Article published in:
Segmental, prosodic and fluency features in phonetic learner corpora
Edited by Jürgen Trouvain, Frank Zimmerer, Bernd Möbius, Mária Gósy and Anne Bonneau
[International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 3:2] 2017
► pp. 175195
References

References

Baker, R., & Hazan, V.
2011 “DiapixUK: task materials for the elicitation of multiple spontaneous speech dialogs”. Behavior Research Methods 43(3), 761–770. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Best, C. T.
1995 “A direct realist perspective on cross-language speech perception”. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Theoretical and Methodological Issues in Cross-language Speech Research. Timonium, MD: York Press, 167–200.Google Scholar
Blaauw, E.
1994 “The contribution of prosodic boundary markers to the perceptual difference between read and spontaneous speech”. Speech Communication 14(4), 359–375. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D.
2016: online. Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer. Version 5.3.51. Available at: http://​www​.praat​.org/ (accessed May 2017).
Bolinger, D.
1989Intonation and Its Uses: Melody in Grammar and Discourse. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Cooke, M., King, S., Garnier, M., & Aubanel, V.
2014 “The listening talker: a review of human and algorithmic context-induced modifications of speech”. Computer Speech and Language 28, 543–571. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Council of Europe
2001Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., Thomson, R. I., & Rossiter, M. J. 2009 “The relationship between L1 fluency and L2 fluency development”. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 31(4), 533–557. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ernestus, M., Hanique, M., & Verboom, E.
2015 “The effect of speech situation on the occurrence of reduced word pronunciation variants”. Journal of Phonetics 48, 60–75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J.
1987 “The production of ‘new’ and ‘similar’ phones in a foreign language: Evidence for the effect of equivalence classification”. Journal of Phonetics 15, 47–65.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E.
1995 “Second-language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems”. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Theoretical and Methodological Issues in Cross-language Speech Research. Timonium, MD: York Press, 233–277.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., & Eefting, W.
1987 “The production and perception of English stops by Spanish speakers of English”. Journal of Phonetics 15, 67–83.Google Scholar
Gimson, A. C.
1964An Introduction to the Pronunciation of English. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Granlund, S., Hazan, V., & Baker, R.
2012 “An acoustic – phonetic comparison of the clear speaking styles of Finnish – English late bilinguals”. Journal of Phonetics 40(3), 509–520. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guion, S. G., Flege, J. E., Liu, S. H., & Yeni-Komshian, G. H.
2000 “Age of learning effects on the duration of sentences produced in a second language”. Applied Psycholinguistics 21(2), 205–228. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, J., Kleber, F., & Reubold, U.
2008 “Compensation for coarticulation, /u/-fronting, and sound change in standard southern British: An acoustic and perceptual study”. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 123(5), 2825–2835. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, S., & Midgley, J.
2005 “Formant frequencies of RP monophthongs in four age groups of speakers”. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 35(2), 183–199. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Howell, P., & Kadi-Hanifi, K.
1991 “Comparison of prosodic properties between read and spontaneous speech material”. Speech Communication 10(2), 163–169. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kang, O., Rubin, D., & Pickering, L.
2010 “Suprasegmental measures of accentedness and judgments of language learner proficiency in oral English”. The Modern Language Journal 94(4), 554–566. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kormos, J., & Dénes, M.
2004 “Exploring measures and perceptions of fluency in the speech of second language learners”. System 32(2), 145–164. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuhl, P. K.
1993 “Early linguistic experience and phonetic perception: implications for theories of developmental speech production”. Journal of Phonetics 21, 125–139.Google Scholar
Laan, G. P.
1997 “The contribution of intonation, segmental durations, and spectral features to the perception of a spontaneous and a read speaking style”. Speech Communication 22(1), 43–65. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M.
1998 “The effects of speaking rate on listener evaluations of native and foreign-accented speech”. Language Learning 48(2), 159–182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Munro, M. J., Derwing, T. M., & Burgess, C. S.
2010 “Detection of nonnative speaker status from content-masked speech”. Speech Communication 52(7), 626–637. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nakamura, M., Iwano, K., & Furui, S.
2008 “Differences between acoustic characteristics of spontaneous and read speech and their effects on speech recognition performance”. Computer Speech & Language 22(2), 171–184. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Riazantseva, A. 2001 “Second language proficiency and pausing: A study of Russian speakers of English”. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 23, 497–526. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rose, R. L.
2013 “Crosslinguistic corpus of hesitation phenomena: A corpus for investigating first and second language speech performance”. Proc. Interspeech, Lyon, 992–996.Google Scholar
Scobbie, J. M., Lawson, E., & Stuart-Smith, J.
2012 “Back to front: a socially-stratified ultrasound tongue imaging study of Scottish English /u/”. Italian Journal of Linguistics 24(1), 103–148.Google Scholar
Trouvain, J., Bonneau, A., Colotte, V., Fauth, C., Fohr, D., Jouvet, D., Jügler, J., Laprie, Y., Mella, O., Möbius, B., & Zimmerer, F.
2016 “The IFCASL corpus of French and German non-native and native read speech”. Proc. 9th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC), Portorož, 1333–1338.Google Scholar
Vaissière, J.
2008 “Perception of intonation”. In D. B. Pisoni, & R. E. Remez (Eds.), The Handbook of Speech Perception. Blackwell, 236–263.Google Scholar
Van Engen, K. J., Baese-Berk, M., Baker, A., Choi, R. E., Kim, M., & Bradlow, A. R.
2010 “The Wildcat Corpus of native-and foreign-accented English: Communicative efficiency across conversational dyads with varying language alignment profiles”. Language and Speech 53, 510–540. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Villegas, J., Cooke, M., Aubanel, V., & Piccolino-Boniforti, M.
2011 “MTRANS: a multi-channel, multi-tier speech annotation tool”. Proc. Interspeech, Florence, 3237–3236.Google Scholar
Wells, J. C.
1962A Study of the Formants of the Pure Vowels of British English. Master’s thesis. London: University of London.Google Scholar
1982Accents of English (Volumes 1 & 2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wester, M., García Lecumberri, M. L., & Cooke, M.
2014 “DIAPIX-FL: A symmetric corpus of conversations in first and second languages”. Proc. Interspeech, Singapore, 509–513.Google Scholar
2015 “/u/-fronting in English speakers’ L1 but not in their L2”. Proc. 18th International Congress on Phonetic Sciences, Glasgow.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Bradlow, Ann R.
2021. Information encoding and transmission profiles of first-language (L1) and second-language (L2) speech*. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle
2020.  In A Practical Handbook of Corpus Linguistics,  pp. 283 ff. Crossref logo
Lopez-Ozieblo, Renia
2019. Cut-offs and co-occurring gestures: Similarities between speakers’ first and second languages . International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 0:0 Crossref logo
Strori, Dorina, Ann R. Bradlow & Pamela E. Souza
2020. Recognition of foreign-accented speech in noise: The interplay between talker intelligibility and linguistic structure. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 147:6  pp. 3765 ff. Crossref logo
Sørensen, A. Josefine Munch, Michal Fereczkowski & Ewen N. MacDonald
2021. Effects of Noise and Second Language on Conversational Dynamics in Task Dialogue. Trends in Hearing 25  pp. 233121652110244 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 august 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.