Chapter published in:
Ideophones, Mimetics and Expressives
Edited by Kimi Akita and Prashant Pardeshi
[Iconicity in Language and Literature 16] 2019
► pp. 229247
References

References

Akita, K.
2009A grammar of sound-symbolic words in Japanese: Theoretical approaches to iconic and lexical properties of mimetics. Ph.D. dissertation, Kobe University.
2015Ideophones and reported discourse as depictive signs. Joint Project on Language & Culture 2014: Theoretical Approaches to Natural Language, 1–10. Osaka University.Google Scholar
2016Gengo taikei no naka no onomatope [Ideophones in linguistic systems]. In Lexicon Forum, No. 7, T. Kageyama (ed.), 19–39. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.Google Scholar
2017aGaikokugo ni mo onomatope wa aru no? [Do foreign languages also have mimetics?]. In Onomatope no Nazo: Pikachū kara Mofumofu made [Mysteries of Mimetics: From Pikachu to Mofumofu ], H. Kubozono (ed.), 65–85. Tokyo: Iwanami.Google Scholar
2017bGrammatical and functional properties of mimetics in Japanese. In The Grammar of Japanese Mimetics: Perspectives from Structure, Acquisition and Translation, N. Iwasaki, P. Sells and Kimi Akita (eds), 20–34. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2017cThe linguistic integration of Japanese ideophones and its typological implications. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 62: 314–334.Google Scholar
Akita, K. and Dingemanse, M.
To appear. Ideophones (mimetics, expressives). In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics, M. Aronoff ed. Oxford Oxford University Press
Akita, K, Nakamura, S., Komatsu, T. and Hirata, S.
2012Onomatope no intarakushon-sei ni kansuru ryō-teki kōsatu [A quantitative study of the interactional function of mimetics]. Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence, 2012, 2N1-OS-8c-5.Google Scholar
Akita, K. and Tsujimura, N.
2016Mimetics. In The Handbook of Japanese Lexicon and Word Formation, T. Kageyama and H. Kishimoto (eds.), 133–160. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Akita, K. and Usuki, T.
2015A constructional account of the “optional” quotative marking on Japanese mimetics. Journal of Linguistics 52: 245–275.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Argyle, M. and Dean, J.
1965Eye-contact, distance and affiliation. Sociometry 28: 289–304.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baba, J.
2003Pragmatic function of Japanese mimetics in the spoken discourse of varying emotive intensity levels. Journal of Pragmatics 35: 1861–1889.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bavelas, J. B. and Chovil, N.
1997Faces in dialogue. In The Psychology of Facial Expression, J. A. Russell and J. M. Fernández-Dols (eds), 334–346. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bavelas, J. B., Coates, L. and Johnson, T.
2002Listener responses as a collaborative process: The role of gaze. Journal of Communication 52: 566–580.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bavelas, J., Gerwing, J. and Healing, S.
2014Effect of dialogue on demonstrations: Direct quotations, facial portrayals, hand gestures, and figurative references. Discourse Processes 51: 619–655.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Burch, A. R. and Kasper, G.
2016 ‘Like Godzilla’: Enactments and formulations in telling a disaster story in Japanese. In Emotion in Multilingual Interaction, M. T. Prior and G. Kasper (eds), 57–85. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Childs, G. T.
1994African ideophones. In Sound Symbolism, L. Hinton, J. Nichols, and J. J. Ohala (eds), 178–204. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H. and Gerrig, R. J.
1990Quotations as demonstrations. Language 66: 764–805.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, C. R.
1872The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals. London: John Murray.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diffloth, G.
1972Notes on expressive meaning. Papers from the Eighth Regional Meeting, the Chicago Linguistic Society, 440–447.Google Scholar
Dingemanse, M.
2011The meaning and use of ideophones in Siwu. Ph.D. dissertation, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics and Radboud University Nijmegen.
2012Advances in the cross-linguistic study of ideophones. Language and Linguistics Compass 6: 654–672.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Ideophones and gesture in everyday speech. Gesture 13: 143–165.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015Ideophones and reduplication: Depiction, description, and the interpretation of repeated talk in discourse. Studies in Language 39: 946–970.Google Scholar
2017Expressiveness and system integration: On the typology of ideophones, with special reference to Siwu. STUF – Language Typology and Universals 70: 363–384.Google Scholar
Dingemanse, M. and Akita, K.
2017An inverse relation between expressiveness and grammatical integration: On the morphosyntactic typology of ideophones, with special reference to Japanese. Journal of Linguistics 53: 501–532.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dingemanse, M. and Majid, A.
2012The semantic structure of sensory vocabulary in an African language. In CogSci 2012: Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, N. Miyake, D. Peebles and R. P. Cooper (eds), 300–305. Austin: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I.
1989Human Ethology. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ekman, P.
1977Facial expression. In Nonverbal Communication and Behavior, A. W. Siegman and S. Feldstein (eds), 97–126. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Feist, J.
2013 ‘Sound symbolism’ in English. Journal of Pragmatics 45: 104–118.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Güldemann, T.
2008Quotative Indexes in African Languages: A Synchronic and Diachronic Survey. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haiman, J.
2018Ideophones and the Evolution of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hogue, R. L.
2010OOs and AAs: Mouth gestures as ideophones in American Sign Language. Ph.D. dissertation, Gallaudet University.
Holt, E.
2000Reporting and reacting: Concurrent responses to reported speech. Research on Language and Social Interaction 33: 425–454.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kendon, A.
1967Some functions of gaze direction in social interaction. Acta Psychologica 26: 22–63.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kita, S.
1997Two-dimensional semantic analysis of Japanese mimetics. Linguistics 35: 379–415.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kunene, D. P.
1965The ideophones in Southern Sotho. Journal of African Linguistics 4: 19–39.Google Scholar
Mihas, E. I.
2012Ideophones in Alto Perené (Arawak) from Eastern Peru. Studies in Language 36: 300–344.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nasu, A.
2002Nihongo onomatope no gokeisei to inritsu kōzō [Word formation and prosodic structure of Japanese mimetics]. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Tsukuba.Google Scholar
Newman, P.
1968Ideophones from a syntactic point of view. Journal of West African Languages 5: 107–117.Google Scholar
Newmeyer, F. J.
1998Language Form and Language Function. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
NHK (Japan Broadcasting Corporation). 2012-present
. NHK Great East Japan Earthquake Archive. http://​www9​.nhk​.or​.jp​/archives​/311shogen/ (last accessed: 26 September 2017)Google Scholar
Nuckolls, J. B.
1992Sound symbolic involvement. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 2: 51–80.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1996Sounds like Life: Sound-Symbolic Grammar, Performance, and Cognition in Pastaza Quechua. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ohala, J. J.
1994The frequency code underlies the sound-symbolic use of voice pitch. In Sound Symbolism, L. Hinton, J. Nichols, and J. J. Ohala (eds), 325–347. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O’Reilly, M.
2005 ‘Active noising’: The use of noises in talk, the case of onomatopoeia, abstract sounds, and the functions they serve in therapy. Text 25: 745–762.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rossano, F.
2013Gaze in conversation. In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, J. Sidnell, and T. Stivers (eds), 308–329. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Russell, J. A. and Fernández-Dols, J. M.
(eds) 1997The Psychology of Facial Expression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ruusuvuori, J.
2013Emotion, affect and conversation. In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, J. Sidnell and T. Stivers (eds), 330–349. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ruusuvuori, J. and Peräkylä, A.
2009Facial and verbal expression in assessing stories and topics. Research on Language and Social Interaction 43: 377–394.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A. and Jefferson, G.
1974A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50: 696–735.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sadanobu, T.
2015Suikō-teki tokushitsu ni motozuku nihongo onomatope no ri/katsuyō [Performative use of Japanese mimetics]. Journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence 30: 353–363.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schourup, L.
1993Nihongo no kaki-kotoba/hanashi-kotoba ni okeru onomatope no bunpu ni tsuite [On the distribution of mimetics in written and spoken Japanese]. In Onomatopia: Gion/Gitaigo no Rakuen [Onomatopia: A Utopia of Mimetics], H. Kakehi and I. Tamori (eds), 77–100. Tokyo: Keiso Shobo.Google Scholar
Sells, P.
2017The significance of the grammatical study of Japanese mimetics. In The Grammar of Japanese Mimetics: Perspectives from Structure, Acquisition, and Translation, N. Iwasaki, P. Sells and K. Akita (eds), 7–19. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sidnell, J.
2006Coordinating gesture, talk, and gaze in reenactments. Research on Language and Social Interaction 39: 377–409.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Son, Y.
2010Giongo/gitaigo to miburi: Terebi hoosoo no maruchimedia kōpasu ni yoru keiryō-teki bunseki [Onomatopoeias and gestures: A multimedia corpus-based quantitative study of Japanese television broadcasts]. Mathematical Linguistics 27: 131–153.Google Scholar
Stec, K., Huiskes, M. and Redeker, G.
2016Multimodal quotation: Role shift practices in spoken narratives. Journal of Pragmatics 104: 1–17.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stivers, T. and Rossano, F.
2010Mobilizing response. Research on Language and Social Interaction 43: 3–31.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Szatrowski, P.
2018Sōgo sayō ni yoru onomatope no shiyō: Nyū seihin no shishoku kai o rei ni shite [On the use of onomatopoeia in interaction: Examples from Japanese dairy taster brunches]. NINJAL Research Papers 16: 77–106.Google Scholar
Tamori, I.
1980Cooccurrence restrictions on onomatopoeic adverbs and particles. Papers in Japanese Linguistics 7: 151–171.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tamori, I. and Schourup, L.
1999Onomatope: Keitai to Imi [Ideophones: Form and Meaning]. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Google Scholar
Toratani, K.
2017The position of to/Ø-marked mimetics in Japanese sentence structure. In The Grammar of Japanese Mimetics: Perspectives from Structure, Acquisition, and Translation, N. Iwasaki, P. Sells and K. Akita (eds), 35–72. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2018Particle drop of mimetics in Japanese: A Discourse Grammar approach. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 5: 39–60.Google Scholar
Vigliocco, G., Perniss, P. and Vinson, D.
2014 Language as a multimodal phenomenon: implications for language learning, processing and evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 369: 20130292.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Voeltz, F. K. E. and Kilian-Hatz, C.
(eds) 2001Ideophones. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, S. and Kitzinger, C.
2006Surprise as an interactional achievement: Reaction tokens in conversation. Social Psychology Quarterly 69: 150–182.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yamamoto, M.
2013Monogatari no ukete ni yoru serifu hatsuwa: Monogatari no sōgo kōi-teki tenkai [ Serifu utterances by recipients of storytelling: Interactive developments of stories]. The Japanese Journal of Language in Society 16: 139–159.Google Scholar