Article published in:Naturalness and Iconicity in Language
Edited by Klaas Willems and Ludovic De Cuypere
[Iconicity in Language and Literature 7] 2008
► pp. 101–119
Naturalness and markedness
The following comparison of Naturalness theory and Markedness theory contrasts naturalness scales and markedness relations and the distinct notions of value in the two theories in order to focus on recent advances in the identification of rules of naturalness syntax and markedness syntax. It is shown that whereas naturalness theory offers little basis for accounts of variation and change, key notions in markedness theory play a central role both in accounts of synchronic variation and in explanations of the initiation and actualization of change. In a concluding comparison of the two theories it is argued that Markedness theory in essential respects subsumes Naturalness theory. This explains why many linguists find the two theories kindred, and it suggests that the future will see their unification.
Published online: 10 December 2008
Cited by 8 other publications
Backer, Maarten De & Ludovic De Cuypere
Heltoft, Lars, Iván Igartua, Brian D. Joseph, Kirsten Jeppesen Kragh & Lene Schøsler
Jensen, Eva Skafte
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 08 january 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.