of Bamberg Press.Google Scholar
Williams, J
1987 “Non-native varieties of English: A special case of language acquisition”, English World-Wide 8(2), 161–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wong, W
2011Census of Population 2010. Statistical Release 1: Demographic Characteristics, Education, Language and Religion. Singapore: Department of Statistics, Ministry of Trade and Industry, Republic of Singapore.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Deshors, Sandra C.
2017. Structuring subjectivity in Asian Englishes. English Text Construction 10:1  pp. 132 ff. DOI logo
Deshors, Sandra C. & Gaëtanelle Gilquin
2018. Modeling World Englishes in the 21st century. In Modeling World Englishes [Varieties of English Around the World, G61],  pp. 281 ff. DOI logo
Deshors, Sandra C. & Sandra Götz
2020. Common ground across globalized English varieties: A multivariate exploration of mental predicates in World Englishes. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 16:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Qin, Melissa Xiaohui
2023. A corpus‐based approach to Chinese English lexis. World Englishes 42:2  pp. 308 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.