Cover not available
Part of
Dimensions of Iconicity
Edited by Angelika Zirker, Matthias Bauer, Olga Fischer and Christina Ljungberg
[Iconicity in Language and Literature 15] 2017
► pp. 15–38

Iconic treadmill hypothesis

The reasons behind continuous onomatopoeic coinage

| St. Petersburg State Electrotechnical University ‘LETI’

The paper deals with the process of iconicity loss and touches upon the enigma of iconic words’ continuous and persistent appearance in languages all over the globe. The hypothesis introduced aims at explaining the reasons behind the never-ceasing iconic coinage. The paper also presents a universal four-step model of iconicity loss.

Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The iconic treadmill hypothesis
  • 3.The iconic lexicon: Some explanatory notes on onomatopoeia, sound symbolism, phonesthemes, and ideophones
    • 3.1Onomatopoeic words
    • 3.2Sound symbolic words
    • 3.3Phonesthemic sound symbolism
    • 3.4Ideophones
  • 4.The de-iconization process
    • 4.1De-iconization of form
    • 4.2De-iconization of meaning
    • 4.3Stages of de-iconization
  • 5.Rates of de-iconization and new iconic coinage: The iconic treadmill
  • 6.The driving force for the iconic treadmill
  • Abbreviations
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 8 September 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ill.15.02fla
References
Abelin, Å
1999 Studies in Sound Symbolism. Göteborg: Göteborg University Press.Google Scholar
Afanasiev, A
1984 Voprosy semanticheskoi evolutsii leksiki: Na materiale angliiskix zvukopodrazhatelnih suschestvitelnikh (Aspects of Vocabulary Semantic Evolution: A Study of English Imitative Words). PhD dissertation, University of Leningrad.Google Scholar
Allan, K. & Burridge, K
1991 Euphemism and Dysphemism: Language Used as Shield and Weapon. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Alpher, B
1994 Yir-Yiront ideophones. In Hinton, Nichols & Ohala (eds), 161–178.Google Scholar
Anderson, E
1998 A Grammar of Iconism. London: Associated University Press.Google Scholar
Avetian, E. G
1968 Priroda lingvisticheckogo znaka (The Nature of Linguistic Signs). Yerevan: Mitk.Google Scholar
Ayto, J
2000 The Dictionary of Euphemisms. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Bartens, A
2000 Ideophones and Sound Symbolism in Atlantic Creoles. Helsinki: Gummerus Printing Saarjärvi.Google Scholar
Bohnhoff, L. E
1982 Yag Dii (Duru) ideophones. Cahier du Département des Langues et Linguistiques, Université de Yaounde 2: 1–14.Google Scholar
Bratus, I. B
1976 Akusticheskie onomatopi v indoneziiiskom jazike (Acousic Onomatopoes in Indonesian). PhD dissertation, University of Leningrad.
Brodovich, O. I
2008 Zvukoizobrazitelnost i zvukovie zakony (Iconicity and Sound Changes). In Yazik-Soznanie-Kultura-Sozium, 485–489. Saratov: Nauka.Google Scholar
Brunner, K
1950 Die Englische Sprache: Ihre Geschichtliche Entwicklung. Halle (Saale): Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Campbell, L. & Kaufman, T
1983 Mesoamerican historical linguistics and distant genetic relationship: Getting it straight. American Anthropologist 85(2): 362–372. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Childs, G. T
1994 African ideophones. In Hinton, Nichols & Ohala (eds), 178–207.Google Scholar
Crystal, D
1987 The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Cuskley, C. & Kirby, S
2013 Synesthesia, cross-modality, and language evolution. In Oxford Handbook of Synesthesia, J. Simner (ed.), 869–899. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Diffloth, G
1994 i: big, a: small. In Hinton, Nichols & Ohala (eds), 107–114.Google Scholar
Dingemanse, M., Blasi, D. E., Lupyan, G., Christiansen, M. K. & Monaghan, P
2015 Arbitrariness, iconicity, and systematicity in language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 19 (10): 603–615. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dingemanse, M
In press. Expressiveness and system integration: On the typology of ideophones, with special reference to Siwu. STUF – Language Typology and Universals 70(2): 119–141.
Doke, C. M
1935 Bantu Linguistic Terminology. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Durkin, P
2009 The Oxford Guide to Etymology. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Elders, S
2001 Defining ideophones in Mundang. In Voeltz & Kilian-Hatz (eds), 97–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, A
1999 What, if anything, is phonological iconicity? In Form Miming Meaning [Iconicity in Language and Literature 1], M. Nänny & O. Fischer (eds.), 123–134. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fivaz, D
1963 The ideophone as a phonosemantic class: The case of Yoruba. Current Approaches to African Linguistics 1: 263–278.Google Scholar
Flaksman, M
2013 Preservation of long vowels in onomatopoeic words denoting pure tones: Phonosemantic inertia. In The Proceedings of the Joseph M. Tronsky XVII Memorial Annual International Conference Indo-European Comparative Linguistics and Classical Philology in the Institute for Linguistic Studies of Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, N. N. Kazanskii (ed.), 917–923. St. Petersburg: Nauka.Google Scholar
2015a Diachronicheskoye razvitie zvuloizobrazitelnoi leksiki angliiskogo yazika (Diachronic Development of English Iconic Vocabulary). PhD dissertation, University of St. Petersburg.
2015b Onomatopoeic words in Gothic: Iconic elements in Wulfila’s translation of the New Testament. In The Proceedings of the 23. Linguistik- und Literaturtage in St. Petersburg, Russland: Die Sprachen Mitteleuropas und darüber hinaus. Internationale Fachtagung der Gesellschaft für Sprache und Sprachen (GeSuS) 22.–24 Juni 2015 , 9–10. St. Petersburg.
Gazov-Ginsberg, А. М
1965 Byl li yazik zvukoizobrazitelen v svoich istokah? (Was the Language Iconic in its Origin?). Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Hinton, L., Nichols J. & Ohala, J. J
(eds) 1994 Sound Symbolism. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Hock, H. H
1986 Principles of Historical Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. & Waugh, L. R
1979 The Sound Shape of Language. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O
1933 Symbolic value of the vowel i. In Linguistica: Selected Papers in English, French and German, O. Jespersen (ed.), 283–303. Copenhagen: Levin and Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Joseph, B. D
1997 On the iconic elements in etymological investigation. Diachronica 4(1): 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kakehi, H
1982 Onomatopoeic expressions in Japanese and English. In Proceedings of the 13th International Congress of Linguistics, Tokyo , 29 Aug. – 4 Sept. 1982. Tokyo. 913–918.
Kankia, N. D
1988 Primarnaya motivirovannost slova: na materiale angliiskogo i grizinskogo yazikov (The Primary Motivation of the Word: In English and Georgian). PhD dissertation, University of Leningrad.
Kaufman, T
1994 Symbolism and change in sound system of Huastec. In Hinton, Nichols & Ohala (eds), 63–75.
Klima, E. S. & Bellugi, U
1979 The Signs of Language. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kozlova, T
2013 Iconically expressible meanings in proto-Indo-European roots and their reflexes in daughter branches. In Iconic Investigations [Iconicity in Language & Literature 12], L. Ellenström, O. Fischer & C. Ljungberg (eds), 311–330. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kunene, D. P
2001 Speaking the act: The ideophone as a linguistic rebel. In Voeltz & Kilian-Hatz (eds), 183–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuzmich, I. V
1993 Zvukoizobrazitelnost i amerikanskii sleng: fonosemanticheskii analiz. (Iconicity in American Slang: A Phonosemantic Analysis). PhD dissertation, University of St. Petersburg.
Lapkina, L. Z
1979 Angliiskie i bashkirskie akusticheskie onomatopi (English and Bashkir Acoustic Onomatopes). PhD Dissertation, University of Leningrad.
Levitskii, V. V
2000 Etimologicheskii slovar germanskikh yazykov (An Etymological Dictionary of Germanic Languages). Chernovtsi: Ruta.Google Scholar
Liberman, A
2010 Iconicity and etymology. In Signergy [Iconicity in Language and Literature 9], J. Conradie, R. Johl, M. Beukes, O. Fischer & C. Ljungberg (eds), 243–258. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Likhomanova, L. F
1986 Semanticheskaya filiatsia angliiskikh glagolov dvizheniya (Semantic Filiantion of English Verbs Denoting Movement). PhD dissertation, University of Leningrad.
Lühr, R
1988 Expressivität und Lautgesetz im Germanischen. Heidelberg: Karl Winter.Google Scholar
Malkiel, Y
1990 Diachronic Problems in Phonosymbolism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malmberg, B
1963 Structural Linguistics and Human Communication. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marchand, H
1959 Phonetic symbolism in English word-formation. Indogermanische Forschungen 64(2): 146–168; (3): 256–267.Google Scholar
Mazanaev, I. A
1985 Osnovnie gruppy zvukosimvolicheskih slov: fonosemanticheskii analiz: na materiale angliiskogo i lesginskogo yazykov (The Main Groups of English and Lezgin Iconic Words). PhD dissertation, University of Leningrad.Google Scholar
McGregor, W
2001 Ideophones as the source of verbs in nothern Australian languages. In Voeltz & C. Kilian-Hatz (eds), 205–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meier, H
1999 Imagination by ideophones. In Form Miming Meaning [Iconicity in Language and Literarure 1], M. Nänny & O. Fischer (eds), 135–154. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mikone, E
2001 Ideophones in the Balto-Finnic languages. In K. Voeltz & C. Kilian-Hatz (eds), 223–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, F. M
1864 Lectures on the Science of Language delivered at the Royal Institution in February, March, April and May, 1863, 2nd series. London: Longman, Green, Longman, Roberts and Green.Google Scholar
Newman, P
2001 Are ideophones really as weird and extra-systematic as linguists make them out to be? In K. Voeltz & C. Kilian-Hatz (eds), 251–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newmeyer, F. J
1992 Iconicity and generative grammar. Language 68(4): 756–796. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Onions, C. T
2002 The Oxford Dictionary of English Etymology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Paul, H
1886 Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Petukhova, E. V
2002 Morphologicheskoe i konversionnoe slovoobrazovanie on zvukopodrazhatelnikh osnov v angliiskom yazike (Conversion and Morphological Derivation from English Onomatopoeic Words). PhD dissertation, University of St. Petersburg.
Pinker, S
1994 The game of the name. The New York Times. 〈[URL]〉 (16 September 2016).Google Scholar
Pokorny, J
2005 Indogermanisches Etymologisches Wörterbuch. Bern: Francke.Google Scholar
Sadowski, P
2001 The sound as an echo to the sense. The iconicity of English gl- words. In The Motivated Sign [Iconicity in Language and Literature 2], M. Nänny & O. Fischer (eds), 69–88. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Samarin, W. J
1979 Simplification, pidginisation, and language change. In Readings in Creole Studies, I. F. Hancock, (ed.), 55–68. Ghent: Story-Scientia. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Saussure, F
1916 Cours de linguistique générale. Lausanne and Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Schultze-Berndt, E
2001 Ideophone-like characteristics of uninflected predicates in Jaminjung (Australia). In K. Voeltz & C. Kilian-Hatz (eds), 355–374. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shliakhova, S. S
1991 Tipi i funktsii onomatopov v russkoi rechi (Types and Functions of Onomatopes in Russian Speech). PhD dissertation, University of Leningrad.
Skeat, W. W
2006 An Etymological Dictionary of the English Language. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Slonitskaya, E. I
1987 Zvukosimvolizm oboznachenii okruglogo: Opyt tipologicheskogo issledovaniya (Iconicity of Roundness: A Typological Comparison). PhD dissertation, University of Leningrad.
Smithers, G. V
1954 Some English ideophones. Archivum Linguistikum 6(2): 73–111.Google Scholar
Taylor, K. J
2007 KA-BOOM! A Dictionary of Comic Book Words, Symbols and Onomatopoeia. Surrey BC: Mora Publications.Google Scholar
The Oxford English Dictionary
3rd edn. Oxford: OUP.
Veldi, E. A
1988 Anglo-estonskie paralleli v onomatopee (English-Estonian Parallels in Onomatopoeia). PhD dissertation, University of Tartu.
Voeltz, F. K. E. & Kilian-Hatz, C
(eds) 2001 Ideophones [Typological Studies in Language 44]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Voronin, S. V
1969 Angliiskie onomatopi: Tipy i stroenie (English Onomatopoes: Types and Structure). PhD dissertation, University of Leningrad.
1997 Phonosemantica i etimologia (Phonosemantics and Etymology). In Diahkronicheskaya Germanistica: Collected Papers, 131–164. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg University Press.Google Scholar
1998 Angliiskie onomatopi: fonosemanticheskaya klassifikatsiya (English Onomatopes: A Phonosemantic Classification). St. Petersburg: IFL.Google Scholar
2005 Iconicity. Glottogenesis. Semiosis: Sundry Papers. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg University Press.Google Scholar
2006 Osnovy Phonosemantiki (The Fundamentals of Phonosemantics). Moscow: Lenand.Google Scholar
Wescott, R. W
1980 Sound and Sense. Linguistic Essays on Phonosemic Subjects. Lake Bluff IL: Jupiter Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 11 other publications

Erben Johansson, Niklas, Andrey Anikin, Gerd Carling & Arthur Holmer
2020. The typology of sound symbolism: Defining macro-concepts via their semantic and phonetic features . Linguistic Typology 24:2 ► pp. 253 ff. DOI logo
Flaksman, Maria
2020. Pathways of de-iconization. In Operationalizing Iconicity [Iconicity in Language and Literature, 17], ► pp. 76 ff. DOI logo
Flaksman, Maria
2022. Echoes of the past. In Iconicity in Cognition and across Semiotic Systems [Iconicity in Language and Literature, 18], ► pp. 331 ff. DOI logo
Lavitskaya, Yulia, Yulia Sedelkina, Elizaveta Korotaevskaya, Liubov Tkacheva, Maria Flaksman & Andrey Nasledov
2022. Does De-Iconization Affect Visual Recognition of Russian and English Iconic Words?. Languages 7:2 ► pp. 97 ff. DOI logo
Nielsen, Alan KS & Mark Dingemanse
2021. Iconicity in Word Learning and Beyond: A Critical Review. Language and Speech 64:1 ► pp. 52 ff. DOI logo
Odiegwu, Nancy Chiagolum & Jesús Romero-Trillo
2023. Gradience in iconicity. Review of Cognitive Linguistics DOI logo
Silva-Júnior, Daltro Roque Carvalho & André Nogueira Xavier
2021. A iconicidade como uma característica universal das línguas. Revista da ABRALIN ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Tkacheva, Liubov, Maria Flaksman, Andrey Nasledov, Yulia Sedelkina & Yulia Lavitskaya
2021. Iconicity and Second Language Visual Perception: A Psycholinguistic Study of English Imitative Words at Different De-iconization Stages. Mathematics 9:12 ► pp. 1331 ff. DOI logo
Winter, Bodo & Marcus Perlman
2021. Iconicity ratings really do measure iconicity, and they open a new window onto the nature of language. Linguistics Vanguard 7:1 DOI logo
Джафарова Самира, Рамиз кызы & Ткачева, Любовь Олеговна
2023. Russian iconic words visual perception, taking into account the neurocognitive profile. Tomsk state pedagogical university bulletin :4(144) ► pp. 7 ff. DOI logo
Флаксман, Мария Алексеевна, Седёлкина, Юлия Георгиевна & Коротаевская, Елизавета Александровна
2021. PSYCHOSEMANTIC INVESTIGATION OF VISUAL PERCEPTION OF ENGLISH ICONIC WORDS DEPENDING ON DE-ICONIZATION STAGE. Pedagogical Review :1(35) ► pp. 122 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.