Cited by (11)

Cited by 11 other publications

Lee, Kathy & Sunyoung Yang
2024. Radical cyberfeminists as language planners: South Korea’s Womad. Current Issues in Language Planning 25:4  pp. 376 ff. DOI logo
GÖKMEN, Seda & Dilek PEÇENEK
2023. PERCEPTION OF ASSOCIATIVE GENDER IN DIFFERENT AGE GROUPS-A TURKISH LANGUAGE CASE. Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi 63:1  pp. 206 ff. DOI logo
Urbancová, Lujza
2023. Gender-Balanced Slovak in Contemporary Society. Gender a výzkum / Gender and Research 23:2  pp. 41 ff. DOI logo
AYDIN, Derya & Songül ERCAN
2021. Gender-Based Use of Concession: Insights from Turkish Spoken Discourse. Dil Dergisi 172:2  pp. 133 ff. DOI logo
Savoldi, Beatrice, Marco Gaido, Luisa Bentivogli, Matteo Negri & Marco Turchi
2021. Gender Bias in Machine Translation. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics 9  pp. 845 ff. DOI logo
Saimon, Musa
2020. Sexist Expressions in Nyakyusa. Issues in Language Studies 9:1  pp. 144 ff. DOI logo
Megawati, Erna
2019. Ekspresi Emosi dan Gender pada Komentar Vlog Dzawin Nur Episode Coki Pardede, Komika tak Beragama. Wacana : Jurnal Bahasa, Seni, dan Pengajaran 3:1  pp. 17 ff. DOI logo
Foubert, Océane & Maarten Lemmens
2017. Gender-biased neologisms: the case of man-X. Lexis :12 DOI logo
Gartzia, Leire & Esther Lopez-Zafra
2016. Gender Research in Spanish Psychology, Part II: Progress and Complexities in the European Context. Sex Roles 74:3-4  pp. 97 ff. DOI logo
Sáinz, Milagros, Julio Meneses, Beatriz-Soledad López & Sergi Fàbregues
2016. Gender Stereotypes and Attitudes Towards Information and Communication Technology Professionals in a Sample of Spanish Secondary Students. Sex Roles 74:3-4  pp. 154 ff. DOI logo
Guzmán-González, Trinidad

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.