Cover not available
Part of
Dimensions of Iconicity
Edited by Angelika Zirker, Matthias Bauer, Olga Fischer and Christina Ljungberg
[Iconicity in Language and Literature 15] 2017
► pp. 135–150

Ekphrasis, cognition, and iconicity

An analysis of W. D. Snodgrass’s “Van Gogh: ‘The Starry Night’”

| West Chester University of Pennsylvania
The paper examines the relationship between iconicity and ekphrasis from the viewpoint of cognitive poetics and literary stylistics. Cognitive poetics draws on cognitive linguistics, literary linguistics, psychology, and neuroscience to explore the relationship between the creation and interpretation of literary texts and the workings of the human mind. The following analysis focuses on W. D. Snodgrass’s ekphrastic poem “Van Gogh: ‘The Starry Night’” and explores how readers are invited to mentally reconstruct van Gogh’s painting. A close reading of the text demonstrates how the poem mirrors the explosive imagery of the night sky and contrasts it with the serene atmosphere of the village. Moreover, the analysis considers how Snodgrass attempts to reconcile the visual and the verbal media so as to present them as working in unison and enable readers to experience the painting.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.An image of the village
  • 3.The sky
  • 4.An “imaginative leap”
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 8 September 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ill.15.08pan
References (28)
References
Beukus, M. 2010. The poem as icon of the painting: Poetic iconicity in Johannes Vermeer and Tom Gouws. In Signergy [Iconicity in Language and Literature 9], C. J. Conradie, R. Johl, M. Beukes, O. Fischer & C. Ljungberg (eds), 225–240. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cheeke, S. 2008. Writing for Art: The Aesthetics of Ekphrasis. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
De Cuypere, L. (ed.). 2008. Limiting the Iconic: From the Metatheoretical Foundations to the Creative Possibilities of Iconicity in Language [Iconicity in Language and Literature 6]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elleström, L. 2015. Visual, auditory, and cognitive iconicity in written literature: The example of Emily Dickinson’s ‘Because I could not stop for Death’. In East meets West [Iconicity in Language and Literature 14], M. K. Hiraga, W. J. Herlofsky, K. Shinohara & K. Akita (eds), 207–218. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, O. & Nänny, M. 2001. Introduction: Veni, vidi, vici. In The Motivated Sign [Iconicity in Language and Literature 2], O. Fischer & M. Nänny (eds), 1–14. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, O. 2011. Cognitive iconic grounding of reduplication in language. In Semblance and Signification [Iconicity in Language and Literature 10], P. Michellucci, O. Fischer & C. Ljungberg (eds), 55–82. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hagstrum, J. H. 1958. The Sister Arts: The Tradition of Literary Pictorialism and English Poetry from Dryden to Gray. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hidalgo-Downing, L. 2000. Negation, Text Worlds and Discourse: The Pragmatics of Fiction. Stamford CT : Ablex.Google Scholar
Hiraga, M. 2005. Metaphor and Iconicity: A Cognitive Approach to Analyzing Texts. New York NY: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R. 2008. Construction after construction and its theoretical challenges. Language 84: 8–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Knowles, K., Schaffner, A. K., Weger, U. & Roberts, A. M. 2012. Reading space in visual poetry: New cognitive perspectives. Writing Technologies 4: 75–106.Google Scholar
Kouwenberg, S. & La Charité, D. 2001. The iconic interpretations of reduplication: Issues in the study of reduplication in Caribbean Creole languages. European Journal of English Studies 5(1): 59–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W. 2008. Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Conceptual semantics, symbolic grammar, and the day after day construction. In LACUS Forum 36: Mechanisms of Linguistic Behavior, P. Sutcliffe, W. J. Sullivan & A. Lommel (eds), 3–24. Houston TX: Lacus.Google Scholar
Loizeaux, L. B. 2008. Twentieth-Century Poetry and the Visual Arts. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Nänny, M. 1999. Alphabetic letters as icons in literary texts. In Form Miming Meaning [Iconicity in Language and Literature 1], M. Nänny & O. Fischer (eds), 173–198. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nöth, W. 2001. Semiotic foundations of iconicity in language and literature. In The Motivated Sign [Iconicity in Language and Literature 2], O. Fischer & M. Nänny (eds), 17–28. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rippl, G. 2011. Iconicity and intermediality in Charles Simic’s Dime-Store Alchemy . In Semblance and Signification [Iconicity in Language and Literature 10], P. Michellucci, O. Fischer & C. Ljungberg (eds), 313–326. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Snodgrass, W. D. 1968. After Experience. New York NY: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Stockwell, P. 2002. Cognitive Poetics: An Introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2009. Texture. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
Styles, E. A. 2005. Attention Perception and Memory: An Integrated Introduction. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Tabakowska, E. 2014. Iconicity and (cognitive) grammar: Where shall the twain meet? In Cognitive Linguistics in the Making, K. Rudnicka-Szozda & A. Szwedek (eds), 319–330. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Travis, L. 2003. Reduplication feeds syntax. In Proceedings of Canadian Linguistics Association (CLA) 2003, S. Burelle & S. Somesfalean (eds), 236–247. Montréal: Université du Québec à Montréal, Département de linguistique et de didactique des langues.Google Scholar
Webb, R. 2009. Ekphrasis, Imagination and Persuasion in Ancient Rhetorical Theory and Practice. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Werth, P. 1999. Text Worlds: Representing Conceptual Space in Discourse. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Williams E. 1994. Remarks on lexical knowledge. In The Acquisition of the Lexicon, L. Gleitman & B. Landau (eds), 7–34. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wolf, W. 2003. Intermedial iconicity in fiction: Tema con variazioni. In From Sign to Signing [Iconicity in Language and Literature 3], W. G. Müller & O. Fischer (eds), 339–360. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Panagiotidou, Maria-Eirini
2022. Ekphrasis: Past and Present. In The Poetics of Ekphrasis, ► pp. 15 ff. DOI logo
Panagiotidou, Maria-Eirini
2022. Representation and Narrativization in Ekphrasis. In The Poetics of Ekphrasis, ► pp. 85 ff. DOI logo
Panagiotidou, Maria-Eirini
2022. Transposition: Cognitive Facets of the Ekphrastic Experience. In The Poetics of Ekphrasis, ► pp. 139 ff. DOI logo
Lugea, Jane
2018. The year’s work in stylistics 2017. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 27:4 ► pp. 329 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.