Cover not available
Part of
Ideophones, Mimetics and Expressives
Edited by Kimi Akita and Prashant Pardeshi
[Iconicity in Language and Literature 16] 2019
► pp. 57–76

Chapter 3
Monosyllabic and disyllabic roots in the diachronic development of Japanese mimetics

| The George Washington University
It has been demonstrated that the distinction between monosyllabic and disyllabic roots is critical in synchronic analyses of Japanese sound-symbolic vocabulary (also known as mimetics). This chapter demonstrates the relevance of this distinction for the diachronic development of Japanese mimetic words. Specifically, the chapter traces the development of the syllable-final nasal /N/ and the voiceless fricative /h/ and argues that these elements existed in monosyllabic mimetic roots before they appeared with disyllabic mimetic roots. The chapter suggests that this dichotomy may have implications for broader issues of language evolution.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Synchronic contrasts between monosyllabic and disyllabic mimetic roots
    • 2.1Sound symbolism
    • 2.2Phonotactics
  • 3.Diachronic changes in monosyllabic and disyllabic mimetic roots
    • 3.1Syllable-final nasal /N/
      • 3.1.1Semantic characteristics of /N/
      • 3.1.2Diachronic development of /N/
    • 3.2Development of /h/ in monosyllabic and disyllabic mimetic roots
      • 3.2.1Standard view on the development of /h/
      • 3.2.2Differences between monosyllabic and disyllabic mimetic roots regarding /h/
  • 4.Implications for cross-linguistic discussions of mimetics
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 6 May 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ill.16.04ham
References (36)
References
Akita, K. 2013. The lexical iconicity hierarchy and its grammatical correlates. In Iconic Investigations, L. Elleström, O. Fischer and C. Ljungberg (eds), 331–350. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017. Gaikokugo ni mo onomatope wa aru no? [Do foreign languages also have onomatopoeic words?]. In Onomatope no Nazo: Pikachū kara Mofumofu made [Mysteries of Onomatopoeia: From Pikachu to Mofumofu ], H. Kubozono (ed.), 65–84. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
Alderete, J. and Kochtetov, A. 2017. Integrating sound symbolism with core grammar: The case of expressive palatalization. Language 93: 731–766. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blasi, D., Wichmann, S., Hammarström, H., Stadler, P. and Christiansen, M. 2016. Sound–meaning association biases evidenced across thousands of languages. PNAS 113: 10818–10823. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fidler, M. U. 2014. Onomatopoeia in Czech. Bloomington: Slavica.Google Scholar
Frellesvig, B. 2010. A History of the Japanese Language. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garrigues, S. L. 1995. Mimetic parallels in Korean and Japanese. Studies in Language 19: 359–398. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hamano, S. 1986. The sound-symbolic system of Japanese. University of Florida Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
Hamano, S. 1994. Palatalization in Japanese sound symbolism. In Sound Symbolism, L. Hinton, J. Nichols and J. J. Ohala (eds), 148–157. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hamano, S. 1998. The Sound-Symbolic System of Japanese. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Google Scholar
2000. Voicing of obstruents in Old Japanese: evidence from the sound-symbolic stratum. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 9: 207–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015. Otomane kara chūshō-teki na onshōchō e no henka [Changes from onomatopoeia to abstract sound symbolism]. Nihongogaku [Japanese Studies] 34: 34–43.Google Scholar
Hashimoto, S. 1950. Kokugo On’in no Kenkyū [Phonological Studies of Japanese]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
Hopper, P. J. and Traugott, E. C. 1993. Grammaticalization. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ishii, T. 1999. The JUN Corpus. Unpublished.Google Scholar
Iwasaki, N., Brown, L., Kita, S. and Vinson, D. 2013. Japanese and Korean speakers’ production of mimetic words. In Japanese/Korean Linguistics 20, B. Frellesvis and P. Sells (eds), 199–213. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Kim, K-O. 1977. Sound symbolism in Korean. Journal of Linguistics 13: 67–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim-Renaud, Y-K. 2009. Korean: An Essential Grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Komatsu, H. 1981. Nihongo no On’in [Phonology of Japanese]. Tokyo: Chuo Koronsha.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, K. 2007. Sekai Gengo no naka no Nihongo [The Japanese Language among World Languages]. Tokyo: Sanseido.Google Scholar
McCawley, J. 1968. The Phonological Component of a Grammar of Japanese. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Mester, A. and Ito, J. 1989. Feature predictability and underspecification: Palatal prosody in Japanese mimetics. Language 65: 258–293. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nakazato, M. 2007. Warai o byōsha suru onomatope no hensen [Changes in the onomatopoeic words depicting laughter]. Bulletin of Joetsu University of Education 26: 1–14.Google Scholar
Nasu, A. 1999. Onomatope ni okeru yūseika to [p] no yūhyōsei [Markedness of voicing and [p] in onomatopoeia]. Journal of the Phonetic Society of Japan 3:52–66.Google Scholar
2015. The phonological lexicon and mimetic phonology. In Handbook of Japanese Phonetics and Phonology, H. Kubozono (ed.), 253–288. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Noji, J. 1973–1977. Yōjiki no Gengo Seikatsu no Jittai [Realities of Early Childhood Language Use]. Hiroshima: Bunka Hyoron Shuppan.Google Scholar
Oswalt, R. L. 1994. Inanimate imitatives in English. In Sound Symbolism, L. Hinton, J. Nichols and J. J. Ohala (eds), 293–306. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pellard, T. 2015. The linguistic archeology of the Ryukyu Islands. In Handbook of the Ryukyuan Languages, P. Heinrich, S. Miyara and M. Shimoji (eds), 13–37. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pintér, G. 2015. The emergence of new consonant contrast. In Handbook of Japanese Phonetics and Phonology, H. Kubozono (ed.), 121–165. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sato, K. (ed.) 1977. Kokugogaku Kenkyū Jiten [Encyclopedia of Japanese Language Studies]. Tokyo: Meiji Shoin.Google Scholar
Suzuki, M. 2007. Kaisetsu: Rekishi-teki hensen to sono hirogari [Commentary: Historical changes and expansion]. In Giongo/Gitaigo 4500: Nihongo Onomatope Jiten [4500 Mimetics: Dictionary of Japanese Onomatopoeia], M. Ono (ed.), 577–648. Tokyo: Shogakukan.Google Scholar
Takayama, T. 2016. Ha-gyō shi’in no datsu-shin’on-ka [Delabialization of voiceless labial obstruents]. In Nihongo-shi Jojutsu no Hōhō [Describing the History of the Japanese Language], K. Oki and Y. Tamon (eds), 95–121. Kobe: Hituzi Syobo.Google Scholar
Tsuchii, T, Morita, T. and Chonan, M. (eds) 1980. Hōyaku Nippo Jisho [Japanese-Portuguese Dictionary]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
Vance, T. 2008. The Sounds of Japanese. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Yamaguchi, N. 2002. Inu wa ‘Biyo’ to Naite ita [Dogs Used to Cry ‘Biyo’]. Tokyo: Kobunsha.Google Scholar
2012. Nara jidai no giongo/gitaigo [Onomatopoeia during the Nara period], Meiji University Global Japanese Studies 4: 152–170.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Thompson, Arthur Lewis, Thomas Van Hoey & Youngah Do
2021. Articulatory features of phonemes pattern to iconic meanings: evidence from cross-linguistic ideophones. Cognitive Linguistics 32:4 ► pp. 563 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.