References
Ajzen, Icek & Fishbein, Martin
2005The influence of attitudes on behavior. In The Handbook of Attitudes, Dolores Albarracín, Blair T. Johnson & Mark P. Zanna (eds), 173-221. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Arendt, Birte
2011Laientheoretische Konzeptionen von Sprache und Dialekt am Beispiel des Niederdeutschen: Eine kontextsensitive Analyse von Spracheinstellungsäußerungen sowie ihre methodologische Fundierung Niederdeutsches Wort: Beiträge zur niederdeutschen Philologie 51: 133-162.Google Scholar
Aron, Arthur, Aron, Elaine N. & Coups, Elliot J
2009Statistics for Psychology, 5th edn. Upper Saddle River NJ: Pearson.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail
1986[1952-53]. The problem of speech genres. In Speech Genres and Other Late Essays, Vern W. McGee (transl.), Caryl Emerson & Michael Holquist (eds), 60-102. Austin TX: The University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Baumann, Richard
1992Performance. In Folklore, Cultural Performances, and Popular Entertainments, Richard Baumann (ed.), 41-49. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Becker, Alton L
1995Beyond Translation. Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Bergmann, Manfred M
(ed.) 2008Advances in Mixed Methods Research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Bhaskar, Roy
1989Reclaiming Reality: A Critical Introduction to Contemporary Philosophy. London: Verso.Google Scholar
1991Philosophy and the Idea of Freedom. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
1997A Realist Theory of Science. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan
2005Discourse. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bryman, Alan
2006Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done? Qualitative Research 6(1): 97-113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007Barriers to integrating quantitative and qualitative research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1(1): 8-22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Deborah
2001Working with Spoken Discourse. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Coupland, Nik
2007Style: Language Variation and Identity. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Creswell, John W
2011Controversies in mixed methods research. In The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research, Norman K. Denzin & Yvonna S. Lincoln (eds), 269-283. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.Google Scholar
2014Die Entwicklung der Mixed-Methods-Forschung. In Introduction to Mixed Methods, Udo Kuckartz (ed.), 13-26. Wiesbaden: Springer.Google Scholar
Creswell, John W. & Plano Clark, Vicki L
2011Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Creswell, John W. & Zhang, Wanqing
2009The application of mixed methods designs to trauma research. Journal of Traumatic Stress 22(6): 612-621.Google Scholar
Denzin, Norman K. & Lincoln, Yvonna S
2011Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research, Norman K. Denzin & Yvonna S. Lincoln (eds), 1-19. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Zoltan
2007Research Methods in Applied Linguistics. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang U. & Wodak, Ruth
1982Sociophonological methods in the study of sociolinguistic variation in Viennese German. Language in Society 2: 339-370. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eagly, Alice H. & Chaiken, Shelly
2005Attitude research in the 21st century: The current state of knowledge. In The Handbook of Attitudes, Dolores Albarracín, Blair T. Johnson & Mark P. Zanna (eds), 743-767. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Ebner, Jakob
2008Duden – Österreichisches Deutsch. Mannheim: Dudenverlag.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope
2008Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(4): 453–476. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erickson, Frederick
1986Listening and speaking. In Languages and Linguistics, Deborah Tannen & James E. Alatis (eds), 294-319. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman
1992Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold
1967Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Garrett, Peter, Coupland, Nik & Williams, Angie
1999Evaluating dialect in discourse: Teachers’ and teenagers’ responses to young English speakers in Wales. Language in Society 28: 321-354. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gee, James Paul
1999An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gergen, Kenneth J
2008On the very idea of social psychology. Social Psychology Quarterly 71(4): 331–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giles, Howard & Coupland, Nik
1991Language: Contexts and Consequences. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Giles, Howard & Bouchard Ryan, Ellen
1982Prolegomena for developing a social psychological theory of language attitudes. In Attitudes Towards Language Variation, Ellen Bouchard Ryan & Howard Giles (eds), 208-223. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1959The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
1974Frame Analysis. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
1981Forms of Talk. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J
1982Discourse strategies. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Himmelfarb, Samuel
1993The measurement of attitudes. In The Psychology of Attitudes, Alice H. Eagly & Shelly Chaiken (eds), 23-87. Fort Worth TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Howe, Kenneth R
2003Closing Methodological Divides. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Huber, Oswald
2013Das psychologische Experiment, 6th edn. Bern: Hans Huber.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell
1972Models of the interaction of language and social life. In Directions in Sociolinguistics, John J. Gumperz & Dell Hymes (eds), 35-71. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston,Google Scholar
Hyrkstedt, Irene & Kalaja, Paula
1998Attitudes toward English and its functions in Finland: A discourse-analytic study. World Englishes 17(3): 359-368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara & Kiesling, Scott F
2008Indexicality and experience: Exploring the meanings of /aw/-monophthongization in Pittsburgh. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(1): 5–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, Imtraud & Ender, Andrea
2013Diglossia or dialect–standard continuum in speakers’ awareness and usage: On the categorisation of lectal variation in Austria. In Variation in Language and Language Use, Monika Reif, Justyna A. Robinson & Martin Pütz (eds), 273-298. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia
1986[1966]. Word, dialog and novel. In The Kristeva Reader, Toril Moi (ed.), 34-61. New York NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Korzybski, Alfred
1994[1933]A non-Aristotelian system and its necessity for rigour in mathematics and physics. In Science and Sanity, 5th edn, 747-761. Fort Worth TX: Institute of General Semantics.Google Scholar
Kuckartz, Udo
2014Mixed Methods. Wiesbaden: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lambert, Wallace E., Hodgson, Richard, Gardner, Robert C. & Fillenbaum, Samuel
1960Evaluational reactions to spoken languages. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 60(1): 44-51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
LaPiere, Richard T
1934Attitudes vs. actions. Social Forces 13(2): 230-237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lenz, Alexandra N. & Glauninger, Manfred M
(eds) 2015Standarddeutsch im 21. Jahrhundert [Wiener Arbeiten zur Linguistik 1]. Vienna: Vienna University Press.Google Scholar
Liebscher, Grit & Dailey-O’Cain, Jennifer
2009Language attitudes in interaction. Journal of Sociolinguistics 13(2): 195-222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meinefeld, Werner
1988Einstellung. In Handwörterbuch der Psychologie, 4th edn, Roland Asanger & Gerd Wenninger (eds), 120-126. Munich: PVU.Google Scholar
Miles, Matthew B. & Huberman, A. Michael
1994Qualitative Data Analysis, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Miles, Matthew B., Huberman, A. Michael & Saldana, Johnny
2014Qualitative Data Analysis, 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Moosmüller, Sylvia
1988Dialekt ist nicht gleich Dialekt: Spracheinschätzung in Wien. Wiener Linguistische Gazette 40-41: 55-80.Google Scholar
1991Hochsprache und Dialekt in Österreich. Vienna: Böhlau.Google Scholar
Morgan, David L
2007Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained: Methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1(1):48-76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Methods. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Ortega y Gasset, José
1959The difficulty of reading, Clarence E. Parmenter (transl.). Diogenes 7(28):1-17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Osgood, Charles E., Suci, George J. & Tannenbaum, Percy H
1957The Measurement of Meaning. Urbana IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Potter, Jonathan
1998Discursive social psychology: From attitudes to evaluative practices. European Review of Social Psychology 9(1): 233-266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Potter, Jonathan & Wetherell, Margaret
1987Discourse and Social Psychology. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Raskin, Jonathan D
2002Constructivism in psychology: Personal construct psychology, radical constructivism, and social constructionism. In Jonathan D. Raskin & Sara K. Bridges (eds) Studies in Meaning, 1-25. New York NY: Pace University Press.Google Scholar
Richards, Lyn
2005Handling Qualitative Data. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Saxe, John Godfrey & Galdone, Paul
1963The Blind Men and the Elephant. New York NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Scheuringer, Hermann
1997Sprachvarietäten in Österreich. In Varietäten des Deutschen, Gerhard Stickel (ed.), 332-335. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah
1994Approaches to Discourse. Malden MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2002Mother and friends in a Holocaust life story. Language in Society 31(3): 309-353. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014Discourse. In An Introduction to Language and Linguistics, 2nd edn, Ralph W. Fasold & Jeff Connor-Linton (eds), 183-215. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Schilling, Natalie
2013Investigating stylistic variation. In The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, 2nd edn, Jack K. Chambers & Natalie Schilling (eds), 327-349. Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schilling-Estes, Natalie
2004Constructing ethnicity in interaction. Journal of Sociolinguistics 8(2):163-195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scollon, Ron
2003The dialogist in a positivist world: Theory in the social sciences and the humanities at the end of the twentieth century. Social Semiotics 13(1):71-88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scollon, Ron & Scollon, Suzie Wong
2004Nexus Analysis. New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Soukup, Barbara
2009Dialect Use as Interaction Strategy. Vienna: Braumüller.Google Scholar
2011Austrian listeners’ perceptions of standard-dialect style-shifting: An empirical approach. Journal of Sociolinguistics 15(3): 347-365. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013aThe measurement of ‘language attitudes’: A reappraisal from a constructionist perspective. In Language (De)standardisation in Late Modern Europe, 251-266. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
2013bOn matching speaker (dis)guises: Revisiting a methodological tradition. In Language (De)standardisation in Late Modern Europe, Stefan Grondelaers & Tore Kristiansen (eds), 267-285. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
2014Konstruktivismus trifft auf Methodik in der Spracheinstellungsforschung: Theorie, Daten, Fazit. In Sprechen über Sprache, Christina Cuonz & Rebekka Studler (eds), 143-168.Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Steinegger, Guido
1998Sprachgebrauch und Sprachbeurteilung in Österreich und Südtirol. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah
1989Talking Voices. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah & Wallat, Cynthia
1993Interactive frames and knowledge schemas in interaction: Examples from a medical examination/ interview. In Framing in discourse, Deborah Tannen (ed.), 57-76. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Tashakkori, Abbas & Creswell, John W
2007Editorial: The new era of mixed methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1(1): 3-7. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tashakkori, Abbas & Teddlie, Charles
(eds) 2010The SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Teddlie, Charles & Tashakkori, Abbas
2010Overview of contemporary issues in mixed methods research. In Tashakkori & Teddlie (eds), 1-41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tophinke, Doris & Ziegler, Evelyn
2006“Aber bitte im Kontext!“ Neue Perspektiven der dialektologischen Einstellungsforschung. Osnabrücker Beiträge zur Sprachtheorie 1: 205-224.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, Lev S
1978Mind in Society. Michael Cole, Vera John-Steiner, Sylvia Scribner & Ellen Souberman (eds). Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Widdowson, Henry G
2004Text, Context, Pretext. Malden MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiesinger, Peter
2006Das österreichische Deutsch in Gegenwart und Geschichte. Vienna: LIT.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Hoffmeister, Toke
2021. Gerd Antos, Thomas Niehr, Jürgen Spitzmüller (Hg.). 2019. Handbuch Sprache im Urteil der Öffentlichkeit (Sprache und Wissen 10). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. 471 S.. Zeitschrift für Rezensionen zur germanistischen Sprachwissenschaft 13:1-2  pp. 37 ff. DOI logo
Kristiansen, Tore
2020. Methods in language-attitudes research. In Handbook of Pragmatics [Handbook of Pragmatics, ],  pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Kristiansen, Tore
2022. Methods in language-attitudes research. In Handbook of Pragmatics [Handbook of Pragmatics, ],  pp. 1702 ff. DOI logo
Prikhodkine, Alexei
2021. Attitudes to accents. In Pragmatics of Accents [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 327],  pp. 19 ff. DOI logo
Soukup, Barbara
2020. Survey area selection in Variationist Linguistic Landscape Study (VaLLS). Linguistic Landscape. An international journal 6:1  pp. 52 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.