Cover not available
Part of
Dimensions of Iconicity
Edited by Angelika Zirker, Matthias Bauer, Olga Fischer and Christina Ljungberg
[Iconicity in Language and Literature 15] 2017
► pp. 63–84

Continuity and change

On the iconicity of Ablaut Reduplication (AR)

| Autonomous University of Madrid
Ablaut Reduplication (AR), as in see-saw, knick-knack, is frequently used in different languages to mimic movement. In this paper, I will discuss its possible iconic interpretations. Following and developing an idea originally suggested by Thun (1963: 75–87), I will show that AR is associated with a physical (visual or acoustic) alternating movement in the following way: reduplication in AR mimics continuity, including repetition, plurality, distribution and habitualness (Fischer 2011: 67), and vowel alternation mimics change including variation, change of direction, instability, uncertainty, vacillation, reciprocity and interruption. I will show that all these meanings can be derived from the combination of the two abstract notions of continuity and change as applied to different aspects of reality and from the results of various semantic shifts associated with reduplicative constructions in general (Fischer 2011: 65–67). I will discuss examples from different languages (including English, French, Spanish, Basque, Estonian, Khakas and Chinese) in order to check the general character of the proposed iconic analysis of AR expressions.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.English AR as a prosodic template
  • 3.An iconic analysis of AR expressions
  • 4. Sound iconicity in AR
  • 5.Movement iconicity in AR
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 8 September 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ill.15.04mor
References (26)
References
Anscombre, J. C. 1986. Onomatopées, délocutivité et autres blablas. Revue Romane 20(2): 169–207.Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. L. 1965. Forms of English. Accent, Morpheme, Order. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Conradie, C. J. 2003. The iconicity of Afrikaans reduplication. In From Sign to Signing [Iconicity in Language and Literature 3], W. G. Müller & O. Fischer (eds), 203–224. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, O. 2011. Cognitive iconic grounding of reduplication in language. In Semblance and Signification [Iconicity in Language & Literature 10], P. Michelucci, O. Fischer & C. Ljungberg (eds), 55–81. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
García de Diego, V. 1968. Diccionario de voces naturales (A Dictionary of Natural Words). Madrid: Aguilar.Google Scholar
Grammont, M. 1901. Onomatopées et mots expressifs. Revue des Langues Romaines 44: 97–158.Google Scholar
Hladký, J. 1998. Notes on reduplicative words in English. Sborník Prací Filozofické Fakulty Brnĕnské Univerzity, Brno Studies in English 24: 33–78.Google Scholar
Hu, Z.. 2011. Imagic iconicity in the Chinese language. In Semblance and Signification [Iconicity in Language & Literature 10], P. Michelucci, O. Fischer & C. Ljungberg (eds), 83–99. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. 2006. Sound Symbolism and Motion in Basque. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
. 2007. Hizkuntzaren bihotzean: Euskal onomatopeien hiztegia (At the Heart of Language: A Dictionary of Basque Onomatopoeias). Donostia: Gaiak.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. & Waugh, L. R. 2002. The Sound Shape of Language, 3rd edn. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, O. 1933. Symbolic value of the vowel I . In Selected Writings of Otto Jespersen, 557–578. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Mikone, E. 2001. Ideophones in the Balto-Finnic languages. In Ideophones [Typological Studies in Language 44], F. K. Erhard Voeltz & C. Kilian-Hatz (eds), 223–234. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Minkova, D. 2002. Ablaut reduplication in English: The criss-crossing of prosody and verbal art. English Language and Linguistics 6(1): 133–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moreno Cabrera, J. C. 2014. Zig-zag: Fundamentos icónicos. In Homenatge a Sebastià Serrano, M. A. Martí & M. Taulé (eds), 217–232. Barcelona: Universitat de Barcelona.Google Scholar
oscillate. 〈[URL]〉 (29 November 2016).
Paul, H. 1920. Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Pott, A. F. 1862. Doppelung (Reduplikation, Gemination) als eines der wichtigsten Bildungsmittel der Sprache beleuchtet aus Sprachen aller Welttheile. Lemgo-Detmold: Verlage der Meyerschen Hofbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Riera, M. & Sanjaume, M. 2011. Diccionari d’onomatopeies i mots de creació expressiva (A Dictionary of Onomatopoeias and Expressive Words). Barcelona: Educaula.Google Scholar
Rozhanskij, F. I. 2011. Reduplikatsija. Opyt tipologicheskogo issledovanija (Reduplication. A Typological Investigation). Moskva: Znak.Google Scholar
Santisteban, K. 2007. Onomatopeia eta adierazpen hotsen hiztegia (A Dictionary of Onomatopoeias and Expressive Sounds). Bilbao: Mensajero.Google Scholar
Sonesson, G. 2008. Prolegomena to a general theory of iconicity: Considerations on language, gestures and pictures. In Naturalness and Iconicity in Language [Iconicity in Language and Literature 7], K. Willems & L. De Cuypere (eds), 47–72, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thun, N. 1963. Reduplicative Words in English. A Study of Formations of the Types tick-tick, hurly-burly and shilly-shally . PhD dissertation, Uppsala.
Usuki, T. & Akita, K. 2015. What’s in a mimetic? On the dynamicity of its iconic stem. In Iconicity. East Meets West [Iconicity in Language and Literature 14], M. K. Hiraga, W. J. Herlofsky, K. Shinohara & K. Akita (eds), 109–124. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zigzag. 2016a. 〈[URL]〉 (29 November 2016).Google Scholar
Zigzag. 2016b. 〈[URL]〉 (29 November 2016).Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Moreno Cabrera, Juan Carlos
2024. La glotomímesis en la lengua española. Asterisco: Revista de lingüística española 2 ► pp. 25 ff. DOI logo
Flaksman, Maria
2020. Pathways of de-iconization. In Operationalizing Iconicity [Iconicity in Language and Literature, 17], ► pp. 76 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.