Article In:
International Journal of Learner Corpus Research: Online-First Articles

Adjective + noun collocations in L2 spoken English

How robust is the role of proficiency?

ORCID logo | Lancaster University
 | Lancaster University
This study explores the development of L2 phraseological knowledge, focusing on the relationship between L2 proficiency and the use of adjective-noun combinations from the perspective of collocation density and association strength. While a growing body of evidence suggests that more advanced L2 production tends to be characterised by (i) a greater collocation density and (ii) more strongly associated collocations, several studies did not find this trend. The present study draws on the British Council-Lancaster Aptis Corpus and data from four proficiency levels (A2-C of the CEFR) to test a hypothesis about the direction of collocation development in order to contribute to a systematic advancement of knowledge about the development of productive L2 collocation use. The study replicates some of the key findings from previous research, confirming that these trends are generalisable to different samples of L2 speakers and across different modes of communication.
Keywords: collocations, phraseological knowledge, L2 spoken production, learner corpus research, L2 proficiency
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.General background
    • 2.1Trends in a-n collocation research in relation to language proficiency
    • 2.2Factors that affect the collocation patterns in relation to proficiency level
      • 2.2.1Learning patterns associated with L2 collocation development
      • 2.2.2Conceptualisation of collocations
      • 2.2.3Conceptualisation of language proficiency
      • 2.2.4Mode of communication
  • 3.The present study
    • 3.1Aims and hypotheses
    • 3.2Methodology
      • 3.2.1Data
    • 3.3Procedure
      • 3.3.1Methodological approach
      • 3.3.2Identifying a-n combinations
      • 3.3.3Collocation measures and data analysis
        • (i)Frequency of a-n co-occurrence (collocation frequency)
        • (ii)Mutual information (MI) score
        • (iii)Log Dice
  • 4.Results
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • Author queries
  • References
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
References (52)
References
Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice: Designing and developing useful language tests. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2013). Discourse characteristics of writing and speaking task types on the TOEFL iBT test: A lexico-grammatical analysis. Educational Research Report Series, 2013(1), i–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brezina, V. (2018). Statistics in corpus linguistics: A practical guide. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brezina, V., & Fox, L. (2021). Adjective + noun collocations in L2 and L1 speech: Evidence from the Trinity Lancaster Corpus and the spoken BNC2014. In S. Granger (Ed.), Perspectives on the L2 phrasicon: The view from learner corpora (pp. 152–177). Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brezina, V., McEnery, T., & Wattam, S. (2015). Collocations in context: a new perspective on collocation networks. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 20 (2), 139–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
British Council. (2020). Aptis Candidate Guide. [URL]
Caines, A., & Buttery, P. (2017). The effect of task and topic on opportunity of use in learner corpora. In V. Brezina & L. Flowerdew (Eds.), Learner Corpus Research: New perspectives and applications (pp. 5–27). Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Chen, W. (2019). Profiling collocations in EFL writing of Chinese tertiary learners. RELC Journal, 50 (1), 53–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Council of Europe. (2018). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR): Learning, teaching, assessment. Companion volume with new descriptors. [URL]
Contreras Kallens, P., & Christiansen, M. H. (2022). Models of language and multiword expressions. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 5 1, Article 781962. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Church, K. W., & Hanks, P. (1990). Word association norms, mutual information and lexicography. Computational Linguistics, 16 (1), 22–29.Google Scholar
De Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. (2007). A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10 (1), 7–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Durrant, P., & Schmitt, N. (2009). To what extent do native and non-native writers make use of collocations? International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 47 (2), 157–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Edmonds, A., & Gudmestad, A. (2021). Collocational development during a stay abroad. Languages, 6 (1), Article 12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eguchi, M., & Kyle, K. (2023). L2 collocation profiles and their relationship with vocabulary proficiency: A learner corpus approach. Journal of Second Language Writing, 60 1, Article 100975. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evert, S. (2005). The statistics of word co-occurrences: Word pairs and collocations. [Doctoral Dissertation, University of Stuttgart.] OPUS- Publication Server of the University of Stuttgart. [URL]
Gablasova, D., Brezina, V., Harding, L., & Dunlea, J. (2020). British Council-Lancaster Aptis corpus. [electronic dataset]. Lancaster University.Google Scholar
Gablasova, D., Brezina, V., & McEnery, T. (2017). Collocations in corpus-based language learning research: Identifying, comparing, and interpreting the evidence. Language Learning, 67 (S1), 155–179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gablasova, D. (2021). Corpora for second language assessments. In T. Brunfaut & P. Winke (Eds), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and language testing. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goulart, L. (2019). The use of collocations across proficiency levels: A literature review. BELT-Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal, 10 (2), Article e34129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Granger, S., & Paquot, M. (2008). Disentangling the phraseological web. In S. Granger & F. Meunier (Eds.), Phraseology. An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 27–50). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Granger, S., & Bestgen, Y. (2014). The use of collocations by intermediate vs. advanced non-native writers: A bigram-based study. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 52 (3), 229–252. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Granger, S. (2019). Formulaic sequences in learner corpora. In A. Siyanova-Chanturia & A. Pellicer-Sánchez (Eds.), Understanding formulaic language: A second language acquisition perspective (pp. 228–238). Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, S. Th. (2013). 50-something years of work on collocations: What is or should be next…. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 18 (1), 137–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hunston, S. (2022). Corpora in applied linguistics. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kilgarriff, A., Baisa, V., Bušta, J., Jakubíček, M., Kovář, V., Michelfeit, J., Rychlý, P., & Suchomel, V. (2014). The Sketch Engine: Ten years on. Lexicography, 1 (1), 7–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kormos, J. (2014). Speech production and second language acquisition. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kremmel, B., Brunfaut, T., & Alderson, J. C. (2017). Exploring the role of phraseological knowledge in foreign language reading. Applied Linguistics, 38 (6), 848–870. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laufer, B., & Waldman, T. (2011). Verb-noun collocations in second language writing: A corpus analysis of learners’ English. Language Learning, 61 (2), 647–672. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, J., & Schmitt, N. (2010). The development of collocation use in academic texts by advanced L2 learners: A multiple case study approach. In D. Wood (Ed.), Perspectives on formulaic language: Acquisition and communication (pp. 22–46). Continuum.Google Scholar
Love, R., Dembry, C., Hardie, A., Brezina, V., & McEnery, T. (2017). The Spoken BNC2014: Designing and building a spoken corpus of everyday conversations. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 22 (3), 319–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Men, H. (2015). Vocabulary increase and collocation learning: A corpus-based cross-sectional study of Chinese EFL learners. [Unpublished PhD thesis]. Birmingham University.
Nesselhauf, N. (2005). Collocations in a learner corpus. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Öksüz, D., Brezina, V., & Rebuschat, P. (2021). Collocational processing in L1 and L2: The effects of word frequency, collocational frequency, and association. Language Learning, 71 (1), 55–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Sullivan, B. (2015). Linking the Aptis reporting scales to the CEFR. Aptis Technical Report (TR/2015/003). London: British Council.Google Scholar
O’Sullivan, B., Dunlea, J., Spiby, R., Westbrook, C., & Dunn, K. (2020). Aptis General technical manual, v 2.21. London: British Council.Google Scholar
Park, H., Solon, M., Dehghan-Chaleshtori, M., & Ghanbar, H. (2022). Proficiency reporting practices in research on second language acquisition: Have we made any progress? Language Learning, 72 (1), 198–236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paquot, M., & Granger, S. (2012). Formulaic language in learner corpora. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32 1, 130–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paquot, M. (2019). The phraseological dimension in interlanguage complexity research. Second language research, 35 (1), 121–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paquot, M., Gablasova, D., Brezina, V., & Naets, H. (2022). Phraseological complexity in EFL learners’ spoken production across proficiency levels. In: A. Leńko-Szymańska & S. Götz (Eds), Complexity, accuracy & fluency in Learner Corpus Research (pp. 115–136). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rychlý, P. (2008). A Lexicographer-friendly association score. In P. Sojka & A. Horák (Eds.), Proceedings of Recent Advances in Slavonic Natural Language Processing, RASLAN (pp. 6–9). Masaryk University, Brno.Google Scholar
Schmid, H. (2013). Probabilistic part-of-speech tagging using decision trees. In D. Jones & H. Somers (Eds.), New methods in language processing (pp. 154–164). Routledge.Google Scholar
Siyanova-Chanturia, A., & Pellicer-Sánchez, A. (Eds.). (2019). Understanding formulaic language: A second language acquisition perspective. Routledge.Google Scholar
Siyanova-Chanturia, A. (2015). Collocation in beginner learner writing: A longitudinal study. System, 53 1, 148–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siyanova-Chanturia, A., & Spina, S. (2020). Multi-word expressions in second language writing: A large-scale longitudinal learner corpus study. Language Learning, 70 (2), 420–463. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Uchihara, T., Eguchi, M., Clenton, J., Kyle, K., & Saito, K. (2022). To what extent is collocation knowledge associated with oral proficiency? A corpus-based approach to word association. Language and Speech, 65 (2), 311–336. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vandeweerd, N., Housen, A., & Paquot, M. (2023). Comparing the longitudinal development of phraseological complexity across oral and written tasks. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 45 (4), 787–811. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2021). Applying phraseological complexity measures to L2 French: A partial replication study. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 7 (2), 197–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
VanPatten, B., Keating, G., & Wulff, S. (2020). Theories in second language acquisition. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wray, A. (2013). Formulaic language. Language Teaching, 46 (3), 316–334. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yoon, H. J. (2016). Association strength of verb-noun combinations in experienced NS and less experienced NNS writing: Longitudinal and cross-sectional findings. Journal of Second Language Writing, 34 1, 42–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar