Article published in:
Creativity in Language
Edited by Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, Andrea Hollington, Nico Nassenstein and Anne Storch
[International Journal of Language and Culture 6:1] 2019
► pp. 83–94

Secret language and resistance to borrowing in Chini

| University of California Santa Barbara
In Chini, a language of northeastern New Guinea, speakers rely on principles of semantic extension including metonymy, metaphor, and other types of association to create new terms using material from the vernacular. They do so in a special sociolinguistically marked register referred to here as ‘secret language’, a linguistic practice not unheard of in New Guinea. The same principles at work in secret language can also be seen in the creation of terms for new, modern concepts in the sociolinguistically unmarked register of the language. There is additionally some degree of overlap between the two registers, since what were originally secret language terms have entered into use in the unmarked register. This suggests that secret language has been a resource for resistance to borrowing and brings into focus the larger point that any understanding of borrowability should be rooted in the local sociolinguistic context, to the locally relevant ideologies at work and the particular creative principles of language use that speakers employ.
Keywords: Papuan languages, secret languages, lexical borrowing, language and creativity
Published online: 01 February 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijolc.00017.bro
References

References

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2008 The Manambu language of East Sepik, Papua New Guinea. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bashkow, Ira
2006 The meaning of whitemen: Race and modernity in the Orokaiva cultural world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Brooks, Joseph
2018 Documentation of Chini language and culture (Madang Province, Papua New Guinea). London: SOAS, Endangered Languages Archive. URL: https://​elar​.soas​.ac​.uk​/Collection​/MPI636676
Dobrin, Lise
2008 From linguistic elicitation to eliciting the linguist: Lessons in community empowerment from Melanesia. Language, 84(2), 300–324. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, Karl J.
1972 A ritual pandanus language of New Guinea. Oceania, 43:1, 66–76. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, Simon
2006 Fracturing resemblances: Identity and mimetic conflict in Melanesia and the West.Google Scholar
Herdt, Gilbert
2011 Talking about sex: On the relationship between discourse, secrecy and sexual subjectivity in Melanesia. In Lipset, David & Paul Roscoe (Eds.) Echoes of the Tambaran: Masculinity, history and the subject in the work of Donald F. Tuzin. (pp. 259–73) Canberra: ANU Press.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Edith
1978 Language contact. In Joseph Greenberg (Ed.) Universals of human languages. Volume 1: Method and Theory (pp. 93–120). Stanford: Stanford University Press. 93–120.Google Scholar
Robbins, Joel
2004 Becoming sinners: Christianity and moral torment in a Papua New Guinea society. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Schieffelin, Bambi B.
1990 The give and take of everyday life: Language socialization of Kaluli children. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G. & Terrence Kaufman
1988 Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel
1966 Languages in contact. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar