Article published in:
Interactional Linguistics
Vol. 1:1 (2021) ► pp. 232
Auer, P.
(1998) Zwischen Parataxe und Hypotaxe: ‘abhängige Hauptsätze’ im gesprochenen und geschriebenen Deutsch. Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik 1998, 284–307. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2000) On line-Syntax – oder: Was es bedeuten könnte, die Zeitlichkeit der mündlichen Sprache ernst zu nehmen. Sprache und Literatur. 851, 43–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Projection in Interaction and Projection in Grammar. Text, 25(1), 7–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) Projection and minimalistic syntax in interaction. Discourse Processes, 46(2–3), 180–205. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Austin, J. L.
(1976) In How to do things with words (2nd ed. edited by J. O. Urmson and Marina Sbisa.). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barth-Weingarten, D.
(2009) Contrasting and turn transition: Prosodic projection with the parallel-opposition construction. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(11), 2271–2294. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Belfrage, H.
(1992) Aspects of verb and pronoun morphology, semantics and syntax in Garrwa [Honours]. University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
Berger, P. L. & Luckmann, T.
(1966) The social construction of reality. A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Blythe, J.
(2009) Doing referring in Murriny Patha conversation. PhD Dissertation: [University of Sydney].Google Scholar
Bybee, J.
(2010) Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. H.
(1996) Communities, commonalities, and communication. In J. Gumperz & S. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 324–355). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clift, R.
(2007) Grammar in time: the non-restrictive ‘which’-clause as an interactional resource. Essex Research Reports in Linguistics, 551, 51–82.Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, E.
(1996) Intonation and clause-combining in discourse: The case of because . Pragmatics, 6(2), 389–426. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) Grammaticization and conversation. In H. Narrog & B. Heine (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization (pp. 424–437). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2012) Turn continuation and clause combinations. Discourse Processes, 491, 273–299. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Ono, T.
(2007) ‘Incrementing’ in conversation. A comparison of practices in English, German and Japanese. Pragmatics, 17(4), 513–552. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Selting, M.
(2018) Interactional linguistics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Thompson, S.
(2008) On assessing situations and events in conversation: “extraposition” and its relatives. Discourse Studies, 10(4), 443–467. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft, W.
(2016) Comparative concepts and language-specific categories: Theory and practice. Linguistic Typology, 20(2). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft, W., & Cruse, D. A.
(2004) Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Deppermann, A.
(2013) Turn-design at turn-beginnings: Multimodal resources to deal with tasks of turn-construction in German. Journal of Pragmatics, 46(1), 91–121. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Deppermann, A. & Günthner, S.
(Eds.) (2015) Temporality in interaction (pp. 1–23). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Deppermann, A., & Pekarek Doehler, S.
(2021) Longitudinal Conversation Analysis. Research on Language and Social Interaction. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dingemanse, M., Roberts, S. G., Baranova, J., Blythe, J., Drew, P., Floyd, S., Gísladóttir, R., Kendrick, K. H., Levinson, S. C., Manrique, E., Rossi, G., & Enfield, N. J.
(2015) Universal principles in the repair of communication problems. PLoS One, 10(9), 1–15. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W.
(1972) The Dyirbal language of North Queensland. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Basic linguistic theory. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dryer, M.
(2006) Descriptive theories, explanatory theories and Basic Linguistic Theory. In F. K. Ameka, A. Dench, & N. Evans (Eds.), Catching language: The standing challenge of grammar writing (pp. 207–234). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Order of subject, object and verb. In M. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (Eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. https://​wals​.info​/chapter​/81
Du Bois, J. W.
(1987) The Discourse Basis of Ergativity. Language, 63(4), 805. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Duranti, A., & Ochs, E.
(1979) Left dislocation in Italian conversation. In T. Givón (Ed.), Discourse and syntax (pp. 377–416). New York: Academic Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eskildsen, S. W.
(2012) L2 negation constructions at work. Language Learning, 62(2), 335–372. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evans, N.
(2007) Insubordination and its uses. In I. Nicolaeva (Ed.), Finiteness: Theoretical and empirical foundations (pp. 366–431). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, N., & Levinson, S. C.
(2009) The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32(5), 429–448. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ewing, M. C.
(2019) The predicate as a locus of grammar and interaction in colloquial Indonesian. Studies in Language, 43(2), 402–443. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Floyd, S., Manrique, E., Rossi, G., & Torreira, F.
(2016) Timing of visual bodily behavior in repair sequences: Evidence from three languages. Discourse Processes, 53(3), 175–204. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Foley, W. A.
(1976) Comparative syntax in Austronesian [PhD Dissertation]. University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Foley, W. A., & Van Valin, R. D.
(1984) Functional syntax and universal grammar. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ford, C. E.
(1993) Grammar in Interaction. Adverbial Clauses in American English Conversations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ford, C. E., Fox, B. A., & Thompson, S. A.
(1996) Practices in the construction of turns: The “TCU” revisited. Pragmatics, 6(3), 427–454. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2002) Constituency and turn increments. In C. Ford, B. Fox, & S. Thompson (Eds.), The Language of Turns and Sequences. London: Oxford University Press, 14–38.Google Scholar
Fox, B.
(1987) Discourse structure and anaphora: written and conversational English. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garde, M.
(2013) Culture, interaction and person reference in an Australian language: An ethnography of Bininj Gunwok communication. John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Geluykens, R.
(1992) From Discourse Process to Grammatical Construction. On left-dislocation in English. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Ch.
(1979) The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 97–121). Irvington.Google Scholar
Goodwin, C.
(1981) Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers / Charles Goodwin. In Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, M. H. & Goodwin, Ch.
(1986) Gesture and coparticipation in the activity of searching for a word. Semiotica, 621, 51–75.Google Scholar
Goodwin, C.
(2002) Time in action. Current Anthropology 43 (S4), 19–35.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P.
(1975) Logic and Conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Speech Acts [ Syntax and Semantics 3 ] (pp. 41–58). Academic Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Günthner, S.
(1996) From subordination to coordination? Verb-second position in German causal and concessive constructions. Pragmatics, 61, 323–371. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) Was ihn trieb, war vor allem Wanderlust” (Hesse: Narziss und Goldmund): Pseudocleft-Konstruktionen im Deutschen. In S. Günthner & W. Imo (Eds.), Konstruktionen in der Interaktion (pp. 59–90). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Günthner, S. & Hopper, P. J.
(2010) Zeitlichkeit & sprachliche Strukturen: Pseudoclefts im Englischen und Deutschen. Gesprächsforschung-Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion, 111, 1–28.Google Scholar
Haiman, J.
(1998) Talk is cheap: Sarcasm, alienation, and the evolution of language / John Haiman. In Talk is cheap: Sarcasm, alienation, and the evolution of language. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M.
(2010) Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in crosslinguistic studies. Language, 86(3), 663–687. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hayashi, M.
(2004) Projection and grammar: notes on the “action-projecting” use of the distal demonstrative are in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(8), 1337–1374. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Helmer, H., Reinke, S. & Deppermann, A.
2016A range of uses of negative epistemic constructions in German: Ich weiss nicht as a resource for dispreferred actions. Journal of Pragmatics, 1061, 97–114. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, J.
(2007) Intersubjectivity and progressivity in person (and place) reference. In N. J. Enfield & T. Stivers (Eds.), Person reference in interaction (pp. 255–280). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heritage, J., & Sorjonen, M.-L.
(Eds.) (2018) Between turn and sequence: Turn-initial particles across languages. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P. J.
(1987) Emergent grammar. Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 139–157. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) Emergent grammar and temporality in interactional linguistics. In P. Auer & S. Pfänder, (Eds.). Constructions: Emerging and emergent (pp. 22–44). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P. J., & Thompson, S. A.
(1980) Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language, 56(2), 251. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1984) The discourse basis for lexical categories in universal grammar. Language, 60(4), 703. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) Projectability and clause combining in interaction. In R. Laury (Ed.), Crosslinguistic studies of clause combining: The multifunctionality of conjunctions (pp. 99–124). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P. J. & Traugott, E. C.
(2003) Grammaticalization. Second edition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kärkkäinen, E.
(2003) Epistemic stance in English conversation: A description of its interactional functions, with a focus on I think. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kendrick, K. H. & Holler, J.
(2017) Gaze direction signals response preference in conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 50(1), 12–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keevallik, L.
(2011) The terms of not knowing. In T. Stivers, L. Mondada, J. Steensig (Eds.), The morality of knowledge in conversation (pp. 184–206). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2020) Grammatical coordination of embodied action: The Estonian ja ‘and’ as a temporal coordinator of Pilates moves. In Y. Maschler, S. Pekarek Doehler, J. Lindstöm, & L. Keevallik (Eds.), Emergent syntax for conversation: Clausal patterns and the organization of action (p. 221–244). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
(1991) Foundations of cognitive grammar, Vol.21: Descriptive applications. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Laughren, M., Pensalfini, R., & Mylne, T.
(2005) Accounting for verb-initial order in an Australian language. In A. Carnie, H. Harley, & S. A. Dooley (Eds.), Verb First: On the syntax of verb-initial languages (Vol. 731, pp. 367–401). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laury, R.
(1997) Demonstratives in interaction: the emergence of a definite article in Finnish. Absterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) Syntactically non-integrated Finnish jos ‘if’ conditional clauses as directives. Discourse Processes, 491, 213–242. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laury, R. & Okamoto, S.
(2011)  Teyuuka and I mean as pragmatic parentheticals in Japanese and English. In Laury, R. & Suzuki, R. (eds.), Subordination in conversation (pp. 209–230). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laury, R. & Suzuki, R.
(Eds.) (2011) Subordination in conversation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, G. H.
(1991) On the syntax of sentences-in-progress. Language in Society, 20(3), 441–458. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C.
(1960) La Pensée sauvage. Paris: Plon.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C.
(1983) Pragmatics / Stephen C. Levinson. In Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lindström, J., Laury, R. & Lindholm, C.
(2019) Insubordination and the contextually sensitive emergence of if-requests in Swedish and Finnish institutional talk-in-interaction. In K. Beijering, G. Kaltenböck, & M. S. Sansiñena (Eds.), Insubordination: Theoretical and empirical issues (pp. 55–78). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Linell, P.
(1998) Approaching dialogue. Talk, interaction and contexts in dialogical perspectives. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) Rethinking language, mind and world dialogically: Interactional and contextual theories of human sense-making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Luke, K., Thompson, S. A. & Ono, T.
(2012) Turns and increments: A comparative perspective. Discourse Processes, 49(3–4), 155–162. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B.
(1987) The Competition model. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), Mechanisms of language aquisition (pp. 249–308). Mahawa, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Maschler, Y., & Fishman, S.
(2020) From multi-clausality to discourse markerhood: The Hebrew ma she- ‘what that’ construction in pseudo-cleft-like structures. Journal of Pragmatics, 1591, 73–97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maschler, Y., Pekarek Doehler, S., Lindström, J., & Keevallik, L.
(Eds.) (2020) Emergent Syntax for Conversation: Clausal patterns and the organization of action. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matthiessen, Ch. & Thompson, S.
(1988) The structure of discourse and “subordination”. In Haiman, J. & Thompson, S. (Eds.), Clause-combining in grammar and discourse (pp. 275–333). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mithun, M.
(1992) Is basic word order universal? In D. L. Payne (Ed.), Pragmatics of word order flexibility. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mondada, L.
(2007) Multimodal resources for turn-taking: Pointing and the emergence of possible next speakers. Discourse Studies, 9(2), 195–226. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mushin, I.
(1995) Epistememes in Australian languages. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 15(1), 1–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005, October). Second Position Clitic Phenomena in North-Central Australia: Some Pragmatic Considerations.Google Scholar
(2006) Motivations for second position: Evidence from North-Central Australia. Linguistic Typology, 10(3), 287–326. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Code-Switching as an Interactional Resource in Garrwa/Kriol Talk-in-Interaction. Australian Journal of Linguistics: Studies in Australian Indigenous Conversation, 30(4), 471–496. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) A grammar of (Western) Garrwa. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014) Liminal pronoun systems: Evidence from Garrwa. In R. Pensalfini, M. Turpin, & D. Guillemin (Eds.), Studies in Language Companion Series (pp. 99–122). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2018a) Grammaticalization and typology in Australian Aboriginal languages. In H. Narrog & B. Heine (Eds.), Grammaticalization from a typological perspective. Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2018b) Diverging from ‘business as usual’: Turn-initial ngala in Garrwa conversation. In J. Heritage & M.-L. Sorjonen (Eds.), Studies in Language and Social Interaction (pp. 119–154). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Newmeyer, F. J.
(2016) Formal and functional explanation. In I. Roberts (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Universal Grammar (pp. 128–152). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ochs, E., Schegloff, E. A., & Thompson, S. A.
(Eds.) (1996) Interaction and grammar. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ogden, R.
(2013) Clicks and percussives in English conversation. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 43(3), 299–320. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ono, T., & Thompson, S. A.
(2017) Negative scope, temporality, fixedness, and right- and left-branching: Implications for typology and cognitive processing. Studies in Language, 41(3), 543–576. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(Eds.) (2020) The “Noun Phrase” across languages: An emergent unit in interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Payne, D. L.
(1990) The pragmatics of word order: Typological dimensions of verb initial languages. In D. L. Payne (Ed.), The pragmatics of word order: Typological dimensions of verb initial languages. Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pekarek Doehler, S.
(2011) Clause-combining and the sequencing of actions: projector constructions in French conversation. In R. Laury & R. Suzuki (Eds.), Subordination in conversation: a crosslinguistic perspective (pp. 103–148). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016) More than an epistemic hedge: French je sais pas ‘I don’t know’ as a resource for the sequential organization of turns and actions. Journal of Pragmatics, 1061, 148–162. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2018) Elaborations on L2 interactional competence: the development of L2 grammar-for-interaction. Classroom Discourse, 9(1), 3–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2019) At the interface of grammar and the body. Chais pas ‘dunno’ as a resource for dealing with lack of recipient response. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 52(4), 1–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2020) Word-order affects response latency: Action projection and the timing of responses to question-word questions. Discourse Processes. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
forthc.). How grammar grows out of social interaction: From multi-unit to single unit question. Open Linguistics. https://​www​.degruyter​.com​/journal​/key​/OPLI​/html
Pekarek Doehler, S., De Stefani, E., & Horlacher, A.-S.
(2015) Time and emergence in grammar: Left-dislocation, right-dislocation, topicalization and hanging topic in French talk-in-interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita and John Heritage
2013Preference. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), Handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 210–228). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Reber, E.
(2012) Affectivity in interaction: Sound objects in English. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rossano, F.
(2012) Gaze behavior in face-to-face interaction. Doctoral dissertation, Radboud University Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Sacks, H.
(1987) On the preferences for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation. In G. Button & J. R. E. Lee (Eds.), Talk and social organisation (pp. 54–69). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G.
(1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Saussure, F. de
(1972 [1916]) Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A.
(1968) Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist, 70(6), 1075–1095. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1996a) Confirming allusion: toward an empirical account of action. American Journal of Sociology, 102(1), 161–216. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1996b) Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 52–133). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2000) On turns’ possible completion, more or less: increments and trail-offs. Paper delivered at the 1st Euroconference on Interactional Linguistics, Spa, Belgium.
(2016) Increments. In J. D. Robinson (Ed.), Accountability in Social Interaction (pp. 238–263). Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scollon, R.
(1976) Conversations with a one year old. A case study of the developmental foundation of syntax. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R.
(1969) Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language / John R. Searle. In Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1975) Indirect speech acts. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics (Vol. 31, pp. 41–58). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Selting, M.
(2000) The construction of units in conversational talk. Language in Society, 291, 477–517. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Lists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction as an interactional resource. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(3), 483–526. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Selting, M., & Couper-Kuhlen, E.
(Eds.) (2001) Studies in Interactional Linguistics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamin. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sorjonen, M.-L., Raevaara, L., & Couper-Kuhlen, E.
(Eds.) (2017) Imperative turns at talk: The design of directives in action. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stoenica, I. M.
(2020) Actions et conduites mimo-gestuelles dans l’usage conversationnel des relatives en français. Berne: Peter Lang. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stoenica, I-M., Pekarek Doehler, S., & Horlacher, A-S.
(2020) Emergent complex NPs: On-line trajectories of ‘relativized’ NPs in French talk-in-interaction. In T. Ono & S. Thompson (Eds.), The ‘Noun Phrase’ across languages: An emergent unit in interaction (pp. 43–70). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Streeck, J.
(2009) Forward-gesturing. Discourse Processes, 46(2–3), 161–179. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Streeck, J., & Jordan, S.
(Eds.) (2009) Projection and anticipation in embodied interaction [Special issue]. Discourse Processes, 46(2–3).Google Scholar
Tanaka, H.
(2005) Grammar and the “timing” of social action: Word order and preference organization in Japanese. Language in Society, 34(03). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, S. A.
(2019) Understanding ‘clause’ as an emergent ‘unit’ in everyday conversation. Studies in Language, 43(2), 254–280. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, S. A., & Couper-Kuhlen, E.
(2005) The clause as a locus of grammar and interaction. Discourse studies, 7(4–5), 481–505. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, S. A., & Mulac, A.
(1991) A quantitative perspective on the grammaticization of epistemic parentheticals in English. In E. C. Traugott & B. Heine (Eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization (pp. 313–329). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M.
(2003) Constructing a language: A usage-based approach to child language acquisition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C.
2008 All that he endeavoured to prove was…: On the emergence of grammatical constructions in dialogal and dialogic contexts. In R. Kempson & R. Cooper (Eds.), Language in glux: variation, change and evolution (pp. 219–250). London: College Publications.Google Scholar
Van Valin, R. D.
(1977) Aspects of Lakhota syntax [PhD Dissertation]. University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Van Valin, R. D., & LaPolla, R. J.
(1997) Syntax: Structure, meaning, and function. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S.
(1962) Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Linguistic structures in social interaction