Part of
Iconicity in Cognition and across Semiotic Systems
Edited by Sara Lenninger, Olga Fischer, Christina Ljungberg and Elżbieta Tabakowska
[Iconicity in Language and Literature 18] 2022
► pp. 213242
Aarons, D. and Morgan, R.
2003Classifier predicates and the creation of multiple perspectives in South African Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 3(2), 125–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aronoff, M., Meir, I. and Sandler, W.
2005The paradox of sign language morphology. Language 81(2), 301–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauman, H-D. L.
2003Redesigning literature: The cinematic poetics of American Sign Language poetry. Sign Language Studies 4(1), 34–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bordwell, D., Thompson, K. and Smith, J.
2019Film Art: An Introduction. Twelfth edition. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar
Branigan, E.
1984Point of View in the Cinema: A Theory of Narration and Subjectivity in Classical Film. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cogill-Koez, D.
Currie, G.
1995Image and Mind. Film, Philosophy and Cognitive Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cuxac, C. and Sallandre, M.-A.
2007Iconicity and arbitrariness in French Sign Language: Highly iconic structures, degenerated iconicity and diagrammatic iconicity. In Verbal and Signed Languages: Comparing Structure, Constructs, and Methodologies, E. Pizzuto, P. Pietrandrea and R. Simone (eds.), 13–33. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dudis, P.
2011The body in scene depictions. In Discourse in Signed Languages, C. B. Roy (ed.), 3–45. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004Body partitioning and real-space blends. Cognitive Linguistics 15(2), 223–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, E.
1993Space in Danish Sign Language. The Semantics and Morphosyntax of the Use of Space in a Visual Language. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Fischer, R. and Kollien, S.
2006Constructed action in DGS: Roses Aktions=Fragmente. Das Zeichen 20, 96–106 and 448–463.Google Scholar
Fischer, R. and Müller, A.
2014eLCA – An e-learning unit for acquiring constructed action. In Teaching and Learning Signed Languages: International Perspectives and Practices, D. McKee, R. S. Rosen and R. McKee (eds.), 111–128. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Galt, R.
2005Back projection: Visualizing past and present Europe in ‘Zentropa’. Cinema Journal 45(1), 3–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herrmann, A. and Pendzich, N.-K.
2018Between narrator and protagonist in fables of German Sign Language. In Linguistic Foundations of Narration in Spoken and Sign Languages, A. Hübl, and M. Steinbach (eds.), 275–308. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kita, S., Van Gijn, I. and Van der Hulst, H.
1998Movement phases in signs and co-speech gestures and their transcription by human coders. In Gesture and Sign Language in Human-Computer Interaction: Proceedings of International Gesture Workshop, I. Wachsmuth and M. Fröhlich (eds.), 23–35. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liddell, S. K.
2003Grammar, Gesture and Meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lillo-Martin, D.
2012Utterance reports and constructed action. In Sign Language. An International Handbook, R. Pfau, M. Steinbach and B. Woll (eds.), 365–387. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mandel, M.
1977Iconic devices in American Sign Language. In On the Other Hand. New Perspectives on American Sign Language, L. A. Friedman (ed.), 57–107. New York, San Francisco, London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
McCleary, L. E. and Viotti, E.
2010Sign-Gesture symbiosis in Brazilian Sign Language narrative. In Meaning, Form, and Body, F. Parrill, V. Tobin and M. Turner (eds.), 181–201. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Metzger, M.
1995Constructed Dialogue and Constructed Action in American Sign Language. In Sociolinguistics in Deaf Communities, C. Lucas (ed.), 255–271. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Morin, E.
2005The Cinema, or The Imaginary Man. Transl. L. Mortimer. [French original 1956]. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Müller, A.
2018Gebärdensprachen als bewegte Bilder? Eine Untersuchung zur Anwendbarkeit von Filmbeschreibungsbegriffen auf bildliche Diskursphänomene in Deutscher Gebärdensprache (DGS). Hamburg: Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Hamburg. Doctoral dissertation. Online: [URL] [English: Sign Languages as Moving Images? A Study on the Applicability of Descriptive Categories from Film Studies to Iconic Discourse Phenomena in German Sign Language (DGS)]
2013Cinematic Devices in Signed Discourse? The Case of Eyeline Match and Point-of-View Editing. (Poster presented at the Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research (TISLR) 11 Conference, London UK, 10–13. July 2013).
Perniss, P.
2007Locative functions of simultaneous perspective constructions in German Sign Language narratives. In Simultaneity in Signed Languages: Form and Function, M. Vermeerbergen, L. Leeson and O. Crasborn (eds.), 27–54. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perniss, P., Thompson, R. L. and Vigliocco, G.
2010Iconicity as a general property of language: evidence from spoken and signed languages. Frontiers in Psychology 1 (00227). [ DOI logo]Google Scholar
Prince, S.
1993The discourse of pictures: Iconicity and film studies. Film Quarterly 47(1), 16–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quer, J., Cecchetto, C., Donati, C., Geraci, C., Kelepir, M., Pfau, R. and Steinbach, M.
(eds.) 2017SignGram Blueprint: A Guide to Sign Language Grammar Writing. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter and Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sallandre, M.-A. and Cuxac, C.
2002Iconicity in sign language: A theoretical and methodological point of view. In Gesture and Sign Language in Human-Computer Interaction. International Gesture Workshop, GW 2001, London, UK, April 18–20, 2001. Proceedings, I. Wachsmuth and T. Sowa (eds.), 173–180. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Schembri, A.
2003Rethinking “classifiers” in signed languages. In Perspectives on Classifier Constructions in Sign Languages, K. Emmorey (ed.), 3–34. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Schick, B.
1990Classifier predicates in American Sign Language. International Journal of Sign Linguistics 1, 15–40.Google Scholar
Supalla, T.
1986The classifier system in American Sign Language. In Noun Classes and Categorization, C. Craig (ed.), 181–214. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tannen, D.
1989Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taub, S. F.
2001Language from the Body. Iconicity and Metaphor in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, R. and Bowen, C. J.
2009Grammar of the Edit. 2nd edition. Amsterdam, Boston, Heidelberg: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Tybjerg, C.
2016Seeing through spirits: Superimposition, cognition, and ‘The Phantom Carriage’. Film History, 28(2), 114–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vermeerbergen, M., Leeson, L., and Crasborn, O.
(eds.) 2007Simultaneity in Signed Languages: Form and Function. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar

DGS Sources

Bedeutungserklärung Brücke (DGS)” [Meaning-Explanation Bridge] 2001In Corpus DGS and German, R. Fischer und S. Kollien, 1999–2015. University of Hamburg, unpublished. 0:29 Min.Google Scholar
[MY DGS – annotated] = Konrad, R., Hanke, T., Langer, G., Blanck, D., Bleicken, J., Hofmann, I., Jeziorski, O., König, L., König, S., Nishio, R., Regen, A., Salden, U., Wagner, S., Worseck, S. and Schulder, M.
2020MY DGS – annotated. Public Corpus of German Sign Language, 3rd release. [Dataset. Universität Hamburg. ; last access: 2021-03-24]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar