Cover not available
Article published In:
International Journal of Language and Culture
Vol. 6:2 (2019) ► pp.225–254

The biblical roots of English ‘love’

The concept of ‘love’ in a historical and cross-linguistic perspective

| The Australian National University
Seen from a broad cross-linguistic perspective, the English verb (to) love is quite unusual because it has very broad scope: it can apply to a mother’s love, a husband’s love, a sister’s love, etc. without any restrictions whatsoever; and the same applies to its counterparts in many other European languages. Trying to locate the origins of this phenomenon, I have looked to the Bible. Within the Bible, I have found both continuity and innovation. In the Hebrew Bible, the verb ’āhēb, rendered in the Greek translation of the Old Testament known as the Septuagint with the verb agapao, implies a “preferential love”, e.g. it is used for a favourite wife of a favourite son. In the New Testament, the concept of ‘love’ loses the “preferential” components and thus becomes applicable across the board: between anybody and anybody else.
The paper argues that the very broad meaning of verbs like love in English, aimer in French, lieben in German, etc. reflects a shared conceptual heritage of many European languages, with its roots in the New Testament; and it shows that by taking a semantic perspective on these historical developments, and exploring them through the rigorous framework of NSM and Minimal English, we can arrive at clear and verifiable hypotheses about a theme which is of great general interest, regardless of one’s own religious and philosophical views and commitments.
Keywords: the meaning of ‘love’, NSM, Minimal English, New Testament, from Hebrew ’āhēb to Greek agapao
Article outline
  • 1.Setting the scene
  • 2.The framework: NSM and Minimal English
  • 3.The origins of the broad concept ‘to love (someone)’
  • 4.The concept of ‘love’ in the Bible
    • 4.1People ‘loving’ God
    • 4.2‘Loving’ another person in the Old Testament
    • 4.3‘Loving’ another person in the New Testament
    • 4.4God’s love for people
    • 4.5Jesus’ deliberate broadening of the concept of ‘love’
  • 5.“Loving one’s neighbour” and “loving one’s enemies”
  • 6.Conclusion: The origins of the broad concept of ‘love’ in present-day European languages
  • Notes
  • References
  • Online sources
Published online: 24 January 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijolc.18006.wie
References (40)
References
Ackerman, Susan. (2002). The personal is political: Covenantal and affectionate love (’āhēb, ’ahăbâ) in the Hebrew Bible. Vetus Testamentum LII (4): 437–458. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Botterweck, G. Johannes & Helmer Ringgren (eds.). Translated by John T. Willis. (1972). Theological dictionary of the Old Testament. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Collins Wordbanks. <[URL]>, accessed 18 June 2018.
Freedman, David Noel (ed.). (1992). The Anchor Bible Dictionary. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Gerber, Eleanor. (1985). Rage and obligation: Samoan emotions in conflict. In Geoffrey M. White & John Kirkpatrick (eds), Person, self, and experience: exploring Pacific ethnopsychologies. Berkeley: University of California Press. pp. 121–67.Google Scholar
Goddard, Cliff. (1990). The lexical semantics of ‘good feelings’ in Yankunytjatjara. Australian Journal of Linguistics 10 (2): 257–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1991). Testing the Translatability of Semantic Primitives into an Australian Aboriginal Language. Anthropological Linguistics 33 (1): 31–56.Google Scholar
. (1996). The “social emotions” of Malay (Bahasa Melayu). Ethos 24 (3): 426–464. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(compiler). (1996). Pitjantjatjara/Yankunytjatjara to English Dictionary, revised 2 edn. Alice Spring: IAD Press.Google Scholar
(compiler). (2011 [1998]). Semantic analysis: A practical introduction. Second edition (first edition 1998). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. (2018). Minimal English for a Global World: Improved Communication Using Fewer Words. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goddard, Cliff & Anna Wierzbicka. (2014). Words and Meanings: Lexical Semantics across Domains, Languages & Cultures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(eds.). (1994). Semantic and Lexical Universals. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(eds.). (2002). Meaning and Universal Grammar: Theory and Empirical Findings. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Heider, Karl. (1991). Landscapes of Emotion: Mapping three cultures of emotion in Indonesia. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press; Paris: Editions de la maison des sciences de l’homme. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levy, Robert. (1973). Tahitians: mind and experience in the Society Islands. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, Charlton T. & Charles Short (eds.). (1962). A Latin Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, C. S. (1977). Four Loves. London: Fount.Google Scholar
Liddell, Henry George & Robert Scott. (1963). A Lexicon Abridged from Liddell and Scott’s Greek-English Lexicon. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Lutz, Catherine. (1985). Ethnopsychology compared to what? Explaining behaviour and consciousness among the Ifaluk. In Geoffrey M. White & John Kirkpatrick (eds), Person, self, and experience: exploring Pacific ethnopsychologies. Berkeley: University of California Press. pp. 35–79.Google Scholar
. (1988). Unnatural Emotions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McKenzie, John L. (1995). The Dictionary of the Bible. London: G. Chapman.Google Scholar
Men’, Alexander. (1969). The Son of Man. Online. <[URL]>, accessed 10 August 2017.
Metzger, Bruce M. & Michael D. Coogan (eds.). (1993). The Oxford Companion to the Bible. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
New Catholic Encyclopedia (prepared by an Editorial Staff at the Catholic University of America, Washington, D.C). (1967). New York: Mcgraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Prager, Denis. (1998). Piece in Simon Wiesenthal, The Sunflower: On the Possibilities and Limits of Forgiveness. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
Peeters, Bert (Ed.). (2006). Semantic Primes and Universal Grammar: Empirical evidence from the Romance languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schuchardt, Hugo. (1887) On Sound Laws: Against the Neogrammarians. In Vennemann, Theo and Terence H. Wilbur. (1972). Schuchardt, the Neogrammarians, and the Transformational Theory of Phonological Change; four essays. Frankfurt: Athenäum.Google Scholar
Shaw, Benjamin. (2018). Love in the Syriac New Testament. Language Studies: Aramaic Thoughts. Online at <[URL]>, accessed 1 March 2018.
Wierzbicka, Anna. (1992). Semantics, Culture and Cognition: Universal Human Concepts in Culture-specific Configurations. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. (1996). Semantics: Primes and universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. (2001). What Did Jesus Mean? Explaining the Sermon on the Mount and the Parables in Simple and Universal Human Concepts. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2014). Imprisoned in English: The Hazards of Using English as a Default Language. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. (2017). W co wierzą chrześcijanie? Opowieść o Bogu i o ludziach [What Christians Believe: The Story of God and People]. Znak, Poland.Google Scholar
. (2018a). Talking about the universe in Minimal English: Teaching science through words that children understand. In Cliff Goddard (ed.), Minimal English for a Global World: Improved Communication Using Fewer Words. Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 169–200. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, A., (2018b), Speaking about God in Universal Words, Thinking about God outside English. In Chilton, P., and Monkia Kopytowska, Religion, Language, and the Human Mind New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna. (2019). What Christians Believe: The Story of God and People in Minimal English. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zwi Werblowsky, R. J. & Geoffrey Wigoder (eds.). (1997). The Oxford Dictionary of the Jewish Religion. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Online sources
The Comprehensive Aramaic Lexicon. Online at <[URL]>
The Jewish Encyclopedia. (1906). <[URL]>, accessed 18 June 2018.
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Pinich, Iryna
2023. 'LOVE' IS ALL YOU NEED: AN ATTEMPT AT CRITICAL CONCEPTUAL ACCOUNT. Lege artis. Language yesterday, today, tomorrow ► pp. 92 ff. DOI logo
Ge, Yanlei
2022. The linguocultural concept based on word frequency: correlation, differentiation, and cross-cultural comparison. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 47:1 ► pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Kacprzak, Aleksander
2022. The structure of the concept of kærlighed ‘love’ in Danish. International Journal of Language and Culture 9:2 ► pp. 258 ff. DOI logo
Wierzbicka, Anna
2021. Seven Essential Messages for the Time of the Coronavirus. In Minimal Languages in Action, ► pp. 319 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.