Article published in:
Language Development: The lifespan perspectiveEdited by Annette Gerstenberg and Anja Voeste
[IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society 37] 2015
► pp. 109–128
A sociolinguistic perspective on vocabulary richness in a seven-year comparison of older adults
Vocabulary richness is known to either stay stable or increase into old age. The sociolinguistic aspects of related phenomena have not been studied intensely until now. We analyse a corpus of spoken French in two series of interviews, guided in 2005 and 2012, with 28 participants living their later life. We included three measures of vocabulary richness that demonstrated significant sociolinguistic relevance. The growth rate differed significantly with the portion of high-frequency elements such as fillers diminishing from the first to the second series. The reduction of ‘redundant’ elements can be seen as an effective way to maintain the perception of fluency in speech even if its production is cognitively and somatically more expensive.
Published online: 22 July 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.37.06ger
https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.37.06ger
Cited by
Cited by other publications
Bolly, Catherine T. & Dominique Boutet
2018. The multimodal CorpAGEst corpus: keeping an eye on pragmatic competence in later life.
Corpora 13:3 ► pp. 279 ff. 
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 february 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
References
References
Abrams, L. & Farrell, M.T.
2011 Language processing in normal aging. In The Handbook of Psycholinguistic and Cognitive Processes: Perspectives in Communication Disorders, J. Guendouzi, F. Loncke & M.J. Williams (eds), 49–73. New York NY: Psychology Press.
Al, B.P.F.
1980 Sur la richesse lexicale du Corpus d’Orléans: Contribution à l’analyse sociolinguistique d’un vocabulaire oral. In Linguistic Studies Offered to Berthe Siertsema, D.J. van Alkemade (ed.), 315–321. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Baayen, R.H.
2001 Word Frequency Distributions. Dordrecht: Springer.
2005 Word frequency distributions. In Quantitative Linguistics: An International Handbook [Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science; HSK 27], R. Köhler, G. Altmann & R.G. Piotrowski (eds), 396–409. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Bailey, G.
2004 Real and apparent time. In The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, J.K. Chambers, P. Trudgill & N. Schilling-Estes (eds), 312–332. Malden MA: Blackwell.
Balibar, R.
1999 L’école de 1880: Le français national: Républicain, scolaire, grammatical, primaire. In Histoire de la Langue Française 1880–1914, G. Antoine & R. Martin (eds), 255–293. Paris: CNRS Éditions.
Beeching, K.
2007 La co-variation des marqueurs discursifs “bon”, “c’est-à-dire”, “enfin”, “hein”, “quand même”, “quoi” et “si vous voulez”: une question d’identité? Langue Française 154(2): 78–93.
2011 The sociolinguistics of lexical variation in Standard French: A diachronic perspective. In On Linguistic Change in French: Socio-historical Approaches: Studies in Honour of R. Anthony Lodge, T. Pooley, D. Lagorgette & R.A. Lodge (eds), 37–53. Chambéry: Université de Savoie, Laboratoire langages, littératures, sociétés.
Blanchet, P.
2001 Enquêtes sur les évolutions générationnelles du français dans le pays vannetais (Bretagne). Français moderne 1: 58–76.
Bosshardt, H.-G.
1994 Sprachgebrauch im Alter: Kompensation und Adaption infolge von Veränderungen im Kurzzeitgedächtnis. In Altern, Gehirn und Persönlichkeit, W. Kuhn (ed.), 125–136. Bern: Huber.
Campione, E., Véronis J. & Deulofeu, H.-J.
2005 The French corpus. In C-Oral-Rom: Integrated Reference Corpora for Spoken Romance Languages [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 15], E. Cresti & M. Moneglia (eds), 111–133. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Carruthers, J.
2005 Oral Narration in Modern French: A Linguistic Analysis of Temporal Patterns. London: Legenda.
Christ, H.
1998 1880–1939: le français entre deux guerres. In Histoire de la Diffusion et de l’Enseignement du Français dans le Monde, W. Frijhoff & A. Reboullet (eds), 50–71. Vanves: Hachette.
Clark, H.H. & Fox Tree, J.E.
2002 Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition 84(1): 73–111.
Clark, H.H. & Wasow, T.
1998 Repeating words in spontaneous speech. Cognitive Psychology 37: 201–242.
Cresti, E.
2005 Notes on lexical strategy, structural strategies and surface clause indexes in the C-ORAL-Rom spoken corpora. In C-Oral-Rom: Integrated Reference Corpora for Spoken Romance Languages[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 15], E. Cresti & M. Moneglia (eds), 209–256. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Dostie, G.
(ed.) 2004 Pragmaticalisation et Marqueurs Discursifs: Analyse Sémantique et Traitement Lexicographique. Bruxelles: De Boeck.
ESLO = Enquêtes SocioLinguistiques à Orléans, ESLO 1 & ESLO 2, Corpora of Spoken French. 1968–1974; 2008– Orléans: Laboratoire Ligérien de Linguistique (LLL). eslo.huma-num.fr.
Fraser, B.
1999 What are discourse markers? Journal of Pragmatics 31: 931–952.
Gerstenberg, A.
2011 Generation und Sprachprofile im höheren Lebensalter. Untersuchungen zum Französischen auf der Basis eines Korpus biographischer Interviews. Frankfurt: Klostermann.
Guiraud, P.
1954 Les caractères statistiques du vocabulaire. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Herdan, G.
1960 Type-token mathematics. The Hague: Mouton.
Hess, T.M., Hinson, J.T. & Hodges, E.A.
2009 Moderators of and mechanisms underlying stereotype threat effects on older adults’ memory performance. Experimental Aging Research 35(2): 153–177.
Horton, W.S., Spieler, D.H. & Shriberg, E.
2010 A corpus analysis of patterns of age-related change in conversational speech. Psychology and Aging 25(3): 708–713.
INSEE = Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques
. Paris www.insee.fr.
Johnson, E.
1993 The relationship between lexical variation and lexical change. Language Variation and Change 3: 285–303.
Kemper, S., Rash, S., Kynette, D. & Norman, S.
1990 Telling stories: The structure of adults’ narratives. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 2–3: 205–228.
Labbé, D. & Hubert, P.
1997 Vocabulary richness. Lexicometrica 0: 1–8.
Labov, W.
2013 The Language of Life and Death: The Transformation of Experience in Oral Narrative. Cambridge: CUP.
LangAge = Gerstenberg, A. 2005; 2012 Corpus of Spoken French, part of Corpora for Language and Aging Research (CLARe). Reference: Gerstenberg 2011.
Le, X., Lancashire, I., Hirst, G. & Jokel, R.
2011 Longitudinal detection of dementia through lexical and syntactic changes in writing. Literary and Linguistic Computing 26(4): 435–460.
Murphy, B.
2010 Corpus and Sociolinguistics: Investigating Age and Gender in Female Talk [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 38]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
O’Hanlon, L., Wilcox, K.A. & Kemper, S.
2005 Age differences in implicit and explicit associative memory: exploring elaborative processing effects. Experimental Aging Research 27(4): 341–359.
Popescu, I.-I. & Altmann, G.
2009 Word Frequency Studies. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
Ramscar, M., Hendrix, P. & Baayen, R.H.
2013 The myth of cognitive decline. In Proceedings of the 35th Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, M. Knauff, M. Pauen, N. Sebanz & I. Wachsmuth (eds), 1193–1198. Austin TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Ramscar, M., Hendrix, P., Shaoul, C., Milin, P. & Baayen, H.
2014 The myth of cognitive decline: non-linear dynamics of lifelong learning. Topics in Cognitive Science 6: 5–42.
Salthouse, T.A.
2009 When does age-related cognitive decline begin? Neurobiology of Aging 30: 507–514.
Sankoff, D. & Lessard, R.
1975 Vocabulary richness: a sociolinguistic analysis. Science 190(4215): 689–690.
Schegloff, E.A. & Sacks, H.
1973 Opening up closings. Semiotica 8: 289–327.
Shafto, M.A., Burke, D.M., Stamatakis, E.A., Tam, P.P. & Tyler, L.K.
2007 On the tip-of-the-tongue: Neural correlates of increased word-finding failures in normal aging. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 19(12): 2060–2070.
Singer, T., Verhaeghen, P., Ghisletta, P., Lindenberger, U. & Baltes, P.B.
2003 The fate of cognition in very old age: Six-year longitudinal findings in the Berlin Aging Study (BASE). Psychology and Aging 18: 318–331.
Taddei Gheiler, F.
2005 La Lingua degli Anziani. Locarno: Osservatorio linguistico della Svizzera italiana.
Tainturier, M.-J., Tremblay, M. & Roch Lecours, A.
1992 Educational level and the word frequency effect: A lexical decision investigation. Brain and Language 43(3): 460–474.
Thibault, P. & Daveluy, M.
1989 Quelques traces du passage du temps dans le parler des Montréalais, 1971–1984. Language Variation and Change 1(1): 19–45.
Tweedie, F.J. & Baayen, R.H.
1998 How variable may a constant be? Measures of lexical richness in perspective. Computers and the Humanities 32(5): 323–352.
Wechsler, D.
1941 The Measurement of Adult Intelligence, 2nd edn. Baltimore MD: Williams & Wilkins.
Yule, G.U.
1944 The statistical study of literary vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zellner-Keller, B.
2007 “Comment est-ce qu’on dit?” Vieillissement et manque de mot en conversation. Nouveaux Cahiers de Linguistique Française 28: 87–97.
Zipf, G.K.
1935 The psycho-biology of language. Boston (MA): Houghton Mifflin.