Cover not available
Article published In:
International Journal of Language and Culture
Vol. 9:1 (2022) ► pp.27–47

The reschematization of face in Chinese overseas students’ intercultural experience

 | Shanghai University of International Business and Economics
There has been little longitudinal research on the relationship between how sojourners define their personal face and how this influences their use of the host language in intercultural settings. This study employs the Cultural Linguistic Perspective developed by Sharifian (2011, 2017), using repeated episodic interviews to explore the process of reschematization of face among three Chinese overseas students in Australia. The students’ schemas of face gradually moved away from the Chinese ideals of sociality and indirectness towards Australian norms of individual autonomy and directness in both English use and social relationships. This study points to the need to examine the contribution of personal, situational, and cultural factors to this process.
Keywords: reschematization of face, Cultural Linguistics, repeated episodic interviews, intercultural communication, Chinese overseas students
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Cultural Linguistics
  • 3.Western and Chinese concepts of face
  • 4.This study
  • 5.Discussion
    • 5.1The cultural schemas of face in relation to English use
    • 5.2Face reschematization in social interactions
  • 6.Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 22 July 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijolc.20020.hou
References (59)
References
Anderson, J. A. (1987). Communication research: Issues and methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Arundale, R. B. (2010). Constituting face in conversation: Face, face-work, and interactional achievement. Journal of Pragmatics, 42 (8), 2078–2105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aveni, V. P. (2005). Study abroad and second language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Rembering. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1978). Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomenon. In E. Goody (Ed.), Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction (pp. 56–289). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Clevedon, England; Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Chai, C., & Chai, W. (1965). The sacred books of Confucius and other Confucian classics. New York: Bantam Books, Inc.Google Scholar
Chang, H.-C., & Holt, G. R. (1994). A Chinese perspective on face as inter-relational concern. In S. Ting-Toomey (Ed.), Challenge of facework (pp. 95–132). Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Cheng, C. (1986). The concept of face and its Confucian roots. J. Chin. Philos, 13 1, 329–348. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Department of Education, A. G. (2019). [URL]
Dewaele, J. M., & Botes, E. (2020). Does multilingualism shape personality? An exploratory investigation. International Journal of Bilingualism, 24 (4), 811–823. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flick, U. (2009). An introduction to qualitative research (4 ed.). London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Gao, G. (1998). “Don’t take my word for it”--understanding Chinese speaking practice. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 22 1, 163–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009). Face and self in Chinese communication. In F. Bargiela-Chiappini & M. Haugh (Eds.), Face, communication and social Interaction (pp. 175–191). London; Oakville: EquinoxGoogle Scholar
Gao, G., & Ting-Toomey, S. (1988). Intercultural conflict style: A face-negotiation theory. In Y. Y. Kim & W. B. Gudykunst (Eds.), Theories in intercultural communication (pp. 213–235). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1955). On facework: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry, 18 1, 213–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.Google Scholar
(1967). Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face to Face Behaviour. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Gu, Y. (1990). Politeness phenomena in modern Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics, 14 (2), 237–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
He, M., & Zhang, S.-j. (2011). Re-conceptualizing the Chinese concept of face from a face-sensitive perspective: A case study of a modern Chinese TV drama. Journal of Pragmatics, 43 1, 2360–2372. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ho, D. (1976). On the concept of face. American Journal of Sociology, 81 1, 867–884. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmes, P. (2004). Negotiating differences in learning and intercultural communication: Ethnic Chinese students in a New Zealand University. Business Communication Quarterly, 67 (3), 294–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006). Problematizing intercultural communication competence in the pluricultural classroom: Chinese students in a New Zealand university. Language and Intercultural Communication, 6 (1), 18–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hu, H. C. (1944). The Chinese Concept of “face”. American Anthropology, 46 1, 45–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hwang, K.-K. (2011). Face dynamism in Confucian society. China Media Research, 7 (4), 13–25.Google Scholar
Jia, W. (1997). Facework as a Chinese conflict-preventive mechanism--A cultural/ discourse analysis. Intercultural Communication Studies, 7 1, 43–58.Google Scholar
(2001). Remaking the Chinese Character and Identity in the 21st Century: The Chinese Face Practices. Westport, CT: Ablex/ Greenwood.Google Scholar
(2003). The Chinese conceptualizations of face: Personhood, communication and emotions. In L. Samovar & R. Porter (Eds.), Intercultural communication: A reader (10th edition ed., pp. 48–57). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.Google Scholar
(2006). Wei (positioning)-ming (naming)-lianmian (face)-guanxi (relationship)-renqing (humanized feelings). In P. Hershock & R. Ames (Eds.), Cultures of Authority: China (pp. 49–64). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Kinnison, L. (2017). Power, integrity, and mask--An attempt to disentangle the Chinese face concept. Journal of Pragmatics, 114 1, 32–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. (1972). Language in the inner city. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Li, W. (2011). Moment Analysis and translanguaging space: Discursive construction of identities by multilingual Chinese youth in Britain. Journal of Pragmatics, 43 1(2011), 1222–1235. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. London: SAGE. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
Mahr, J. B., & Csibra, G. (2018). Why do we remember? The communicative function of episodic memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 41 (e1). DOI logo, e1Google Scholar
Mao, L. R. (1994). Beyond politeness theory: “face” revisited and reviewed. Journal of Pragmatics, 21 (5), 451–486. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, Y. (1988). Reexamination of the universality of face: politeness phenomena in Japanese Journal of Pragmatics, 12 1, 403–426. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rintell, E. M. (1990). That’s incredible: Stories of emotion told by second language learners and native speakers. In R. C. Scarcella, E. S. Andersen, & S. D. Krashen (Eds.), Developing communicative competence in a second language (pp. 75–94). Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.Google Scholar
Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W. (1995). Intercultural communication: A discourse approach. Oxford, UK Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sharifian, F. (2008). Distributed, emergent cultural congnition, conceptualisation and language. In R. D. R. M. Frank, T. Ziemke, & E. Bernardez (Ed.), Body, language and mind: Vol. 2. Sociocultural situatedness (pp. 247–265). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2013). Globalization and developing metacultural competence in English as an international language. Multilingual Education, 3 (7), 1–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017). Cultural Linguistics: Cultural conceptualisations and language. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(Ed.) (2009). English as an international language: Perspectives and pedagogical issues. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shi, X. (2011). The impact of face on Chinese students’ simulated negotiation practices with Americans. Language and Intercultural Communication, 11 (1), 26–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, H. (2008). Face, (im)politeness and rapport. In H. Spencer-Oatey (Ed.), Culturally speaking: Culture, communication and politeness theory (2nd ed., pp. 11–47). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Taguchi, N., & Roever, C. (2017). Second language pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tantucci, V., & Wang, A. (2018). Illocutional concurrences: The case of evaluative speech acts and face-work in spoken Mandarin and American English. Journal of Pragmatics, 138 1, 60–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020). Diachronic change of rapport orientation and sentence-periphery in Mandarin. Discourse Studies, 22 (2), 146–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ting-Toomey, S. (2005). The matrix of face: an updated face-negotiation theory. In W. B. Gudykunst (Ed.), Theorizing about intercultural communication (pp. 71–92). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
(2017). Facework and face negotiation theory. In Y. Y. Kim (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of intercultural communication. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(Ed.) (1988). Intercultural conflict style: A face-negotiation theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, L., & Vermeer, A. (2002). Communicative competence and personality dimensions in first and second language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 23 (3), 361–374. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Volkema, R. J. (1988). The mediator as face manager. Mediation Quarterly, 22 1, 5–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wen, W. P., & Clement, R. (2003). A Chinese conceptualization of willingness to communicate in ESL. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 16 (1), 18–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, M., & Burden, R. L. (1997). Psychology for language teachers: A social constructive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Yang, K. S. (1981). Social orientation and individual modernity among Chinese students in Taiwan. Journal of Social Psychology, 13 1, 159–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yu, M.-C. (2003). On the universality of face: Evidence from Chinese compliment response behaviour. Journal of Pragmatics, 35 1, 1679–1710. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhou, V. X., & Pilcher, N. (2019). Tapping the thirdness in the intercultural space of dialogue. Language and Intercultural Communication, 19 (1), 23–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Zhu, Junqi, Mengdi Gu, Li Yang, Shoukui Xun, Ming Wan & Jie Li
2022. Academic Adaptation of International Students in China: Evidence from the Grounded Theory and Structure Equation Model. Sustainability 15:1 ► pp. 692 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.