Cover not available
Article published In:
International Journal of Language and Culture
Vol. 3:1 (2016) ► pp.90–114

Gender in Hinuq and other Nakh-Daghestanian languages

Nakh-Daghestanian languages are known for their relatively elaborate gender systems and the impact the systems have on the grammar of the languages, most notably on verbal agreement. This paper explores the gender system of Hinuq with its five genders, taking into account semantic and formal principles for gender assignment and the rules of verbal and nonverbal gender agreement. Moreover, the paper discusses the Hinuq gender system within the wider context of Nakh-Daghestanian gender systems and possible social and cultural influences on these systems.
Keywords: gender agreement, Nakh-Daghestanian languages, Hinuq, gender assignment, grammatical gender, gender stereotypes
Published online: 5 August 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijolc.3.1.05for
References (42)
Abdulaev, A.K., & Abdullaev, I.K. (2010). Didojskij (cezskij) fol’klor. Leipzig/Makhachkala: Lotos.Google Scholar
Akhlakov, A.A. (1976). Avarskie teksty. In A.A. Axlakov & K.M. Xalilov (Eds.), Satira i jumor narodov Dagestana (pp. 7–42). Makhachkala: Daginogoizdat.Google Scholar
Alekseev, M.E. (2003). Sravnitelʼno-istoričeskaja morfologija naxsko-dagestanskix jazykov: Kategorii imeni. Moscow: Academia.Google Scholar
Authier, G. (2009). Grammaire Kryz: Langue Caucasique d’Azerbaidjan dialecte d’Alik. Leuven/Paris: Peeters.Google Scholar
Baerman, M., & Corbett, G.G. (2013). Person by other means. In D. Bakker & M. Haspelmath (Eds.), Languages across boundaries: Studies in memory of Anna Siewierska (pp. 1–14). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bokarev, E.A. (1959). Cezskie (didojskie) jazyki Dagestana. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Akademii nauk SSSR.Google Scholar
Comrie, B., & Polinsky, M. (1999). Some observations on class categorization in Tsez. In H. van den Berg (Ed.), Studies in Caucasian linguistics: Selected papers of the eighth Caucasian colloquium (pp. 125–139). Leiden: CNWS.Google Scholar
Corbett, G.G. (1991). Gender. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chumakina, M., Kibort, A., & Corbett, G.G. (2007). Determining a language’s feature inventory: Person in Archi. Linguistische Berichte, 141, 143–172.Google Scholar
Daniel, M. (2015, May 15). Person in Archi revisited, with parallels from Dargwa and Nakh. Paper presented at Language in Daghestan Conference , Chicago.
Forker, D. (2013). A grammar of Hinuq. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (in preparation). Grammatical relations in Sanzhi Dargwa. In B. Bickel & A. Witzlack-Makarevich (Eds.), Handbook of grammatical relations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logo
Friedman, V. (1996). Gender, class, and age in the Daghestanian highlands: Towards a unified account of the morphology of agreement in Lak. In H. Aronson (Ed.), Linguistic studies in the non-Slavic languages of the Commonwealth of Independent States and the Baltic Republics, Vol. 81 (pp. 187–199). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Gagliardi, A., & Lidz, J. (2014). Statistical insensitivity in the acquisition of Tsez noun classes. Language, 901, 58–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Imnajšvili, D.S. (1963). Didojskij jazyk v sravnenii s ginuxskim i xwaršijskim jazykami. Tbilisi: Izd. AN Gruzinskoj SSR.Google Scholar
Hellinger, M., & Bussmann, H. (Eds.). (2001-2003). Gender across languages: The linguistic representation of women and men, Vol. 1-31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaliszewska, I., & Falkowski, M. (2015). Veiled and unveiled in Chechnya and Daghestan. London: Hurst.Google Scholar
Karimova, R. Š. (2014). Qwaršik’alys fol’klor. Leipzig: MPI EVA.Google Scholar
Khalilov, M. Š. (1995). Bežtinkso-russkij slovar’. Makhachkala: Institut JaLI DNC RAN.Google Scholar
. (1999). Cezsko-russkij slovar’. Maxačkala: Institut JaLI DNC RAN.Google Scholar
Khalilov, M. Š., & Isakov, I.A. (2005). Ginuxsko-russkij slovar’. Makhachkala: Institut JaLI DNC RAN.Google Scholar
Khalilova, Z. (2009). A grammar of Khwarshi. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Kibrik, A.E., Kodzasov, S.V., Olovjannikova, I.P., & Samedov, D.F.S. (1977). Opyt strukturnogo opisanija arčinskogo jazyka, Vol. 11. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo Universiteta.Google Scholar
Kibrik, A.E. (1994). Archi. In Rieks Smeets (Ed.), The indigenous languages of the Caucasus, Vol. 4. The North East Caucasian languages II (pp. 297–365). Delmar, NY: Caravan Books.Google Scholar
. (1999). Suščestvitel’noe. In A.E. Kibrik (Ed.), Èlementy caxurskogo jazyka v tipologičeskom osveščenii (pp. 48–57). Moscow: Nasledie.Google Scholar
Kibrik, A.E., & Testelec, J.G. (2004). Bezhta. In M. Job (Ed.), The indigenous languages of the Caucasus, vol. 3: The North East Caucasian languages, part 1 (pp. 217–295). Ann Arbor: Caravan Books.Google Scholar
Lomtadze, È. A. (1963). Ginuxskij dialekt didojskogo jazyka. Tbilisi: Izd. AN Gruzinskoj SSR.Google Scholar
Magomedova, P.T. (1999). Čamalinsko-russkij slovar’. Makhachkala: Institut JaLI DNC RAN.Google Scholar
Nichols, J. (1989). The Nakh evidence for the history of gender in Nakh-Daghestanian. In H.I. Aronson (Ed.), The non-Slavic languages of the USSR: Linguistic studies (pp. 158–175). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
. (2007, December 8). Head gender/source gender in Nakh-Daghestanian: Synchrony and typology. Paper presented at Conference on the languages of the Caucasus , MPI EVA Leipzig.
. (2011). Ingush grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Plaster, K., Polinsky, M., & Harizanov, B. (2013). Noun classes grow on trees. In B. Bickel, L.A. Grenoble, D. A. Peterson, & A. Timberlake (Eds.), Language typology and historical contingency: In honor of Johanna Nichols (pp. 153–169). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poplack, S., Pousada, A., & Sankoff, D. (1982). Competing influences on gender assignment: Variable process, stable outcome. Lingua, 571, 1–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saidova, P.A., & Abusov, M.G. (2012). Botlixsko-russkij slovar’. Makhachkala: Institut JaLI DNC RAN.Google Scholar
Schulze, W. (1992). How can class markers petrify? Towards a functional diachrony of morphological subsystems. In H.I. Aronson (Ed.), The non-Slavic languages of the USSR (pp. 189–233). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Saidov, M. (1967). Avarsko-russkij slovar’. Moscow: Izdat. Sovetskaja Ènciklopedija.Google Scholar
Šejxov, È. M. (2000). Buduxskij jazyk. In G.G. Gamzatov (Ed.), Jazyki Dagestana (pp. 483–496). Makhachkala/Moscow: RAN, Otdelenie Literatura i Jazyka.Google Scholar
Sosenskaja, T. (1999). Mestoimenie. In A.E. Kibrik (Ed.), Èlementy caxurskogo jazyka v tipologičeskom osveščenii (pp. 129–151). Moscow: Nasledie.Google Scholar
. (2001). Prilagatel’noe. In A.E. Kibrik (Ed.), Bagvalinskij jazyk (pp. 151–155). Moscow: Nasledie.Google Scholar
Testelec, J.G. (1998). Word order in Daghestanian languages. In A. Siewierska (Ed.), Constituent order in the languages of Europe (pp. 257–280). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Xajdakov, S.M. (1963). Principy raspredelenija imen suščestvitel’nyx po grammatičeskim klassam v lakskom jazyke. Studia Caucasica, 11, 48–55.Google Scholar
. (1980). Principy imennoj klassifikacii v dagestanskix jazykax. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Levkovych, Nataliya
2024. Gender assignment in language contact. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 77:2 ► pp. 235 ff. DOI logo
Bellamy, Kate & Jesse Wichers Schreur
2022. When semantics and phonology collide: Gender assignment in mixed Tsova-Tush–Georgian nominal constructions. International Journal of Bilingualism 26:3 ► pp. 257 ff. DOI logo
Alvanoudi, Angeliki
2021. Aspects of the meaning of gender. International Journal of Language and Culture ► pp. 56 ff. DOI logo
Wichers Schreur, Jesse
2021. Nominal borrowings in Tsova-Tush (Nakh-Daghestanian, Georgia) and their gender assignment. In Language Contact in the Territory of the Former Soviet Union [IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society, 50], DOI logo
Corbett, Greville G.
2019. Pluralia tantum nouns and the theory of features: a typology of nouns with non-canonical number properties. Morphology 29:1 ► pp. 51 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.