Cover not available
Part of
Gender Across Languages: Volume 4
Edited by Marlis Hellinger and Heiko Motschenbacher
[IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society 36] 2015
► pp. 97–123

Gender in a planned language: Esperanto

| University of Leipzig, Germany
Published online: 9 April 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.36.04fie
References (69)
References
Anikejev, Sergej. 1982. “Reeĥe al la artikolo de János Sárközi ‘Medito pri virinoj’” [A reaction to János Sárközi’s article ‘Medito pri virinoj’]. In Akademiaj studoj 1982, ed. Rüdiger Eichholz. Bailieboro, Ontario: Esperanto Press, 62.Google Scholar
Back, Otto. 2011. “Bemerkungen zu Zamenhofs reformiertem Esperanto von 1894.” In Florilegium Interlinguisticum. Festschrift für Detlev Blanke zum 70. Geburtstag, ed. Cyril Brosch & Sabine Fiedler. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 263–269.Google Scholar
Baudouin de Courtenay, 1976 [1907]. “Zur Kritik der künstlichen Weltsprachen.” In Plansprachen, ed. Reinhard Haupenthal. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 59–110.Google Scholar
Blanke, Detlev. 1985. Internationale Plansprachen. Eine Einführung. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
. 2009. “Causes of the relative success of Esperanto.” Language Problems and Language Planning 33: 251–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bormann, Werner. 1983. “Feminisma lingvouzo en planlingvoj” [Feminist language use in planned languages]. In Akademiaj studoj 1983, ed. Rüdiger Eichholz. Bailieboro, Ontario: Esperanto Press, 49–61.Google Scholar
Brennan, Anna & Marcella Fasani. 1982. “Pri inoj kaj iroj” [On women and men]. Sekso kaj Egaleco 10 (Julio 1982): 18–23.Google Scholar
Brugmann, Karl & August Leskien. 1907. Zur Kritik der künstlichen Weltsprachen. Straßburg: Trübner.Google Scholar
Camacho, Jorge (Georgo Kamaĉo). 1991. Sur la linio [On the line]. Berkeley: Bero.Google Scholar
Council of Europe. 2007. Komuna Eŭropa Referenckadro por lingvoj: Lernado, instruado, pritaksado [Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessing]. Rotterdam: UEA.Google Scholar
Couturat, Louis & Léopold Leau. 2001 [1903, 1907]. Histoire de la langue universelle. Hildesheim: Georg Olms.Google Scholar
de Beaufront, Louis. 2004. Kompleta gramatiko detaloza di la linguo internaciona Ido. Ponferrada: Editorio Krayono ([URL] [15 August 2013]).Google Scholar
Edwards, John. 2010. Minority languages and group identity. Cases and categories. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eichholz, Rüdiger. 1983. “Seksa diskriminacio en Esperanto kaj eblecoj por malpliigi ĝin” [Sexual discrimination in Esperanto and ways of diminishing it]. In Akademiaj studoj 1983, ed. Rüdiger Eichholz. Bailieboro, Ontario: Esperanto Press, 65–73.Google Scholar
. 1988. Esperanta bildvortaro [Esperanto pictorial dictionary]. Bailieboro, Ontario: Esperanto Press.Google Scholar
Eichholz, Vilma. 1980. “Seksa diskriminacio en nia lingvo” [Sexual discrimination in our language]. In Akademiaj studoj 1980, ed. Rüdiger Eichholz. Bailieboro, Ontario: Esperanto Press, 44–47.Google Scholar
Fiedler, Sabine. 1999. Plansprache und Phraseologie. Empirische Untersuchungen zu reproduziertem Sprachmaterial im Esperanto. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. 2006. “Standardization and self-regulation in an international speech-community: The case of Esperanto.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language 177: 67–90.Google Scholar
. 2007. “Phraseology in planned languages”. In Phraseology. An international handbook of contemporary research, ed. Harald Burger & Dmitrij Dobrovolskij & Peter Kühn & Neal R. Norrick. Berlin: De Gruyter, 779–788.Google Scholar
. 2012. “The Esperanto denaskulo: The status of the native speaker of Esperanto within and beyond the planned language community.” Language Problems and Language Planning 36(1): 69–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Rudolf-Josef. 2002. “Das Pronominalsystem in Esperanto – noch sexusinklusiv?” In Plansprachen und ihre Gemeinschaften. Beiträge der 11. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Interlinguistik e.V., 23.-25. November 2001 in Berlin, ed. Detlev Blanke. Berlin: GIL, 86–106.Google Scholar
. 2003. “Sexusneutrale und sexusindizierende Bezeichnungen für Lebewesen.” Plansprachen und elektronische Medien. Beiträge der 12. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Interlinguistik e.V., 6.-8. Dezember 2002 in Berlin, ed. Detlev Blanke. Berlin: GIL, 110–149.Google Scholar
Gilmore, Karolina. 1987. “Ina dupencaĵo” [A woman’s tuppence]. La Brita Esperantisto 83 (julio-aŭgusto 1987): 292–293.Google Scholar
Gledhill, Christopher J. 2000. The grammar of Esperanto. A corpus-based description. 2nd ed. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Golden, Bernard. 1984. “Revizio de la seks-rilata parto de la Esperanta leksiko” [Revision of the gender-related part of Esperanto lexis]. Esperanta Finnlando 3: 22–23.Google Scholar
Gomard, Kirsten & Mette Kunøe. 2003. “Equal before the law – unequal in language“. In Gender across languages: The linguistic representation of women and men, vol. 3, eds. Marlis Hellinger & Hadumod Bußmann. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 59–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grady, Gary D. 2010. “Gender in Esperanto.” Usona Esperantisto (USA) 6/2010. [URL] [9 May 2014].Google Scholar
Hain, Mathilde. 1978. “Das Sprichwort.” In Ergebnisse der Sprichwörterforschung, ed. Wolfgang Mieder. Berlin: Peter Lang, 13–25.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1987. Transitivity alternations of the anticausative type. Köln: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Köln.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin & Matthew S. Dryer & David Gil, eds. 2005. World atlas of language structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haveman, Roel. 1989. “Seksismo en Esperanto.” Fenomeno 21(3), 8–9.Google Scholar
Hornscheidt, Antje. 2003. “Linguistic and public attitudes towards gender in Swedish.” In Gender across languages: The linguistic representation of women and men, vol. 3, eds. Marlis Hellinger & Hadumod Bußmann. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 339–368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hüllen, Werner. 1984. “Bischof John Wilkins und die Fachsprachen unserer Zeit.” Fachsprache 6: 115–122.Google Scholar
Janton, Pierre. 1993 [1973]. Esperanto. Language, literature, and community, ed. Humphrey Tonkin. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Jarlibroj de Universala Esperanto-Asocio 1973, 1983, 1993, 2003. Rotterdam: UEA.Google Scholar
Kalocsay, Kálmán & Gaston Waringhien. 1985. Plena analiza gramatiko de Esperanto (kvina korektita eldono). Rotterdam: UEA.Google Scholar
Kimura, Goro Christoph. 2012. “Esperanto and minority languages: A sociolinguistic comparison.” Language Problems and Language Planning 26(2): 167–181.Google Scholar
Leipzig Corpora Collection: Esperanto Corpus. [URL] [1 May 2014].
McCoy, Roy, ed. 2013. Jarlibro de Universala Esperanto-Asocio 2013. Rotterdam: UEA.Google Scholar
Mieder, Wolfgang. 1987. “Preface.” Proverbium. Yearbook of International Proverb Scholarship 4: XI.Google Scholar
. 1997. The politics of proverbs. From traditional wisdom to proverbial stereotypes. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Nakamura, Tazuo. 1979. “La pronomo por ‘homo’” [The pronoun for ‘human being’]. Oomoto (Japan) January-June 1979: 58–59.Google Scholar
Nuessel, Frank. 2000. The Esperanto language. New York: Legas.Google Scholar
Okrent, Arika. 2009. In the land of invented languages. New York: Spiegel & Grau.Google Scholar
Oljanov, Violin. 1988. “Diferencigo de la seksoj en Esperanto” [Gender differentiation in Esperanto]. Bulgara Esperantisto 1/1988: 3–4.Google Scholar
Parkvall, Mikael. 2010. “How European is Esperanto? A typological study.” Language Problems and Language Planning 34(1): 63–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Philippe, Benoît. 1991. Sprachwandel bei einer Plansprache am Beispiel des Esperanto. Konstanz: Hartung-Gorre-Verlag.Google Scholar
Piron, Claude. 1989. “Who are the speakers of Esperanto?” In Interlinguistics. Aspects of the science of planned languages, ed. Klaus Schubert. New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 157–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1991. Esperanto: European or Asiatic language? Esperanto documents 22/A. Rotterdam: UEA.Google Scholar
Pool, Jonathan. 1992. “Sekso kaj (mal)egaleco” [Gender and (in)equality]. Esperanto (USA) 2/1992: 2.Google Scholar
Pool, Jonathan & Bernard Grofman. 1989. “Linguistic artificiality and cognitive competence.” In Interlinguistics. Aspects of the science of planned languages, ed. Klaus Schubert. New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 145–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quasthoff, Uwe & Sabine Fiedler & Erla Hallsteinsdóttir, eds. forthcoming. Frequency dictionary Esperanto. Leipzig: Universitätsverlag.
Romaine, Suzanne. 2001. “A corpus-based view of gender in British and American English.” In Gender across Languages: The linguistic representation of women and men, vol. 1, eds. Marlis Hellinger & Hadumod Bußmann. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 153–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roff, Derek. 1992. “Sekso kaj (mal)egaleco” [Gender and (in)equality]. Esperanto (USA) 2/1992: 2–3.Google Scholar
Sárközi, János. 1981. “Medito pri virinoj” [Meditation on women]. In Akademiaj Studoj 1981, ed. Rüdiger Eichholz. Bailieboro, Ontario: Esperanto Press, 62.Google Scholar
Sly, Sybil V. 1980. “Virseksa pronomo” [A male pronoun]. Sekso kaj Egaleco 2: 20.Google Scholar
Vaitilavičius, Adomas. 1991. “La bovuno kornobatas Esperanton, se la prezidantuno ne defendos …” [‘The ox (marked by the suffix -un) strikes with horns if the president (marked by the suffix -un) does not defend …’] Litova Stelo (Lithiania) 2/1991: 16–18.Google Scholar
Vesty, David. 1986. “Seksismo”. La Brita Esperantisto 82 (julio-aŭgusto), 164–165.Google Scholar
Wells, John C. 1989. Lingvistikaj aspektoj de Esperanto [Linguistic aspects of Esperanto]. Rotterdam: UEA.Google Scholar
Wennergren, Bertilo. 2005. Plena manlibro de Esperanta gramatiko [Complete handbook of Esperanto grammar]. [URL] [1 May 2014].
Wilkins, John. 1968 [1668]. An essay towards a real character, and a philosophical language. Menston: The Scolar Press.Google Scholar
Wüster, Eugen. 1931. Internationale Sprachnormung in der Technik, besonders in der Elektrotechnik (Die nationale Sprachnormung und ihre Verallgemeinerung). Berlin: VDI-Verlag.Google Scholar
. 1976 [1955]. “Die Benennungen ‘Esperantologie’ und ‘Interlinguistik’.” In Plansprachen, ed. Reinhard Haupenthal. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 271–277.Google Scholar
Zamenhof, Lazar Ludwik. 1887. Meždunarodnyj jazyk [International language]. Warsaw: Kel’ter.Google Scholar
. 1894a. Universala vortaro de Esperanto [Universal dictionary of Esperanto]. Warsaw: Press Gins.Google Scholar
. 1894b. “Al la demando pri la reformoj.” La Esperantisto 5(3): 36–39.Google Scholar
. 1991 [1905]. Fundamento de Esperanto[Foundation of Esperanto]. 10th ed. Pisa: Edistudio.Google Scholar
. 1910. Proverbaro Esperanta [Esperanto proverb collection]. La Laguna: J. Régulo.Google Scholar
. 1962. Lingvaj respondoj. Konsiloj kaj opinioj pri Esperanto [Linguistic replies. Recommendations and opinions on Esperanto]. 6th ed. Marmande: Esperantaj Francaj Eldonoj.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.