Part of
Language Development: The lifespan perspective
Edited by Annette Gerstenberg and Anja Voeste
[IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society 37] 2015
► pp. 129146
References (28)
References
CEEC = Corpus of Early English Correspondence. 1998. Compiled by T. Nevalainen, H. Raumolin-Brunberg, J. Keränen, M. Nevala, A. Nurmi & M. Palander-Collin. Helsinki: Department of English, University of Helsinki. <[URL]Google Scholar
Chambers, J.K. 2004. Dynamic typology and vernacular universals. In Dialectology Meets Typology: Dialect Grammar from a Cross-linguistic Perspective, B. Kortmann (ed.), 128–145. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Efron, B. & Tibshirani, R. 1993. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. New York NY: Chapman & Hall. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Georgakopoulou, A. & Charalambidou, A. 2011. Doing age and ageing: language, discourse and social interaction. In Pragmatics of Society. Handbooks of Pragmatics 5, G. Andersen & K. Aijmer (eds), 31–52. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
HC = Helsinki Corpus of English Texts. 1991. Compiled by M. Rissanen (Project leader), M. Kytö (Project secretary); L. Kahlas-Tarkka, M. Kilpiö (Old English); S. Nevanlinna, I. Taavitsainen (Middle English); T. Nevalainen, H. Raumolin-Brunberg (Early Modern English). Helsinki: Department of English, University of Helsinki. <[URL]Google Scholar
Hockett, C.F. 1950. Age-grading and linguistic continuity. Language 26(4): 449–457. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kerswill, P1996. Children, adolescents, and language change. Language Variation and Change 8: 177–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. 1994. Principles of Linguistic Change, Vol. 1: Internal Factors. Malden MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2001. Principles of Linguistic Change, Vol. 2: Social Factors. Malden MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2007. Transmission and diffusion. Language 83(2): 344–387. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leithead, H. 2009. Cromwell, Thomas, Earl of Essex (b. in or before 1485, d. 1540). Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Online edition, May 2009. Oxford: OUP. <[URL] (12 Feb 2014).Google Scholar
Nahkola, K. & Saanilahti, M. 2004. Mapping language changes in real time: A panel study on Finnish. Language Variation and Change 16(2): 75–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nevalainen, T. 1998. Social mobility and the decline of multiple negation in Early Modern English. In Advances in English Historical Linguistics (1996), J. Fisiak & M. Krygier (eds), 263–291. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Negative concord as an English “vernacular universal”: Social history and linguistic typology. Journal of English Linguistics 34(3): 257–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Words of kings and counsellors: register variation and language change in early English courtly correspondence. In Scribes as Agents of Language Change, E.‑M. Wagner, B. Outhwaite & B. Beinhoff (eds), 99–120. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nevalainen, T. & Raumolin-Brunberg, H. 2003. Historical Sociolinguistics: Language Change in Tudor and Stuart England. London: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, T., Raumolin-Brunberg, H. & Mannila, H. 2011. The diffusion of language change in real time. Language Variation and Change 23(1): 1–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raumolin-Brunberg, H. 2005a. Language change in adulthood: Historical letters as evidence. European Journal of English Studies 9(1): 37–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005b. The diffusion of subject YOU: A case study in historical sociolinguistics. Language Variation and Change 17(1): 55–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. Lifespan changes in the language of three early modern gentlemen. In The Language of Daily Life in England (1450–1800), A. Nurmi, M. Nevala & M. Palander-Collin (eds), 165–196. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raumolin-Brunberg, H. & Nevalainen, T. 2007a. From mine to my and thine to thy: the loss of the nasal in the first and second person possessives. In Tracing English through Time: Explorations in Language Variation, U. Smit, S. Dollinger, J. Hüttner, G. Kaltenböck & U. Lutzky (eds), 303–314. Vienna: Braumüller.Google Scholar
. 2007b. Historical sociolinguistics: The corpus of early English correspondence. In Creating and Digitizing Language Corpora, Vol. 2: Diachronic Databases, J.C. Beal, K.P. Corrigan & H.L. Moisl (eds), 148–171. Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Rissanen, M. 2000. Standardisation and the language of early statutes. In The Development of Standard English: Theories, Descriptions, Conflicts, L. Wright (ed.), 117–130. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sankoff, G. 2005. Cross-sectional and longitudinal studies in sociolinguistics. In Sociolinguistics. An International Handbook of the Science of Language and Society [Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science; HSK 3.2], U. Ammon, N. Dittmar, K.J. Mattheier & P. Trudgill (eds), 1003–1013. 2nd edn. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Sankoff, G. & Blondeau, H. 2007. Language change across the lifespan: ⁄ r ⁄ in Montreal French. Language 83(3): 560–588. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tristram, A. & Ayres-Bennett, W. 2012. From negation to agreement: Revisiting the problem of sources for socio-historical linguistics. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 113(3): 365–393.Google Scholar
Wagner, S.E. 2012. Age grading in sociolinguistic theory. Language and Linguistics Compass 6(6): 371–382, <
CrossRef DOI logo with hyperlink to permanent DOI
(4 May 2014). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Warner, A. 2005. Why do dove: Evidence for register variation in Early Modern English negatives. Language Variation and Change 17: 257–280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Sanz-Sánchez, Israel
Siebers, Lucia
Sankoff, Gillian
2018. Language Change Across the Lifespan. Annual Review of Linguistics 4:1  pp. 297 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.