Article published in:Iconicity: East meets West
Edited by Masako K. Hiraga, William J. Herlofsky, Kazuko Shinohara and Kimi Akita
[Iconicity in Language and Literature 14] 2015
► pp. 57–70
Iconic inferences about personality
From sounds and shapes
The current study oﬀers a new case of an iconic relationship amongst diﬀerent modalities of cognition, going beyond traditional studies of sound symbolism. We report experiments that show that particular types of personalities can be iconically related to particular types of sounds and shapes. Two experiments show that “inaccessible types of personality” are iconically associated with a class of sounds called “obstruents” as well as with angular shapes. The ﬁrst connection – the one between personalities and sounds – adds to the large body of literature on sound symbolism. The second connection – the link between personalities and shapes – goes beyond the traditional cases of sound symbolism, instantiating a case of trans-modal iconic projection from one cognitive modality to another.
Published online: 12 February 2015
Ahlner, F. & Zlatev, J.
2010 Cross-modal iconicity: A cognitive semiotic approach to sound symbolism. Sign Systems Studies 38(1–4): 298–348.
Barkhuysen, P., Krahmer, E. & Swerts, M.
Brown, R. & Ford, M.
Cassidy, K.W., Kelly, M.H. & Sharoni, L.A.J.
Cutler, A., McQueen, J. & Robinson, K.
Hinton, L., Nichols, J. & Ohala, J.J.
(eds) 1994 Sound Symbolism. Cambridge: CUP.
Irwin, F.W. & Newland, E.
1922 Symbolic value of the vowel i . In Linguistica. Selected Papers in English, French and German, Vol. 1, 283–303. Copenhagen: Levin and Munksgaard.
Kawahara, S. & Shinohara, K.
2012 A tripartite trans-modal relationship between sounds, shapes and emotions: A case of abrupt modulation. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, N. Miyake, D. Peebles & R.P. Cooper (eds), 569–574. Austin TX: Cognitive Science Society.
1929 Gestalt Psychology. New York NY: Liveright.
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M.
1980 Metaphors We Live By. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
1999 Philosophy in the Flesh. New York NY: Basic Books.
Macmillan, N.A. & Creelman, C.D.
2005 Detection Theory: A User’s Guide, 2nd edn. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Martino, G. & Marks, L.E.
1983 The phonological end justifies any means. In Proceedings of the 13th International Congress of Linguists, S. Hattori & K. Inoue (eds), 232–243. Tokyo: Sanseido.
1994 The frequency code underlies the sound symbolic use of voice pitch. In Sound Symbolism, L. Hinton, J. Nichols & J.J. Ohala (eds), 325–347. Cambridge: CUP.
2004 What’s in a name? The effect of sound symbolism on perception of facial attractiveness. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, K. Forbus, D. Gentner & T. Regier (eds), 1617 .
Ramachandran, V.S. & Hubbard, E.M.
2001 Synaesthesia. A window into perception, thought and language. Journal of Consciousness Studies 8(12): 3–34.
de Saussure, F.
1916 Course in General Linguistics. Peru IL: Open Court Publishing. ( Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot. Translated by R. Harris).
Shinohara, K. & Kawahara, S.
2013 The sound symbolic nature of Japanese maid names. Proceedings of the Japanese Cognitive Linguistics Association 13: 183–193.
. To appear. A cross-linguistic study of sound symbolism: The images of size. In Proceedings of Berkeley Linguistics Society 36. Berkeley CA: BLS.
Slater, A.S. & Feinman, S.
1978 Size-sound symbolism. In Universals of Human Language, II: Phonology, J. Greenberg (ed.), 525–568. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.
Wright, S. & Hay, J.
2002 Fred and trema: A phonological conspiracy. In Gendered Practices in Language, S. Benor, M. Rose, D. Sharma, J. Sweetland & Q. Zhang (eds), 175–191. Standford CA: CSLI.