Part of
Gender Across Languages: Volume 4
Edited by Marlis Hellinger and Heiko Motschenbacher
[IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society 36] 2015
► pp. 97123
References
Anikejev, Sergej
1982 “Reeĥe al la artikolo de János Sárközi ‘Medito pri virinoj’” [A reaction to János Sárközi’s article ‘Medito pri virinoj’]. In Akademiaj studoj 1982, ed. Rüdiger Eichholz. Bailieboro, Ontario: Esperanto Press, 62.Google Scholar
Back, Otto
2011 “Bemerkungen zu Zamenhofs reformiertem Esperanto von 1894.” In Florilegium Interlinguisticum. Festschrift für Detlev Blanke zum 70. Geburtstag, ed. Cyril Brosch & Sabine Fiedler. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 263–269.Google Scholar
Baudouin de Courtenay
1976 [1907] “Zur Kritik der künstlichen Weltsprachen.” In Plansprachen, ed. Reinhard Haupenthal. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 59–110.Google Scholar
Blanke, Detlev
1985Internationale Plansprachen. Eine Einführung. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
2009 “Causes of the relative success of Esperanto.” Language Problems and Language Planning 33: 251–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bormann, Werner
1983 “Feminisma lingvouzo en planlingvoj” [Feminist language use in planned languages]. In Akademiaj studoj 1983, ed. Rüdiger Eichholz. Bailieboro, Ontario: Esperanto Press, 49–61.Google Scholar
Brennan, Anna & Marcella Fasani
1982 “Pri inoj kaj iroj” [On women and men]. Sekso kaj Egaleco 10 (Julio 1982): 18–23.Google Scholar
Brugmann, Karl & August Leskien
1907Zur Kritik der künstlichen Weltsprachen. Straßburg: Trübner.Google Scholar
Camacho, Jorge
(Georgo Kamaĉo) 1991Sur la linio [On the line]. Berkeley: Bero.Google Scholar
Council of Europe
2007Komuna Eŭropa Referenckadro por lingvoj: Lernado, instruado, pritaksado [Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessing]. Rotterdam: UEA.Google Scholar
Couturat, Louis & Léopold Leau
2001 [1903, 1907]Histoire de la langue universelle. Hildesheim: Georg Olms.Google Scholar
de Beaufront, Louis
2004Kompleta gramatiko detaloza di la linguo internaciona Ido. Ponferrada: Editorio Krayono ([URL] [15 August 2013]).Google Scholar
Edwards, John
Eichholz, Rüdiger
1983“Seksa diskriminacio en Esperanto kaj eblecoj por malpliigi ĝin” [Sexual discrimination in Esperanto and ways of diminishing it]. In Akademiaj studoj 1983, ed. Rüdiger Eichholz. Bailieboro, Ontario: Esperanto Press, 65–73.Google Scholar
1988Esperanta bildvortaro [Esperanto pictorial dictionary]. Bailieboro, Ontario: Esperanto Press.Google Scholar
Eichholz, Vilma
1980 “Seksa diskriminacio en nia lingvo” [Sexual discrimination in our language]. In Akademiaj studoj 1980, ed. Rüdiger Eichholz. Bailieboro, Ontario: Esperanto Press, 44–47.Google Scholar
Fiedler, Sabine
1999Plansprache und Phraseologie. Empirische Untersuchungen zu reproduziertem Sprachmaterial im Esperanto. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2006 “Standardization and self-regulation in an international speech-community: The case of Esperanto.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language 177: 67–90.Google Scholar
2007 “Phraseology in planned languages”. In Phraseology. An international handbook of contemporary research, ed. Harald Burger & Dmitrij Dobrovolskij & Peter Kühn & Neal R. Norrick. Berlin: De Gruyter, 779–788.Google Scholar
Fischer, Rudolf-Josef
2002 “Das Pronominalsystem in Esperanto – noch sexusinklusiv?” In Plansprachen und ihre Gemeinschaften. Beiträge der 11. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Interlinguistik e.V., 23.-25. November 2001 in Berlin, ed. Detlev Blanke. Berlin: GIL, 86–106.Google Scholar
2003 “Sexusneutrale und sexusindizierende Bezeichnungen für Lebewesen.” Plansprachen und elektronische Medien. Beiträge der 12. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Interlinguistik e.V., 6.-8. Dezember 2002 in Berlin, ed. Detlev Blanke. Berlin: GIL, 110–149.Google Scholar
Gilmore, Karolina
1987 “Ina dupencaĵo” [A woman’s tuppence]. La Brita Esperantisto 83 (julio-aŭgusto 1987): 292–293.Google Scholar
Gledhill, Christopher J
2000The grammar of Esperanto. A corpus-based description. 2nd ed. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Golden, Bernard
1984 “Revizio de la seks-rilata parto de la Esperanta leksiko” [Revision of the gender-related part of Esperanto lexis]. Esperanta Finnlando 3: 22–23.Google Scholar
Gomard, Kirsten & Mette Kunøe
2003“Equal before the law – unequal in language“. In Gender across languages: The linguistic representation of women and men, vol. 3, eds. Marlis Hellinger & Hadumod Bußmann. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 59–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grady, Gary D
2010 “Gender in Esperanto.” Usona Esperantisto (USA) 6/2010. [URL] [9 May 2014].Google Scholar
Hain, Mathilde
1978 “Das Sprichwort.” In Ergebnisse der Sprichwörterforschung, ed. Wolfgang Mieder. Berlin: Peter Lang, 13–25.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1987Transitivity alternations of the anticausative type. Köln: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Köln.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin & Matthew S. Dryer & David Gil
eds. 2005World atlas of language structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haveman, Roel
1989 “Seksismo en Esperanto.” Fenomeno 21(3), 8–9.Google Scholar
Hornscheidt, Antje
2003 “Linguistic and public attitudes towards gender in Swedish.” In Gender across languages: The linguistic representation of women and men, vol. 3, eds. Marlis Hellinger & Hadumod Bußmann. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 339–368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hüllen, Werner
1984 “Bischof John Wilkins und die Fachsprachen unserer Zeit.” Fachsprache 6: 115–122.Google Scholar
Janton, Pierre
1993 [1973]Esperanto. Language, literature, and community, ed. Humphrey Tonkin. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Jarlibroj de Universala Esperanto-Asocio
1973, 1983, 1993, 2003 Rotterdam: UEA.Google Scholar
Kalocsay, Kálmán & Gaston Waringhien
1985Plena analiza gramatiko de Esperanto (kvina korektita eldono). Rotterdam: UEA.Google Scholar
Kimura, Goro Christoph
2012 “Esperanto and minority languages: A sociolinguistic comparison.” Language Problems and Language Planning 26(2): 167–181.Google Scholar
Leipzig Corpora Collection: Esperanto Corpus
[URL] [1 May 2014].
McCoy, Roy
ed. 2013Jarlibro de Universala Esperanto-Asocio 2013. Rotterdam: UEA.Google Scholar
Mieder, Wolfgang
1987 “Preface.” Proverbium. Yearbook of International Proverb Scholarship 4: XI.Google Scholar
1997The politics of proverbs. From traditional wisdom to proverbial stereotypes. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Nakamura, Tazuo
1979 “La pronomo por ‘homo’” [The pronoun for ‘human being’]. Oomoto (Japan) January-June 1979: 58–59.Google Scholar
Nuessel, Frank
2000The Esperanto language. New York: Legas.Google Scholar
Okrent, Arika
2009In the land of invented languages. New York: Spiegel & Grau.Google Scholar
Oljanov, Violin
1988 “Diferencigo de la seksoj en Esperanto” [Gender differentiation in Esperanto]. Bulgara Esperantisto 1/1988: 3–4.Google Scholar
Parkvall, Mikael
2010 “How European is Esperanto? A typological study.” Language Problems and Language Planning 34(1): 63–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Philippe, Benoît
1991Sprachwandel bei einer Plansprache am Beispiel des Esperanto. Konstanz: Hartung-Gorre-Verlag.Google Scholar
Piron, Claude
1989 “Who are the speakers of Esperanto?” In Interlinguistics. Aspects of the science of planned languages, ed. Klaus Schubert. New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 157–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1991Esperanto: European or Asiatic language? Esperanto documents 22/A. Rotterdam: UEA.Google Scholar
Pool, Jonathan
1992 “Sekso kaj (mal)egaleco” [Gender and (in)equality]. Esperanto (USA) 2/1992: 2.Google Scholar
Pool, Jonathan & Bernard Grofman
1989 “Linguistic artificiality and cognitive competence.” In Interlinguistics. Aspects of the science of planned languages, ed. Klaus Schubert. New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 145–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quasthoff, Uwe & Sabine Fiedler & Erla Hallsteinsdóttir
eds. forthcoming Frequency dictionary Esperanto Leipzig Universitätsverlag
Romaine, Suzanne
2001 “A corpus-based view of gender in British and American English.” In Gender across Languages: The linguistic representation of women and men, vol. 1, eds. Marlis Hellinger & Hadumod Bußmann. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 153–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roff, Derek
1992 “Sekso kaj (mal)egaleco” [Gender and (in)equality]. Esperanto (USA) 2/1992: 2–3.Google Scholar
Sárközi, János
1981 “Medito pri virinoj” [Meditation on women]. In Akademiaj Studoj 1981, ed. Rüdiger Eichholz. Bailieboro, Ontario: Esperanto Press, 62.Google Scholar
Sly, Sybil V
1980 “Virseksa pronomo” [A male pronoun]. Sekso kaj Egaleco 2: 20.Google Scholar
Vaitilavičius, Adomas
1991 “La bovuno kornobatas Esperanton, se la prezidantuno ne defendos …” [‘The ox (marked by the suffix -un) strikes with horns if the president (marked by the suffix -un) does not defend …’] Litova Stelo (Lithiania) 2/1991: 16–18.Google Scholar
Vesty, David
1986 “Seksismo”. La Brita Esperantisto 82 (julio-aŭgusto), 164–165.Google Scholar
Wells, John C
1989Lingvistikaj aspektoj de Esperanto [Linguistic aspects of Esperanto]. Rotterdam: UEA.Google Scholar
Wennergren, Bertilo
2005Plena manlibro de Esperanta gramatiko [Complete handbook of Esperanto grammar]. [URL] [1 May 2014].
Wilkins, John
1968 [1668]An essay towards a real character, and a philosophical language. Menston: The Scolar Press.Google Scholar
Wüster, Eugen
1931Internationale Sprachnormung in der Technik, besonders in der Elektrotechnik (Die nationale Sprachnormung und ihre Verallgemeinerung). Berlin: VDI-Verlag.Google Scholar
1976 [1955] “Die Benennungen ‘Esperantologie’ und ‘Interlinguistik’.” In Plansprachen, ed. Reinhard Haupenthal. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 271–277.Google Scholar
Zamenhof, Lazar Ludwik
1887Meždunarodnyj jazyk [International language]. Warsaw: Kel’ter.Google Scholar
1894aUniversala vortaro de Esperanto [Universal dictionary of Esperanto]. Warsaw: Press Gins.Google Scholar
1894b “Al la demando pri la reformoj.” La Esperantisto 5(3): 36–39.Google Scholar
1991 [1905]Fundamento de Esperanto[Foundation of Esperanto]. 10th ed. Pisa: Edistudio.Google Scholar
1910Proverbaro Esperanta [Esperanto proverb collection]. La Laguna: J. Régulo.Google Scholar
1962Lingvaj respondoj. Konsiloj kaj opinioj pri Esperanto [Linguistic replies. Recommendations and opinions on Esperanto]. 6th ed. Marmande: Esperantaj Francaj Eldonoj.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.