Part of
Ideophones, Mimetics and Expressives
Edited by Kimi Akita and Prashant Pardeshi
[Iconicity in Language and Literature 16] 2019
► pp. 199228
References (44)
Sources
Čapek, K. 1992. Devatero pohádek. [Nine Fairytales] In Karel Čapek Menší prózy 1. Prague: Československý spisovatel. [URL]Google Scholar
Kopřivová, M., Lukeš, D., Komrsková, Z., Poukarová, P., Waclawičová, M., Benešová, L. and Křen, M. ORAL: korpus neformální mluvené češtiny [ORAL: Corpus of informal spoken Czech ], version 1, June 2, 2017. Institute of the Czech National Corpus, Charles University, Prague 2017. [URL]Google Scholar
Křen, M., Cvrček, V., Čapka, T., Čermáková, A., Hnátková, M., Chlumská, L., Jelínek, T., Kováříková, D., Petkevič, V., Procházka, P., Skoumalová, H., Škrabal, M., Truneček, P., Vondřička, P. and Zasina, A. Korpus SYN [ Corpus SYN ], version 5, April 24, 2017. Institute of the Czech National Corpus, Charles University, Prague 2017. [URL]Google Scholar
SYN2015: reprezentativní korpus psané češtiny [SYN2015: representative corpus of written Czech]. Institute of the Czech National Corpus, Charles University, Prague 2015. [URL]Google Scholar
Werich, J. 1960. Fimfárum. Prague: Albatros.
References
Akita, K. 2017. The linguistic integration of Japanese ideophones and its typological implications. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 62: 314–334. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Akita, K., Nakamura, S., Komatsu, T. and Hirata, S. 2012. Onomatope no intarakushonsei ni kansuru ryōteki kōsatsu [A quantitative study of the interactional function of mimetics]. Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence, 2012, 2N1-OS-8c-5.Google Scholar
Alpher, B. 1994. Yir-Yoront ideophones. In Sound Symbolism, L. Hinton, J. Nichols and J. J. Ohala (eds), 161–177. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2001. Ideophones in interaction with intonation and the expression of new information in some indigenous languages of Australia. In Ideophones, F. K. E. Voeltz and C. Klian-Hatz (eds), 9–24. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. L. and Pagliuca, W. 1987. The evolution of future meaning. In Papers from the 7th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, A. G. Ramat, O. Carruba and G. Bernini (eds), 109–202. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. H. and Gerrig, R. J. 1990. Quotation as demonstration. Language 66: 764–805. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cvrček, V., Kodýtek, V., Kopřivová, M., Kováříková, D., Sgall, P., Šulc, M., Táborský, J., Volín, J. and Waclawičová, M. 2015. Mluvnice současné češtiny I: Jak se píśe a jak se mluví [Grammar of contemporary Czech I: How it is written and how it is spoken]. 2nd ed. Prague: Karolínum.Google Scholar
Diffloth, G. 1976. Expressives in Semai. Oceanic Linguistics Special Publications 13: Austroasiatic Studies, Part I, 249–264.Google Scholar
Dingemanse, M. 2009. Ideophones in unexpected places. In Proceedings of Conference on Language Documentation and Linguistic Theory 2, P. K. Austin, O. Bond, M. Charette, D. Nathan and P. Sells (eds), 83–94. London: SOAS.Google Scholar
Dingemanse, M. 2011. The meaning and use of ideophones in Siwu. Ph.D. dissertation, Radboud University Nijmegen.
Dressler, W. U. and Barbaresi, L. M. 1994. Morphopragmatics Diminutives and Intensifiers in Italian, German, and Other Languages. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
England, N. 2009. To tell a tale: the structure of narrated stories in Mam, a Mayan language. International Journal of American Linguistics. 75: 207–311. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fidler, M. U. 2014. Onomatopoeia in Czech: A Conceptualization of Sound and Its Connections to Grammar and Discourse. Bloomington: Slavica.Google Scholar
Fidler, M. and Cvrček, V. 2015. A data-driven analysis of reader viewpoints: Reconstructing the historical reader using keyword analysis. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 23: 197–239. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fónagy, I. 1999. Why iconicity? In Form Miming Meaning, M. Nänny and O. Fischer (eds), 3–35. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Franco, L. 2017. L-syntax and phono-symbolism: On the status of ideophones in complex predicates. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 62: 243–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hinton, L., Nichols, J. and Ohala, J. J. (eds). 1994. Introduction: Sound-symbolic processes. In Sound Symbolism, L. Hinton, J. Nichols and J. J. Ohala (eds), 1–14. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hopper, P. J. and Thompson, S. 1980. Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56: 251–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, R. and Waugh, L. R. 1987 / 2002. The Sound Shape of Language. 2nd ed. The Hague: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kilian-Hatz, C. 2001. Universality and diversity: Ideophones from Baka and Kxoe. In Ideophones, F. K. E. Voeltz and C. Kilian-Hatz (eds), 155–163. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kita, S. 1997. Two-dimensional analysis of Japanese mimetics. Linguistics 35: 379–415. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kořínek, J. M. 1934. Studie z oblasti onomatopoje [Study from the area of onomatopoeia]. Prague: Faculty of Arts, Charles University.Google Scholar
Labov, W. 1972. Language in the Inner City. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Lyndall, J. 2000. Having fun with ideophones: A socio-linguistic look at ideophones in Hamar, Southern Ethiopia. In Proceedings of the XIV International Conference of Ethiopian Studies, B. Yimam, R. Pankhurst, D. Chapple, Y. Admassu, A. Pankhurst and B. Teferra (eds), 886–891. Addis Ababa: Addis Ababa University.Google Scholar
Mphande, L. 1992. Ideophones and African verse. Research in African Literatures 23: 117–129.Google Scholar
Mous, M. and Sanka, S. 2014. Sound symbolism in Iraqw literature. In In and Out of Africa Languages in Question In Honor of Robert Nikolaï, Vol. 2: Language Contact and Language Change in Africa, C. de Féral, M. Kossmann and M. Tosco (eds), 201–207. Louvain-la-Neuve and Walpole, MA: Peeters.Google Scholar
Nuckolls, J. B. 1996. Sounds like Life: Sound-Symbolic Grammar, Performance, and Cognition in Pastaza Quechua. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
O’Reilly, M. 2005. ‘Active noising’: The use of noises in talk, the case of onomatopoeia, abstract sounds, and the functions they serve in therapy. Text 25: 745–762. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reichard, G. 1950. Navaho Religion: A Study of Symbolism. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Samarin, W. J. 1969. The art of Gbeya insults. International Journal of American Linguistics 35: 323–329. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schourup, L. 1993. Nichi-ei onomatope no taishō-kenkyū [A contrastive study of Japanese and English onomatopoeia]. Gengo 22 (6): 48–55.Google Scholar
Scott, M. and Tribble, C. 2006. Textual Patterns. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Szatrowski, P. 2015. Shishoku-kai ni okeru onomatope [Onomatopoeia in taster lunches]. Japanese-Language Education in Europe 19: 95–100.Google Scholar
Schaefer, R. P. 2001. Ideophonic adverbs and manner gaps in Emai. In Ideophones, F. K. E. Voeltz and C. Kilian-Hatz (eds), 339–354. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Šlosar, D. 1995. Slovotvorba [Word formation]. In Příruční mluvnice češtiny [ A Concise Grammar of Czech ], P. Karlík, M. Nekula and Z. Rusínová (eds), 109–225. Prague: Lidové noviny.Google Scholar
Tannen, D. 1983. ‘I take out the rock – DOK!’: How Greek women tell about being molested and create involvement. Anthropological Linguistics 25: 359–374.Google Scholar
1984 /2005. Conversational Style: Analyzing Talk among Friends. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tsujimura, N. 2014. Mimetic verbs and meaning. In Morphology and Meaning, F. Rainer, F. Gardani, H. Ch, Luschützky and W. U. Dressler (eds), 303–314. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Webster, A. K. 2009. The poetics and politics of Navajo ideophony in contemporary Navajo poetry. Language & Communication 29: 133–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

McLean, Bonnie
2021. Revising an implicational hierarchy for the meanings of ideophones, with special reference to Japonic. Linguistic Typology 25:3  pp. 507 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.