Cover not available
Article published In:
International Journal of Language and Culture
Vol. 9:1 (2022) ► pp.151–172

Self-sacrifice expressions in Persian

 | Tarbiat Modares University
 | Yazd University
In spite of its prevalence in Iranian Persian-speaking communities, the issue of self-sacrifice expressions as a culture-specific verbal behavior has remained almost ignored in the existing literature on speech acts. The current study is an enquiry into the use of self-sacrifice expressions by Iranian Persian speakers in performing different speech acts such as thanking, sympathizing, and expressing affection and love. Serving as a device of encoding emotion into speech, self-sacrifice expressions have been found to be of variety in diction as well as variation in frequency across such social factors as age, gender, and education level. The results indicate pragmalinguistic variations in the use of self-sacrifice expressions in terms of social context, gender, age, and educational level. The tenets of this study are intended to be of insight into socio-cultural aspects of self-sacrifice expressions in language use.
Keywords: pragmatics, speech act, expressions of self-sacrifice, Persian language
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Socio-cultural basis for emotional verbal behavior
  • 3.Related studies
  • 4.Method
  • 5.Results
    • To thank someone
    • To show sympathy
    • To show affection (as a term of endearment)
    • To address someone when you are upset
    • To praise someone
    • To both accept and reject an offer
    • To respond to a compliment or thank you
    • To respond to people asking “How are you? In greetings
    • To say goodbye
    • To politely reject an invitation
  • 6.Discussion
  • 7.Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 16 May 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijolc.21072.all
References (45)
References
Afghari, A. (2007). A socio-pragmatic study of apology speech act realization patterns in Persian. Speech Communication, 49 (3), 177–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arundale, R. B. (2010). Constituting face in conversation: Face, facework, and interactional achievement. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(3), 2078–2105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bachman, L. (1990) Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bachman, L. F. & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice designing and developing useful language tests. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beeman, W. O. (1976). What is (Iranian) national character? Iranian Studies, 9(1), 29–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Behnam, B., Ai Akbari Hamed, L. & Goharkhani Aslic, F. (2012). An investigation of giving condolences in English and Persian via short messages. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 701, 1679–1685. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berns, M. (2006). World Englishes and communicative competence, In B. B. Kachru, Y. Kachru, & C. L. Nelson (Eds.), The handbook of world Englishes, (pp. 718–731), Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berry, J. W., Poortinga, Y. H., Segall, M. H., & Dasen, P. R. (2002). Cross-cultural Psychology: Research and Applications (2nd ed). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brody, L. R. & Hall, J. A. (1993). Gender and emotion. In M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland (Eds), Handbook of emotions (pp. 447–460). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Brown, P. & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Canale, M. & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1 (1), 1–47.Google Scholar
Crystal, D. (1997). English as a global language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eggins, S. (1994). An introduction to systemic functional linguistics. London: Pinter Publisher Ltd.Google Scholar
Eslami-Rasekh, Z. (2004). Face keeping strategies in reaction to complaints: English and Persian. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 14 (1), 181–198.Google Scholar
Feyzi Behnagh, R. (2011). A comparative study of speech act of sympathy between Iranian EFL students and Farsi speaking university students. Chișinău: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
Gilbert, M. A. (1997). Prolegomenon to a pragmatics of emotion. Proceedings of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation. Brock University, St. Catherine’s.Google Scholar
(2001). Emotional messages. Argumentation, 151, 239–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004). Emotion, argumentation & informal logic. Informal Logic, 24(3), 245–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guiraud, N., Longin, D., Lorini, E., Pesty, S. & Rivière, J. (2011). The face of emotions: A logical formalization of expressive speech acts. In K. Tumer, P. Yolum, L. Sonenberg and P. Stone (eds.), Proc. of 10th international conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems (AAMAS), (pp. 1031–1038). Taipei, Taiwan, Richland: International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems.Google Scholar
Hess, U., Senécal, S., Kirouac, G. H., Pedro, P., Pierre, K. & Robert, E. (2000). Emotional expressivity in men and women: Stereotypes and self-perceptions. Cognition & Emotion, 14 1, 609–642. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmes, J. (2008). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics (3rd ed.). Essex: Pearson Education Ltd.Google Scholar
Kachru, B. B., & Nelson, C. L. (1996). World Englishes. In S. L. McKay & N. Hornberger (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language teaching (pp. 71–102). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Khodaei Moghaddam, M., Elyasi, M. & Sharifi, S. (2014). “Xaste Nabâši(D)” as a culture specific speech act in Persian. Journal of Advances in Linguistics, 4(1), 269–289. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, G. N. (1983). Principle of pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Lim, N. (2016). Cultural differences in emotion: differences in emotional arousal level between the East and the West. Integrative Medicine Research, 5(2), 105–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lotfollahi, B. & Eslami Rasekh, A. (2011). Speech act of condolence in Persian and English: A cross-cultural study. Studies in Literature and Language, 3(1), 139–145Google Scholar
Makarova, V. & Pourmohammadi, E. (2020). Gender factor in the expression of politeness in Farsi. Journal of Gender Studies, 29(4), 373–385. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Markus, H. R. & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98 (2), 224–253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McRae, K., Ochsner, K. N., Mauss, I. B., Gabrieli, J. J. D. & Gross, J. J. (2008). Gender differences in emotion regulation: An fMRI study of cognitive reappraisal. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 111, 143–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mesthrie, R. & Bhatt, R. M. (2008). World Englishes: The study of new linguistic varieties. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morady Moghaddam, M. & Pishghadam, R. (2013). Studies in literature and language. Journal of English language teaching and learning. 4(10), 105–125Google Scholar
Nanbakhsh, G. (2011). Persian address pronouns and politeness in interaction. Unpublished PhD Dissertation. UK: University of Edinburgh.
Pham, M. T. (2007). Emotion and rationality: A critical review and interpretation of empirical evidence. Review of General Psychology, 11 (2), 155–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pham, M. T., Cohen, J. B., Pracejus, J. W. & Hughes, G. D. (2001). Affect monitoring and the primacy of feelings in judgment. Journal of Consumer Research, 28 1, 167–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pishghada, R. & Nourouzi Kermanshahi, P. (2012). Insha’ Allah (God’s willing) and its functions in Persian. Studies in Literature and Language, 4(1), 6–11Google Scholar
Richeson, P. J. & Boyd, R. (2005). Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rose, K. R., & Kasper, G. (2001). Pragmatics in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rueckert, L., Branch, B. & Doan, T. (2011). Are gender differences in empathy due to differences in emotional reactivity? Psychology, 2 (6), 574–578. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Samavarchi, L. & Allami, H. (2012). Giving Condolences by Persian EFL Learners: A Contrastive Sociopragmatic Study. International Journal of English Linguistics. 2(1), 71–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, G. E., Brown, S. & Ahern, G. L. (1980). Facial muscle patterning and subjective experience during affective imagery: Sex differences. Psychophysiology, 17 1, 75–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwarz, N. (2002). Situated cognition and the wisdom of feelings: Cognitive tuning. In L. F. Barrett & P. Salovey (Eds.), The wisdom in feelings: Psychological processes in emotional intelligence (pp. 144–166). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Searle, J. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shobeiry, M. (2021a). Pragmatic functions of formulaic expressions of embarrassment in Persian refusals: A qualitative study. Journal of International Social Research, 14(76), 33–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2021b). Gender differences in using hedges and external pragmatic modifiers of “Taarof” in Persian native speakers’ refusals. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 8(1), 11–35.Google Scholar
Thomas, J. (1983). Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics, 41, 91–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

House, Juliane & Dániel Z. Kádár
2023. Speech acts and interaction in second language pragmatics: A position paper. Language Teaching ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
House, Juliane & Dániel Z. Kádár
2024. An interactional approach to speech acts for applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics Review 15:4 ► pp. 1695 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.