In this introductory paper to the inaugural volume of the journal Interactional Linguistics, we
raise the question of what a theory of language might look like once we factor time into explanations of regularities in
linguistic phenomena. We first present a historical overview that contextualises interactional approaches within the broader field
of linguistics, and then focus on temporality as a key dimension of language use in interaction. By doing so, we discuss issues of
emergence and its consequences for constituency and dependency, and of projection and its relation to action formation within and
across languages. Based on video-recorded conversational data from French and Garrwa (Australian), we seek to illustrate how the
discipline of linguistics can be enriched by attending to the temporal deployment of patterns of language use, and how this may in
turn modify what we understand to be language structure.
Auer, P. (1998). Zwischen
Parataxe und Hypotaxe: ‘abhängige Hauptsätze’ im gesprochenen und geschriebenen
Deutsch. Zeitschrift für Germanistische
Linguistik, 1998, 284–307.
Auer, P. (2000). On
line-Syntax – oder: Was es bedeuten könnte, die Zeitlichkeit der mündlichen Sprache ernst zu
nehmen. Sprache und
Literatur. 851, 43–56.
Auer, P. (2005). Projection
in Interaction and Projection in
Grammar. Text, 25(1), 7–36.
Auer, P. (2009). Projection
and minimalistic syntax in interaction. Discourse
Processes, 46(2–3), 180–205.
Austin, J. L. (1976). In
How to do things with words (2nd ed. edited by J. O. Urmson and Marina Sbisa.). Oxford University Press.
Barth-Weingarten, D. (2009). Contrasting
and turn transition: Prosodic projection with the parallel-opposition construction. Journal of
Pragmatics, 41(11), 2271–2294.
Belfrage, H. (1992). Aspects
of verb and pronoun morphology, semantics and syntax in
Garrwa [Honours]. University of Melbourne.
Berger, P. L. & Luckmann, T. (1966). The
social construction of reality. A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Doubleday.
Blythe, J. (2009). Doing
referring in Murriny Patha conversation. PhD
Dissertation: [University of Sydney].
Bybee, J. (2010). Language,
usage and cognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Clark, H. H. (1996). Communities,
commonalities, and communication. In J. Gumperz & S. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking
linguistic
relativity (pp. 324–355). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Clift, R. (2007). Grammar
in time: the non-restrictive ‘which’-clause as an interactional resource. Essex Research
Reports in
Linguistics, 551, 51–82.
Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2011). Grammaticization
and conversation. In H. Narrog & B. Heine (Eds.), The
Oxford Handbook of
Grammaticalization (pp. 424–437). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2012). Turn
continuation and clause combinations. Discourse
Processes, 491, 273–299.
Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Selting, M. (2018). Interactional
linguistics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Thompson, S. (2008). On
assessing situations and events in conversation: “extraposition” and its relatives. Discourse
Studies, 10(4), 443–467.
Croft, W. (2016). Comparative
concepts and language-specific categories: Theory and practice. Linguistic
Typology, 20(2).
Croft, W., & Cruse, D. A. (2004). Cognitive
linguistics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Deppermann, A. (2013). Turn-design
at turn-beginnings: Multimodal resources to deal with tasks of turn-construction in
German. Journal of
Pragmatics, 46(1), 91–121.
Deppermann, A. & Günthner, S. (Eds.) (2015). Temporality
in
interaction (pp. 1–23). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
Deppermann, A., & Pekarek Doehler, S. (2021). Longitudinal
Conversation Analysis. Research on Language and Social
Interaction.
Dingemanse, M., Roberts, S. G., Baranova, J., Blythe, J., Drew, P., Floyd, S., Gísladóttir, R., Kendrick, K. H., Levinson, S. C., Manrique, E., Rossi, G., & Enfield, N. J. (2015). Universal
principles in the repair of communication problems. PLoS
One, 10(9), 1–15.
Dixon, R. M. W. (1972). The
Dyirbal language of North Queensland. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Dixon, R. M. W. (2010). Basic
linguistic theory. Oxford University Press.
Dryer, M. (2006). Descriptive
theories, explanatory theories and Basic Linguistic Theory. In F. K. Ameka, A. Dench, & N. Evans (Eds.), Catching
language: The standing challenge of grammar
writing (pp. 207–234). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Dryer, M. (2013). Order
of subject, object and verb. In M. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (Eds.), The
world atlas of language structures online. Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL]
Du Bois, J. W. (1987). The
Discourse Basis of
Ergativity. Language, 63(4), 805.
Duranti, A., & Ochs, E. (1979). Left
dislocation in Italian conversation. In T. Givón (Ed.), Discourse
and
syntax (pp. 377–416). New York: Academic Press.
Eskildsen, S. W. (2012). L2
negation constructions at work. Language
Learning, 62(2), 335–372.
Evans, N. (2007). Insubordination
and its uses. In I. Nicolaeva (Ed.), Finiteness:
Theoretical and empirical
foundations (pp. 366–431). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Evans, N., & Levinson, S. C. (2009). The
myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive
science. Behavioral and Brain
Sciences, 32(5), 429–448.
Floyd, S., Manrique, E., Rossi, G., & Torreira, F. (2016). Timing
of visual bodily behavior in repair sequences: Evidence from three languages. Discourse
Processes, 53(3), 175–204.
Foley, W. A. (1976). Comparative
syntax in Austronesian [PhD Dissertation]. University of California, Berkeley.
Foley, W. A., & Van Valin, R. D. (1984). Functional
syntax and universal grammar. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Ford, C. E. (1993). Grammar
in Interaction. Adverbial Clauses in American English Conversations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Ford, C. E., Fox, B. A., & Thompson, S. A. (2002). Constituency
and turn increments. In C. Ford, B. Fox, & S. Thompson (Eds.), The
Language of Turns and Sequences. London: Oxford University Press, 14–38.
Fox, B. (1987). Discourse
structure and anaphora: written and conversational English. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Goodwin, Ch. (1979). The
interactive construction of a sentence in natural
conversation. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday
language: Studies in
ethnomethodology (pp. 97–121). Irvington.
Goodwin, C. (1981). Conversational
organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers / Charles
Goodwin. In Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers
and hearers. Academic Press.
Goodwin, M. H. & Goodwin, Ch. (1986). Gesture
and coparticipation in the activity of searching for a
word. Semiotica, 621, 51–75.
Goodwin, C. (2002). Time in action. Current Anthropology 43 (S4), 19–35.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic
and Conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Speech
Acts [Syntax and Semantics
3] (pp. 41–58). Academic Press.
Günthner, S. (2006). Was
ihn trieb, war vor allem Wanderlust” (Hesse: Narziss und Goldmund): Pseudocleft-Konstruktionen im
Deutschen. In S. Günthner & W. Imo (Eds.), Konstruktionen
in der
Interaktion (pp. 59–90). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Günthner, S. & Hopper, P. J. (2010). Zeitlichkeit
& sprachliche Strukturen: Pseudoclefts im Englischen und
Deutschen. Gesprächsforschung-Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen
Interaktion, 111, 1–28.
Haiman, J. (1998). Talk
is cheap: Sarcasm, alienation, and the evolution of language / John
Haiman. In Talk is cheap: Sarcasm, alienation, and the evolution of
language. Oxford University Press.
Haspelmath, M. (2010). Comparative
concepts and descriptive categories in crosslinguistic
studies. Language, 86(3), 663–687.
Hayashi, M. (2004). Projection
and grammar: notes on the “action-projecting” use of the distal demonstrative are in
Japanese. Journal of
Pragmatics, 36(8), 1337–1374.
Helmer, H., Reinke, S. & Deppermann, A.2016. A
range of uses of negative epistemic constructions in German: Ich weiss nicht as a resource for dispreferred
actions. Journal of
Pragmatics, 1061, 97–114.
Heritage, J. (2007). Intersubjectivity
and progressivity in person (and place) reference. In N. J. Enfield & T. Stivers (Eds.), Person
reference in
interaction (pp. 255–280). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Hopper, P. J. (1987). Emergent
grammar. Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics
Society, 139–157.
Hopper, P. J. (2011). Emergent
grammar and temporality in interactional linguistics. In P. Auer & S. Pfänder, (Eds.). Constructions:
Emerging and
emergent (pp. 22–44). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter.
Hopper, P. J., & Thompson, S. A. (1980). Transitivity
in grammar and
discourse. Language, 56(2), 251.
Hopper, P. J., & Thompson, S. A. (1984). The
discourse basis for lexical categories in universal
grammar. Language, 60(4), 703.
Hopper, P. J., & Thompson, S. A. (2008). Projectability
and clause combining in interaction. In R. Laury (Ed.), Crosslinguistic
studies of clause combining: The multifunctionality of
conjunctions (pp. 99–124). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
Hopper, P. J. & Traugott, E. C. (2003). Grammaticalization. Second
edition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Kendrick, K. H. & Holler, J. (2017). Gaze
direction signals response preference in conversation. Research on Language and Social
Interaction, 50(1), 12–32.
Keevallik, L. (2011). The
terms of not knowing. In T. Stivers, L. Mondada, J. Steensig (Eds.), The
morality of knowledge in
conversation (pp. 184–206). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Langacker, R. W. (1991). Foundations
of cognitive grammar, Vol.21: Descriptive
applications. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Laughren, M., Pensalfini, R., & Mylne, T. (2005). Accounting
for verb-initial order in an Australian language. In A. Carnie, H. Harley, & S. A. Dooley (Eds.), Verb
First: On the syntax of verb-initial
languages (Vol. 731, pp. 367–401). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
Lerner, G. H. (1991). On
the syntax of sentences-in-progress. Language in
Society, 20(3), 441–458.
Lévi-Strauss, C. (1960). La
Pensée
sauvage. Paris: Plon.
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics
/ Stephen C.
Levinson. In Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.
Lindström, J., Laury, R. & Lindholm, C. (2019). Insubordination
and the contextually sensitive emergence of if-requests in Swedish and Finnish institutional
talk-in-interaction. In K. Beijering, G. Kaltenböck, & M. S. Sansiñena (Eds.), Insubordination:
Theoretical and empirical
issues (pp. 55–78). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter.
Linell, P. (2009). Rethinking
language, mind and world dialogically: Interactional and contextual theories of human
sense-making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Luke, K., Thompson, S. A. & Ono, T. (2012). Turns
and increments: A comparative perspective. Discourse
Processes, 49(3–4), 155–162.
MacWhinney, B. (1987). The
Competition model. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), Mechanisms
of language
aquisition (pp. 249–308). Mahawa, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Maschler, Y., & Fishman, S. (2020). From
multi-clausality to discourse markerhood: The Hebrew ma she- ‘what that’ construction in pseudo-cleft-like
structures. Journal of
Pragmatics, 1591, 73–97.
Matthiessen, Ch. & Thompson, S. (1988). The
structure of discourse and “subordination”. In Haiman, J. & Thompson, S. (Eds.), Clause-combining
in grammar and
discourse (pp. 275–333). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
Mithun, M. (1992). Is
basic word order universal? In D. L. Payne (Ed.), Pragmatics
of word order
flexibility. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
Mondada, L. (2007). Multimodal
resources for turn-taking: Pointing and the emergence of possible next speakers. Discourse
Studies, 9(2), 195–226.
Mushin, I. (1995). Epistememes
in Australian languages. Australian Journal of
Linguistics, 15(1), 1–32.
Mushin, I. (2005, October). Second
Position Clitic Phenomena in North-Central Australia: Some Pragmatic Considerations.
Mushin, I. (2006). Motivations
for second position: Evidence from North-Central Australia. Linguistic
Typology, 10(3), 287–326.
Mushin, I. (2010). Code-Switching
as an Interactional Resource in Garrwa/Kriol Talk-in-Interaction. Australian Journal of
Linguistics: Studies in Australian Indigenous
Conversation, 30(4), 471–496.
Mushin, I. (2012). A
grammar of (Western) Garrwa. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Mushin, I. (2014). Liminal
pronoun systems: Evidence from Garrwa. In R. Pensalfini, M. Turpin, & D. Guillemin (Eds.), Studies
in Language Companion
Series (pp. 99–122). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
Mushin, I. (2018a). Grammaticalization
and typology in Australian Aboriginal languages. In H. Narrog & B. Heine (Eds.), Grammaticalization
from a typological perspective. Oxford University Press.
Newmeyer, F. J. (2016). Formal
and functional explanation. In I. Roberts (Ed.), The
Oxford Handbook of Universal
Grammar (pp. 128–152). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Ochs, E., Schegloff, E. A., & Thompson, S. A. (Eds.) (1996). Interaction
and grammar. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Ogden, R. (2013). Clicks
and percussives in English conversation. Journal of the International Phonetic
Association, 43(3), 299–320.
Payne, D. L. (1990). The
pragmatics of word order: Typological dimensions of verb initial
languages. In D. L. Payne (Ed.), The
pragmatics of word order: Typological dimensions of verb initial languages. Mouton de Gruyter.
Pekarek Doehler, S. (2016). More
than an epistemic hedge: French je sais pas ‘I don’t know’ as a resource for the sequential organization of turns and
actions. Journal of
Pragmatics, 1061, 148–162.
Pekarek Doehler, S. (2018). Elaborations
on L2 interactional competence: the development of L2 grammar-for-interaction. Classroom
Discourse, 9(1), 3–24.
Pekarek Doehler, S. (2019). At
the interface of grammar and the body. Chais pas ‘dunno’ as a resource for dealing with lack of recipient
response. Research on Language and Social
Interaction, 52(4), 1–23.
Pekarek Doehler, S. (2020). Word-order
affects response latency: Action projection and the timing of responses to question-word
questions. Discourse Processes.
Pekarek Doehler, S. (forthc.). How
grammar grows out of social interaction: From multi-unit to single unit question. Open
Linguistics. [URL]
Pomerantz, Anita and John Heritage. 2013. Preference. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), Handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 210–228). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Rossano, F. (2012). Gaze
behavior in face-to-face interaction. Doctoral
dissertation, Radboud University Nijmegen.
Sacks, H. (1987). On
the preferences for agreement and contiguity in sequences in
conversation. In G. Button & J. R. E. Lee (Eds.), Talk
and social
organisation (pp. 54–69). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A
simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in
conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735.
Saussure, F. de. (1972 [1916]). Cours de linguistique
générale. Paris: Payot.
Schegloff, E. A. (1968). Sequencing
in conversational openings. American
Anthropologist, 70(6), 1075–1095.
Schegloff, E. A. (1996a). Confirming
allusion: toward an empirical account of action. American Journal of
Sociology, 102(1), 161–216.
Schegloff, E. A. (1996b). Turn
organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction
and
grammar (pp. 52–133). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Schegloff, E. A. (2000). On
turns’ possible completion, more or less: increments and trail-offs. Paper delivered at
the 1st Euroconference on Interactional Linguistics, Spa,
Belgium.
Schegloff, E. A. (2016). Increments. In J. D. Robinson (Ed.), Accountability
in Social
Interaction (pp. 238–263). Oxford University Press.
Scollon, R. (1976). Conversations
with a one year old. A case study of the developmental foundation of
syntax. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech
acts: An essay in the philosophy of language / John R.
Searle. In Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of
language. Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J. R. (1975). Indirect
speech acts. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax
and
semantics (Vol. 31, pp. 41–58). Academic Press.
Selting, M. (2000). The
construction of units in conversational talk. Language in
Society, 291, 477–517.
Selting, M. (2007). Lists
as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction as an interactional
resource. Journal of
Pragmatics, 39(3), 483–526.
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing
a language: A usage-based approach to child language acquisition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Traugott, E. C.2008. All
that he endeavoured to prove was…: On the emergence of grammatical constructions in dialogal and dialogic
contexts. In R. Kempson & R. Cooper (Eds.), Language
in glux: variation, change and
evolution (pp. 219–250). London: College Publications.
Van Valin, R. D. (1977). Aspects
of Lakhota syntax [PhD Dissertation]. University of California, Berkeley.
Van Valin, R. D., & LaPolla, R. J. (1997). Syntax:
Structure, meaning, and function. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought
and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cited by (13)
Cited by 13 other publications
Au-Yeung, Terry S. H. & Richard Fitzgerald
2023. Time structures in ethnomethodological and conversation analysis studies of practical activity. The Sociological Review 71:1 ► pp. 221 ff.
2022. Visualizing Emergent Turn Construction: Seeing Writing While Speaking. The Modern Language Journal 106:S1 ► pp. 69 ff.
HALL, JOAN KELLY
2022. L2 Classroom Input and L2 Positionally Sensitive Grammars: The Role of Information‐Seeking Question Sequences. The Modern Language Journal 106:S1 ► pp. 113 ff.
LARSEN–FREEMAN, DIANE
2022. Combinations and Connections: Reaching Across Disciplinary Boundaries. The Modern Language Journal 106:S1 ► pp. 132 ff.
Maschler, Yael & Simona Pekarek Doehler
2022. Pseudo-cleft-like structures in Hebrew and French conversation: The syntax-lexicon-body interface. Lingua 280 ► pp. 103397 ff.
PEKAREK DOEHLER, SIMONA & SØREN W. ESKILDSEN
2022. Emergent L2 Grammars in and for Social Interaction: Introduction to the Special Issue. The Modern Language Journal 106:S1 ► pp. 3 ff.
PEKAREK DOEHLER, SIMONA & KLARA SKOGMYR MARIAN
2022. Functional Diversification and Progressive Routinization of a Multiword Expression in and for Social Interaction: A Longitudinal L2 Study. The Modern Language Journal 106:S1 ► pp. 23 ff.
PIIRAINEN–MARSH, ARJA & NIINA LILJA
2022. Learning Grammar for Social Action: Implications for Research and Language Teaching. The Modern Language Journal 106:S1 ► pp. 141 ff.
2021. Dialogue. Language and Dialogue 11:3 ► pp. 457 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.