Cover not available
Article published In:
International Journal of Learner Corpus Research
Vol. 7:2 (2021) ► pp.275–289
Corpus report

The interphonology of contemporary English corpus (IPCE-IPAC)

| Paris Nanterre University
| Northwestern Polytechnical University
| Paris 8 University
| Western Ontario University
This article presents the IPCE-IPAC corpus, an ongoing project, which has been collected in France, Italy, Spain and China since 2014. The data is collected to investigate the acquisition of segmental and suprasegmental phenomena by L2 learners of English, with a focus on phonemes. The article discusses the methods for the compilation of this original spoken learner corpus, designed to study L2 “interphonology” (Detey, Racine, Kawaguchi, & Zay, 2016), or interlanguage phonology.
Keywords: interphonology, phonetic learner corpora, EFL, transcription, coding
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.IPCE-IPAC project: Goals and originality
  • 3.The IPCE-IPAC methodological framework
    • 3.1Word list reading task
    • 3.2Repetition task
    • 3.3Reading of a written text
    • 3.4Participation in two types of conversation
      • 3.4.1Formal interview
      • 3.4.2Informal conversation
    • 3.5Speakers
  • 4.Corpus annotation
    • 4.1Orthographic transcription
    • 4.2Coding
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 11 October 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.20010.her
References (43)
References
Ballier, N., & Martin, P. (2016). Speech annotation of learner corpora. In S. Granger, G. Gilquin & F. Meuniers (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Learner Corpus Research (pp. 107–34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boersma, P. & Weenink, D. (2014). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 6.1.16) [Computer software]. Retrieved on 27 July 2021 from [URL]
Brulard, I., Carr, P., & Durand, J. (Eds.). (2015). La prononciation de l’anglais contemporain dans le monde. Variation et structure. Toulouse: Presses Universitaires du Midi.Google Scholar
Carr, P., Durand, J., & Pukli, M. (2004). The PAC project: Principles and methods. La Tribune Internationale des Langues Vivantes, 361, 24–35.Google Scholar
Chelliah, S. L., & De Reuse, W. J. (2011). Handbook of descriptive linguistic fieldwork. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chéreau, C., Hallé, P. A., & Ségui, J. (1999). Interference between surface form and abstract representation in spoken word perception. In Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology. Budapest, Hungary.Google Scholar
Council of Europe. (2018). The common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
De Cock, S., Gilquin, G., & Granger, S. (2009). Introducing LINDSEI, ICLE’s talkative sister. Paper presented at the 30th Annual Conference of the International Computer Archive for Modern and Medieval English (ICAME) 2009, Lancaster University, UK.
Delais-Roussarie, E., & Post, B. (2014). Corpus annotation: Methodology and transcription systems. In J. Durand, U. Gut, & G. Kristoffersen (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corpus phonology (pp. 46–88). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Delais-Roussarie, E., & Yoo, H. (2011). Learner corpora and prosody: From the COREIL corpus to principles on data collection and corpus design. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 47(1), 26–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deschamps, A., Duchet, J. L., Fournier, J. M., & O’Neil, M. (2004). English phonology and graphophonemics. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Detey, S. (2005). Interphonologie et représentation orthographiques: Du rôle de l’écrit dans l’enseignement/apprentissage du français oral chez des étudiants japonais (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Toulouse Le Mirail, Toulouse.
Detey, S., Racine, I., Kawaguchi, Y., & Zay, F. (2016). Variation among non-native speakers: The interphonology of contemporary French. In S. Detey, J. Durand, B. Laks, & C. Lyche (Eds.), Varieties of spoken French (pp. 491–502). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Durand, J., Laks, B., & Lyche, C. (2002). La phonologie du français contemporain: Usages, variétés et structure. In C. Pusch & W. Raible (Eds.), Romanistische Korpuslinguistik: Korpora und gesprochene Sprache / Romance corpus linguistics: Corpora and spoken language (pp. 93–106). Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Durand, J., & Przewozny, A. (2012). La phonologie de l’anglais contemporain: Usages, variétés et structure. Les approches de corpus à orientation phonologico-phonétique pour l’anglais. Revue Française de Linguistique Appliquée, 17(1), 25–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Exare, C. (2017). Les aspirations intrusives dans l’anglais des apprenants francophones (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Paris 3 Sorbonne Nouvelle.
Foulkes, P., & Docherty, G. (1999). Urban voices: Variation and change in British accents. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Ginésy, M. (2000). Phonétique et phonologie de l’anglais. Paris: Ellipses.Google Scholar
Grainger, J., Nguyen Van Kang, M., & Ségui, J. (2001). Cross-modal repetition priming of heterographic homophones. Memory and Cognition, 29(1), 53–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Granger, S., Gilquin, G., & Meunier, F. (Eds.). (2013). Twenty years of learner corpus research: Looking back, moving ahead. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
(Eds.) (2015). The Cambridge handbook of learner corpus research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gut, U. (2009). Non-native speech: A corpus-based analysis of phonological and phonetic properties of L2 English and German. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012). The LeaP corpus. A multilingual corpus of spoken learner German and learner English. In T. Schmidt & K. (Eds.), Multilingual corpora and multilingual corpus analysis (pp. 3–23). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014). Corpus phonology and second language acquisition. In J. Durand, U. Gut, & G. Kristoffersen (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corpus phonology (pp. 286–301). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Herry-Bénit, N. (2011). Didactique de la phonétique anglaise. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.Google Scholar
Huart, R. (2009). Nouvelle grammaire de l’oral. Paris: OphrysGoogle Scholar
Kondo, M. (2012). Design and analysis of Asian English speech corpus: How to elicit L1 phonology in L2 English data. In Y. Tono, Y. Kawaguchi, & M. Minegishi (Eds.), Developmental and crosslinguistic perspectives in learner corpus research (pp. 251–278). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. (1966). The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
(1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Milroy, J. & Milroy, L. (1985). Linguistic change, social network and speaker innovation. Journal of Linguistics, 211, 339–384. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Milroy, L. (1987a). Language and social networks (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(1987b). Observing and analysing natural language. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Myles, F. (2005). Interlanguage corpora and second language acquisition research. Second Language Research, 211, 373–391. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Piccardo, E. (2016). Phonological scale revision process report. Strasbourg: Council of Europe. [Online report]. Retrieved on 15 August 2020 from [URL]
Racine, I., Zay, F., Detey, S., & Kawaguchi, Y. (2011). De la transcription de corpus à l’analyse interphonologique: Enjeux méthodologiques en FLE. In G. Col & S. N. Osu (Eds.), Transcrire, écrire, formaliser. Travaux linguistiques du CerLiCO, 241 (pp. 13–30). Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.Google Scholar
Schmidt, T., & Wörner, K. (Eds.) (2012). Multilingual corpora and multilingual corpus analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tono, Y., Kawaguchi, Y., & Minegishi, M. (Eds.) (2012). Developmental and crosslinguistic perspectives in learner corpus research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trouvain, J., Zimmerer, F., Möbius, B., Gósy, M., & Bonneau, A. (2017). Segmental, prosodic and fluency features in phonetic learner corpora: Introduction to the special issue. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 3(2), 105–117. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Y., Zhou, S., Chen, C., Ban, Y., Zhao, L., & Zhang, X. (2017). Chinese college students’ typical English pronunciation errors. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 1191, 1684–1691. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weinberger, S. H. (2017). Speech accent archive. Fairfax VA: George Mason University.Google Scholar
Zhang, F., & Yin, P. (2009). A study of pronunciation problems of English learners in China. Asian Social Science, 5(6), 141–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ziegler, J. C., Muneaux, M., & Grainger, J. (2003). Neighborhood effects in auditory word recognition: Phonological competition and orthographic facilitation. Journal of Memory and Language, 481, 779–793. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Xu, Bo
2024. 2024 International Conference on Distributed Computing and Optimization Techniques (ICDCOT), ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Mairano, Paolo, Fabián Santiago & Leonardo Contreras Roa
2023. Can L2 Pronunciation Be Evaluated without Reference to a Native Model? Pillai Scores for the Intrinsic Evaluation of L2 Vowels. Languages 8:4 ► pp. 280 ff. DOI logo
Liang, Chaohui, Jiling Shang & Qiangyi Li
2022. English Syntactic Analysis and Word Sense Disambiguation Strategy of Neutral Set from the Perspective of Natural Language Processing. Advances in Multimedia 2022 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.