Chapter published in:
Ideophones, Mimetics and Expressives
Edited by Kimi Akita and Prashant Pardeshi
[Iconicity in Language and Literature 16] 2019
► pp. 77100
References
Abelin, Å.
1999Studies in sound symbolism. Ph.D. dissertation, Göteborg University.Google Scholar
Abramova, E., Fernández, R. and Sangati, F.
2013Automatic labeling of phonesthemic senses. Proceedings of the 35th annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. M. Knauff, M. Pauen, N. Sebanz, and I. Wachsmuth (eds),1696–1701.Google Scholar
Baerman, M. and Corbett, G. G.
2012Stem alternations and multiple exponence. Word Structure 5: 52–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bergen, B. K.
2004The psychological reality of phonaesthemes. Language 80: 290–311. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blasi, D. E., Wichmann, S., Hammarström, H., Stadler, P. F. and Christiansen, M. H.
2016Sound-meaning association biases evidenced across thousands of languages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113: 10818–10823. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blust, R. A.
1988Austronesian Root Theory: An Essay on the Limits of Morphology [Studies in Language companion series 19]. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, D. L.
1950Rime, assonance, and morpheme analysis. Word 6: 117–136. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bond, O.
2013A base for canonical negation. In Canonical Morphology and Syntax, D. Brown, M. Chumakina and G. G. Corbett (eds), 20–47. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, D., Chumakina, M., Corbett, G. G., Popova, G. and Spencer, A.
2012Defining ‘periphrasis’: Key notions. Morphology 22: 233–275. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, D. and Chumakina, M.
2013What there might be and what there is: An introduction to Canonical Typology. In Canonical Morphology and Syntax, D. Brown, M. Chumakina and G. G. Corbett (eds), 1–19. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Childs, G. T.
1994African ideophones. In Sound Symbolism, L. Hinton, J. Nichols and J. Ohala (eds), 178–204. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Corbett, G. G.
2003Agreement: Canonical instances and the extent of the phenomenon. In Topics in Morphology: Selected Papers from the Third Mediterranean Morphology Meeting (Barcelona, September 20–22 2001), A. Ralli and S. Scalise (eds), 109–128. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra.Google Scholar
2005The canonical approach in typology. In Linguistic Diversity and Language Theories (Studies in Language Companion Series 72), Z. Frajzyngier, A. Hodges and D. S. Rood (eds), 25–49. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Canonical Typology, suppletion, and possible words. Language 83: 8–42. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Canonical derivational morphology. Word Structure 3: 141–155. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015Morphosyntactic complexity: A typology of lexical splits. Language 91: 145–193. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diffloth, G.
1994 i: big, a: small. In Sound Symbolism, L. Hinton, J. Nichols, and J. Ohala (eds), 107–113. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dingemanse, M.
2012Advances in the cross-linguistic study of ideophones. Language and Linguistics Compass 6: 654–672. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dingemanse, M., Blasi, D. E., Lupyan, G., Christiansen, M. H., and Monaghan, P.
2015Arbitrariness, iconicity, and systematicity in language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 19: 603–615. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dingemanse, M., Schuerman, W., Reinisch, E., Tufvesson, S. and Mitterer, H.
2016What sound symbolism can and cannot do: Testing the iconicity of ideophones from five languages”. Language 92: 67–83. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Firth, J.
1930Speech. London: Ernest Benn.Google Scholar
Haiman, J.
1980The iconicity of grammar: Isomorphism and motivation. Language 56: 515–540. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hamano, S.
1998The Sound-Symbolic System of Japanese. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Hinton, L., Nichols J. and Ohala J. J.
1994Sound symbolism. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hutchins, S. S.
1998The psychological reality, variability, and compositionality of English phonaesthemes. Ph.D. dissertation, Emory University.Google Scholar
Hyman, L. M.
2012In defense of prosodic typology: A response to Beckman and Venditti. Linguistic Typology 16: 341–385. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jones, D.
1956An Outline of English Phonetics. Cambridge: Heffer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y. S.
1984Aspects of Korean morphology. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Kwon, N.
2015The natural motivation of sound symbolism. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Queensland. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kwon, N. and Round, E. R.
2015Phonaesthemes in morphological theory. Morphology 25: 1–27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kwon, N.
2016Empirically observed iconicity levels of English phonaesthemes. Public Journal of Semiotics 7: 73–93.Google Scholar
2017Total reduplication in Japanese ideophones: An exercise in Localized Canonical Typology. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 2: 40. 1–31 Crossref. Google Scholar
2018Iconicity correlated with vowel harmony in Korean ideophones. Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology 9: 1. 1–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
To appear. A theoretical extension of Ohala’s frequency code hypothesis on size-sound symbolism. In Sound Symbolism in the History of Thought, L. Nobile ed. Amsterdam and Philadelphia John Benjamins
Larsen, D. and Heinz, J.
2012Neutral vowels in sound-symbolic vowel harmony in Korean. Phonology 29: 433–464. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J. S.
1992Phonology and sound symbolism of Korean ideophones. Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University.Google Scholar
Lockwood, G. and Dingemanse, M.
2015Iconicity in the lab: A review of behavioural, developmental, and neuroimaging research into sound-symbolism. Frontiers in Psychology 6: 1246.Google Scholar
Marchand, H.
1969The Categories and Types of Present-Day English Word-Formation: A Synchronic-Diachronic Approach. München: Beck.Google Scholar
Martin, S. E.
1962Phonetic symbolism in Korean. American Studies in Altaic Linguistics 13: 177–189.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. J.
1983Phonological features and morphological structure. In Papers from the Para-Session on the Interplay of Phonology, Morphology, and Syntax. J. F. Richardson, M. Marks and A. Chukerman (eds), 135–161. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
1989Linear order in phonological representation. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 71–99.Google Scholar
Monaghan, P., Shillcock, R. C., Christiansen, M. H., and Kirby, S.
2014How arbitrary is language? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 369: 20130299. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moravcsik, E.
1978Reduplicative constructions. In Universals of Human Language, vol. 3: Word Structure, J. H. Greenberg (ed.), 297–334. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Otis, K. and Sagi, E.
2008 Phonoaesthemes: a corporabased analysis. Proceedings of the 30th annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, B. C. Love, K McRae, and V. M. Sloutsky (eds), 65–70.Google Scholar
Parault, S. J.
2006Sound symbolic word learning in written context. Contemporary Educational Psychology 31: 228–252. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2005.06.002Google Scholar
Parault, S. J. and Schwanenflugel, P. J.
2006Sound-symbolism: A piece in the puzzle of word learning. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 35(4): 329–351.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S.
1932Collected Writings, 2: Elements of Logic. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Perniss, P., Thompson, R. and Vigliocco, G.
2010Iconicity as a general property of language: evidence from spoken and signed languages. Frontiers in Psychology 1: 227. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rhodes, R. A. and Lawler, J. M.
1981Athematic metaphors. Proceedings of the 17th regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS 17), R. Hendrick, C. Masek, and M. F. Miller (eds). 318–342.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M.
1994Relative motivation in denotational and indexical sound symbolism of Wasco-Wishram Chinookan. In Sound Symbolism, L. Hinton, J. Nichols, and J. J. Ohala (eds), 40–60. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sohn, H. -M.
1999The Korean Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tufvesson, S.
2011Analogy-making in the Semai sensory world. The Senses and Society 6: 86–95. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ultan, R.
1978Size-sound symbolism. In Universals of Human Language, vol. 2: Phonology, J. H. Greenberg, C. A. Ferguson, and E. A. Moravcsik (eds), 525–568. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Uspensky, B. A.
1972Subsystems in language, their interrelations and their correlated universals. Linguistics: An International Review 88: 53–71.Google Scholar
Woodworth, N. L.
1991Sound symbolism in proximal and distal forms. Linguistics 29: 273–300. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zingler, T.
2017Evidence against the morpheme: The history of English phonaesthemes. Language Sciences 62: 76–90. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Willemsen, Jeroen & Ehm Hjorth Miltersen
2020. The expression of vulgarity, force, severity and size. Studies in Language 44:3  pp. 659 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.