Cover not available
Article published In:
Emotions across Languages and Cultures
Edited by Angeliki Athanasiadou and Ad Foolen
[International Journal of Language and Culture 4:1] 2017
► pp. 100–120

‘This silence doesn’t find favor in my eyes’

Cultural conceptualization of xen ‘favor’ in Biblical and Israeli Hebrew

| Radboud University
Examination of the figurative construction [X find favor in Y’s eyes] ([X ffi Y]) in Biblical and Israeli Hebrew reveals semantic and pragmatic differences in its use. In Biblical Hebrew, the construction reflects an ancient cultural conceptualization (Sharifian 2011) of xen ‘favor’ in which it is associated with the eyes of God or humans of high social status. The distribution of [X ffi Y] in this language emphasizes social and cultural hierarchies based on this ancient conceptualization of favor. Although originating from Biblical Hebrew, the use of the construction in Israeli Hebrew does not reflect the ancient conceptualization of xen ‘favor’ that had motivated its emergence. The analysis shows the differences in meaning and pragmatic function of [X ffi Y] in the two language variants, with a focus on contexts of use and the social-cultural identity of participants. This study illustrates the involvement of cultural conceptualization and scenarios in linguistic expression.
Keywords: cultural conceptualization, scenarios, favor, Biblical Hebrew, Israeli Hebrew, constructions, embodiment
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The emergence of [X ffi Y]
    • 2.1Conceptualization through embodiment
    • 2.2Cultural origin of xen ‘favor’ as linked to eyes
  • 3.The use of [X ffi Y] in BH
  • 4.[X ffi Y] in IH
  • 5.BH vs. IH
  • 6.Summary and conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 17 October 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijolc.4.1.06var
References (26)
References
Ackerman, S. (2002). The Personal Is Political: Covenantal and Affectionate Love ('āhēb, 'ahăbâ) in the Hebrew Bible. Vetus Testamentum, 52(4), pp. 437–458.Google Scholar
Bosman, T. (2011). Biblical Hebrew lexicology and cognitive semantics: A study of lexemes of affection. PhD diss., The University of Stellenbosch.Google Scholar
Brown, F., Driver, S. R., & Briggs, C. A. (1906). The Brown-Driver-Briggs Hebrew and English lexicon. Dania Beach: Scribe, digital edition: Oak Tree software Inc., version 3.1Google Scholar
Cross, F. M. (1998). From epic to canon: History and literature in ancient Israel. Baltimore/London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Ekman, P., Friesen, W. V., & Ellsworth, P. (1972). Emotion in the human face: Guidelines for research and an integration of findings, New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Even Shoshan, A. (1988). The concentrated Hebrew dictionary. Jerusalem: Kiryat Sefer.Google Scholar
Kautzch, E. (Ed.). (1910). Gesenius’s Hebrew grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press, digital edition: Oak Tree Software Inc., version 2.4.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z., & Palmer, G. B. (1999). Language and emotion concepts: What experientialists and social constructionists have in common. In G. B. Palmer & D. J. Occhi (Eds.), Languages of sentiment (pp. 237–262). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kroeze, D. G. (2004). A semantic study of the lexical field of ‘fear’ terms in Biblical Hebrew. PhD dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
Kruger, P. A. (2000). A cognitive interpretation of the emotion of anger in the Hebrew bible. Journal of Northwest Semitic languages, 26(1), pp. 181–193.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Moran, W. L. (1963). The ancient Near Eastern background of love of god in Deuteronomy. The Catholic Biblical Quarterly, 25(1), 77–87.Google Scholar
Noll, K. L. (2013). Canaan and Israel in antiquity. London/New Delhi/New York/Sydney: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Palmer, G. B. (1996). Toward a theory of cultural linguistics. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Sauter, D., Leguen, O., & Haun, D. (2011). Categorical perception of emotional expressions does not require lexical categories. Emotion, 11(6), 1479–1483. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schlimm, M. R. (2008). From fratricide to forgiveness: The ethics of anger in Genesis. PhD dissertation, Duke University.Google Scholar
Sharifian, F. (2008). Conceptualization of del ‘heart-stomach’ in Persian. In F. Sharifian, R. Dirven, N. Yu & S. Niemeier, (Eds.), Culture, body, and language: Conceptualizations of internal body organs across cultures and languages (pp. 247–265). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011). Cultural conceptualizations and language. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). Cultural linguistics. In F. Sharifian (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and culture (pp. 473–492). Oxon/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
The Historical Dictionary Project of The Academy of the Hebrew Language at [URL]
Vardi, R. (2015). Favor: A construction of affection in Biblical Hebrew. Hebrew Studies, 561, 49–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(in preparation) The social conceptualization of ’hb ‘love’ in Biblical Hebrew. PhD Nijmegen.
Weinfeld, M. (1982). ‘You will find favour… In the sight of God and man’ (Proverbs 3:4): A history of an idea. In B. A. Levine & A. Malamat (Eds.), Harry M. Orlinsky volume of Eretz-Israel, vol. 161, (pp. 93–99). Jerusalem: The Israel Exploration Society in cooperation with Hebrew Union College / Jewish Institute of Religion. [Hebrew]Google Scholar
van Wolde, E. J. (2008). Sentiments and culturally constructed emotions: Anger and love in the Hebrew Bible. Biblical Interpretation, 161, 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar