Article published In:
International Journal of Language and Culture
Vol. 2:1 (2015) ► pp.3861
References
Almeida, A.C
(2007) A cabeça do brasileiro. Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo: Editora Record.Google Scholar
Bachmann-Medick, D
(2009) Cultural turns. Neuorientierungen in den Kulturwissenschaften. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt.Google Scholar
Bhabha, H.K
(1994) The location of culture. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Boers, F., & Demecheleer, M
(1997) A few metaphorical models in (western) economic discourse. In W. Liebert, G. Redeker, & L.R. Waugh (Eds.), Discourse and perspective in cognitive linguistics (pp. 115–129). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boroditsky, L
(2007) Does language shape thought? Mandarin and English speakers’ conception of time. In V. Evans, B. Bergen, & J. Zinken (Eds.), The cognitive linguistics reader (pp. 881–901). London: Equinox Publishing.Google Scholar
Bude, H
(2008) Die Ausgeschlossenen. Das Ende vom Traum einer gerechten Gesellschaft. München: Carl Hanser Verlag.Google Scholar
Cameron, L
(2007) Confrontation or complementarity? Metaphor in language use and cognitive metaphor theory. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 51, 107–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008) Metaphor and talk. In R.W. Gibbs, Jr. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 197–211). Cambridge: Cambridge University. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cienki, A
(2008) Why study metaphor and gesture? In A. Cienki & C. Müller (Eds.), Metaphor and gesture (pp. 5–25). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cienki, A., & Müller, C
(2008) Metaphor, gesture, and thought. In R.W. Gibbs, Jr. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 483–501). Cambridge: University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clifford, J
(1997) Routes: Travel and translation in the late twentieth century. Cambridge, London.Google Scholar
Cortazzi, M., & Jin, L
(1999) Bridges to learning. Metaphors of teaching, learning and language. In L. Cameron & G. Low (Eds.), Researching and applying metaphor (pp. 149–176). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dreher, J
(2007) Konstitutionsprinzipien ‘kultureller Differenz’: Zur Analyse der Konstruktion kultureller Grenzbestimmungen in grundlagentheoretischer Absicht. In J. Dreher & P. Stegmaier (Eds.), Zur Unüberwindbarkeit kultureller Differenz. Grundlagentheoretische Reflexionen (pp. 129–151). Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Freyre, G
(1933/1999) Casa Grande & Senzala. Formação da Família Brasileira sob o Regime da Economia Patriarcal. Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo: Editora Record.Google Scholar
Geideck, S., & Liebert, W.A
(2003) Sinnformeln. Linguistische und soziologische Analysen von Leitbildern, Metaphern und anderen kollektiven Orientierungsmustern. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M
(1987) The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kasper, G
(2008) Data collection in pragmatics research. In H. Spencer-Oatey (Ed.), Culturally speaking: Culture, communication and politeness theory (pp. 279–303). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Kimmel, M
(2005) Culture regained: Situated and compound image schemas. In B. Hampe & J.E. Grady (Eds.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp. 285–311). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kohl, K
(2007) Metaphor. Stuttgart, Weimar: Metzler.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z
(2002) Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2003) Metaphor and emotion: Language, culture, and body in human feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2005) Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010) A new look at metaphorical creativity in cognitive linguistics. Cognitive Linguistics, 21(4), 663–697. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M
(1980/2003) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(1999) Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Book.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Turner, M
(1989) More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G
(1987) Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1993) The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 202–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leezenberg, M
(2001) Contexts of metaphor. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Linz, E
(2004) Sprachlose Metaphern. Zur Rhetorizität der Kognition und ihrer Modellierung in der kognitiven Linguistik. In J. Fohrmann (Ed.), Rhetorik. Figuration und Performanz (pp. 246–266). Stuttgart, Weimar: Metzler.Google Scholar
Littlemore, J
(2008) The relationship between associative thinking, analogical reasoning, image formation and metaphoric extension strategies. In M.S. Zanotto, L. Cameron, & M.C. Cavalcanti (Eds.), Confronting metaphor in use: An applied linguistic approach (pp. 199–222). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marschark, M
(2005) Metaphors in sign language and sign language users: A window into relations of language and thought. In H.L. Colston & A.N. Katz (Eds.), Figurative language comprehension: Social and cultural influences (pp. 209–334). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
McNeill, D
(2008) Unexpected metaphors. In A. Cienki & C. Müller (Eds.), Metaphor and gesture (pp. 155–170). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, C
(2008a) What gestures reveal about the nature of metaphor. In A. Cienki & C. Müller (Eds.), Metaphor and gesture (pp. 219–245). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008b) Metaphors, dead and alive, sleeping and waking: A dynamic view. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Musolff, A
(2000) Political imagery of Europe: A house without exit doors? Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 21(3), 216–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Núñez, R.E., Neumann, V.G., & Mamani, M
(1997) Los mapeos conceptuales de la concepción del tiempo en la lengua Aymara del norte de Chile. Boletin de Educación de la Universidad Católica del Norte, 281, 47–55.Google Scholar
Parrill, F
(2008) Form, meaning, and convention: A comparison of a metaphoric gesture with an emblem. In A. Cienki & C. Müller (Eds.), Metaphor and gesture (pp. 195–217). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peirce, C.S
(1965) Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Vol. I and II1) (C. Hartshorne & P. Weiss, Eds.). Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Quinn, N
(1987) Convergent evidence for a cultural model of American marriage. In D. Holland & N. Quinn (Eds.), Cultural models in language and thought (pp. 173–192). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1991) The cultural basis of metaphor. In J.W. Fernandez (Ed.), Beyond metaphor: The theory of tropes in anthropology (pp. 56–93). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Ribeiro, D
(1983) As Américas e a civilização. Formação histórica e causas do desenvolvimento desigual dos povos americanos. Petrópolis: Editora Vozes Ltda.Google Scholar
Schmidt, T., & Wörner, K
Schmitz, H.W
(1985) Die durchgängige Tropisierung der Sprache. Über einen Aspekt von ‘Zeichen im Wandel. In K.D. Dutz & P. Schmitter (Eds.), Historiographia Semioticae. Studien zur Rekonstruktion der Theorie und Geschichte der Semiotik (pp. 241–270). Münster: MAkS Publikationen.Google Scholar
Schröder, U
(2004) Der Selbstbeobachter-ein deutsches Phänomen? Kodikas/Code Ars Semeiotica. An International Journal of Semiotics, 27 ¾1, 201–218.Google Scholar
(2009) Preferential metaphorical conceptualizations in everyday discourse about love in the Brazilian and German speech communities. Metaphor and Symbol, 24(2), 105–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010a) Der Einfluss kultureller und kontextueller Faktoren bei der Konstruktion integrierter Netzwerke in metaphorischen blends . Zeitschrift für Angewandte Linguistik, 11, 81–102.Google Scholar
(2010b) Die metaphorische Konstruktion von Gesellschaft in kulturvergleichender Perspektive. Lusorama, 83–841, 183–213.Google Scholar
(2011) Trinta Anos da Teoria Conceptual da Metáfora: uma Retrospectiva Crítica. Cadernos de Estudos Lingüísticos, 531, 59–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012a) Applying conceptual metaphor and blending theory to culture-specific speech functions in rap lyrics. Text & Talk, 321, 211–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012b) Kommunikationstheoretische Fragestellungen in der kognitiven Metaphernforschung. Eine Betrachtung von ihren Anfängen bis zur Gegenwart. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
(2014) The interplay of (im)politeness, conflict styles, rapport management and metacommunication in Brazilian-German interaction. Intercultural Pragmatics, 111, 57–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schröder, U., & Viterbo Lage, C. de
(2014) Estratégias de polidez em momentos de dissensão: análise de uma interação entre estudantes brasileiros e alemães. Revista de Estudos da Linguagem, 22(1), 153–179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selting, M., Auer, P., Barth-Weingarten, D., Bergmann, J.R., Bergmann, P., Birkner, K., Couper-Kuhlen, E., Deppermann, A., Gilles, P., Günthner, S., Hartung, M., & Kern, F
(2009) Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2). Gesprächsforschung-Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion, 101, 353–402.Google Scholar
Semino, E
(2008) Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Steen, G.J
(2007) Finding metaphor in grammar and usage. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ungeheuer, G
(2004) Kommunikative und extrakommunikative Betrachtungsweisen in der Phonetik. In G. Ungeheuer (Ed.), Sprache und Kommunikation (pp. 22–34). Münster: Nodus Publikationen.Google Scholar
Wodak, R
(2002) Fragmented identities: Redefining and recontextualizing national identity. In P.A. Chilton & C. Schäffner (Eds.), Politics as talk and text: Analytic approaches to political discourse (pp. 143–169). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yu, N
(2008) Metaphor from body and culture. In R. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 247–261). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 9 other publications

Dyrmo, Tomasz
2024. Image schemas in gestural metaphorical scenarios of swearing. Multimodal Communication 0:0 DOI logo
Johnson, Esko
2021. ‘They are not very open to people’: how mobile students construct interculturality through metaphor and narrative. Language and Intercultural Communication 21:5  pp. 588 ff. DOI logo
Johnson, Esko
2023. Figurative language and ‘doing interculturality’ in a lingua franca. European Journal of Applied Linguistics 11:2  pp. 410 ff. DOI logo
Schröder, Ulrike
2015. The interplay of verbal, vocal, and visual cues in the co-construction of the experience of alterity in exchange students’ talk. Journal of Pragmatics 81  pp. 21 ff. DOI logo
Schröder, Ulrike
2015. Metaphorical blends and their function in discourse on society. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 2:1  pp. 50 ff. DOI logo
Schröder, Ulrike
2017. Multimodal metaphors as cognitive pivots for the construction of cultural otherness in talk. Intercultural Pragmatics 14:4 DOI logo
Schröder, Ulrike
2019. Comunicação (inter)cultural em interação: Um grupo de pesquisa na interface dos estudos da fala-em-interação e da linguística cultural. In Comunicação (inter)cultural em interação,  pp. 19 ff. DOI logo
Schröder, Ulrike, Milene Mendes de Oliveira & Hans-Georg Wolf
2020. Intercultural Pragmatics and Cultural Linguistics. International Journal of Language and Culture 7:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Stephens, Gregory
2023. Postcolonialism as leftist firing squad and procrustean bed: a communicative take. Journal for Cultural Research 27:1  pp. 38 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.