Cover not available
Part of
Endangered Languages and Languages in Danger: Issues of documentation, policy, and language rights
Edited by Luna Filipović and Martin Pütz
[IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society 42] 2016
► pp. 87–114

Towards language planning for sign languages

Measuring endangerment and the treatment of British Sign Language

| Deaf Ex-Mainstreamers' Group Ltd | DEXperience, United Kingdom
Sign languages are well researched autochthonous, bio-culturally diverse, visio-­spatial languages, both linguistically and neurologically. They confer identity and form new minorities within complex social systems. The continuity of their ethnolinguistic heritages are endangered as replacement levels fall due to the fact that sign languages are not traditionally considered to be mother tongue languages, since most deaf children are born to hearing parents who do not sign, although theoretically they are. A longstanding international discourse since 1880 when sign language was banned in education was due to the supposed effect sign languages have on spoken language acquisition for deaf children. This ethos continues to modern day, with few parents of deaf children being informed about sign language or offered instruction, or it being used as a teaching medium for their child. This signifies the linguistic imperialism that stems from ignorance of modern research, and surdism (in which deaf people are normalised to be as hearing as possible). All the countries which have implemented sign language legislation fall short of revitalisation since there is no promotion to all parents of deaf children. This study demonstrates that the resulting extremely low number of new learners means British Sign Language (BSL) can be categorised as a severely endangered language. This paper applies spoken language planning theory and methodology to British Sign Language, taking into account the discrete political environments in the UK and history of spoken language revival. It is a rationale view of BSL, and other sign languages, as requiring immediate intervention, against the backdrop of English (and spoken language generally) being the language of oppression.
Keywords: British Sign Language, deaf, language planning, language policy, sign language/s
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 3 October 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.42.05jon
References (74)
References
Austrian Sign Language recognition. <[URL]>
Bess, F. & Tharpe, A. 1986. Case history data on unilaterally hearing-impaired children. Ear and Hearing 7: 14–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1988. Performance and management of children with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss. Scandinavian Audiology. Supplementum 30: 75–79.Google Scholar
Bess, F.H., Dodd-Murphy, J. & Parker, R.A. 1998. Children with minimal sensorineural hearing loss: Prevalence, educational performance, and functional status. Ear and Hearing Journal 19: 339–354. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blair, J., Peterson, M. & Viehwed, S. 1985. The effects of mild sensorineural hearing loss on academic performance of young school-age children. The Volta Review 87: 87–93.Google Scholar
Bourland, C.H. & Tharpe, A.M. 1994. Listening effort and fatigue in school-age children with and without hearing loss. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 37: 216–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bovo, R., Martini, A., Agnoletto, M., Beghi, D., Carmignoto, D., Milani, M. & Zangaglia, A.M. 1988. Auditory and academic performance of children with unilateral hearing loss. Scandinavian Audiology. Supplementum 30: 71–74.Google Scholar
Branson, J. & Miller, D. 2008. National Sign Languages and Language Policies. In Encyclopedia of Language and Education, 2nd edition, Volume 1: Policy and Political Issues in Education, Stephen May & Nancy H. Hornberger (eds), 151–165. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brookhouser, P.E., Worthington, D.W. & Kelly, W.J. 1991. Unilateral hearing loss in children. Laryngoscope 101: 1264–1272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
BSL Corpus Project. <[URL]>
Calderon, R. & Greenberg, M. 2000. Challenges to parents and professionals in promoting socioemotional development in deaf children. In The Deaf Child in the Family and at School, P.E. Spencer, C.J. Erting & M. Marschark (eds). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Campbell, R., Brammer, M., Calvert, G., David, A., MacSweeney, M. & Woll, B. 2000. Language, deafness and the brain: fMRI findings. International Journal of Psychology 35(3): 225–226.Google Scholar
Colomer, J.M. 1996. La utilitat del bilinguisme. Barcelona: Edicions 62.Google Scholar
Consortium of Research in Deaf Education. 2012. Survey. <[URL]>Google Scholar
Culbertson, J.L. & Gilbert, L.E. 1986. Children with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss: Cognitive, academic, and social development. Ear and Hearing 7: 38–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davis, J.M., Elfenbein, J., Schum, R. & Bentler, R.A. 1986. Effects of mild and moderate hearing impairments on language, educational, and psychosocial behavior of children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 51: 53–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davis, A., Reeve, K. & Hind, S.B.J. 2000. Children with mild and unilateral hearing loss. In A Sound Foundation through Early Amplification 2001: Proceedings of the Second International Conference, R.C. Seewald & J.S. Gravel (eds), 179–186. Bury St. Edmunds: St. Edmundsbury Press.Google Scholar
Deaf Ex-Mainstreamers Group. DEXperience. 2004. Deaf Toolkit: Best Value Review of Deaf Children in Education, from Users’ Perspective. Delta Press.Google Scholar
Deafness Cognition and Language Research Centre University College London. <[URL]>
De Meulder, M. 2014. Whose Recognition? – The British Sign Language (Scotland) Bill. Ms. <[URL]>Google Scholar
Dorian, N.C. 1980. Language shift in community and individual: The phenomenon of the laggard semi-speaker. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 25: 85–94.Google Scholar
. 1981. Language Death: The Life Cycle of a Scottish Gaelic Dialect. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, V. & Pritchard Newcombe, L. 2005. Language transmission in the family in Wales: An example of innovative language planning. Language Problems & Language Planning 29(2): 135–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
European Union. Resolution on sign languages for the deaf. Official Journal C 187. 18 July1988, 0236.
European Union of Deaf. 2005. The status of sign languages report.Google Scholar
Finitzo, T., Albright, K. & O’Neal, J. 1998. The newborn with hearing loss: Detection in the nursery. Paediatrics 102: 1452–1459. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fishman, J.A. 1991. Reversing Language Shift: Theory and Practice of Assistance to Threatened Languages. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
. 2001. Can Threatened Languages be Saved? Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Gruffud, H. 2000. Planning for the use of Welsh by young people. In Language Revitalization: Policy and Planning in Wales, C.H. Williams (ed.), 173–207. Cardiff: University of Wales Press. Google Scholar
Hansard. UK Government. UK Parliamentary records. 2003. 18 March 2003. <[URL]>.
Hindley, P.A., Hill, P.D., McGuigan, S. & Kitson, N. 1994. Psychiatric disorder in deaf and hearing impaired children and young people: A prevalence study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 35(5): 917–934. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnston, T. 2004. W(h)ither the deaf community? Population, genetics, and the future of Australian sign language. American Annals of Deaf 148(5): 358–375. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, R.B. & Baldauf, R.B. 1997. Language Planning from Practice to Theory. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Klee, T.M. & Davis-Dansky, E. 1986. A comparison of unilaterally hearing-impaired children and normal-hearing children on a battery of standardized language tests. Ear and Hearing 7: 27–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ladd, P. 2003. Understanding Deaf Culture: In search of Deafhood. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Lewis, M.P. & Simons, G.F. 2010. Assessing endangerment: Expanding Fishman’s GIDS. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique 2: 103–120.Google Scholar
Lieu, J.E. 2004. Speech-language and educational consequences of unilateral hearing loss in children. Archives of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery 130: 524–530. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marschark, M. & Spencer, P.E. 2009. Evidence of Best Practice Models and Outcomes in the Education of Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Children: An International Review. A report commissioned by the National Council for Special Education (Ireland).Google Scholar
Mason, D.G. 1997. Mainstream education and deaf students. Canadian Annals of Education for Deaf and Hard of Hearing 23.Google Scholar
Meadow-Orlans, K.P., Mertens, D.M. & Sass-Lehrer, M.A. 2003. Hard of Hearing Children: Still Overlooked. Odyssey: Winter.Google Scholar
. 2003. Parents and Their Deaf Children: The Early Years. Washington DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R.E. & Karchmer, M.A. 2002. Chasing the mythical ten percent: Parental hearing status of deaf and hard of hearing students in the United States. Washington DC: Gallaudet Research Institute, Gallaudet University.Google Scholar
Moeller, P.M. 2000. Early intervention and language development in children who are deaf and hard of hearing. Paediatrics. <[URL]> DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Most, T., Ingber, S. & Heled-Ariam, E. 2011. Social competence, sense of loneliness, and speech intelligibility of young children with hearing loss in individual inclusion and group inclusion. Deaf Students and Deaf Education 17(2): 259–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nelde, P.H. 2002. Language contact. In The Oxford Handbook of Applied Linguistics, R.B. Kaplan (ed.), 325–334. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar
New Zealand Office for Disability Issues. 2011. Review of New Zealand Sign Language Act report.Google Scholar
Nicolaisen, O., Trask, I., Skutnabb-Kangas, T. & Dunbar, R. 2005. Indigenous children’s education and indigenous languages. Expert paper 1 written for the United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues. <[URL]>
Oyler, R.F. & Gross, S.R. 2000. Survey of educational preparation in paediatric audiology: A decade later. Communication Disorders Quarterly 21: 195–209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richardson, J.T.E., Marschark, M., Thomastine, S. & Sapere, P. 2010. Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Students’ Experiences in Mainstream and Separate Postsecondary Education. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 15(4): 358–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salamanca Statement and Framework for Action on Special Needs Education, 1994. <[URL]>
Sarant, J. & Garrard, P. 2014. Parenting stress in parents of children with cochlear implants: Relationships among parent stress, child language, and unilateral versus bilateral implants. Deaf Students and Deaf Education 19(1): 85–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schein, J.D. 1996. The demography of deafness. In Understanding Deafness Socially, P.C. Higgins & J.E. Nash (eds), 21–43. Springfield OH: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
Scottish parliament’s national plan for Gaelic. <[URL]> 13 October 2014.
Shirin, A., Jones, P., Luckner, J., Kreimeyer, K.H. & Reed, S. 2011. Social outcomes of students who are deaf and hard of hearing in general education classrooms. Academic Journal Article. Exceptional Children 77(4): 487–502.Google Scholar
Skutnabb-Kangas, T. 1995. Linguistic human rights, past and present. In Linguistic Human Rights: Overcoming Linguistic Discrimination, T. Skutnab-Kangas & R. Philipson (eds), 71–110. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. Linguistic genocide in education – Or worldwide diversity and human rights? In English in International Deaf Communication [Linguistic Insights 72], C. Kellett Bidoli & E. Ochse (eds), 75–94. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. 2003. Language rights in a globalised world. Montreal, Canada: Plenary address at the World Federation of Deaf People conference.Google Scholar
Skutnabb-Kangas, T. & Aikio-Puoskari, U. 2003. Exclusion or inclusion – Linguistic human rights for a linguistic minority, the Deaf Sign language users, and an indigenous people, the Saami. In Many Voices, One Vision: The Right to Communicate in Practice, P. Lee (ed.), 59–88. London: WACCGoogle Scholar
Skutnabb-Kangas, T. 2008. Bilingual education and Sign language as the mother tongue of Deaf children. In English in International Deaf Communication [Linguistic Insights 72], C. Kellett Bidoli & E. Ochse (eds), 75–94. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Strubell, M. 2001. Edit. In Reversing Language Shift: Theory and Practice of Assistance to Threatened Languages, J.A. Fishman (ed.), 260–283. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Stokoe, W.C. 1960. Sign language structure: An outline of the visual communication systems of the American deaf, studies in linguistics: Occasional papers. Buffalo NY: Department of Anthropology and Linguistics, University of Buffalo.Google Scholar
Svartholm, K. 2006. Review of FinSSL – Finland Swedish sign language. Nordica, Department of Scandinavian Languages and Literature, University of Helsinki. Language and Style: Magazine for Swedish Language Research 16: 219–223.Google Scholar
Swedish National Association for Deaf, Hearing-Impaired and Language Impaired Children. <[URL]>
The Council of Europe. Status of sign languages in Europe report in co-operation with the Committee on the Rehabilitation and Integration of People with disabilities. Edited by Council of Europe Publishing F-67075 Strasbourg Cedex. <[URL]>
Turner, G.H., 2009. Sign language planning: Pragmatism, pessimism and principles. Current Issues in Language Planning 10(3): 243–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Naarden, K., Decouflé, P. & Caldwell, K. 1999. Prevalence and characteristics of children with serious hearing impairment in metropolitan Atlanta, 1991–1993. Paediatrics 103: 570–575. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vostanis, M., Hayes, M., Feu, D. & Warren, J. 1997. Detection of behavioural and emotional problems in deaf children and adolescents: Comparison of two rating scales. Child: Care, Health and Development 23(3): 233–246. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
UNESCO. 2003. Language Vitality and Endangerment. Document adopted by the International Expert Meeting on UNESCO Programme Safeguarding of Endangered Languages. <[URL]>
. 2009. Atlas of the World’s Languages in Danger.Google Scholar
Wheatley, M. & Pabsch, A. 2012. Sign Language Legislation in the European Union. Brussels: European Union of the Deaf.Google Scholar
Welsh Assembly. 2014. The Welsh Ministers’ response to the Welsh Language Commissioner’s standards reports and advice note. <[URL]>
Xie, Y.H., Potměšil, M. & Peters, B. 2014. Children who are deaf or hard of hearing in inclusive educational settings: A literature review on interactions with peers. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 19(4): 423–437. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yoshinaga-Itano, C., Sedey, A., Coulter, D.K. & Mehl, A.L. 1998. Language of early and later identified children with hearing loss. Pediatrics 103: 1161–1171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Websites
Gregory, Susan. Date unknown. Schools for the Deaf. <[URL]>