Language and Material Culture

| University of Mississippi
HardboundAvailable
ISBN 9789027218803 | EUR 95.00 | USD 143.00
 
e-Book
ISBN 9789027267948 | EUR 95.00 | USD 143.00
 
This innovative and provocative work introduces complexity theory and its application to both the study of language and the study of material culture. The book begins with a wide-ranging theoretical background, covering the areas of dialect geography, the anthropological study of material culture, and a general introduction to the study of complex adaptive systems. Following this general introduction, the principles of complexity theory are demonstrated in data drawn from linguistics and material culture studies. Language and Material Culture further highlights the principles of complexity through a series of case studies, using data from the Linguistic Atlas, colonial American inventories and the Historic American Building Survey. LMC shows that language and material culture are intertwined as they interact within the same cultural complex system. The book is designed for students in courses that focus on language variation, American English and material culture, in addition to general courses on applications of complex systems.
[IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society, 38]  2015.  xvii, 192 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
List of figures
xi–xii
List of tables
xiii
Acknowledgments
xv
Preface
xvii
1. Introduction: Words for things
1–22
2. A dual history
23–40
3. Complex adaptive systems
41–70
4. Material culture as a complex system
71–94
5. Case study: Pantry
95–120
6. Case study: Estate inventories
121–136
7. Case study: Historic American building survey
137–154
8. Conclusion: On artifacts
155–160
Appendix A. Complete data sets from Chapter 1
161
Appendix B. Complete data sets from Chapter 3
162–170
Appendix C. Complete data set from Chapter 4
171–172
Appendix D. Complete data sets from Chapter 5
173–174
Appendix E. Complete data sets from Chapter 6
175–177
Appendix F. Complete data sets from Chapter 7
178–182
References
183–190
Index
191–192
“‘People are annoyingly casual about the application of names’, the great dialect lexicographer Frederic G. Cassidy once tellingly observed. Carefully unfolding the science of complex systems and applying it to well-chosen examples of untidy lexical and material culture variation, Burkette replaces annoyance with enlightenment in the most erudite and entertaining way. Firmly grounded in the data of the mighty American Linguistic Atlas Project, this work is essential reading for all those who know, or who suspect, that the ‘not neat’ of language is the norm, and who seek the means by which to embrace it.”
Language and Material Culture is brilliantly creative, making the connection between language with both historical culture and complexity science. It bridges linguistics and anthropology in a fundamentally new way, using complex systems to explain words and things in culture. Burkette shows how distributional patterns emerge in our words for things, as we all interact to create our culture, and that the study of culture creation involves getting to know the history and contexts for our household and community circumstances, as for pantries and building styles, so that we can understand our houses as part of broad movements in complex systems.”
“As Allison Burkette reminds us, the study of objects and words has a long shared theoretical history. Over the past half century, trends in archaeology and linguistics have moved from exploring the hard and fast rules of structuralism to accounting for the dynamic interaction between agents and objects in complexity theory. Along the way, we have seen structuralist verities picked apart and left behind in favor of the flexibility inherent in the concept of complex systems where identities, meanings, and uses of objects and words are shaped and transformed by their engagement with a variety of agents within a specific cultural environment.

Language and Material Culture explores the continuing dependence of historians of material culture on linguistic theory. Burkette’s description of complexity theory reveals how closely it is akin to the manner in which many architectural historians in recent decades have approached the interpretation of buildings. Architecture gives physical shape to the way people perceive their place in the world and how they interact with others. The arrangement of spaces and the naming of those places reveal much about patterns of behavior. The historical landscape communicated a variety of meanings that sometimes changed over time or were transformed by new ideas and attitudes. More often the significance of a building was implied by its positions in a landscape, its materials, level of finish, or plan. However, these meanings were not static but dynamic and could be interpreted in a variety of ways or contested by different members of society. The author carefully picks apart many of these issues in chapters that address the nature of data found in estate inventories, Historic American Buildings Survey drawings and photographs, and in the naming patterns of building types.

With parallels drawn from the examination of the use of words, Burkette demonstrates why questions that have taxed architectural historians concerning the nature of regionalism and its boundaries are hard to define and difficult to map. So too, the relationship between a metropolitan core and the hinterland or periphery, which defies precision because it is contingent on so many shifting influences. In this well-written study, Burkette has provided a very useful framework for thinking about material culture theory.”
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Asghar, Salman, George Edward Torrens & Robert Harland
2020. Cultural influences on perception of disability and disabled people: a comparison of opinions from students in the United Kingdom (UK) Pakistan (PAK) about a generic wheelchair using a semantic differential scale. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 15:3  pp. 292 ff. Crossref logo
Burkette, Allison
2015. The Burial Ground: A Bridge Between Language And Culture. Journal of Linguistic Geography 3:2  pp. 60 ff. Crossref logo
Burkette, Allison
2017. To Start a Fire. American Speech 92:3  pp. 321 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 04 may 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Baker, P.
(2006) Using corpora in discourse analysis. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M.M.
(1981) The dialogic imagination: Four essays. M. Holquist (Ed.) (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Barthes, R.
(1972) Mythologies. New York, NY: Hill & Wang.Google Scholar
Beaudry, M.C., & Hicks, D.
(2010) The Oxford handbook of material culture studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bergen, Benjamin
(2012) Louder Than Words. NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Binford, L.
([1965] 2004) Archaeological systematics and the study of cultural processes. In V. Buchli (Ed.), Material Culture: Critical concepts in the social sciences (Vol. I), (pp. 41–55). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(1972) An archaeological perspective. New York, NY: Seminar Press.Google Scholar
Bishir, C.
(2006) Southern built: American architecture, regional practice. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P.
(1972) Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Buchli, V.
(2000) Interpreting material culture: The trouble with text. In A. Alexandri, V. Buchli, J. Caraman, I. Hodder, J. Last, G. Lucas & M. Shanks (Eds.), Interpreting archaeology: Finding meanings in the past (pp. 181–193). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Buchli, V.A.
(2010) Presencing the immaterial. In M. Bille, et al. (Eds.), An anthropology of absence. Materializations of transcendence (pp. 185–206). New York, NY: Springer Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, M.
(1999) “Why be normal?”: Language and identity practices in a community of nerd girls. Language in Society, 28(2), 203–223. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K.
(1995) Twenty years after language and woman’s place. In K. Hall & M. Bucholtz (Eds.), Gender articulated: Language and the socially constructed self (pp. 1–22). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2005) Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7(4–5), 584–614. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Burkette, A.
(2001) The story of chester drawers. American Speech, 76(2), 139–157. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) The lion, the witch, and the armoire: Lexical variation in case furniture terms. American Speech, 84(3), 315–339. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) “Constructing the (M)other: A-Prefixing, Stance and the Lessons of Motherhood.” Language in Society April. 42(2), 239–258. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Butler, J.
(1990) Gender trouble. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bybee, J.
(2003) Cognitive processes in grammaticalization. In M. Tomasello (Ed.), The new psychology of language, Vol. 2 (pp. 145–168). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
(2006) From usage to grammar: the mind’s response to repetition. Language, 82(4), 711–33.Google Scholar
(2007) Frequency of use and the organization of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, L.
(2004) Historical linguistics (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cassidy, F.C., & Hall, J.
(1985-) Dictionary of American Regional English (5 Vols.). Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Carver, C.M.
(1987) American regional dialects: A word geography. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carsten, J. & S. Hugh-Jones
(1995) About the House: Levi-Strauss and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, J.K.
(2008) Sociolinguistic theory (rev. ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Childe, V.G.
(1929) The Danube in Prehistory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.
(1957) Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
(1988) Language and the problems of knowledge. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cummings, A.L.
(1979) Framed houses of the Massachusetts Bay, 1625–1725. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
D’Andrade, R.G.
(1995) The development of cognitive anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Deetz, J.
(1967) Invitation to archaeology. Garden City, NY: Natural History Press.Google Scholar
(1977) In small things forgotten: An archaeology of early American life. New York, NY: Anchor, Doubleday.Google Scholar
Deetz, J., & Dethlefsen, E.
(1967) Death’s head, cherub, urn and willow”. Natural History, 76(3), 29–37.Google Scholar
Eckert, P., & McConnell-Ginet, S.
(1992) Think practically and look locally: Language and gender as community-based practice. Annual Review of Anthropology, 21, 461–490. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Edensor, T.
(2011) Entangled agencies, material networks and repair in a building assemblage: the mutable stone of St Ann’s Church, Manchester. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 36(2), 238–52. Google Scholar
Evans-Pritchard, E.E.
(1950) Social anthropology: Past and present. Man, 50, 118–124. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles
(1972) On generativity. In P.S. Peters(Ed.) Goals of Linguistic Theory (pp. 1–20). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Gamkrelidze, Thomas V., & V.V. Ivanov
(1990) The early history of Indo-European languages. Scientific American, March, 110–116. Google Scholar
Garfinkle, H.
(1967) Studies in ethnomethodology. New York, NY: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Garvin, J.L.
(2001) A building history of northern New England. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.Google Scholar
Geertz, C.
(1973) The interpretation of cultures. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
George, R.S.
(2010) Material culture in folklife studies. In M.C. Beaudry & D. Hicks (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of material culture studies (pp. 123–149). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, A.
(1979) Central problems in social theory. London: Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1981) A contemporary critique of historical materialism(Vol. 1). London: Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gilliam, J.K.
(1998) The evolution of the house in early Virginia. In E.M. Thompson (Ed.), The American home: Material culture, domestic space, and family life. Winterthur, DE: Henry Francis du Pont Winterthur Museum.Google Scholar
Glassie, H.
(1968) Pattern in the material folk culture of the eastern United States. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
(1975) Folk housing in middle Virginia. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, E.
(1974) Frame analysis. New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Gottdiener, M.
(1995) Postmodern semiotics. New York, NY: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Graffam, O.B.
(1998) They are very handy: Kitchen furnishings, 1875–1920. In E.M. Thompson (Ed.), The American home: Material culture, domestic space, and family life (pp. 217–240). Winterthur, DE: Henry Francis du Pont Winterthur Museum.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J.
(1982) Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
HABS. Historic American Building Survey
Hall, K., & Bucholtz, M.
(Eds.) (1995) Gender articulated: Language and the socially constructed self. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hallam, E., & Ingold, T.
(2007) Creativity and cultural improvisation. Oxford: Berg Publishers.Google Scholar
Haviland, J.B.
(2005) “Whorish old man” and “One (animal) gentleman”: The intertextual construction of enemies and selves. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 15(1), 81–94. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hawkes, C.
(1954) Archaeological theory and Method: Some suggestions from the Old World. American Anthropologist, 56(2), 155–168. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, D.
(2012) The material-cultural turn: Event and effect. In D. Hicks & M.C. Beaudry (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of material culture studies (25–98). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hiller, Nancy
(2009) The Hoosier Cabinet and the American Housewife. Indiana Magazine of History, 105, 1–30.Google Scholar
Hodder, I.
(1982a) Symbols in action. Ethnoarchaeological studies of material culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1982b) The present past. An introduction to anthropology for archaeologists. London: Batsford.Google Scholar
(1986) Reading the past. Current approaches to interpretation in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2012) Entangled. An archaeology of the relationships between humans and things. Oxford: Wiley and Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hodder, I., & Hutson, S.
(2003) Reading the past. Current approaches to interpretation in archaeology (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hodder, I., Shanks, M., Alexandri, A., Buchli, V., Carman, J., Last, J., & Lucas, G.
(Eds.) (1995a) Interpreting archaeology: Finding meaning in the past. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hopper, P.J.
(1987) Emergent grammar. Papers of the 13th Annual Meeting, Berkeley Linguistic Society (pp. 139–157). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistic Society.
(1988) Emergent grammar and the a priori grammar postulate. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Linguistics in context (pp. 117–134). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
(1998) Emergent grammar. In M. Tomasello (Ed.), The new psychology of language (Vol. 2), (pp. 155–176). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Hopper, P.J., & Bybee, J.
(2001) Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hubka, T.
(1986) Just folks designing: Vernacular design and the generation of form. In D. Upton & J.M. Vlach (Eds.), Common places: Readings in American vernacular architecture, (pp.426–432). Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Hymes, D.
(1964) Introduction: Toward ethnographies of communication. American Anthropologist, 66(6), 1–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ingold, T.
(2008) Anthropology is not ethnography. Proceedings of the British Academy, 154, 69–92.Google Scholar
Iordan, I., Orr, J., & Posner, R.
(1970) An introduction to Romance linguistics, its schools and scholars. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Irvine, J.T.
(1996) Shadow conversations: The indeterminacy of participant roles. In M. Silverstein & G. Urban (Eds.), Natural histories of discourse. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jaffee, D.
(2010) A new nation of goods: The material culture of early America. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, E.
(1996) Lexical change and variation in the southeastern United States: 1930–1960. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, N.
(2007) Simply complexity. Oxford: Oneworld.Google Scholar
Jones, W.
(2003) Complex adaptive systems. Interviewed by J. Portilla for www​.beyondintractability​.org [9 January, 2014].
Kaiser, M., M. Goerner, & C. Hilgetag
(2007) Criticality of spreading dynamics in hierarchical cluster networks without inhibition. New Journal of Physics, 9, 1–110.Google Scholar
Knappet, C.
(2005) Thinking through material culture: An interdisciplinary perspective. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kramsch, C.
(Ed.) (2002) Language acquisition and language socialization. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Kretzschmar, W.A., Jr
(1996) Dialectology and sociolinguistics: Same coin, different currency. Language Sciences, 17(3), 271–282. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) Neural networks and the linguistics of speech. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 33(4), 336–356. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) Linguistics of speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Language variation and complex systems. American Speech, 85(3), 263–286. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kretzschmar, W.A. Jr
(2012) Variation in the traditional vowels of the Eastern States. American Speech, 87, 378–90.Google Scholar
Kretzschmar, W.A.., Jr., & Burkette, A.
(2014) Complex systems and language change. Paper given at GURT in Georgetown, March 13–16.
Kretzschmar, W.A., Jr., & Stenroos, M.
(2012) Evidence from surveys and atlases in the history of the English language. In T. Nevalainen and E. Traugott (Eds.), Rethinking the history of the English language (pp. 111–122). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kretzschmar, W.A., Jr., & Tamasi, S.
(2003) Distributional foundations for a theory of language change. World Englishes, 22(4), 377–401. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kretzschmar, W.A., Jr., McDavid, V.G., Lerud, T., & Johnson, E.
(1994) Handbook of the Linguistic Atlas of the Middle and South Atlantic States. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kroskrity, P.V.
(2000) Regimes of language: Ideologies, polities, and identities. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
Kurath, H.
(1939) Handbook of the linguistic geography of New England. Providence, RI: Brown University, for ACLS. [2nd ed., rev., New York, NY: AMS Press 1973.]Google Scholar
(1939–1943) Linguistic Atlas of New England (3 Vols. in 6). Providence, RI: Brown University, for ACLS.Google Scholar
(1949) A word geography of the eastern United States. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Kurath, H., & McDavid, R.
(1961) Pronunciation of English in the Atlantic states. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Kyto, M.
(2004) The emergence of American English: Evidence from seventeenth-century records in New England. In R. Hickey (Ed.), Legacies of colonial English: Studies in transplanted dialects (pp. 127–151). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W.
(1966) The linguistic variable as a structural unit. Washington Linguistics Review, 3, 4–25.Google Scholar
(1972) The boundaries of words and their meanings. In R.W. Bailey & R. Shuy (Eds.), New ways of analyzing variation in English (pp. 340–373). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G.
(2008) The neural theory of metaphor. In R. Gibbs, Jr. (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 17–38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lameli, A.
(2010) Linguistic atlases – traditional and modern. In P. Auer and J.E. SchmidtEds. (Language and Space: An International Handbook of Linguistic Variation Theories and Methods. Berlin/NY: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lanier, G.M., & Herman, B.L.
(1997) Everyday architecture of the Mid-Atlantic: Looking at buildings and landscapes. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Linguistic Atlas Project
Available online at http://​lap​.uga​.edu/
Larsen-Freeman, D.
(2006) The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English. Applied Linguistics, 27(4), 590–619.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L.
(2008) Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Levi-Strauss, C.
(1955) The structural study of myth. Journal of American Folklore, 68, 270, 428–444. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levi-Strauss, Claude
(1972) The Savage Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen
(2003) Space in Language and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Litchfield, F.
(1893) Illustrated history of furniture: From the earliest to present time. Accessed online at http://​www​.gutenberg​.org​/cache​/epub​/12254​/pg12254​.txtGoogle Scholar
Lockwood, L.V.
(1921) Colonial furniture in America (Vol. 1). New York, NY: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
Lounsbury, Carl
(2010) Architecture and cultural history. In D. Hicks & M. BeaudryEds. (The Oxford Handbook of Material Culture Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lyon, I.W.
(1891) Colonial furniture of New England: A study of the domestic furniture in use in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Cambridge, MA: Riverside Press.Google Scholar
Mandelbrot, B.
(1983) The fractal geometry of nature. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman and Co.Google Scholar
Matthews, P.
(2001) A short history of structural linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McDavid, R.
(1958) Dialects of American English. In W. Nelson Francis (Ed.), The structure of American English (pp. 480–543). New York, NY: Ronald Press Company.Google Scholar
Meringer, R.
(1912) Zur Aufgabe und zum Namen unserer Zeitschrift. Worter und Sachen, III, n.p.Google Scholar
Miller, D.
(1982) Artefacts as products of human categorisation processes. In I. Hodder (Ed.), Symbolic and structural archaeology (pp. 17–25). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1985) Artefacts as categories: A study of ceramic variability in central India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1987) Material culture and mass consumption. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(Ed.) (2005) Materiality: An introduction. In Materiality (pp. 1–50). Durham and London: Duke University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J.H., & Page, S.E.
(2007) Complex adaptive systems. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, M.
(2009) Complexity: A guided tour. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mufwene, S.
(2001) Ecology of language evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norgaard, M.
(2011) Descriptions of improvisational thinking by artist-level jazz musicians. Journal of Research in Music Education, 59, 109–127. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Cain, R.
(1979) Linguistic Atlas of New England. American Speech, 54(4), 243–278. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary
. Online 2000- Oxford University Press. http://​oed​.com/Google Scholar
Olsen, B.
(1987) Arkeologi, tekst, samfunn. Fragmenter til en post-prosessuell arkeologi. Stensilserie B, historie/arkeologi 24, ISV University of Tromso.
(2003) Material culture after text: Re-Membering things. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 36(2), 87–104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ormsbee, T.
(1951) Field guide to early American furniture. Drawings by Norman B. Palmstrom. New York, NY: Bonanza.Google Scholar
Page, S.E.
(2011) Diversity and complexity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pederson, L., McDavid, R., Foster, C., & Billiard, C.
(1974) A manual for dialect research in the southern states (2nd ed.). Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A.
(2010) Language as local practice. London: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
Pinney, C.
(2005) Things happen. In D. Miller (Ed.), Materiality (pp. 256–272). Durham, NC: Duke University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pitt Rivers, A.H.L. F.
(1875) On the evolution of culture. Proceedings of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 7, 496–520.Google Scholar
Pond, C.S.
(2007) The pantry: Its history and modern uses. Salt Lake City, UT: Gibbs Smith.Google Scholar
Preston, D.
(1993) The uses of folk linguistics. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3(2), 181–259. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1999) Handbook of perceptual dialectology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rampton, B.
(1995) Crossing: Language and ethnicity among adolescents. New York, NY: Addison Wesley Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Rosch, E.
(1975) Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104(3), 192–233. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor
(1978) Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and Categorization. (pp. 27–48). Hillsdale, NJ: Laurence Erbaum.Google Scholar
Rosch, E., & Mervis, C.
(1975) Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573–605. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rowlands, M.J.J.
(2004) Cultural rights and wrongs: Uses of the concept of property. In K. Verderey & C. Humphrey (Eds.), Property in question: Value transformation in the global economy (pp. 207–227). Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Sandeman, D., Heilmann, H., & Tautz, J.
(2008) The buzz about bees: Biology of a superorganism. Berlin: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag.Google Scholar
Sapir, E.
([1921] 1949) Language: An introduction to the study of speech. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace & Co.Google Scholar
(1929) The status of linguistics as a science. Language, 5, 207–214. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Saussure, F.
(1972) Course in general linguistics. Chicago, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Schatzki, T.R.
(2001) Practice mind-ed orders. In T. Schatzki, K.K. Cetina, & E. von Savingy (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 42–55). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schliecher, A.
(1861) Compendium of the comparative grammars of the Indo-European, Sanskrit, Greek, and Latin languages. London: Trubner and Co.Google Scholar
Shanks, M., & Tilley, C.
(1993) Reconstructing archaeology: Theory and practice (2nd ed.). London and New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
(1987) Social theory and archaeology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Shuy, R.
(2003) A brief history of American sociolinguistics: 1949–1989. InC.B. Paulston & G.R. Tucker (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: Essential readings (pp. 4–16). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Singer, W.
(2009) The brain, a complex self-organizing system. European Review, 17(2), 321–329. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D., & D. Wilson
(2008) A deflationary account of metaphor. In R. Gibbs (Ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought (pp. 84–105). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Steer, F.W.
(1969) Farm and cottage inventories of mid-Essex 1635–1749. London: Hertford Press.Google Scholar
Strathern, M.
(2004) The aesthetics of substance. In V. Buchli (Ed.), Material culture: Critical concepts in the social sciences (Vol. III, part 2), (pp. 230–249). London and New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stubbs, M.
(2001) Words and phrases: Corpus studies of lexical semantics. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M.
(2003) Constructing a language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(2008) Origins of human communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tylor, E.B.
(1896) Preface. In F. Ratzel (Ed.), The history of mankind (Vol. 1) (A. Butler, Trans.), (pp. i–xxiv). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Upton, C.
(2006) Modern regional English in the British Isles. In L. Mugglestone (Ed.), The Oxford history of English (pp. 304–333). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Upton, D.
(1979) Toward a performance theory of vernacular architecture: Early Tidewater Virginia as a case study. Folklore Forum, 12, 173–98.Google Scholar
(1986) Vernacular domestic architecture in eighteenth century Virginia. In D. Upton & J.M. Vlach (Eds.), Common places: Readings in vernacular architecture (pp. 315–335). Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel, William Labov, and Marvin Herzog
(1968) Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In Winifred Lehmann & Jakob Malkiel (Eds.), Directions for Historical Linguistics (pp. 95–118). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Whorf, Benjamin Lee
(1940) Science and linguistics. Technology Review, 42(6), 229–31, 247–8. Google Scholar
Wilson, E.O.
(2012) Social Conquest of Earth. NY: Liveright Publishing.Google Scholar
Wolfram, S.
(2012) The father of fractals. Wall Street Journal, Nov. 22 2012 Accessed online www​.wsj​.com
Subjects

Terminology & Lexicography

Lexicography
BIC Subject: CFB – Sociolinguistics
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2015026593 | Marc record