“You turn your back and there’s somebody moving in”
Syntactic anacrusis in spoken English
Anacrustic Coordination (AC) is a type of biclausal conjunction such that an initial clause or phrase sets up a
state of affairs and is followed by and and a strongly focused second clause, for example three years
it’s been sitting here and I haven’t done it. AC figures in a number of kinds of interaction. One is the
topic/comment conditional, as in call it up and there’s something that actually says your number. It is a
possibility for enhancing certain illocutionary acts such as threats and warnings: I’m gonna take that and I’m gonna dig
it into you. It is a basis for syntactic mirativity, the coding of surprise and unexpectedness (DeLancey 1997): you turn your back and there’s somebody moving in. AC raises questions
about the nature of constructions and of Construction Grammar.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction: Coordination with and
- 2.Constructions in spoken language
- 2.1Constructions
- 2.2Constructions in Conversational Data
- 3.Anacrustic Coordination
- 3.1Syntactic Anacrusis
- 3.2Structuration of the anacrusis
- 3.3Co-construction of anacrustic coordination
- 4.Semantics and pragmatics of anacrustic coordination
- 4.1Speech acts
- 4.2Conditional
- 4.3Mirativity
- 5.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
- Symbols used in transcripts
-
References
This article is available free of charge.
References (44)
Aichenvald, A.
(
2012)
The
essence of mirativity.
Linguistic
Typology 16,3:435–85.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Auer, P.
(
2000)
On-line-Syntax,
oder was es bedeuten könnte, die Zeitlichkeit der gesprochenen Sprache ernst zu nehmen.
Sprache
und Literatur 851:43–56.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Auer, P.
(
2009)
On
line syntax: some thoughts on the temporality of spoken language.
Language
Sciences 311:1–13.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barth-Weingarten, D.
(
2014)
Dialogism
and the emergence of final particles: The case of
and
. In
S. Günthner,
W. Imo &
J. Bücker (Eds.),
Grammar
and Dialogism: Sequential, Syntactic, and Prosodic Patterns between Emergence and
Sedimentation, 335–66. Berlin: De Gruyter. (
Linguistik: Impulse & Tendenzen, 61)
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barth-Weingarten, D. & Couper-Kuhlen, E.
(
2011)
Action,
prosody and emergent constructions: the case of
and
. In
P. Auer &
S. Pfänder,
Constructions:
Emerging and
Emergent, 263–292. Berlin: De Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bolduc, M. K. & Frank, D. A.
(
2010)
Chaïm
Perelman and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca’s ‘On Temporality as a Characteristic of Argumentation’: Commentary and
Translation.
Philosophy and
Rhetoric 43 (4): 308–315.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Collins, P. C.
(
1994)
Cleft
and Pseudocleft Constructions in
English. London: Routledge.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
DeLancey, S.
(
1997)
Mirativity:
The grammatical marking of unexpected information.
Linguistic
Typology 11: 33–52.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Deppermann, A., & Günthner, S.
Du Bois, J. W., Chafe, W. L., Meyer, C., Thompson, S. A., Englebretson, R., & Martey, N.
(
2000–2005)
The
Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English, Parts
1–4. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Du Bois, J.
(
2014)
Towards
a dialogic syntax.
Cognitive
Linguistics 25,3: 359–410.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Green, M.
(
2020)
Speech
Acts.
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
[URL] Accessed November 14, 2020.
Günthner, S.
(
2011)
Between
emergence and sedimentation: Projecting constructions in German
interactions. In
P. Auer and
S. Pfänder (Eds.),
Constructions:
Emergent and
Emerging, 156–185. Berlin: De Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Günthner, S., & Hopper, P. J.
(
2010)
Zeitlichkeit
und sprachliche Struktur: Pseudoclefts im Englischen und
Deutschen.
Gesprächsforschung 111:1–28.
[URL]
Haiman, J.
(
1978)
Conditionals
are
topics.
Language 541:565–589.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hopper, P. J.
(
1987)
Emergent
Grammar.
Berkeley Linguistic
Society 131:139–157.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hopper, P. J.
(
2001)
Grammatical
Constructions and their Discourse Origins: Prototype or Family
Resemblance? In
M. Pütz &
S. Niemeier (Eds.),
Applied
Cognitive Linguistics: Theory, Acquisition, and Language
Pedagogy 109–30. Berlin: Mouton/De Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hopper, P. J.
(
2004)
The
openness of grammatical constructions.
Chicago Linguistic
Society 401:153–175.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hopper, P. J.
(
2007)
Emergent
serialization in English: Pragmatics and typology. In
J. Good (Ed.),
Language
Universals and Language
Change, 520–554. London: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hopper, P. J.
(
2011)
Emergent
Grammar and Temporality in Interactional Linguistics. In
P. Auer &
S. Pfänder (Eds.),
Constructions:
Emerging and
Emergent, 22–44. Berlin: De Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hopper, P. J.
(
2012)
Emergent
Grammar. In
J. P. Gee &
M. Handford (Eds.),
The
Routledge Handbook of Discourse
Analysis, 301–315. London/New York: Routledge.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hopper, P. J.
(
2019)
Timely
Notes on Saussure and Hermann Paul after 1968. In
H. Boas &
M. Pierce (Eds.),
New
Directions in Historical
Linguistics, 78–109. Leiden: Brill.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hyland, Kenneth
(
1998)
Boosting,
hedging and the negotiation of academic
knowledge.
Text 18,3:349–382.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kuteva, T.
(
2004)
Auxiliation:
An Enquiry into the Nature of Grammaticalization. Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, R.
(
1971)
If’s,
and’s and but’s about conjunction. In
C. J. Fillmore &
D. T. Langendoen (Eds.), Studies
in Linguistic
Semantics, 115–149. NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Matthiessen, C., & Thompson, S. A.
Paul, H.
(
1920)
Prinzipien
der
Sprachgeschichte. 51. Auflage. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pawley, A. & Syder, F. H.
(
2000)
The
one clause at a time hypothesis. In
H. Riggenbach (Ed.),
Perspectives
on fluency, 163–199. Ann Arbor: U. of Michigan Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pekarek Doehler, S., De Stefani, E., & Horlacher, A.-S.
Perelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L.
(
1958)
De
la temporalité comme caractère de l’argumentation.
Archivio di
filosofia 28 (2): 115–33.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Prince, E.
(
1978)
A
comparison of WH- and IT clefts in
discourse.
Language 541:883–906.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J.
(
1985)
A
Comprehensive Grammar of the English
Language. London: Longman.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schiffrin, D.
(
1986)
Functions
of and in discourse.
Journal of
Pragmatics 101:41–46.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schmerling, S.
(
1974)
Asymmetric
conjunction and rules of conversation. In
P. Cole &
J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Speech
Acts.
Syntax and
Semantics 31:211–231. Academic Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thompson, S. A. & Hopper, P. J.
(
2009)
Projectability
and Clause Combining in Interaction. In
R. Laury, (Ed.),
Crosslinguistic
Studies of Clause
Combining 99–123. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by 1 other publications
Lu, Jingjia
2024.
2024 International Conference on Distributed Computing and Optimization Techniques (ICDCOT),
► pp. 1 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.