Part of
Dimensions of Iconicity
Edited by Angelika Zirker, Matthias Bauer, Olga Fischer and Christina Ljungberg
[Iconicity in Language and Literature 15] 2017
► pp. 1538
Abelin, Å
1999Studies in Sound Symbolism. Göteborg: Göteborg University Press.Google Scholar
Afanasiev, A
1984Voprosy semanticheskoi evolutsii leksiki: Na materiale angliiskix zvukopodrazhatelnih suschestvitelnikh (Aspects of Vocabulary Semantic Evolution: A Study of English Imitative Words). PhD dissertation, University of Leningrad.Google Scholar
Allan, K. & Burridge, K
1991Euphemism and Dysphemism: Language Used as Shield and Weapon. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Alpher, B
1994Yir-Yiront ideophones. In Hinton, Nichols & Ohala (eds), 161–178.Google Scholar
Anderson, E
1998A Grammar of Iconism. London: Associated University Press.Google Scholar
Avetian, E. G
1968Priroda lingvisticheckogo znaka (The Nature of Linguistic Signs). Yerevan: Mitk.Google Scholar
Ayto, J
2000The Dictionary of Euphemisms. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Bartens, A
2000Ideophones and Sound Symbolism in Atlantic Creoles. Helsinki: Gummerus Printing Saarjärvi.Google Scholar
Bohnhoff, L. E
1982Yag Dii (Duru) ideophones. Cahier du Département des Langues et Linguistiques, Université de Yaounde 2: 1–14.Google Scholar
Bratus, I. B
1976Akusticheskie onomatopi v indoneziiiskom jazike (Acousic Onomatopoes in Indonesian). PhD dissertation, University of Leningrad.
Brodovich, O. I
2008Zvukoizobrazitelnost i zvukovie zakony (Iconicity and Sound Changes). In Yazik-Soznanie-Kultura-Sozium, 485–489. Saratov: Nauka.Google Scholar
Brunner, K
1950Die Englische Sprache: Ihre Geschichtliche Entwicklung. Halle (Saale): Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Campbell, L. & Kaufman, T
1983Mesoamerican historical linguistics and distant genetic relationship: Getting it straight. American Anthropologist 85(2): 362–372. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Childs, G. T
1994African ideophones. In Hinton, Nichols & Ohala (eds), 178–207.Google Scholar
Crystal, D
1987The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Cuskley, C. & Kirby, S
2013Synesthesia, cross-modality, and language evolution. In Oxford Handbook of Synesthesia, J. Simner (ed.), 869–899. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Diffloth, G
1994i: big, a: small. In Hinton, Nichols & Ohala (eds), 107–114.Google Scholar
Dingemanse, M., Blasi, D. E., Lupyan, G., Christiansen, M. K. & Monaghan, P
2015Arbitrariness, iconicity, and systematicity in language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 19 (10): 603–615. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dingemanse, M
In press. Expressiveness and system integration: On the typology of ideophones, with special reference to Siwu. STUF – Language Typology and Universals 70(2): 119–141.
Doke, C. M
1935Bantu Linguistic Terminology. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Durkin, P
2009The Oxford Guide to Etymology. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Elders, S
2001Defining ideophones in Mundang. In Voeltz & Kilian-Hatz (eds), 97–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, A
1999What, if anything, is phonological iconicity? In Form Miming Meaning [Iconicity in Language and Literature 1], M. Nänny & O. Fischer (eds.), 123–134. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fivaz, D
1963The ideophone as a phonosemantic class: The case of Yoruba. Current Approaches to African Linguistics 1: 263–278.Google Scholar
Flaksman, M
2013Preservation of long vowels in onomatopoeic words denoting pure tones: Phonosemantic inertia. In The Proceedings of the Joseph M. Tronsky XVII Memorial Annual International Conference Indo-European Comparative Linguistics and Classical Philology in the Institute for Linguistic Studies of Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, N. N. Kazanskii (ed.), 917–923. St. Petersburg: Nauka.Google Scholar
2015aDiachronicheskoye razvitie zvuloizobrazitelnoi leksiki angliiskogo yazika (Diachronic Development of English Iconic Vocabulary). PhD dissertation, University of St. Petersburg.
2015bOnomatopoeic words in Gothic: Iconic elements in Wulfila’s translation of the New Testament. In The Proceedings of the 23. Linguistik- und Literaturtage in St. Petersburg, Russland: Die Sprachen Mitteleuropas und darüber hinaus. Internationale Fachtagung der Gesellschaft für Sprache und Sprachen (GeSuS) 22.–24 Juni 2015 , 9–10. St. Petersburg.
Gazov-Ginsberg, А. М
1965Byl li yazik zvukoizobrazitelen v svoich istokah? (Was the Language Iconic in its Origin?). Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Hinton, L., Nichols J. & Ohala, J. J
(eds) 1994Sound Symbolism. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Hock, H. H
1986Principles of Historical Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. & Waugh, L. R
1979The Sound Shape of Language. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O
1933Symbolic value of the vowel i. In Linguistica: Selected Papers in English, French and German, O. Jespersen (ed.), 283–303. Copenhagen: Levin and Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Joseph, B. D
1997On the iconic elements in etymological investigation. Diachronica 4(1): 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kakehi, H
1982Onomatopoeic expressions in Japanese and English. In Proceedings of the 13th International Congress of Linguistics, Tokyo , 29 Aug. – 4 Sept. 1982. Tokyo. 913–918.
Kankia, N. D
1988Primarnaya motivirovannost slova: na materiale angliiskogo i grizinskogo yazikov (The Primary Motivation of the Word: In English and Georgian). PhD dissertation, University of Leningrad.
Kaufman, T
1994Symbolism and change in sound system of Huastec. In Hinton, Nichols & Ohala (eds), 63–75.
Klima, E. S. & Bellugi, U
1979The Signs of Language. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kozlova, T
2013Iconically expressible meanings in proto-Indo-European roots and their reflexes in daughter branches. In Iconic Investigations [Iconicity in Language & Literature 12], L. Ellenström, O. Fischer & C. Ljungberg (eds), 311–330. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kunene, D. P
2001Speaking the act: The ideophone as a linguistic rebel. In Voeltz & Kilian-Hatz (eds), 183–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuzmich, I. V
1993Zvukoizobrazitelnost i amerikanskii sleng: fonosemanticheskii analiz. (Iconicity in American Slang: A Phonosemantic Analysis). PhD dissertation, University of St. Petersburg.
Lapkina, L. Z
1979Angliiskie i bashkirskie akusticheskie onomatopi (English and Bashkir Acoustic Onomatopes). PhD Dissertation, University of Leningrad.
Levitskii, V. V
2000Etimologicheskii slovar germanskikh yazykov (An Etymological Dictionary of Germanic Languages). Chernovtsi: Ruta.Google Scholar
Liberman, A
2010Iconicity and etymology. In Signergy [Iconicity in Language and Literature 9], J. Conradie, R. Johl, M. Beukes, O. Fischer & C. Ljungberg (eds), 243–258. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Likhomanova, L. F
1986Semanticheskaya filiatsia angliiskikh glagolov dvizheniya (Semantic Filiantion of English Verbs Denoting Movement). PhD dissertation, University of Leningrad.
Lühr, R
1988Expressivität und Lautgesetz im Germanischen. Heidelberg: Karl Winter.Google Scholar
Malkiel, Y
1990Diachronic Problems in Phonosymbolism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malmberg, B
1963Structural Linguistics and Human Communication. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marchand, H
1959Phonetic symbolism in English word-formation. Indogermanische Forschungen 64(2): 146–168; (3): 256–267.Google Scholar
Mazanaev, I. A
1985Osnovnie gruppy zvukosimvolicheskih slov: fonosemanticheskii analiz: na materiale angliiskogo i lesginskogo yazykov (The Main Groups of English and Lezgin Iconic Words). PhD dissertation, University of Leningrad.Google Scholar
McGregor, W
2001Ideophones as the source of verbs in nothern Australian languages. In Voeltz & C. Kilian-Hatz (eds), 205–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meier, H
1999Imagination by ideophones. In Form Miming Meaning [Iconicity in Language and Literarure 1], M. Nänny & O. Fischer (eds), 135–154. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mikone, E
2001Ideophones in the Balto-Finnic languages. In K. Voeltz & C. Kilian-Hatz (eds), 223–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, F. M
1864Lectures on the Science of Language delivered at the Royal Institution in February, March, April and May, 1863, 2nd series. London: Longman, Green, Longman, Roberts and Green.Google Scholar
Newman, P
2001Are ideophones really as weird and extra-systematic as linguists make them out to be? In K. Voeltz & C. Kilian-Hatz (eds), 251–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newmeyer, F. J
1992Iconicity and generative grammar. Language 68(4): 756–796. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Onions, C. T
2002The Oxford Dictionary of English Etymology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Paul, H
1886Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Petukhova, E. V
2002Morphologicheskoe i konversionnoe slovoobrazovanie on zvukopodrazhatelnikh osnov v angliiskom yazike (Conversion and Morphological Derivation from English Onomatopoeic Words). PhD dissertation, University of St. Petersburg.
Pinker, S
1994The game of the name. The New York Times. 〈[URL]〉 (16 September 2016).Google Scholar
Pokorny, J
2005Indogermanisches Etymologisches Wörterbuch. Bern: Francke.Google Scholar
Sadowski, P
2001The sound as an echo to the sense. The iconicity of English gl- words. In The Motivated Sign [Iconicity in Language and Literature 2], M. Nänny & O. Fischer (eds), 69–88. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Samarin, W. J
1979Simplification, pidginisation, and language change. In Readings in Creole Studies, I. F. Hancock, (ed.), 55–68. Ghent: Story-Scientia. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Saussure, F
1916Cours de linguistique générale. Lausanne and Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Schultze-Berndt, E
2001Ideophone-like characteristics of uninflected predicates in Jaminjung (Australia). In K. Voeltz & C. Kilian-Hatz (eds), 355–374. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shliakhova, S. S
1991Tipi i funktsii onomatopov v russkoi rechi (Types and Functions of Onomatopes in Russian Speech). PhD dissertation, University of Leningrad.
Skeat, W. W
2006An Etymological Dictionary of the English Language. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Slonitskaya, E. I
1987Zvukosimvolizm oboznachenii okruglogo: Opyt tipologicheskogo issledovaniya (Iconicity of Roundness: A Typological Comparison). PhD dissertation, University of Leningrad.
Smithers, G. V
1954Some English ideophones. Archivum Linguistikum 6(2): 73–111.Google Scholar
Taylor, K. J
2007KA-BOOM! A Dictionary of Comic Book Words, Symbols and Onomatopoeia. Surrey BC: Mora Publications.Google Scholar
The Oxford English Dictionary
3rd edn. Oxford: OUP.
Veldi, E. A
1988Anglo-estonskie paralleli v onomatopee (English-Estonian Parallels in Onomatopoeia). PhD dissertation, University of Tartu.
Voeltz, F. K. E. & Kilian-Hatz, C
(eds) 2001Ideophones [Typological Studies in Language 44]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Voronin, S. V
1969Angliiskie onomatopi: Tipy i stroenie (English Onomatopoes: Types and Structure). PhD dissertation, University of Leningrad.
1997Phonosemantica i etimologia (Phonosemantics and Etymology). In Diahkronicheskaya Germanistica: Collected Papers, 131–164. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg University Press.Google Scholar
1998Angliiskie onomatopi: fonosemanticheskaya klassifikatsiya (English Onomatopes: A Phonosemantic Classification). St. Petersburg: IFL.Google Scholar
2005Iconicity. Glottogenesis. Semiosis: Sundry Papers. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg University Press.Google Scholar
2006Osnovy Phonosemantiki (The Fundamentals of Phonosemantics). Moscow: Lenand.Google Scholar
Wescott, R. W
1980Sound and Sense. Linguistic Essays on Phonosemic Subjects. Lake Bluff IL: Jupiter Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 11 other publications

Erben Johansson, Niklas, Andrey Anikin, Gerd Carling & Arthur Holmer
2020. The typology of sound symbolism: Defining macro-concepts via their semantic and phonetic features . Linguistic Typology 24:2  pp. 253 ff. DOI logo
Flaksman, Maria
2020. Pathways of de-iconization. In Operationalizing Iconicity [Iconicity in Language and Literature, 17],  pp. 76 ff. DOI logo
Flaksman, Maria
2022. Echoes of the past. In Iconicity in Cognition and across Semiotic Systems [Iconicity in Language and Literature, 18],  pp. 331 ff. DOI logo
Lavitskaya, Yulia, Yulia Sedelkina, Elizaveta Korotaevskaya, Liubov Tkacheva, Maria Flaksman & Andrey Nasledov
2022. Does De-Iconization Affect Visual Recognition of Russian and English Iconic Words?. Languages 7:2  pp. 97 ff. DOI logo
Nielsen, Alan KS & Mark Dingemanse
2021. Iconicity in Word Learning and Beyond: A Critical Review. Language and Speech 64:1  pp. 52 ff. DOI logo
Odiegwu, Nancy Chiagolum & Jesús Romero-Trillo
2023. Gradience in iconicity. Review of Cognitive Linguistics DOI logo
Silva-Júnior, Daltro Roque Carvalho & André Nogueira Xavier
2021. A iconicidade como uma característica universal das línguas. Revista da ABRALIN  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Tkacheva, Liubov, Maria Flaksman, Andrey Nasledov, Yulia Sedelkina & Yulia Lavitskaya
2021. Iconicity and Second Language Visual Perception: A Psycholinguistic Study of English Imitative Words at Different De-iconization Stages. Mathematics 9:12  pp. 1331 ff. DOI logo
Winter, Bodo & Marcus Perlman
2021. Iconicity ratings really do measure iconicity, and they open a new window onto the nature of language. Linguistics Vanguard 7:1 DOI logo
Джафарова Самира, Рамиз кызы & Ткачева, Любовь Олеговна
2023. Russian iconic words visual perception, taking into account the neurocognitive profile. Tomsk state pedagogical university bulletin :4(144)  pp. 7 ff. DOI logo
Флаксман, Мария Алексеевна, Седёлкина, Юлия Георгиевна & Коротаевская, Елизавета Александровна

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.