Cover not available
Article published In:
The Conceptualization of ‘Beautiful’ and ‘Ugly’ across Languages and Cultures
Edited by Anna Gladkova and Jesús Romero-Trillo
[International Journal of Language and Culture 8:1] 2021
► pp. 84–105

“What is beauty?”

Cultural semantics of the Russian folk aesthetics

 | Monash University | Australian National University
The paper studies the semantics of four Russian key terms of aesthetic evaluation: krasivyj ‘beautiful’, prekrasnyj ‘beautiful/fine’, nekrasivyj ’ugly/plain’ and bezobraznyj ‘ugly/frightful’. It demonstrates different patterns of polysemy of the words and the nuances of meaning. Following the framework of folk aesthetics and cultural semantics, the meanings of the terms in question are represented using the Natural Semantic Metalanguage (NSM) and are shown to relate to Russian cultural themes. The analysis demonstrates cultural significance of aesthetic value in Russian and its intrinsic link with ethics, morality and politeness.
Keywords: cultural semantics, folk aesthetics, Russian, natural semantic metalanguage (NSM), beautiful, ugly, polysemy, politeness
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction: An overview of the Russian folk aesthetic lexicon
  • 2.Data and methodology
  • 3.The semantic analysis of krasivyj, prekrasnyj, nekrasivyj, and bezobraznyj
    • 3.1 Krasivyj
      • 3.1.1 Krasivyj 1
      • 3.1.2 Krasivyj 2
      • 3.1.3 Krasivyj 3
    • 3.2 Prekrasnyj
      • 3.2.1 Prekrasnyj 1
      • 3.2.2 Prekrasnyj 2
    • 3.3 Nekrasivyj
      • 3.3.1 Nekrasivyj 1
      • 3.3.2 Nekrasivyj 2
      • 3.3.3 Nekrasivyj 3
    • 3.4 Bezobraznyj
      • 3.4.1 Bezobraznyj 1
      • 3.4.2 Bezobraznyj 2
      • 3.4.3 Bezobraznyj 3
  • 4.Discussion and conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 7 June 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijolc.00036.gla
References (39)
References
Apresjan, J. (2004). Ljubovat’sja, zagljadet’sja. In Apresjan, J. (Ed.), Novyj ob’’jasnitel’nyj slovar’ sinonimov russkogo jazyka [The New Explanatory Dictionary of Russian Synonyms] (pp. 526–529). Moskva-Wien: Jazyki slavjanskoj kul’tury-Wiener Slawistischer Almanach.Google Scholar
Evgen’eva, A. (Ed.). (1981–1984). Slovar’ russkogo jazyka [Russian Dictionary]. 41 Vols. 2nd ed. Moscow: Russkij Jazyk.Google Scholar
Fasmer, M. (2004). Ėtymologičeskij slovar’ russkogo jazyka [Russian Etymological Dictionary]. 41 Vols. 4th ed. Moscow: Asterl-ACT.Google Scholar
Gladkova, A. (2010). Russkaja kul’turnaja semantika: ėmocii, cennosti, žiznennye ustanovki. [Russian cultural semantics: emotions, values and attitudes.] Moscow: Languages of Slavonic Cultures.Google Scholar
(2011). Cultural variation in language use. In Aijmer, K. & G. Andersen (Eds.), Pragmatics of society (pp. 567–588). Vol. 5 of series Handbooks of Pragmatics . Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013a). “Is he one of ours?” The cultural semantics and ethnopragmatics of social categories in Russian. Journal of Pragmatics, 551, 180–194. [ DOI logo]Google Scholar
(2013b). ‘Intimate’ talk in Russian: human relationships and folk psychotherapy. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 33(3), 322–343. [ DOI logo]Google Scholar
(2017). Communication Modes, Russian. In Kim, Y. Y. (Ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Intercultural Communication. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. [ DOI logo].Google Scholar
(2020). The semantics of verbs of visual aesthetic appreciation in Russian. In Bromhead, H. and Z. Ye (Eds), Meaning, Life and Culture: In Conversation with Anna Wierzbicka. ANU Press: Canberra.Google Scholar
Gladkova, A. & Larina, T. (2018a). Anna Wierzbicka, words and the world. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 22(3), 499–520. [ DOI logo]Google Scholar
(2018b). Anna Wierzbicka, culture and text. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 22(4), 717–748. [ DOI logo]Google Scholar
Gladkova, A. & Romero-Trillo, J. (2014). Ain’t it beautiful? The conceptualization of beauty from an ethnopragmatic perspective. Journal of Pragmatics, 601, 140–159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(this issue a). The linguistic conceptualization in folk aesthetics.
(this issue b). Is ugliness in the mind of the beholder?: The conceptualization of ‘ugly’ in English.
Goddard, C. (2009). Polysemy. A problem of definition. In Ravil, Y. & C. Leacock (Eds.), Polysemy: Theoretical and Computational Approaches, (pp. 129–151). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goddard, C. & Wierzbicka, A. (Eds.), 2002. Meaning and universal grammar: Theory and empirical findings. 21 Vols. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
(2014). Words and Meanings: Lexical semantics across domains, languages and cultures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haugh, M. & Schneider, K. (Eds.), (2012). Special issue on “Im/politeness across Englishes”. Journal of Pragmatics 44(9), 1017–1133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larina, T. (2009). Kategorija vežlivosti i stil’ kommunikacii. [The category of politeness and style of communication.] Moscow: Jazyki Slavjanskix kul’tur.Google Scholar
Levisen, C. (this issue). Pæn, Flot, Dejlig, and Lækker: A Lexical Anthropology of Danish Folk Aesthetics.
Levontina, I. (2004). Ostorožno, pošlost’! [Beware of vulgarity]. In Arutjunova, N. D. (Ed.), Logičeskij analiz jazyka. Jazyki ėstetiki. Konceptual’nye polja prekrasnogo i bezobraznogo [Logical analysis of language. Languages of aesthetics. Conceptual fields of beautiful and ugly] (pp. 231–250). Moscow: Indrik.Google Scholar
Levontina, I. & Šmelev, A. (2005). Rodnye prostory. [Dear vast space.] In Zalizniak, Anna A., Levontina, I., Šmelev, A., Ključevye idei russkoj jazykovoj kartiny mira. [Key ideas of the Russian linguistic worldview.] (pp. 64–75). Moscow: Jazyki slavjanskoj kul’tury.Google Scholar
Lišaev, S. (2015). Ėstetika prostranstva [The Aesthetics of Space.] St. Petersburg: Aleteya.Google Scholar
Pasternak, B. L. (1990). Stixotvorenija i poėmy. [Poems.] 21 Vols. 3rd ed. Leningrad: Sovetskij pisatel’.Google Scholar
Romero-Trillo, J. & Fuentes, V. (2017). What is pretty cannot be beautiful? A corpus-based analysis of the aesthetics of nature. In J. Blochowiak, C. Grisot, S. Durrleman-Tame, & C. Laenzlinger (Eds.), Formal Models in the Study of Language (pp. 415–430). Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Russian National Corpus [RNC] [URL]
Sharifian, F. & Tayebi, T. (2017). Perception of (im)politeness and the underlying cultural conceptualisations: A study of Persian. Pragmatics and Society, 8(2), 231–253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Šmelev, A. (2004). Vidy aestetičeskoj ocenki v predstavlenii russkogo jazyka. [Types of aesthetic evaluation in Russian.] In Arutjunova, N. D. (Ed.) Logičeskij analiz jazyka. Jazyki ėstetiki. Konceptual’nye polja prekrasnogo i bezobraznogo. [Logical analysis of language. Languages of aesthetics. Conceptual fields of beautiful and ugly] (pp. 303–311). Moscow: Indrik.Google Scholar
(2005). Širota russkoj duši. [Breadth of the Russian soul.] In Zalizniak, Anna A., Levontina, I., Šmelev, A., Ključevye idei russkoj jazykovoj kartiny mira. [Key ideas of the Russian linguistic worldview.] (pp. 51–63). Moscow: Jazyki slavjanskoj kul’tury.Google Scholar
Šmeleva, E. (2004). Ot nekrasivogo, urodlivogo, bezobraznogo – k prekrasnomu. [From unbeautiful, crippled and ugly to beautiful]. In Arutjunova, N. D. (Ed.) Logičeskij analiz jazyka. Jazyki ėstetiki. Konceptual’nye polja prekrasnogo i bezobraznogo [Logical analysis of language. Languages of aesthetics. Conceptual fields of beautiful and ugly] (pp. 597–602). Moscow: Indrik.Google Scholar
Tayebi, T. (this issue). Conceptualisations of ugly and beautiful: An analysis of im/politeness metapragmatic markers in Persian.
Uryson, E. (2004). Aestetičeskaja ocenka tela čeloveka v russkom jazyke. [Aesthetic evaluation of human body in Russian.] In Arutjunova, N. D. (Ed.) Logičeskij analiz jazyka. Jazyki ėstetiki. Konceptual’nye polja prekrasnogo i bezobraznogo [Logical analysis of language. Languages of aesthetics. Conceptual fields of beautiful and ugly] (pp. 471–486). Moscow: Indrik.Google Scholar
Ušakov, D. N. (1994). Tolkovyj slovar’ russkogo jazyka [Russian Explanatory Dictionary]. 41 Vols. Moscow: Russkie slovari.Google Scholar
Watts, R. 2003. Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. (1997). Understanding Cultures Through Their Key Words: English, Russian, Polish, German, Japanese. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2002). Russian cultural scripts: The theory of cultural scripts and its applications. Ethos, 30(4), 401–432. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wong, J. & Or, M. (this issue). “Is beauty only skin deep?” The conceptualization of ‘beauty’ in Mandarin Chinese.
Zabolotsky, N. A. (2004). Stixotvorenija. [Poems]. Moscow: Progress-Plejada.Google Scholar
Zalizniak, Anna A., & Šmelev, A. D. (2004). Ėstetičeskoe izmerenie v russkoj jazykovoj kartine mira: byt, pošlost’, vran’e. [Aesthetic dimension in the Russian linguistic worldview: byt, pošlost’, vran’e.] In Arutjunova, N. D. (Ed.), Logičeskij analiz jazyka. Jazyki ėstetiki. Konceptual’nye polja prekrasnogo i bezobraznogo [Logical analysis of language. Languages of aesthetics. Conceptual fields of beautiful and ugly] (pp. 209–230). Moscow: Indrik.Google Scholar