Article published in:
From Culture to Language and Back: The Animacy Hierarchy in language and discourse
Edited by Laure Gardelle and Sandrine Sorlin
[International Journal of Language and Culture 5:2] 2018
► pp. 271301
Cotte, P.
(2005) Réflexions sur le sujet, le thème et le cadre. In J. Pauchard & F. Canon-Roger (Eds.), Recherches en linguistique et psychologie cognitive 211 (pp. 267–282). Reims: Presses Universitaires de Reims.Google Scholar
(2006) Un sujet, deux prédications. In D. Lebaud, C. Paulin & K. Ploog (Eds.), Constructions verbales et production de sens (pp. 17–26). Besançon: Presses Universitaires de Franche-Comté.Google Scholar
(2012) Hiérarchies. E-rea, 9.21. http://​erea​.revues​.org​/2652 Crossref
Croft, W.
(1991) Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(2003) Typology and Universals. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Culioli, A.
(1990) Pour une linguistique de l’énonciation. Tome 1. Opérations et représentations. Gap: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Dirven, R.
(Ed.) (1989) A User’s Grammar of English: Word, Sentence, Text, Interaction. Compact edition. Frankfurt am Main/Bern: Verlag Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W.
([1991] 1992) A New Approach to English Grammar, on Semantic Principles. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Dowty, D. R.
([1979] 1991) Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language, 671, 547–619. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Groussier, M. -L., & Rivière, C.
(1996) Les mots de la linguistique. Lexique de linguistique énonciative. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M.
([1985] 2014) Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar. 4th ed. revised. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G.
(1987) Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
([1980] 2003) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
(1987) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. I1. Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(1991) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. II. Descriptive Application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(2006) Subjectification, grammaticalization, and conceptual archetypes. In A. Athanasiadou, C. Canakis & B. Cornillie (Eds.), Subjectification. Various Paths to Subjectivity (pp. 17–40). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) Cognitive Grammar. A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levin, B.
(1993) English Verb Classes and Alternations. A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Levin, B., & Rappaport Hovav, M.
(2005) Argument Realization. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nuyts, J.
(2001) Subjectivity as an evidential dimension in epistemic modal expressions. Journal of Pragmatics, 331, 383–400. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, F. R.
([1974] 1988) The English Verb. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Pottier, B.
(1992) Sémantique générale. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J.
(1996) Collins Cobuild Grammar Patterns 1: Verbs. London: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Talmy, L.
(2000) Towards a Cognitive Semantics. Vol. I and II1. Cambridge, Mass./London: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C.
(1989) On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: an example of subjectification in semantic change. Language, 651, 31–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1995) Subjectification in grammaticalisation. In D. Stein & S. Wright (Eds.), Subjectivity and Subjectification (pp. 31–55). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Viberg, Å.
(1984) The verbs of perception: a typological study. In B. Butterworth, B. Comrie & Ö. Dahl (Eds.), Explanations for Language Universals (pp. 123–162). Berlin: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Dictionaries and Corpora

Davies, M.
(2004)  BYU-BNC. (Based on the British National Corpus from Oxford University Press). 100 million words, 1980s-1993. https://​corpus​.byu​.edu​/bnc/. Accessed 12 Dec. 2017. (BNC)
(2008) The Corpus of Contemporary American English. 560 million words, 1990-present. https://​corpus​.byu​.edu​/coca/. Accessed 12 Dec. 2017. (COCA)
Harper, D.
(2001–2018) Online Etymology Dictionary. www​.etymonline​.com. (OnED)
Lawrence, D. H.
(1921) Women in Love. London: Penguin. (WIL)Google Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary Online
(2018) Oxford: Oxford University Press. www​.oed​.com. (OED)